Social Rationality, Semi-Modularity and Goal-Framing: What Is It All About?Siegwart Lindenberg -2008 -Analyse & Kritik 30 (2):669-687.detailsHuman beings are not general problem solvers. Their mental architecture is modular and the microfoundations for the social sciences have to take that into consideration. Modularity means that there are hardwired and softwired functionally specific subroutines, such as face recognition and habits that make the individual particularly sensitive to a narrow range of information from both inside and outside. Goals are the most important creators of modules that contain both hard- and softwired submodules. Goals determine what we attend to, what (...) information we are sensitive to, what information we neglect, what chunks of knowledge and what concepts are being activated at a given moment, what we like and dislike, what criteria for goal achievement are being applied, etc. Overarching goals govern large classes of submodules, and therefore the social sciences have to deal especially with these overarching goals. Three such overarching goals are identified: hedonic, gain, and normative goals. At every given moment one of them is focal (a goal-frame) and self-regulation is the process by which humans balance the dominance of goal-frames. In turn, self-regulation (here seen as the heart of ‘social rationality’), depends much on social circumstances that are open to sociological investigation. (shrink)
Does distance from the equator predict self-control? Lessons from the Human Penguin Project.Hans IJzerman,Marija V. Čolić,Marie Hennecke,Youngki Hong,Chuan-Peng Hu,Jennifer Joy-Gaba,Dušanka Lazarević,Ljiljana B. Lazarević,Michal Parzuchowski,Kyle G. Ratner,Thomas Schubert,Astrid Schütz,Darko Stojilović,Sophia C. Weissgerber,Janis Zickfeld &Siegwart Lindenberg -2017 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40:e86.detailsWe comment on the proposition “that lower temperatures and especially greater seasonal variation in temperature call for individuals and societies to adopt … a greater degree of self-control” (Van Lange et al., sect. 3, para. 4) for which we cannot find empirical support in a large data set with data-driven analyses. After providing greater nuance in our theoretical review, we suggest that Van Lange et al. revisit their model with an eye toward the social determinants of self-control.
Die drei Orte des Lernens von und mit Hans Albert.Siegwart Lindenberg -2018 - In Giuseppe Franco,Begegnungen Mit Hans Albert: Eine Hommage. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. pp. 219-221.detailsWieso lernt man von einem Professor soviel mehr als von einem anderen? Da mag es ganz verschiedene Gründe geben, aber ein Grund ist sicherlich die ganz persönliche Schiene: die reine intellektuelle Ansteckung. Hans Albert war so ein Professor: man konnte sich der Ansteckung gar nicht entziehen.
No categories
Post-Fordist Work: A Man's World?: Gender and Working Overtime in the Netherlands.Siegwart Lindenberg,Suzan Lewis,Arie Glebbeek &Patricia Van Echtelt -2009 -Gender and Society 23 (2):188-214.detailsThere is debate about whether the post-Fordist or high-performance work organization can overcome the disadvantages women encounter in traditional gendered organizations. Some authors argue that substituting a performance logic for control by the clock offers opportunities for combining work and family life in a more natural way. Critics respond that these organizational reforms do not address the nonresponsibility of firms for caring duties at a more fundamental level. The authors address this debate through an analysis of overtime work, using data (...) from a survey of 1,114 employees in 30 Dutch organizations. The findings reveal that post-Fordist work is associated with more overtime hours than traditional forms of work and that far from challenging gendered organization, it reproduces and exacerbates the traditional male model of work. (shrink)
No categories
The rationality of beliefs at the frontier of social science: Comments on Boudon's paper.Siegwart Lindenberg -1993 -International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7 (1):51 – 53.details(1993). The rationality of beliefs at the frontier of social science: Comments on Boudon's paper. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science: Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 51-53.