Results for 'Thomas D. Parker'
959 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- Christian Theology: A Case Study Approach.Robert A. Evans &Thomas D.Parker -1976No categoriesExport citation
Bookmark - And science.Christian de Duve Gregory R. Peterson,Fred D. Miller,Jeffrey Paul Michael J. Degnan &James M. GustafsonThomas D.Parker -1997 -Zygon 32 (2):143.Export citation Bookmark
- The impact of reporting magnetic resonance imaging incidental findings in the Canadian alliance for healthy hearts and minds cohort.Rhian Touyz,Amy Subar,Ian Janssen,Bob Reid,Eldon Smith,Caroline Wong,Pierre Boyle,Jean Rouleau,F. Henriques,F. Marcotte,K. Bibeau,E. Larose,V. Thayalasuthan,A. Moody,F. Gao,S. Batool,C. Scott,S. E. Black,C. McCreary,E. Smith,M. Friedrich,K. Chan,J. Tu,H. Poiffaut,J. -C. Tardif,J. Hicks,D. Thompson,L.Parker,R. Miller,J. Lebel,H. Shah,D. Kelton,F. Ahmad,A. Dick,L. Reid,G. Paraga,S. Zafar,N. Konyer,R. de Souza,S. Anand,M. Noseworthy,G. Leung,A. Kripalani,R. Sekhon,A. Charlton,R. Frayne,V. de Jong,S. Lear,J. Leipsic,A. -S. Bourlaud,P. Poirier,E. Ramezani,K. Teo,D. Busseuil,S. Rangarajan,H. Whelan,J. Chu,N. Noisel,K. McDonald,N. Tusevljak,H. Truchon,D. Desai,Q. Ibrahim,K. Ramakrishnana,C. Ramasundarahettige,S. Bangdiwala,A. Casanova,L. Dyal,K. Schulze,M.Thomas,S. Nandakumar,B. -M. Knoppers,P. Broet,J. Vena,T. Dummer,P. Awadalla,Matthias G. Friedrich,Douglas S. Lee,Jean-Claude Tardif,Erika Kleiderman & Marcotte -2021 -BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-15.BackgroundIn the Canadian Alliance for Healthy Hearts and Minds (CAHHM) cohort, participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, heart, and abdomen, that generated incidental findings (IFs). The approach to managing these unexpected results remain a complex issue. Our objectives were to describe the CAHHM policy for the management of IFs, to understand the impact of disclosing IFs to healthy research participants, and to reflect on the ethical obligations of researchers in future MRI studies.MethodsBetween 2013 and 2019, 8252 participants (...) (mean age 58 ± 9 years, 54% women) were recruited with a follow-up questionnaire administered to 909 participants (40% response rate) at 1-year. The CAHHM policy followed a restricted approach, whereby routine feedback on IFs was not provided. Only IFs of severe structural abnormalities were reported.ResultsSevere structural abnormalities occurred in 8.3% (95% confidence interval 7.7–8.9%) of participants, with the highest proportions found in the brain (4.2%) and abdomen (3.1%). The majority of participants (97%) informed of an IF reported no change in quality of life, with 3% of participants reporting that the knowledge of an IF negatively impacted their quality of life. Furthermore, 50% reported increased stress in learning about an IF, and in 95%, the discovery of an IF did not adversely impact his/her life insurance policy. Most participants (90%) would enrol in the study again and perceived the MRI scan to be beneficial, regardless of whether they were informed of IFs. While the implications of a restricted approach to IF management was perceived to be mostly positive, a degree of diagnostic misconception was present amongst participants, indicating the importance of a more thorough consent process to support participant autonomy.ConclusionThe management of IFs from research MRI scans remain a challenging issue, as participants may experience stress and a reduced quality of life when IFs are disclosed. The restricted approach to IF management in CAHHM demonstrated a fair fulfillment of the overarching ethical principles of respect for autonomy, concern for wellbeing, and justice. The approach outlined in the CAHHM policy may serve as a framework for future research studies.Clinical trial registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/nct02220582. (shrink)
- A manual of modern scholastic philosophy.Désiré Mercier,Désiré Nys,Jean Halleux,M. de Wulf,Thomas LeoParker &Stanislaus AnselmParker (eds.) -1926 - St. Louis,: B. Herder book company.I. General introduction to philosophy, by Cardinal Mercier. Cosmology, by D. Nys. Psychology, by Cardinal Mercier. Criteriology, by Cardinal Mercier. General metaphysics; or, Ontology, by Cardinal Mercier. Appendix to Cosmology, by D. Nys.--II. Natural theology; or, Theodicy, by Cardinal Mercier. Logic, by Cardinal Mercier. Ethics: General ethics, by A. Arendt (based on Cardinal Mercier's notes); Special ethics, by J. Halleux. History of philosophy, by M. de Wulf. Synopsis in the form of the principal theses. Glossary of scholastic terms, by G. (...) Simons. (shrink)No categories
- Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: Advances in Neurophysiology, Adaptive DBS, Virtual Reality, Neuroethics and Technology.Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora,James Giordano,Aysegul Gunduz,Jose Alcantara,Jackson N. Cagle,Stephanie Cernera,Parker Difuntorum,Robert S. Eisinger,Julieth Gomez,Sarah Long,Brandon Parks,Joshua K. Wong,Shannon Chiu,Bhavana Patel,Warren M. Grill,Harrison C. Walker,Simon J. Little,Ro’ee Gilron,Gerd Tinkhauser,Wesley Thevathasan,Nicholas C. Sinclair,Andres M. Lozano,Thomas Foltynie,Alfonso Fasano,Sameer A. Sheth,Katherine Scangos,Terence D. Sanger,Jonathan Miller,Audrey C. Brumback,Priya Rajasethupathy,Cameron McIntyre,Leslie Schlachter,Nanthia Suthana,Cynthia Kubu,Lauren R. Sankary,Karen Herrera-Ferrá,Steven Goetz,Binith Cheeran,G. Karl Steinke,Christopher Hess,Leonardo Almeida,Wissam Deeb,Kelly D. Foote &Okun Michael S. -2020 -Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 14.
- (1 other version)The trial and execution of Socrates: sources and controversies.Thomas C. Brickhouse &Nicholas D. Smith (eds.) -2002 - New York: Oxford University Press.Socrates is one of the most important yet enigmatic philosophers of all time; his fame has endured for centuries despite the fact that he never actually wrote anything. In 399 B.C.E., he was tried on the charge of impiety by the citizens of Athens, convicted by a jury, and sentenced to death (ordered to drink poison derived from hemlock). About these facts there is no disagreement. However, as the sources collected in this book and the scholarly essays that follow them (...) show, several of even the most basic facts about these events were controversial in antiquity, and the questions persist today: How and why was Socrates brought to trial? Why did the jurors, members of the world's first democracy, find him guilty? When he was given an opportunity to escape execution, why did he refuse to do so and instead accept the punishment that he and his friends agreed was unjustly assigned to him? How exactly did Socrates die? Differences of opinion on these and other issues continue to arouse our curiosity and to challenge new generations of students and scholars. The Trial and Execution of Socrates: Sources and Controversies is the first work to collect in one place all of the major ancient sources on Socrates' death--those of both his critics and his defenders--as well as recent scholarly views. Part I includes new translations of Plato's Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, and the death scene from Phaedo, as well as other ancient sources that shed light on Socrates' trial and execution. Part II features some of the most influential recent scholarship on this historically momentous event with work by M. F. Burnyeat, RobertParker, Mark L. McPherran,Thomas C. Brickhouse and Nicholas D. Smith, Richard Kraut, Christopher Gill, and Enid Bloch (whose essay is published here for the first time). Ideal for undergraduate surveys of ancient Greek philosophy and upper-level courses on Socrates and Socratic philosophy, this unique collection provides an unprecedented look into the many perplexing questions surrounding the trial and execution of this remarkable man. (shrink)
- Who Am I? The Influence of Knowledge Networks on PhD Students’ Formation of a Researcher Role Identity.Marie Gruber,Thomas Crispeels &Pablo D’Este -2023 -Minerva 61 (4):521-552.Higher education institutes both foster the advancement of knowledge and address society's socioeconomic and environmental challenges. To fulfil these multiple missions requires significant changes to how the role of a researcher is perceived e.g. a researcher identity that is congruent with the objective of contributing to fundamental knowledge while also engaging with non-academic actors, broadly, and entrepreneurship, in particular. We argue that the early stages of an academic career—namely the PhD training trajectory—and the knowledge networks formed during this period have (...) a major influence on the scientist’s future capacity to develop an appropriate researcher role identity. We draw on knowledge network and identity theories to investigate how the knowledge networks (i.e. business, scientific and career knowledge networks) of PhD students promote changes to, reinforce or conflict with the perception of a researcher role identity. Our longitudinal qualitative network study includes PhD students and their supervisors funded by the H2020 FINESSE project. At the network level, we show that scientific knowledge is distributed equally throughout young academics’ networks but that entrepreneurial (business) and career knowledge tend to be concentrated around certain individuals in these networks. On the PhD student level, we observe different pronunciations of the researcher role identity linked to students’ interactions with their knowledge networks. We distinguish identity conflicts due to misalignment between ego and alters which leads to withdrawal from the network. Our findings have practical implications and suggest that universities and PhD student supervisors should support PhD students to develop a researcher identity which is in line with the individual PhD student’s expectations. (shrink)No categories
- Twentieth century philosophy.Dagobert D. Runes -1943 - New York,: Philosophical Library.pt. I. Ethics, by J. H. Tufts. Aesthetics, by D. H.Parker. Axiology, by W. M. Urban. Philosophy of law, by Roscoe Pound. Philosophy of history, by J. E. Boodin. Philosophy of science, by V. F. Lenzen. Philosophy of life, by A. N. Whitehead. Metaphysics, by E. W. Hall. Theology and metaphysics, by D. C. Mackintosh.--pt. II. Philosophy of the twentieth century, by Bertrand Russell. Kantianism, by A. C. Ewing. Philosophy of Hegelianism, by Richard Hoenigswald. The humanism of St. (...)Thomas Aquinas, by Jacques Maritain. Transcendental absolutism, by George Santayana. (shrink)No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Twentieth century philosophy.Dagobert D. Runes -1947 - New York: Greenwood Press.pt. I. Ethics, by J. H. Tufts. Aesthetics, by D. H.Parker. Axiology, by W. M. Urban. Philosophy of law, by Roscoe Pound. Philosophy of history, by J. E. Boodin. Philosophy of science, by V. F. Lenzen. Philosophy of life, by A. N. Whitehead. Metaphysics, by E. W. Hall. Theology and metaphysics, by D. C. Mackintosh.--pt. II. Philosophy of the twentieth century, by Bertrand Russell. Kantianism, by A. C. Ewing. Philosophy of Hegelianism, by Richard Hoenigswald. The humanism of St. (...)Thomas Aquinas, by Jacques Maritain. Transcendental absolutism, by George Santayana. (shrink)
- Reason and religion in Socratic philosophy.Nicholas D. Smith &Paul Woodruff (eds.) -2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.This volume brings together mostly previously unpublished studies by prominent historians, classicists, and philosophers on the roles and effects of religion in Socratic philosophy and on the trial of Socrates. Among the contributors areThomas C. Brickhouse, Asli Gocer, Richard Kraut, Mark L. McPherran, Robert C. T.Parker, C. D. C. Reeve, Nicholas D. Smith, Gregory Vlastos, Stephen A. White, and Paul B. Woodruff.
- Rational Use of Cognitive Resources: Levels of Analysis Between the Computational and the Algorithmic.Thomas L. Griffiths,Falk Lieder &Noah D. Goodman -2015 -Topics in Cognitive Science 7 (2):217-229.Marr's levels of analysis—computational, algorithmic, and implementation—have served cognitive science well over the last 30 years. But the recent increase in the popularity of the computational level raises a new challenge: How do we begin to relate models at different levels of analysis? We propose that it is possible to define levels of analysis that lie between the computational and the algorithmic, providing a way to build a bridge between computational- and algorithmic-level models. The key idea is to push the (...) notion of rationality, often used in defining computational-level models, deeper toward the algorithmic level. We offer a simple recipe for reverse-engineering the mind's cognitive strategies by deriving optimal algorithms for a series of increasingly more realistic abstract computational architectures, which we call “resource-rational analysis.”. (shrink)
- Personalism.Thomas D. Williams -2010 -Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.No categories
- Elementary Signal Detection Theory.Thomas D. Wickens -2001 - Oxford University Press USA.Detection theory has been applied to a host of varied problems (for example, measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems or reliability of lie detection tests) and extends far beyond the detection of signals. This book is a primer on the subject.
- Rethinking Philosophy of Religion with Wittgenstein: Religious Diversities and Racism.Thomas D. Carroll -2025 - London: Bloomsbury Academic.Can Wittgenstein's philosophy help us to see religious diversities?Thomas D. Carroll uses Wittgenstein's thoughts on religion and language to bring a cross-cultural perspective to philosophy of religion. Through a focus on Chinese philosophical and religious traditions and the intertwining of racism and religion in the United States, Carroll highlights two related features of Wittgenstein's philosophy: the relevance of contextual backgrounds to interpreting ways of life and the importance of reflecting on existential purposes in philosophical inquiry. Committed to the (...) essential task of expanding philosophy of religion, Carroll critically studies the term “religion” and goes beyond the traditional categories of belief to consider diverse religious phenomena such as rituals, practices, institutions, forms of belonging, and pragmatic forms of religious engagement. We see the value of paying close attention to social contexts and refusing to oversimplify interpretation of philosophical arguments. By demonstrating how Wittgenstein's ideas can enrich our understanding of the complex phenomenon of religion and the place it has in our lives, this inclusive and timely study asks us to rethink how we approach philosophy of religion. (shrink)
- Toward accommodating physicians’ conscientious objections: an argument for public disclosure.Thomas D. Harter -2015 -Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (3):224-228.This paper aims to demonstrate how public disclosure can be used to balance physicians9 conscientious objections with their professional obligations to patients – specifically respect for patient autonomy and informed consent. It is argued here that physicians should be permitted to exercise conscientious objections, but that they have a professional obligation to provide advance notification to patients about those objections. It is further argued here that public disclosure is an appropriate and ethically justifiable limit to the principle of advance notification. (...) The argument for publicly disclosing physicians9 conscientious objections is made in this paper by discussing three practical benefits of public disclosure in medicine, and then addressing how publicly disclosing physicians9 conscientious objections is not an undue invasion of privacy. Three additional concerns with public disclosure of physicians9 conscientious objections are briefly addressed – potential harassment of physicians, workplace discrimination, and mischaracterising physicians9 professional aptitude – concluding that each of these concerns requires further deliberation in the realm of business ethics. (shrink)
- Wittgenstein and Justice.D. A. LloydThomas -1974 -Philosophical Quarterly 24 (94):76-77.No categories
- Epistemological problems of memory.Thomas D. Senor -2008 -Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
- World-Systems, Frontiers, and Ethnogenesis.Thomas D. Hall -2001 -ProtoSociology 15:51-85.
- The wisdom of the hive: the social physiology of honey bee colonies.Thomas D. Seeley -1997 -Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 40 (2).
- On the Alleged Causeless Beginning of the Universe: A Reply to Quentin Smith.Thomas D. Sullivan -1994 -Dialogue 33 (2):325-.
- Reconsidering Kant on suicide.Thomas D. Harter -2011 -Philosophical Forum 42 (2):167-185.
- Virtual Reality for Enhanced Ecological Validity and Experimental Control in the Clinical, Affective and Social Neurosciences.Thomas D. Parsons -2015 -Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9.
- False memories and statistical design theory: Comment on Miller and Wolford (1999) and Roediger and McDermott (1999).Thomas D. Wickens &Elliott Hirshman -2000 -Psychological Review 107 (2):377-383.No categories
- Second Graders Thinking Historically: Theory into Practice.Thomas D. Fallace,Ashley D. Biscoe &Jennifer L. Perry -2007 -Journal of Social Studies Research 31 (1):44-53.
- Conference at Southampton.D. O.Thomas -1968 -Philosophy 43:187.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Bitter Knowledge: Learning Socratic Lessons of Disillusion and Renewal.Thomas D. Eisele -2009 - University of Notre Dame Press.Thomas Eisele explores the premise that the Socratic method of inquiry need not teach only negative lessons. Instead, Eisele contends, the Socratic method is cyclical: we start negatively by recognizing our illusions, but end positively through a process of recollection performed in response to our disillusionment, which ultimately leads to renewal. Thus, a positive lesson about our resources as philosophical investigators, as students and teachers, becomes available to participants in Socrates' robust conversational inquiry. __Bitter Knowledge __includes Eisele's detailed readings (...) of Socrates' teaching techniques in three fundamental Platonic dialogues, _Protagoras, Meno_, and _Theaetetus_, as well as his engagement with contemporary authorities such as Gregory Vlastos, Martha Nussbaum, and Stanley Cavell. Written in a highly engaging and accessible style, this book will appeal to students and scholars in philosophy, classics, law, rhetoric, and education. "This book is original, fresh, and of very high quality, opening up these Platonic texts, central to Western culture, in new ways. In addition, it establishes a method that others can use and apply to the other dialogues. It would be a wonderful text to assign in courses in philosophy, basic humanities, education, and law." --_James Boyd White, University of Michigan_ "Through his thoughtful and incisive readings of Plato,Thomas Eisele puts Socrates in a new light. In Eisele's hands, Socrates offers us a method not simply for philosophy but for the challenges of life and mind. This superb book builds on the great readings of Plato, adding to the richness of our understanding of the enigmatic figure of Socrates. These are profound readings of Plato." --_Dennis Patterson, Rutgers University School of Law_ "Eisele's book is much more than an erudite, seductive, and imaginative exploration of three central Platonic dialogues. It is also a fine general treatment of philosophy, discussing the kind of finality or closure to which philosophical questions are susceptible and the appropriate stance of the inquirer. It considers the pedagogy of philosophy and law brilliantly." --_Thomas Morawetz, University of Connecticut School of Law_. (shrink)
- Secularization: Openness to God?Thomas D. Stanks -1969 -Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 44 (2):185-200.The God that our age is revealing to us is one Who asks new questions, challenges men anew, calls to deeper honesty and better service.
- On the form of the retention function: Comment on Rubin and Wenzel (1996): A quantitative description of retention.Thomas D. Wickens -1998 -Psychological Review 105 (2):379-386.
- "Well!": Voloshinov's Double-Talk.Thomas D. Cohen -1992 -Substance 21 (2):91.
- VIII—Political Decision Procedures1.D. A. LloydThomas -1970 -Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 70 (1):141-160.D. A. LloydThomas; VIII—Political Decision Procedures1, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume 70, Issue 1, 1 June 1970, Pages 141–160, https://doi.or.
- Ethical Challenges in Digital Psychology and Cyberpsychology.Thomas D. Parsons -2019 - Cambridge University Press.Our technologies are progressively developing into algorithmic devices that seamlessly interface with digital personhood. This text discusses the ways in which technology is increasingly becoming a part of personhood and the resulting ethical issues. It extends upon the framework for a brain-based cyberpsychology outlined by the author's earlier book Cyberpsychology and the Brain: The Interaction of Neuroscience and Affective Computing. Using this framework,Thomas D. Parsons investigates the ethical issues involved in cyberpsychology research and praxes, which emerge in algorithmically (...) coupled people and technologies. The ethical implications of these ideas are important as we consider the cognitive enhancements that can be afforded by our technologies. If people are intimately linked to their technologies, then removing or damaging the technology could be tantamount to a personal attack. On the other hand, algorithmic devices may threaten autonomy and privacy. This book reviews these and other issues. (shrink)No categories
- ThePhilosophical Investigations in Philosophy of Religion.Thomas D. Carroll -2024 -JOLMA 5 (Special Issue):37-64.Despite overlooking religious topics, Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations (PI) has had a large impact in philosophy of religion. This article surveys that influence and the reasons for it. In what follows, I first describe the reception of certain key concepts from the PI in philosophy of religion. Second, I examine a few scattered remarks on religious topics in the PI. Third, I consider the relevance of the PI for contemporary philosophy of religion. I argue that the dialogical nature of the PI, (...) allowing different generations of readers to engage it with their particular philosophical problems, is key to its longterm influence. (shrink)
- Critical Introduction to the Epistemology of Memory.Thomas D. Senor -2019 - New York: Bloomsbury.In this clear and up-to-date introduction,Thomas D. Senor lays the philosophical foundation needed to understand the justification of memory belief. This book explores traditional accounts of the justification of memory belief and examines the resources that prominent positions in contemporary epistemology have to offer theories of the memorial justification. Along the way, epistemic conservatism, evidentialism, foundationalism, phenomenal conservatism, reliabilism, and preservationism all feature. Study Questions and annotated Further Reading guides at the end of each chapter make this book (...) ideal for classroom use and independent study. Written in very clear prose, A Critical Introduction to the Epistemology of Memory is a valuable resource for students approaching epistemology for the first time or those looking to advance their understanding of a core area of philosophy. (shrink)
- Some Future Issues in the Sex Problem.Thomas D. Eliot -1920 -International Journal of Ethics 30 (3):296-310.
- Heroism Is Not a Plan—From “Duty to Treat” to “Risk and Rewards”.Thomas D. Kirsch -2022 -American Journal of Bioethics 22 (12):3-6.
- Curiosity and the Integrated Self.Thomas D. Kennedy -2001 -Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture 4 (4):33-54.No categories
- Reinforcement frequency, task characteristics, and interval of awareness assessment as factors in verbal conditioning without awareness.Thomas D. Kennedy -1971 -Journal of Experimental Psychology 88 (1):103.
- Staging Memory, Staging Strife: Empire and Civil War in the Octavia by Lauren Donovan.Thomas D. Kohn -2018 -Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 111 (2):269-271.No categories
- Prof. Swain's account of knowledge.Thomas D. Paxson -1974 -Philosophical Studies 25 (1):57 - 61.
- Preserving preservationism: A reply to Lackey.Thomas D. Senor -2007 -Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1):199–208.
- Justified Belief and Demon Worlds.Thomas D. Senor -2013 -Res Philosophica 90 (2):203-214.The New Demon World Objection claims that reliabilist accounts of justification are mistaken because there are justified empirical beliefs at demon worlds— worlds at which the subjects are systematically deceived by a Cartesian demon. In this paper, I defend strongly verific (but not necessarily reliabilist) accounts of justification by claiming that there are two ways to construct a theory of justification: by analyzing our ordinary concept of justification or by taking justification to be a theoretic term defined by its role (...) in the theory of knowledge. The former route is not promising because of the splintered nature of our ordinary concept of justification—or perhaps because there is no single such concept. On the other hand, if justification is defined by the role it plays in the theory of knowledge, then there is good reason to think that justification must be strongly truth-conductive since the term was introduced by Edmund Gettier to play the primary role in converting true belief into knowledge. And if that is right, then there will be no justified empirical belief at demon worlds. The real lesson of the demon world is then turned on its head: justification does not supervene on what one shares with one’s deceived doppelganger. (shrink)
- The Church and Economic Development.Thomas D. Williams -2009 -Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture 12 (4):115-132.No categories
- The Knowledge-As-Perception Account of Knowledge.Thomas D. Senor -2016 -Journal of Philosophical Research 41 (9999):91-109.William Alston once argued that justification is not necessary for knowledge. He was convinced of this because he thought that, in cases of clear perception, one could come to know that P even if one’s justification for believing P was defeated. The idea is that the epistemic strength of clear perception is sufficient to provide knowledge even where justification is lacking; perceiving (and believing) that P is sufficient for knowing that P. In this paper, I explore a claim about knowledge (...) that is the opposite side of the coin from Alston’s position: clear perception (with belief) that P is necessary for knowledge. Taking my cue from John Locke, I examine the plausibility of a theory of knowledge that distinguishes justified true unGettiered belief that P from knowing that P. Although I don’t fully advocate this position, I argue that it has significant plausibility, and that the initially troubling consequences of the account are not as problematic as one might have suspected. (shrink)
- Discovering empirical patterns in the social sciences : small assignments with web-based data in introductory classes.Thomas D. Lancaster -2018 - In Jeffery Galle & Rebecca L. Harrison,Revitalizing classrooms: innovations and inquiry pedagogies in practice. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Export citation Bookmark
- Decomposition of influence diagrams.Thomas D. Nielsen -2002 -Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 12 (2):135-150.When solving a decision problem we want to determine an optimal policy for the decision variables of interest. A policy for a decision variable is in principle a function over its past; however, some of the past may be irrelevant and for both communicational as well as computational reasons it is important not to deal with redundant variables in the policies. In this paper we present a method to decompose a decision problem into a collection of smaller sub-problems s.t. a (...) solution to the original decision problem can be found by solving the sub-problems independently. The method is based on an operational characterization of the future variables being relevant for a decision variable, thereby also providing a characterization of those parts of a decision problem that are relevant for a particular decision. (shrink)
- The effects of instructions on recall and recognition of categorized lists by the elderly.Thomas D. Overcast,Martin D. Murphy,Sandra S. Smiley &Ann L. Brown -1975 -Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 5 (4):339-341.
- Is Heidegger a Nihilist?Thomas D. Langan -1958 -The Thomist 21:302.Export citation Bookmark
- The prima/ultima facie justification distinction in epistemology.Thomas D. Senor -1996 -Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (3):551-566.
- The Problem of Universals in the Later Ludwig Wittgenstein.Thomas D. Sullivan -1969 - Dissertation, St. John's University (New York)Export citation Bookmark
- Internalistic foundationalism and the justification of memory belief.Thomas D. Senor -1993 -Synthese 94 (3):453 - 476.In this paper I argue that internalistic foundationalist theories of the justification of memory belief are inadequate. Taking a discussion of John Pollock as a starting point, I argue against any theory that requires a memory belief to be based on a phenomenal state in order to be justified. I then consider another version of internalistic foundationalism and claim that it, too, is open to important objections. Finally, I note that both varieties of foundationalism fail to account for the epistemic (...) status of our justified nonoccurrent beliefs, and hence are drastically incomplete. (shrink)
| 1 — 50 / 959 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5b9ff6f457-7w7lb uwo