Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs
Order:

1 filter applied
  1.  260
    Needs, moral demands and moral theory.Soran Reader &Gillian Brock -2004 -Utilitas 16 (3):251-266.
    In this article we argue that the concept of need is as vital for moral theory as it is for moral life. In II we analyse need and its normativity in public and private moral practice. In III we describe simple cases which exemplify the moral demandingness of needs, and argue that the significance of simple cases for moral theory is obscured by the emphasis in moral philosophy on unusual cases. In IV we argue that moral theories are inadequate if (...) they cannot describe simple needs-meeting cases. We argue that the elimination or reduction of need to other concepts such as value, duty, virtue or care is unsatisfactory, in which case moral theories that make those concepts fundamental will have to be revised. In conclusion, we suggest that if moral theories cannot be revised to accommodate needs, they may have to be replaced with a fully needs-based theory. Correspondence:c1[email protected] g. brock @auckland.ac.nz. (shrink)
    Direct download(8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  2.  64
    Needs and Moral Necessity.Soran Reader -2007 - New York: Routledge.
    Needs and Moral Necessity analyses ethics as a practice, explains why we have three moral theory-types, consequentialism, deontology and virtue ethics, and argues for a fourth needs-based theory.
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  3.  152
    The other side of agency.Soran Reader -2007 -Philosophy 82 (4):579-604.
    In our philosophical tradition and our wider culture, we tend to think of persons as agents. This agential conception is flattering, but in this paper I will argue that it conceals a more complex truth about what persons are. In 1. I set the issues in context. In 2. I critically explore four features commonly presented as fundamental to personhood in versions of the agential conception: action, capability, choice and independence. In 3. I argue that each of these agential features (...) presupposes a non-agential feature: agency presupposes patiency, capability presupposes incapability, choice presupposes necessity and independence presupposes dependency. In 4. I argue that such non-agential features, as well as being implicit within the agential conception, are as apt to be constitutive of personhood as agential features, and in 5. I conclude. (shrink)
    Direct download(7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  4. (1 other version)The Philosophy of Need.Soran Reader (ed.) -2006 - New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
    Until recently, philosophers tended to be suspicious of the concept of need. Contributors to this volume build on recent work establishing its philosophical importance. David Wiggins, Gillian Brock and John O'Neill propose remedies for some mistakes made in ignoring or marginalising need, for example in need-free theories of rationality or justice. Christopher Rowe, Soran Reader and Sarah Miller highlight insights that emerge when the concept of need is explored through Plato, Aristotle and Kant - and others that emerge when historical (...) work is seen through the lens of need. Jonathan Lowe and Garrett Thomson consider the role need plays in the philosophies of action and mind. Bill Wringe, David Braybrooke and Sabina Alkire debate how our obligations relating to need are best understood and articulated, and how we can best ensure they are fulfilled, exploring for example how talk of need is related to talk of rights, well-being or capability. (shrink)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  5.  109
    Does a basic needs approach need capabilities?Soran Reader -2006 -Journal of Political Philosophy 14 (3):337–350.
  6.  142
    Distance, Relationship and Moral Obligation.Soran Reader -2003 -The Monist 86 (3):367-381.
    How can we justify partiality to those near to us, such as our own families, friends, neighbours and colleagues, when we could act in much more morally valuable ways by helping others who are merely distant from us? In 1972 Peter Singer used two now-famous examples, Pond and.
    Direct download(4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  7.  122
    Needs-centered ethical theory.Gillian Brock &Soran Reader -2002 -Journal of Value Inquiry 36 (4):425-434.
    Our aims in this paper are: (1) to indicate some of the many ways in which needs are an important part of the moral landscape, (2) to show that the dominant contemporary moral theories cannot adequately capture the moral significance of needs, indeed, that the dominant theories are inadequate to the extent that they cannot accommodate the insights which attention to needs yield, (3) to offer some sketches that should be helpful to future cartographers charting the domain of morally significant (...) needs, and (4) to consider some anticipated objections to our project and offer some replies. (shrink)
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  8.  320
    Abortion, Killing, and Maternal Moral Authority.Soran Reader -2008 -Hypatia 23 (1):132-149.
    A threat to women is obscured when we treat “abortion-as-evacuation” as equivalent to “abortion-as-killing.” This holds only if evacuating a fetus kills it. As technology advances, the equivalence will fail. Any feminist account of abortion that relies on the equivalence leaves moral room for women to be required to give up their fetuses to others when it fails. So an account of the justification of abortion-as-killing is needed that does not depend on the equivalence.
    Direct download(6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  9.  21
    Agency, Patiency, and Personhood.Soran Reader -2010 - In Timothy O'Connor & Constantine Sandis,A Companion to the Philosophy of Action. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 200–208.
    This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction Action and Passivity Capability/Incapability and Need Choice, Rationality, Freedom/Constraint Independence and Dependency References Further reading.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  10.  121
    Making pacifism plausible.Soran Reader -2000 -Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2):169–180.
  11.  124
    Aristotle on Necessities and Needs.Soran Reader -2005 -Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 57:113-136.
    Aristotle’s account of human needs is valuable because it describes the connections between logical, metaphysical, physical, human and ethical necessities. But Aristotle does not fully draw out the implications of the account of necessity for needs and virtue. The proper Aristotelian conclusion is that, far from being an inferior activity fit only for slaves, meeting needs is the first part of Aristotelian virtue.
    Direct download(8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  12.  79
    Principle Ethics, Particularism and Another Possibility.Soran Reader -1997 -Philosophy 72 (280):269 - 292.
    One of the most striking contributions of particularism to moral philosophy has been its emphasis on the relative opacity of the moral scene to the tools of rational analysis traditionally used by philosophers. Particularism changes the place of the philosopher in relation to the moral life, pointing up the limits to what philosophy can do here. The modern moral philosopher who takes particularism seriously no longer has the luxury, endemic in our tradition, of imagining that moral philosophy can be done (...) with only passing illustrative reference to experience, or that the truth about the whole of our moral life may be read of a list of a priori moral principles, whose rationality is underwritten by the mechanistic account of what it is to follow a rule that pre-Wittgensteinian philosophers took for granted. (shrink)
    Direct download(6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  13.  109
    Ethical Necessities.Soran Reader -2011 -Philosophy 86 (4):589-607.
    In this paper I introduce my work in ethics, inviting others to draw on my approach to address the ethical issues that concern them. I set up the Centre for Ethical Philosophy at Durham University in 2007 to plug a puzzling gap in philosophical work to help us help the world. In 1. I set out ethical philosophy. In 2. I consider some implications, for example, that to do good we must pay much more attention to the beings around us, (...) less to ourselves. In 3. I consider the implications for how we should think about war and peace. In 4. I draw out some implications for good political practice. In 5. I consider objections and conclude. (shrink)
    Direct download(6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  14.  123
    Cosmopolitan pacifism.Soran Reader -2007 -Journal of Global Ethics 3 (1):87 – 103.
    In this paper I argue that cosmopolitanism prohibits war and requires a global approach to criminal justice. My argument proceeds by drawing out some implications of the core cosmopolitan intuition that every human being has a moral status which constrains how they may be treated. In the first part of this paper, I describe cosmopolitanism. In the second part, Cosmopolitanism and War, I analyse violence, consider the standards cosmopolitanism sets for its justification, and argue that war fails to meet them. (...) In the third part, Cosmopolitanism and Criminal Justice, I argue that cosmopolitanism implies a moral obligation to deal justly with human wrongdoing wherever it occurs. Cosmopolitan pacifism follows: war is prohibited, and a consistent global criminal justice system is required. In the fourth part, Why No Cosmopolitan Pacifists?, I consider why cosmopolitans tend not to identify as pacifists, and in the final part, Objections, I discuss some objections. (shrink)
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  15.  69
    Essays for David Wiggins: Identity, truth and value by Sabina Lovibond and S. G. Williams (eds) oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1996.Soran Reader -2003 -Philosophy 78 (4):553-555.
    No categories
    Direct download(4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  61
    Reasons and Purposes.Soran Reader -2005 -International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (3):410-412.
  17.  51
    (1 other version)Value, respect and attachment. By Joseph Raz, cambridge university press, 2001, pp. 194.Soran Reader -2003 -Philosophy 78 (3):430-432.
    Direct download(4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  94
    Morality and Action By Warren Quinn Cambridge University Press 1994 xii and 255. £35.00.Soran Reader -1994 -Philosophy 69 (270):513-.
    Direct download(4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  85
    New directions in ethics: Naturalisms, reasons and virtue. [REVIEW]Soran Reader -2000 -Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (4):341-364.
    This paper discusses three topics in contemporary British ethical philosophy: naturalisms, moral reasons, and virtue. Most contemporary philosophers agree that 'ethics is natural' - in Section 1 I examine the different senses that can be given to this idea, from reductive naturalism to supernaturalism, seeking to show the problems some face and the problems others solve. Drawing on the work of John McDowell in particular, I conclude that an anti-supernatural non-reductive naturalism plausibly sets the limits on what we can do (...) in ethics. Moral reasons are widely discussed - in Section 2 I describe some of the criteria that used to distinguish moral practical reasons, and note possibilities and problems. Drawing on the work of Elizabeth Anscombe in particular, I suggest that an inclusive, minimalist account of moral reasons may be most fruitful. There has been a revival of philosophical interest in virtue ethics, which I take to be linked to the emergence of non-reductive naturalisms - in Section 3 I describe three points where virtue ethics has an especially significant contribution to make: learning, motivational self-sufficiency, and the question of whether virtues can be reasons. The naturalism of Section 1 constrains the accounts of moral reasons considered in Section 2, and depends upon an account of virtue as learned second nature, discussed in Section 3. (shrink)
    Direct download(6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  20.  56
    Aftermath: Violence and the Remaking of a Self By Susan Brison. Princeton University Press. 2002. $29.25. [REVIEW]Soran Reader -2005 -Philosophy 80 (2):300-303.
  21.  19
    Review: Reviews. [REVIEW]Soran Reader -2005 -Philosophy 80 (312):300 - 303.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
Export
Limit to items.
Filters





Configure languageshere.Sign in to use this feature.

Viewing options


Open Category Editor
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?

Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp