Results for 'Walter F. Daniel'
955 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- Measurements of everyday memory: Toward the prevention of forgetting.Herbert F. Crovitz &Walter F.Daniel -1984 -Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 22 (5):413-414.
- The effect of D-amphetamine on visual vigilance performance in the squirrel monkey.Daniel F. Rice &Walter Isaac -1991 -Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29 (2):155-157.
- Genomics spawns novel approaches to mosquito control.Robin W. Justice,Harald Biessmann,Marika F.Walter,Spiros D. Dimitratos &Daniel F. Woods -2003 -Bioessays 25 (10):1011-1020.In spite of advances in medicine and public health, malaria and other mosquito‐borne diseases are on the rise worldwide. Although vaccines, genetically modified mosquitoes and safer insecticides are under development, herein we examine a promising new approach to malaria control through better repellents. Current repellents, usually based on DEET, inhibit host finding by impeding insect olfaction, but have significant drawbacks. We discuss how comparative genomics, using data from the Anopheles genome project, allows the rapid identification of members of three protein (...) classes critical to insect olfaction: odorant‐binding proteins, G‐protein‐coupled receptors, and odorant‐degrading enzymes. A rational design approach similar to that used by the pharmaceutical industry for drug development can then be applied to the development of products that interfere with mosquito olfaction. Such products have the potential to provide more complete, safer and longer lasting protection than conventional repellents, preventing disease transmission by interrupting the parasite life cycle. BioEssays 25:1011–1020, 2003. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (shrink)
- Auditory Deficits in Audiovisual Speech Perception in Adult Asperger’s Syndrome: fMRI Study.Fabian-Alexander Tietze,Laura Hundertmark,Mandy Roy,Michael Zerr,Christopher Sinke,Daniel Wiswede,MartinWalter,Thomas F. Münte &Gregor R. Szycik -2019 -Frontiers in Psychology 10.
- O Núcleo de Estudos de Filosofias e Inf'ncias (NEFI): um percurso para pensarmos o campo do ensino de filosofia no Brasil.Walter Omar Kohan,Daniel Gaivota Contage &Carlineide Justina da Silva Almeida -2024 -Educação E Filosofia 38:1-26.Resumo: O presente texto apresenta o Núcleo de Estudos de Filosofias e Infâncias com seus vinte anos de ensino, pesquisa e extensão dedicados ao ensino de filosofia e uma educação filosófica. O texto tematiza a especificidade e a história do grupo, colocando ênfase em algumas dimensões de sua atuação presente: a) Os colóquios internacionais de filosofia e educação; b) a NEFI edições; c) o Mestrado Profissional em educação filosófica com infâncias; d) os projetos de extensão; e) o periódico childhood & (...) philosophy; f) as experiências de formação. Antes, um breve histórico é oferecido e, depois, uma reflexão sobre a dimensão metodológica do NEFI. Assim, o texto é oferecido como uma oportunidade para pensar o NEFI como um coletivo – possibilidade aberta e em permanente busca de sentidos relativos ao ensino de filosofia ou, para dizê-lo mais amplamente, a uma educação filosófica. Palavras-chave: Núcleo de Estudos de Filosofias e Infâncias (NEFI); Infância; Escuta; Pergunta; Metodologia The Center for the Study of Philosophy and Childhood (NEFI): a path to think about the field of the teaching of philosophy in Brazil Abstract: The present text presents the Center for the Study of Philosophy and Childhood (NEFI) with its twenty years of teaching, research and extension dedicated to the teaching of philosophy and a philosophical education. The text discusses the specificity and the history of the group, emphasizing some dimensions of its present action: a) the international colloquiums on philosophy and education; b) the NEFI editions; c) the Professional Master in philosophical education with childhoods; d) the extension projects; e) the journal childhood & philosophy; f) the educational (formation) experiences. First, a brief history is offered, and then a reflection on the methodological dimension of the NEFI. Thus, the text is presented as an opportunity to think of the NEFI as a collective – open possibility in permanent search for meaning concerning the teaching of philosophy or, to put it more broadly, a philosophical education. Keywords: Center for the Study of Philosophy and Childhood (NEFI); Childhood; Listening; Question; Methodology Núcleo de Estudios de Filosofías e Infancias: una trayectoria para pensar el campo de la enseñanza de la filosofía en Brasil Resumen: El presente texto presenta el Centro de Estudios de Filosofía e Infancia con sus veinte años de docencia, investigación y extensión dedicados a la enseñanza de la filosofía y a una educación filosófica. El texto discute la especificidad y la historia del grupo, poniendo énfasis en algunas dimensiones de su acción actual: a) los coloquios internacionales de filosofía y educación; b) las ediciones del NEFI; c) el Máster Profesional en educación filosófica con infancias; d) los proyectos de extensión; e) la revista childhood & philosophy; f) las experiencias de formación. Antes, se ofrece una breve historia y, a continuación, una reflexión sobre la dimensión metodológica del NEFI. Así, el texto se ofrece como una oportunidad para pensar el NEFI como un colectivo – posibilidad abierta y en permanente búsqueda de significados relativos a la enseñanza de la filosofía o, para decirlo más ampliamente, a una educación filosófica. Palabras-clave: Núcleo De Estudios De Filosofías E Infancias (NEFI); Infancia; Escucha; Pregunta; Metodología Data de registro: 23/01/2024 Data de aceite: 23/08/2023. (shrink)No categories
- Venetian Drawings XIV-XVII CenturiesJohn Singleton CopleyRufino TamayoJuan Gris: His Life and WorkFlemish Drawings XV-XVI CenturiesGuernicaThe Prints of Joan MiroHorace Pippin: A Negro Painter in AmericaGiovanni SegantiniSpanish Drawings XV-XIX Centuries.Graziano D'Albanella,James Thomas Flexner,Robert Goldwater,Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler,Juan Gris,Andre Leclerc,Pablo Picasso,Selden Rodman,Gottardo Segantini,Jose Gomez Sicre,Walter Ueberwasser,Robert Spreng,Bruno Adriani,C. Ludwig Brumme,Alec Miller,Jacques Schnier,Louis Slobodkin,Richard F. French,Simon L. Millner,Edward A. Armstrong,Alfred H. Barr Jr,E. K. Brown,R. O. Dunlop,Walter Pach,Robert Ethridge Moore,Alexander Romm,H. Ruhemann,Hans Tietze,R. H. Wilenski,D. Bartling,W. K. Wimsatt Jr,Samuel Johnson &Leo Stein -1950 -Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 8 (3):205.
- (1 other version)Ailred of Rievaulx and his biographerWalterDaniel. Part I.F. M. Powicke -1921 -Bulletin of the John Rylands Library 6 (3):310-351.No categories
- Ailred of Rievaulx and his biographerWalterDaniel. Part II.F. M. Powicke -1922 -Bulletin of the John Rylands Library 6 (4):452-521.No categories
- Stan badań nad filozofią Schellinga.Walter F. Ehrhardt -2000 -Idea Studia nad strukturą i rozwojem pojęć filozoficznych 12 (12).No categoriesExport citation
Bookmark - The Learning Health Care System: Pellegrino on t he Learning Health Care System: A Speculative Extrapolation.F.Daniel Davis -2025 - In Edmund D. Pellegrino,Pellegrino's clinical bioethics: a compendium. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- John Herschel and the idea of science.Walter F. Cannon -1961 -Journal of the History of Ideas 22 (April-June):215-239.
- Retinal local signs.Walter F. Dearborn -1904 -Psychological Review 11 (4-5):297-307.No categories
- The Issues before Us.Walter F. Mondale -1971 -Hastings Center Report 1 (1):4.
- Androgens and spatial ability: Failure to find a relationship between testosterone and ability measures.Walter F. McKeever,Deborah A. Rich,Richard A. Deyo &Robert L. Conner -1987 -Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 25 (6):438-440.
- Further evidence of the absence of measurable interhemispheric transfer time in left-handers who employ an inverted handwriting posture.Walter F. McKeever &Anne L. Hoff -1983 -Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 21 (4):255-258.
- On Orenstein’s and Meighan’s finding of left visual field recognition superiority for bilaterally presented words.Walter F. Mckeever -1976 -Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 8 (2):85-86.
- Primate handedness should be considered – but not “reconsidered” at this point.Walter F. McKeever -1987 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (2):281-282.
- Testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, and spatial task performances of males.Walter F. McKeever &Richard A. Deyo -1990 -Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 28 (4):305-308.
- On laterality research and dichotomania.Walter F. McKeever -1981 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (1):73-74.
- Renaissance Humanism: Studies in Philosophy and Poetics.Ernesto Grassi &Walter F. Veit -1990 -Philosophy and Rhetoric 23 (4):320-324.No categories
- Agricultural Change and Peasant Choice in a Thai Village.Walter F. Vella &Michael Moerman -1970 -Journal of the American Oriental Society 90 (4):627.No categories
- The Restoration of Thailand under Rama I, 1782-1809.Walter F. Vella,Klaus Wenk &Greeley Stahl -1970 -Journal of the American Oriental Society 90 (4):628.No categories
- Rerum Novarum.Walter F. Sullivan -1991 -Journal for Peace and Justice Studies 3 (2):125-136.No categories
- Ephesians and Colossians.Walter F. Taylor &John H. P. Reumann -1985No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- History in Depth: The Early Victorian Period.Walter F. Cannon -1964 -History of Science 3 (1):20-38.No categories
- A Note on Aristos as a Class Term.Walter F. Donlan -1969 -Philologus: Zeitschrift für Antike Literatur Und Ihre Rezeption 113 (1-2):268-270.No categories
- (1 other version)8. Evangelizing Buddhists through the Cross.Walter F. Kedjierski -2005 -Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 8 (2).No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Literary Insinuations: Sorting Out Sinyavsky's Irreverence.Walter F. Kolonosky -2003 - Lexington Books.The first in-depth examination of Sinyavsky's satirical side,Literary Insinuations: Sorting out Sinyavsky's Irreverence not only discusses the relatively under-analysed area of playful and provocative writing, but also ties together a number of loose ends in the fascinating and often contentious field of Sinyavsky scholarship.No categories
- On Chronology in the Imperial Books of Cassius Dio's Roman History.Walter F. Snyder -1940 -Klio 33 (1-4):39-56.No categories
- Human genetics: The molecular challenge.Walter F. Bodmer -1987 -Bioessays 7 (1):41-45.The 1986 Cold Spring Harbor Symposium was on the subject of human genetics; it was the first symposium at Cold Spring Harbor on this topic since 1964. In the opening remarks for the conference,Walter F. Bodmer first summarized the progress in this field since 1964. He then described what is presently known about the functional complexity of the human genome and discussed the case for a definitive characterization and sequencing of the human genome. The following is an abridged (...) and slightly adapted version of this talk; it is reproduced courtesy of the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory © 1987. (shrink)
- The Normative Role of Science in Early Victorian Thought.Walter F. Cannon -1964 -Journal of the History of Ideas 25 (4):487.
- Morality without law.Walter F. Ewbank -1969 - New York,: World Pub. Co..
- Introduction to Sociology.Walter F. Willcox -1897 -Philosophical Review 6 (2):214-214.
- Social Process.Walter F. Willcox -1919 -Philosophical Review 28:323.No categories
- Task Force Report: Ethics and American Population Policy.Walter F. Mondale -1971 -Hastings Center Report 1 (1):6-7.This is the first of a series of reports on the research groups of the institute: Death and Dying, Behavior Control, Genetic Engineering/Genetic Counseling, the Teaching of Medical Ethics, and the subject of this report, Population Control.
- A Statistician's Idea of Progress.Walter F. Willcox -1913 -International Journal of Ethics 23 (3):275-298.
- Catholic Social Teaching and Ecology.Walter F. Sullivan -2007 -Journal of Catholic Social Thought 4 (2):203-209.
- Phronesis, clinical reasoning, and Pellegrino's philosophy of medicine.F.Daniel Davis -1997 -Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 18 (1-2):173-195.In terms of Aristotle's intellectual virtues, the process of clinical reasoning and the discipline of clinical medicine are often construed as techne (art), as episteme (science), or as an amalgam or composite of techne and episteme. Although dimensions of process and discipline are appropriately described in these terms, I argue that phronesis (practical reasoning) provides the most compelling paradigm, particularly of the rationality of the physician's knowing and doing in the clinical encounter with the patient. I anchor this argument, moreover, (...) in Pellegrino's philosophy of medicine as a healing relationship, oriented to the end of a right and good healing action for the individual patient. (shrink)
- Political Opposition in the Early Turkish Republic: The Progressive Republican Party, 1924-1925.Walter F. Weiker &Erik Jan Zurcher -1993 -Journal of the American Oriental Society 113 (2):297.No categories
- From Language to the Art of Language: Cassirer's Aesthetics.Walter F. Eggers Jr -1971 - In Osborne Bennett Hardison,The Quest for imagination. Cleveland,: Press of Case Western Reserve University.Export citation Bookmark
- (1 other version)Oertel, Hans Joachim, George Berkeley und die englische Literatur. [REVIEW]Walter F. Schirmer -1935 -Société Française de Philosophie, Bulletin 40:303.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- In the belly of the whale: Some thoughts on preserving the integrity of the new bioethics commission.F.Daniel Davis -2010 -Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (3):291-297.In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:In the Belly of the Whale:Some Thoughts on Preserving the Integrity of the New Bioethics CommissionF.Daniel Davis (bio)10 July 2010. Washington, D.C. President Obama's Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues has just concluded its inaugural meeting, designed as a primer—the first of three that it plans to hold—on synthetic biology. As a topic for deliberation by a national bioethics commission, "synbio" is ideal. A cloud (...) of equipoise hangs over the practical implications of recent developments in this, the latest phase in the evolution of biotechnology—a seemingly genuine uncertainty about the need for additional mechanisms of oversight to mitigate potential risks to biosafety or biosecurity. Despite these concerns, its advocates and practitioners enthusiastically champion the prospect of eventual, perhaps significant benefits to be gained with progress in "synbio," including, for example, enhanced processes for the mass production of vaccines and biofuels. And yet like the advent of recombinant DNA technologies in the mid-1970s, synthetic biology has generated not only hope for benefits and concern for risks, but also questions variously described as "deep," "profound," "fundamental," and "philosophical": Is the capacity to synthesize novel, living entities yet another technological invitation to hubris on the part of humankind? Will that capacity alter the relationship between humankind and nature? How should we think about the moral status of living entities created de novo in the laboratory? Should we even care? How will wide-scale applications of synthetic biology tip the scales of social justice? And finally, the democratization of synthetic biology, the growth of DIY-BIO (do-it-yourself-biology) communities beyond the usual scientific arenas of academia and industry, has infused old questions about scientific freedom and responsibility with new complexities—all in the midst of an American public that is reportedly unaware and uneducated about this new chapter in the often triumphant, unsettling history of biotechnology.Thus, the topic of synthetic biology presents the new commission with several possibilities. It could very well make a substantial contribution to public policies responsive to both the current capabilities and the possible trajectories of [End Page 291] these emergent biotechnologies. The very fact that the President explicitly asked the Commission to take up the topic and report back to him (in six months) means that that potential is especially promising. It could, as well, delve into the "deeper" philosophical questions that "synbio" raises with the aim of bringing both depth and breadth to the tasks of critically analyzing and reflecting upon what currently is known and what, with regard to the future, can only be glimpsed of this amalgam of the life sciences, engineering, and other disciplines. The Commission could also set its sights on diminishing the apparent deficit in public understanding of these biotechnologies. And finally, with this topic as well as any others it takes up, the Commission, along with the administration that established it, could make an effort to reinvigorate public bioethics in the United States. At the very least, in the sobering light of experience with the President's Council on Bioethics, certain actions or behaviors could be avoided in the interests of preserving the integrity—the moral and political legitimacy—of the new commission. Although each of these possibilities warrants further explanation, my focus here is the final one.The Belly of the WhaleIn several decades, some future historian of public bioethics in the U.S. will be able to look back on the bioethics commissions established to date and offer an insightful, comprehensive—maybe even magisterial—account of their beginnings and endings, their deliberations and the political forces that shaped them, and perhaps most important, their ultimate value as public bodies. Lacking the strategic perch of historical distance, and fresh from the trenches, I can only offer a few somewhat informed but partial observations and arguments about public bioethics in the context of contemporary American politics, acknowledging at the outset that my thoughts are open to, and needful of, critical amendment or supplement by others.In the U.S., bioethics commissions are political creatures, established through the authority of the Congress or the President for the purpose of providing counsel to the legislative and/or executive... (shrink)
- President's Council on Bioethics.Edmund D. Pellegrino &F.Daniel Davis -2009 -Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (3):309-310.In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:President’s Council on BioethicsEdmund D. Pellegrino (bio) and F.Daniel Davis (bio)Approximately two weeks before what was to have been its final meeting, the White House dissolved the President’s Council on Bioethics by terminating the appointments of its 18 members. The letters of dismissal, dated 10 June 2009, informed the members that their service on the Council would end with the close of business the next day.The Council’s (...) term was set to expire on 30 September 2009. After President Obama’s election in November and during the transition, we were advised to proceed on the assumption that the Council would be permitted to cease on that date. Reasons for the abrupt move to disband the Council are unknown. We have accepted the fact that we Council members served at the pleasure of the President and that he simply exercised his rightful prerogative. No explanation is therefore required.Some observers have speculated that the action was retaliatory. They related to the fact that several members of the Council disagreed with the President’s stem cell policy in a signed statement published in the Hastings Center’s Bioethics Forum. Others have speculated that the move was pre-emptive. At its final meeting, scheduled for 25–26 June, the Council was set to sign-off on two of its final publications. One was a comprehensive report on the ethics of organ transplantation, and the other a white paper entitled Health Care and the Common Good. The aim was immediately to release the latter as a contribution to the intensifying debate about health care reform. Health Care and the Common Good could well have aided rather than impeded the President’s drive to better control health care costs and achieve universal coverage. The Council report attempted to ground both goals in the ethical framework of, as the title indicates, the common good of all Americans.In his letter terminating the members’ appointments, Assistant to the President for Presidential Personnel Don Gips said that the President “recognizes the values of having a commission of experts in bioethical issues to provide objective and non-ideological bioethics advice to his administration.” Gips went on to say that the President is “currently rethinking the purposes and goals of such a bioethics commission, and is carefully considering a revitalized mission and mandate.” And, [End Page 309] responding to media enquiries, White House press officer Reid Cherlin explained that the President’s Council was terminated because it was a “philosophically leaning advisory group” and, according to a New York Times account by Nicholas Wade, “because it favored discussion over developing a shared consensus.” As for the ultimate outcome of the President’s “rethinking,” Cherlin indicated that President Obama will appoint a new commission with the mandate of offering “practical policy options” in bioethics.In the light of our experiences with the Council, we leave it with hopes that certain questions of national importance will be addressed. In light of the nature of federal advisory commissions, what is or are the proper roles of a national bioethics commission? If the aim is to provide advice and counsel to the President or, perhaps to the U. S. Congress, is that advice best rendered as a group consensus or as an in-depth exploration of the inevitably conflicting ethical perspectives on a given issue? How should such a commission be constituted—with what sorts of individuals? And what is the nature of the expertise that they individually and collectively bring to the commission’s functions? If the commission is to promote public debate and discussion, how exactly should it go about that task? And how is the efficacy of a commission to be assessed? Such questions inevitably lead us deep into contested territory, as the experience of this Council has shown: into the intersections of politics, religion, and science and into the relations between practice and theory—between policy and what some seem to deride as “philosophy.” Indeed, policy without an underlying philosophy is an edifice without a foundation; philosophy without policy is a foundation without an edifice.At the last meeting of the Council in March 2009, we launched a discussion of these questions with the... (shrink)
- Human dignity and respect for persons : a historical perspective on public bioethics.F.Daniel Davis -2008 - In Adam Schulman,Human dignity and bioethics: essays commissioned by the President's Council on Bioethics. Washington, D.C.: [President's Council on Bioethics.
- (1 other version)News from the president's council on bioethics.F.Daniel Davis &Diane M. Gianelli -2006 -Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (4):375-377.In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:News from the President’s Council on BioethicsF.Daniel Davis (bio) and Diane M. Gianelli (bio)As most readers of this column already know, the President's Council on Bioethics went through a major transition during the past year when Leon Kass—in October 2005—handed the chairman's gavel over to Georgetown University's Edmund Pellegrino. Dr. Kass has remained on the Council as a member.1When the gavel change took place, the Council's phone (...) started ringing. Everyone wanted to know the same thing: What topics would the Council take up this term? Dr. Pellegrino's answer was always the same: The Council's agenda would be established through a consultative process with the members themselves and with an eye to those problems and controversies in bioethics to which we, as a body, can make a contribution.Taking its cue from the list of potential topics suggested by members, the Council—over the course of the next several meetings—listened to experts on such topics as children and bioethics (with a focus on children in clinical research), organ transplantation, and that oft-cited-but-hard-to-define concept, "human dignity."The latter topic entered the arena of discussion because it is a concept that is cited frequently in the bioethics literature, and it is also one that has figured prominently in Council discussions and documents. Although the concept is widely invoked, there is no universal understanding of what it means, and it is not easy to encapsulate into a one-size-fits-all definition. Indeed, some critics maintain that appeals to human dignity are fig leaves used to camouflage unconvincing arguments. So between December 2005 and April 2006, the Council devoted several sessions to various perspectives on "human dignity: its meaning, its foundations, and its relevance to bioethics." After hearing from James Childress, Patricia Churchland,Daniel Sulmasy, and Paul Weithman2 on the topic, the Council decided to issue a volume of approximately 20 essays, some by Council members and others by scholars from a variety of relevant disciplines.3 The volume is expected to encompass a broad array of opinion on the topic of human dignity and is scheduled to be published next spring."Children" were also the focus of several sessions during the past year. The Council's last report addressed care giving for the elderly.4 After it was issued, several members suggested it was time to focus on the youngest members of [End Page 375] society. The challenge, of course, was to find a topic that was both timely and relevant—and one about which the Council was uniquely qualified to make a contribution. A number of experts in a variety of related fields testified before the Council about possible issues it could explore: newborn screening for genetic disorders; decision-making standards for those who lack capacity; ethical issues in neonatal and pediatric intensive care; pharmacology and psychiatric disorders in children; and children and clinical research. In addition, a number of groups and individuals involved in related topics met with staff to discuss their interests and concerns.This exploratory engagement with facets of the broad topic of children and bioethics led the Council to focus, more narrowly, on a cluster of issues concerning newborn screening for genetic disorders—a topic on which it is likely that the Council will issue a white paper, possibly by next summer. The stimulus for this particular focus has been the American College of Medical Genetics's recommendation that all newborns in the U.S. be screened for a panel of 29 disorders.5 Currently, each state decides for its residents which conditions are subject to mandated screening, so it is possible to get early diagnoses of treatable disorders in one geographical area but not in another. Proponents of screening find the federal approach to mandated screening more equitable. Potential ethical problems, however, exist with the proposal. Some want to ensure that newborns are screened only for treatable conditions on grounds that it would be too burdensome to discover one is carrying the gene for a late-onset disease that cannot be prevented. Others want to make sure that insurance coverage for individuals and their families is... (shrink)
- Fredrik Svenaeus, the hermeneutics of medicine and the phenomenology of health: Steps towards a philosophy of medical practice.F.Daniel Davis -2000 -Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (4):381-384.
- Zur Psychologie des Lesens Bei Kindern Und Erwachsenen. [REVIEW]Walter F. Dearborn -1905 -Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 2 (16):441-443.
- Spatial processing laterality and spatial visualization ability: Relations to sex and familial sinistrality variables.Michael F. Marino &Walter F. McKeever -1989 -Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 27 (2):135-137.
- Catholic Social Teaching and Ecology.Most ReverendWalter F. Sullivan -2007 -Journal of Catholic Social Thought 4 (2):203-209.
- Rerum Novarum.Most ReverendWalter F. Sullivan -1991 -Journal for Peace and Justice Studies 3 (2):125-136.
| 1 — 50 / 955 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5b9ff6f457-q9rxf uwo