Divine Evolution: Empedocles’ Anthropology.A. V. Halapsis -2021 -Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 19:107-116.detailsPurpose. Reconstruction of Empedocles’ doctrine from the point of view of philosophical anthropology. Theoretical basis. Methodological basis of the article is the anthropological comprehending of Empedocles’ text fragments presented in the historical-philosophical context. Originality. Cognition of nature in Ancient Greece was far from the ideal of the objective knowledge formed in modern times, cognition of the world as it exists before man and independently of him. Whatever the ancient philosophers talked about, man was always in the center of their attention. (...) I proposed an anthropological version of the interpretation of the doctrine of Empedocles, within the framework of which various elements of his concept fit into a consistent model. Conclusions. Empedocles’ anthropology is based on the recognition of several fundamental things. First of all, there is no death. Second, there is no fundamental difference between human and celestial. This line is conventional and under certain conditions one can overcome it. Cod can become a human, and a human can become God. Teaching of evolution is also double. Not only physical shell evolves, keeping only the most adapted species, but the soul too. The latter can both ascend to the gods and go down to the bushes and fish. Purification of the soul and mastering the magic of the elements gives an impetus for a correct direction of evolution. Empedocles is an anthropologist-practitioner, who shows by his example that a human can cope with all the elements and reach divinity. He chose the elemental ingredients for penetrating the Fortunate Isles, leaving the instructions on how to become God. (shrink)
A Systematic Review of Momentary Assessment Designs for Mood and Anxiety Symptoms.Mila Hall,Paloma V. Scherner,Yannic Kreidel &Julian A. Rubel -2021 -Frontiers in Psychology 12:642044.detailsBackground:Altering components of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) measures to better suit the purposes of individual studies is a common and oftentimes necessary step. Though the inherent flexibility in EMA has its benefits, no resource exists to provide an overview of the variability in how convergent constructs and symptoms have been assessed in the past. The present study fills that gap by examining EMA measurement design for mood and anxiety symptomatology.Methods:Various search engines were used to identify 234 relevant studies. Items administered, (...) data collection schedules (i.e., beeps per day), response scales (i.e., Likert), data collection platforms (i.e., apps), and psychometric properties (i.e., reliability) were extracted.Results:Study designs varied greatly in all aspects across the identified papers. Over 4,600 extracted items were qualitatively analyzed, resulting in the identification of 12 themes. The most EMA items focused on affect, with categories such as “happiness” and “tension” appearing most frequently. We provide all of our data extraction in the format of an open-source database.Limitations:Despite our best attempts to include as much of the relevant literature as possible, this review and the accompanying database are not exhaustive, but can easily be built upon to include other, newer studies.Conclusions:The fact that the affect theme featured both positive and negative emotional constructs highlights the dichotomous focus on valence and affect within the literature surrounding anxious and depressive symptomatology. We hope that our database will act as a helpful design decision-making resource for researchers studying this kind of symptomatology in the future.Systematic Review Registration:PROSPERO (CRD42019139409). (shrink)
Konstruktivizm v teorii poznanii︠a︡.V. A. Lektorskiĭ,E. O. Trufanova &I. P. Farman (eds.) -2008 - Moskva: If Ran.detailsКнига предназначена для студентов, преподавателей и научных сотрудников высших учебных заведений, занимающихся вопросами философии.
No categories
Teorii︠a︡ poznanii︠a︡ v chetyrekh tomakh.V. A. Lektorskiĭ &T. I. Oĭzerman (eds.) -1991 - Moskva: "Myslʹ".detailst. 1. Domarksistskai︠a︡ teorii︠a︡ poznanii︠a︡ --t. 2. Sot︠s︡ialʹno-kulturnai︠a︡ priroda poznanii︠a︡.
Filosofii︠a︡, poznanie, kulʹtura.V. A. Lektorskiĭ -2012 - Moskva: Reabilitat︠s︡ii︠a︡.detailsВ книге обсуждаются проблемы, концентрирующиеся вокруг главной темы: трансформации познания, субъекта, субъективности и культуры в современном мире. Для специалистов.
No categories