Results for 'Susan E. Haviland'
950 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- Why words are perceived more accurately than nonwords: Inference versus unitization.Edward E. Smith &Susan E.Haviland -1972 -Journal of Experimental Psychology 92 (1):59.
- Memory scanning as a serial self-terminating process.John Theios,Peter G. Smith,Susan E.Haviland,Jane Traupmann &Melvyn C. Moy -1973 -Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 (3):323.
- (1 other version)Impossible dreams: rationality, integrity, and moral imagination.E. BabbittSusan -1996 - Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Conventional wisdom and commonsense morality tend to take the integrity of persons for granted. But for people in systematically unjust societies, self-respect and human dignity may prove to be impossible dreams.Susan Babbitt explores the implications of this insight, arguing that in the face of systemic injustice, individual and social rationality may require the transformation rather than the realization of deep-seated aims, interests, and values. In particular, under such conditions, she argues, the cultivation and ongoing exercise of moral imagination is (...) necessary to discover and defend a more humane social vision. Impossible Dreams is one of those rare books that fruitfully combines discourses that were previously largely separate: feminist and antiracist political theory, analytic ethics and philosophy of mind, and a wide range of non-philosophical literature on the lives of oppressed peoples around the world. It is both an object lesson in reaching across academic barriers and a demonstration of how the best of feminist philosophy can be in conversation with the best of “mainstream” philosophy—as well as affect the lives of real people. (shrink)
- Public Bioethics and Publics: Consensus, Boundaries, and Participation in Biomedical Science Policy.Susan E. Kelly -2003 -Science, Technology and Human Values 28 (3):339-364.Public bioethics bodies are used internationally as institutions with the declared aims of facilitating societal debate and providing policy advice in certain areas of scientific inquiry raising questions of values and legitimate science. In the United States, bioethical experts in these institutions use the language of consensus building to justify and define the outcome of the enterprise. However, the implications of public bioethics at science-policy boundaries are underexamined. Political interest in such bodies continues while their influence on societal consensus, public (...) debate, and science policy remains ambiguous. This article presents a theoretical discussion of public bioethics bodies as boundary organizations and examines them in terms of relationship to the moral and cognitive authority of science and other forms of expertise, mechanisms for public participation in controversial science policy, and the deployment of consensus models. The theoretical discussion is examined in the case of the U.S. Human Embryo Research Panel. (shrink)No categories
- Working memory and language.Susan E. Gathercole -2009 - In Gareth Gaskell,Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Oxford University Press.
- Hope for the future: Achieving the original intent of advance directives.Susan E. Hickman,Bernard J. Hammes,Alvin H. Moss &Susan W. Tolle -2005 -Hastings Center Report 35 (6):s26-s30.
- The Other Boston Busing Story: Whats Won and Lost Across the Boundary Line.Susan E. Eaton -2001 - Yale University Press.METCO, America’s longest-running voluntary school desegregation program, has for 34 years bused black children from Boston’s city neighborhoods to predominantly white suburban schools. In contrast to the infamous violence and rage of forced school busing within the city in the 1970s, METCO has quietly and calmly promoted school integration. How has this program affected the lives of its graduates? Would they choose to participate if they had it to do over again? Would they place their own children on the bus (...) to suburbia? Sixty-five METCO graduates vividly recall their own stories in this revealing book.Susan E. Eaton interviewed program participants who are now adults, asking them to assess the benefits and hardships of crossing racial and class lines on their way to school. Their answers poignantly show that this type of racial integration is not easy—they struggled to negotiate both black and white worlds, often feeling fully accepted in neither. Even so, nearly all the participants believe the long-term gains outweighed the costs and would choose a similar program for their own children—though not without conditions and apprehensions. Even as courts and policymakers today are forcing the abandonment of desegregation, educators warn that students are better prepared in schools that reflect our national diversity. This book offers an accessible and moving account of a rare program that, despite serious challenges, provides a practical remedy for the persistent inequalities in American education. (shrink)No categories
- Project Muse and "The Web": An American university press goes on-line.Susan E. Lewis -1995 -Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 6 (2):73-78.No categories
- Forgiveness and Life in Community.Susan E. Hylen -2000 -Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 54 (2):146-157.The church must respond to the crisis of domestic violence with a renewed vision of forgiveness. As suggested in a parable of Jesus, forgiveness is viable when it is exercised within a community of mutual confession and accountability.
- “Ethics and Clinical Research” in Biographical Perspective.Susan E. Lederer -2016 -Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 59 (1):18-36.Fifty years ago, Henry Knowles Beecher published his essay on clinical research ethics in the New England Journal of Medicine. The culmination of more than a decade and a half’s rumination and reflection on the use of patients and “captive populations” in research, Beecher’s 1966 article understandably casts a large shadow in American bioethics. In 1976, the Institute of Society, Ethics and the Life Sciences established the Henry Knowles Beecher Award for Contributions to Ethics and the Life Sciences and named (...) the Harvard professor as the first recipient of the Award. “It is unusual for a researcher,” Daniel Callahan explained, on behalf of the Board of Directors of the... (shrink)
- Two Steps to Three Choices: A New Approach to Mandated Choice.Susan E. Herz -1999 -Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (3):340-347.Approximately 62,000 people in this country await organ transplants. Ten years ago the waiting list numbered 16,000. The line gets longer every day. Up to 30% of those waiting in line will die waiting. We face a chronic shortage of organs. While demand for organs steadily increases, the number of cadaveric organ donors remains relatively constant: approximately 4,000 in 1988, and approximately 5,500 in 1997. In response to this environment of scarcity, policymakers have considered initiatives in a number of domains.
- Engineering education for sustainability: Reflections on “the Greening of engineers” (A. ansari).Susan E. Murcott -2001 -Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (1):137-140.
- Three Ch'ing Critics on Yüan Painting and the Ideal of SpontaneityThree Ch'ing Critics on Yuan Painting and the Ideal of Spontaneity.Susan E. Nelson -1986 -Journal of the American Oriental Society 106 (2):297.
- The Winking Owl: Art in the People's Republic of China.Susan E. Nelson &Ellen Johnston Laing -1991 -Journal of the American Oriental Society 111 (1):124.
- Letters to a mother on the philosophy of Froebel.Susan E. Blow -1899 - New York,: D. Appleton and company.This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.This work is in the public domain in (...) the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant. (shrink)
- The Logic of the Development of Feminism; or, Is MacKinnon to Feminism as Parmenides Is to Greek Philosophy?Susan E. Bernick -1992 -Hypatia 7 (1):1-15.Catharine MacKinnon's investigation of the role of sexuality in the subordination of women is a logical culmination of radical feminist thought. If this is correct, the position of her work relative to radical feminism is analogous to the place Parmenides's work occupied in ancient Greek philosophy. Critics of MacKinnon's work have missed their target completely and must engage her work in a different way if feminist theory is to progress past its current stalemated malaise.
- Exposing Student Teachers' Content Knowledge: Empowerment or debilitation?Susan E. Sanders &Heather Morris -2000 -Educational Studies 26 (4):397-408.Previous governments and other commentators have emphasized the relationship between a teacher's knowledge of the subject material being taught and the quality of learning outcomes. This has been reflected in the entry requirements to Initial Teacher Training of public examination performance in the core subjects. However, disquiet has been expressed as to the efficacy of such qualifications as indicators of knowledge and skills at the entry point. Recent changes to ITT regulations require students' actual knowledge of the content of the (...) three core subjects to be audited. This paper reports and reflects on the effects that re-examining their knowledge and skills in mathematics has had on the confidence of primary trainee teachers. It presents some key questions that must be addressed if the current audit regulations are indeed to benefit our future teachers and to enhance the learning of our pupils. (shrink)
- What do Schools Think Makes a Good Mathematics Teacher?Susan E. Sanders -2002 -Educational Studies 28 (2):181-191.This paper describes the attributes of good mathematics teachers in the UK. These are derived from the material provided by 80 schools to applicants for mathematics teaching posts in the UK. The assumption is made that schools are trying to recruit the very best teacher and hence will have listed those attributes that they believe good teachers to have. Many of the attributes sought are not specifically about the teaching of mathematics. Indeed much about competency in the teaching of mathematics (...) is assumed and not made explicit. The requirements of schools are compared and contrasted with the Standards detailed in current Initial Teacher Training requirements and the Career Entry Profile used by newly qualified teachers. (shrink)
- The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Science: Volume 1.Susan E. F. Chipman (ed.) -2016 - Oxford University Press USA.This handbook is currently in development, with individual articles publishing online in advance of print publication. At this time, we cannot add information about unpublished articles in this handbook, however the table of contents will continue to grow as additional articles pass through the review process and are added to the site. Please note that the online publication date for this handbook is the date that the first article in the title was published online.
- The Theater of His Glory: Nature and the Natural Order in the Thought of John Calvin.Susan E. Schreiner -1991No categories
- Joint british academy/british psychological society lecture.Susan E. Gathercole -2004 -Proceedings of the British Academy: Volume 125: 2003 Lectures 125:365-380.No categoriesExport citation
Bookmark - Proceedings of the British Academy Volume 125, 2003 Lectures.E. GathercoleSusan -2004No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Before Pigs' Germs Fly: Xenotransplantation and a Call for Federal Action.Susan E. Herz -2001 -Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10 (4):441-444.When surgeons transplant animal organs into humans, people who did not receive the organs incur risks. These third parties may stand near or far in time or space. No one knows the likelihood, breadth, or nature of the risks in question. The common wisdom among infectious-disease specialists is that in the best of xenotransplant conditions, such third-party risk may be minimized but not eliminated.
- 1 The stratigraphy of serendipity.Susan E. Alcock -2010 - In Mark de Rond & Iain Morley,Serendipity: fortune and the prepared mind. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 22--11.No categories
- Keepin’ This Little Town Going: Gender and Volunteerism in Rural America.Susan E. Mannon &Peggy Petrzelka -2006 -Gender and Society 20 (2):236-258.Past studies have shown that women’s volunteer work benefits communities but that women themselves tend to minimize their efforts. Most of these studies, however, have been limited to women volunteering in suburban and urban contexts. Drawing on a study of women volunteers in rural Iowa, the authors find that women frame their volunteer experiences in three ways: as an expression of their maternal nature, as a way to socialize, and as a contribution to the local economy. The authors’ findings depart (...) from past research in that the women in their sample do not downplay the importance of their volunteer work; rather, they recognize the importance of their unpaid labor for the social and economic vitality of the community. The authors argue this recognition stems from the particular context in which their volunteerism takes place, namely, in a devastated rural economy in which future economic potential rests on women’s hospitality work. (shrink)No categories
- Pro‐Choice: A New Militancy.Susan E. Davis -1989 -Hastings Center Report 19 (6):32-33.
- Dumb Ox at the Crossroads of English Catholicism.Susan E. Hanssen -2009 -Renascence 62 (1):3-20.
- The Use of Narratives In Graduate Bioethics Education.Susan E. Zinner -2019 -Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (2):361-368.
- The Rule of the Rich?: Adam Smith's Argument Against Political Power.Susan E. Gallagher -1998 - Pennsylvania State University Press.Usually viewed as the premier apologist for laissez-faire capitalism, Smith is seen in this new interpretation within the context of an earlier tradition that condemned the British aristocracy for relinquishing its moral obligation to promote the public good in favor of an unceasing pursuit of private gain. Through separate chapters on Mandeville, Bolingbroke, and Hume, Gallagher shows that Smith echoed civic humanist sermons against the avaricious inclinations of the nobles who profited most from commercial expansion. Unlike earlier critics, however, Smith (...) concluded that the most prudent response to aristocratic corruption was not to hold ministers, kings, and social notables to higher standards but to limit their access to political power. _The Rule of the Rich?_ accordingly shows that the case for limited government made in _The Wealth of Nations_ was not a defense of individual liberty so much as a concession to the apparent incompetence of the British upper class. (shrink)
- Understanding the Practice of Ethics Consultation: Results of an Ethnographic Multi-Site Study.Susan E. Kelly,Patricia A. Marshall,Lee M. Sanders,Thomas A. Raffin &Barbara A. Koenig -1997 -Journal of Clinical Ethics 8 (2):136-149.
- Women In Mission: From the New Testament to Today.Susan E. Smith -2007No categories
- Priorities of counseling programs and outcomes within the Virginia community college system.Susan E. Short -1998 -Inquiry (ERIC) 2 (1):62-67.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Partner‐Specific Adaptation in Dialog.Susan E. Brennan &Joy E. Hanna -2009 -Topics in Cognitive Science 1 (2):274-291.No one denies that people adapt what they say and how they interpret what is said to them, depending on their interactive partners. What is controversial is when and how they do so. Several psycholinguistics research programs have found what appear to be failures to adapt to partners in the early moments of processing and have used this evidence to argue for modularity in the language processing architecture, claiming that the system cannot take into account a partner’s distinct needs or (...) knowledge early in processing. We review the evidence for both early and delayed partner‐specific adaptations, and we identify some challenges and difficulties with interpreting this evidence. We then discuss new analyses from a previously published referential communication experiment (Metzing & Brennan, 2003) demonstrating that partner‐specific effects need not occur late in processing. In contrast to Pickering and Garrod (2004) and Keysar, Barr, and Horton (1998b), we conclude that there is no good evidence that early processing has to be be “egocentric,”“dumb,” or encapsulated from social knowledge or common ground, but that under some circumstances, such as when one partner has made an attribution about another’s knowledge or needs, processing can be nimble enough to adapt quite early to a perspective different from one’s own. (shrink)
- Clarifications on mass media campaigns promoting organ donation: a response to Rady, McGregor, & Verheijde (2012).Susan E. Morgan &Thomas Hugh Feeley -2013 -Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (4):865-868.The current paper provides readers some clarifications on the nature and goals of mass media campaigns designed to promote organ donation. These clarifications were necessitated by an earlier essay by Rady et al. (Med Health Care Philos 15:229–241, 2012) who present erroneous claims that media promotion campaigns in this health context represent propaganda that seek to misrepresent the transplantation process. Information is also provided on the nature and relative power of media campaigns in organ donation promotion.
- Creating Emotionally Intelligent Schools With RULER.Lori Nathanson,Susan E. Rivers,Lisa M. Flynn &Marc A. Brackett -2016 -Emotion Review 8 (4):305-310.How educators and students process and respond to emotions can either enhance or impede the development of the whole child. Social and emotional learning (SEL) refers to the processes of developing social and emotional competencies, which depend on individuals’ capacity to recognize, understand, and manage emotions (i.e., emotional intelligence or EI). Consensus across disciplines about the importance of EI highlights the need to advance the science of how to teach SEL. RULER, an evidence-based approach to teaching EI, provides an educational (...) framework that encompasses a set of practices for comprehensive SEL integration across a school or district. In this article, we describe RULER, explain how it teaches EI, and summarize evidence of its effectiveness. (shrink)
- Coordinating cognition: The costs and benefits of shared gaze during collaborative search.Susan E. Brennan,Xin Chen,Christopher A. Dickinson,Mark B. Neider &Gregory J. Zelinsky -2008 -Cognition 106 (3):1465-1477.No categories
- Listening to People: Using Social Psychology to Spotlight an Overlooked Virtue.Susan E. Notess -2019 -Philosophy 94 (4):621-643.I offer a novel interdisciplinary approach to understanding the communicative task of listening, which is under-theorised compared to its more conspicuous counterpart, speech. By correlating a Rylean view of mental actions with a virtue ethical framework, I show listeners’ internal activity as a morally relevant feature of how they treat people. The listener employs a policy of responsiveness in managing the extent to which they allow a speaker's voice to be centred within their more effortful, engaged attention. A just listener's (...) policy of responsiveness avoids unwarrantedly dismissing speakers’ messages on the basis of peripheral attention alone. (shrink)No categories
- Walter Reed and the yellow fever experiments.Susan E. Lederer -2008 - In Ezekiel J. Emanuel,The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 9--17.No categories
- Racism and Philosophy.Susan E. Babbitt &Sue Campbell (eds.) -1999 - Cornell University Press.By definitively establishing that racism has broad implications for how the entire field of philosophy is practiced -- and by whom -- this powerful and ...
- Adding dynamic consent to a longitudinal cohort study: A qualitative study of EXCEED participant perspectives.Susan E. Wallace &José Miola -2021 -BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-10.Background Dynamic consent has been proposed as a process through which participants and patients can gain more control over how their data and samples, donated for biomedical research, are used, resulting in greater trust in researchers. It is also a way to respond to evolving data protection frameworks and new legislation. Others argue that the broad consent currently used in biobank research is ethically robust. Little empirical research with cohort study participants has been published. This research investigated the participants’ opinions (...) of adding a dynamic consent interface to their existing study. Methods Adult participants in the Extended Cohort for E-health, Environment and DNA longitudinal cohort study who are members of the EXCEED Public and Participant Engagement Group were recruited. Four focus groups were conducted and analysed for thematic content. Discussion topics were derived from a review of the current literature on dynamic consent. Results Participants were in favour of many aspects of a dynamic consent interface, such as being able to update their information, add additional data to their records and choose withdrawal options. They were supportive provided it was simple to use and not intrusive. Participants expressed a markedly high level of trust in the study and its investigators and were unanimously happy with their current participation. No strong support was found for adding a dynamic consent interface to EXCEED. Conclusions Trust in the study researchers was the strongest theme found. Openness and good data security were needed to retain their trust. While happy to discuss dynamic consent, participants were satisfied with the current study arrangements. There were indications that changing the study might unnecessarily disturb their trust. This raised the question of whether there are contexts where dynamic consent is more appropriate than others. This study was limited by the small number of participants who were committed to the study and biased towards it. More research is needed to fully understand the potential impact of adding a dynamic consent interface to an existing cohort study. (shrink)
- Artless Integrity: Moral Imagination, Agency, and Stories.Susan E. Babbitt -2000 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Susan Babbitt dissects a common moral perspective for judging importance which she calls 'moral imagination.' In order to explain ourselves, and to recognize in others, what we often already perceive intuitively to be right or good, we instinctively create a story as a framework. She argues that we intentionally create stories which appear artless or chaotic, something capable of imperfection. This allows the story-maker to eventually deviate if he or she chooses, without a loss of hope, even if that (...) direction and goal may not yet be able to be fully articulated or defended. (shrink)
- Collective memory or knowledge of the past : "Covering reality with flowers".Susan E. Babbitt -2009 - In Sue Campbell, Letitia Meynell & Susan Sherwin,Embodiment and Agency. Pennsylvania State University Press.No categories
- Respecting Autonomy Over Time: Policy and Empirical Evidence on Re‐Consent in Longitudinal Biomedical Research.Susan E. Wallace,Elli G. Gourna,Graeme Laurie,Osama Shoush &Jessica Wright -2015 -Bioethics 30 (3):210-217.Re-consent in research, the asking for a new consent if there is a change in protocol or to confirm the expectations of participants in case of change, is an under-explored issue. There is little clarity as to what changes should trigger re-consent and what impact a re-consent exercise has on participants and the research project. This article examines applicable policy statements and literature for the prevailing arguments for and against re-consent in relation to longitudinal cohort studies, tissue banks and biobanks. (...) Examples of re-consent exercises are presented, triggers and non-triggers for re-consent discussed and the conflicting attitudes of commentators, participants and researchers highlighted. We acknowledge current practice and argue for a greater emphasis on ‘responsive autonomy,’ that goes beyond a one-time consent and encourages greater communication between the parties involved. A balance is needed between respecting participants' wishes on how they want their data and samples used and enabling effective research to proceed. (shrink)
- An Experimental Evaluation of Competing Age-Predictions of Future Time Perspective between Workplace and Retirement Domains.Matthew J. Kerry &Susan E. Embretson -2018 -Frontiers in Psychology 8.
- Nurses' Responses to Initial Moral Distress in Long-Term Care.Marie P. Edwards,Susan E. McClement &Laurie R. Read -2013 -Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (3):325-336.While researchers have examined the types of ethical issues that arise in long-term care, few studies have explored long-term care nurses’ experiences of moral distress and fewer still have examined responses to initial moral distress. Using an interpretive description approach, 15 nurses working in long-term care settings within one city in Canada were interviewed about their responses to experiences of initial moral distress, resources or supports they identified as helpful or potentially helpful in dealing with these situations, and factors that (...) hindered nurses in their responses. Using a thematic analysis process, three major themes were identified from the nurses’ experiences: (i) the context of the situation matters; (ii) the value of coming together as a team; and (iii) looking for outside direction. The work of responding to initial moral distress was more fruitful if opportunities existed to discuss conflicts with other team members and if managers supported nurses in moving their concerns forward through meetings or conversations with the team, physician, or family. Access to objective others and opportunities for education about ethics were also identified as important for dealing with value conflicts. (shrink)
- From "scraps and fragments" to "whole organisms" : Molecular biology, clinical research, and post genomic bodies.Susan E. Kelly -2006 - In Paul Atkinson,New Genetics, New Indentities. Routledge.Export citation Bookmark
- Developmental changes in short-term memory: A revised working memory perspective.Susan E. Gathercole &Graham J. Hitch -1993 - In A. Collins, Martin A. Conway & P. E. Morris,Theories of Memory. Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 1--189.
- Whose Movement? STS and Social Justice.Susan E. Cozzens -1993 -Science, Technology and Human Values 18 (3):275-277.No categories
- Holly Folk. The Religion of Chiropractic: Populist Healing from the American Heartland. xii + 351 pp., bibl., index. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2017. $34.95. [REVIEW]Susan E. Cayleff -2018 -Isis 109 (2):424-425.No categories
- The Needle in the Haystack: International Consortia and the Return of Individual Research Results.Susan E. Wallace -2011 -Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):631-639.Where research was once strictly confined to one laboratory or office, investigators now widely share and compare their plans, analyses, and results. With the advent of genomic knowledge, researchers are seeking to understand the genetics and genomics of complex human disease. They are combining their efforts into international consortia in order to take on problems that face individuals around the world, such as cancer and malaria — problems that are too large to solve by one country alone. These consortia bring (...) together diverse research groups from different parts of the world to focus on a common goal. Their projects may all focus on one disease or condition, but examine it from different perspectives and share the newly gained information with each other and the wider scientific community. (shrink)
| 1 — 50 / 950 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-nwt9g uwo