Results for 'Sally E. Taylor-Adams'
881 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- An evaluation of adverse incident reporting.Nicola Stanhope,Margaret Crowley-Murphy,Charles Vincent,Anne M. O'Connor &Sally E.Taylor-Adams -1999 -Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 5 (1):5-12.
- The yeast Ty element: Recent advances in the study of a model retro‐element.Sally E.Adams,Susan M. Kingsman &Alan J. Kingsman -1987 -Bioessays 7 (1):1-9.The past three years have seen a dramatic increase in our understanding of the structural organization and expression strategies of the dispersed, repetitive yeast transposon, Ty. These studies have led to a logical comparison of Ty with retroviral proviruses and other mobile, repetitive elements. Such comparisons have culminated in the hypotheses that transposition occurs via the formation of Ty‐encoded virus‐like particles and that these particles represent a basic unit of all ‘retro‐systems’.
- Illness Online: Self-reported Data and Questions of Trust in Medical and Social Research.Sally Wyatt,Anna Harris,SamanthaAdams &Susan E. Kelly -2013 -Theory, Culture and Society 30 (4):131-150.Self-reported data are regarded by medical researchers as invalid and less reliable than data produced by experts in clinical settings, yet individuals can increasingly contribute personal information to medical research through a variety of online platforms. In this article we examine this ‘participatory turn’ in healthcare research, which claims to challenge conventional delineations of what is valid and reliable for medical practice, by using aggregated self-reported experiences from patients and ‘pre-patients’ via the internet. We focus on 23andMe, a genetic testing (...) company that collects genetic material and self-reported information about disease from its customers. Integral to this research method are relations of trust embedded in the information exchange: trust in customers’ data; trust between researchers/company and research subjects; trust in genetics; trust in the machine. We examine the performative dimension of these trust relations, drawing on Shapin and Schaffer’s (1985) discussion of how material, literary and social technologies are used in research in order to establish trust. Our scepticism of the company’s motives for building trust with the self-reporting consumer forces us to consider our own motives. How does the use of customer data for research purposes by 23andMe differ from the research practices of social scientists, especially those who also study digital traces? By interrogating the use of self-reported data in the genetic testing context, we examine our ethical responsibilities in studying the digital selves of others using internet methods. How researchers trust data, how participants trust researchers, and how technologies are trusted are all important considerations in studying the social life of digital data. (shrink)
- Friedrich Nietzsche.Hugh Adam Reyburn,H. E. Hinderks &James GardenTaylor -1946 - Kempen, Niederrhein,: Thomas-Verlag.
- Split brains: no headache for the soul theorist.David B. Hershenov &Adam P.Taylor -2014 -Religious Studies 50 (4):487-503.Split brains that result in two simultaneous streams of consciousness cut off from each other are wrongly held to be grounds for doubting the existence of the divinely created soul. The mistake is based on two related errors: first, a failure to appreciate the soul's dependence upon neurological functioning; second, a fallacious belief that if the soul is simple, i.e. without parts, then there must be a unity to its thought, all of its thoughts being potentially accessible to reflection or (...) even unreflective causal interactions. But a soul theorist can allow neurological events to keep some conscious thoughts unavailable to others. (shrink)
- Promoting coherent minimum reporting guidelines for biological and biomedical investigations: the MIBBI project.Chris F.Taylor,Dawn Field,Susanna-Assunta Sansone,Jan Aerts,Rolf Apweiler,Michael Ashburner,Catherine A. Ball,Pierre-Alain Binz,Molly Bogue,Tim Booth,Alvis Brazma,Ryan R. Brinkman,Adam Michael Clark,Eric W. Deutsch,Oliver Fiehn,Jennifer Fostel,Peter Ghazal,Frank Gibson,Tanya Gray,Graeme Grimes,John M. Hancock,Nigel W. Hardy,Henning Hermjakob,Randall K. Julian,Matthew Kane,Carsten Kettner,Christopher Kinsinger,Eugene Kolker,Martin Kuiper,Nicolas Le Novere,Jim Leebens-Mack,Suzanna E. Lewis,Phillip Lord,Ann-Marie Mallon,Nishanth Marthandan,Hiroshi Masuya,Ruth McNally,Alexander Mehrle,Norman Morrison,Sandra Orchard,John Quackenbush,James M. Reecy,Donald G. Robertson,Philippe Rocca-Serra,Henry Rodriguez,Heiko Rosenfelder,Javier Santoyo-Lopez,Richard H. Scheuermann,Daniel Schober,Barry Smith &Jason Snape -2008 -Nature Biotechnology 26 (8):889-896.Throughout the biological and biomedical sciences there is a growing need for, prescriptive ‘minimum information’ (MI) checklists specifying the key information to include when reporting experimental results are beginning to find favor with experimentalists, analysts, publishers and funders alike. Such checklists aim to ensure that methods, data, analyses and results are described to a level sufficient to support the unambiguous interpretation, sophisticated search, reanalysis and experimental corroboration and reuse of data sets, facilitating the extraction of maximum value from data sets (...) them. However, such ‘minimum information’ MI checklists are usually developed independently by groups working within representatives of particular biologically- or technologically-delineated domains. Consequently, an overview of the full range of checklists can be difficult to establish without intensive searching, and even tracking thetheir individual evolution of single checklists may be a non-trivial exercise. Checklists are also inevitably partially redundant when measured one against another, and where they overlap is far from straightforward. Furthermore, conflicts in scope and arbitrary decisions on wording and sub-structuring make integration difficult. This presents inhibit their use in combination. Overall, these issues present significant difficulties for the users of checklists, especially those in areas such as systems biology, who routinely combine information from multiple biological domains and technology platforms. To address all of the above, we present MIBBI (Minimum Information for Biological and Biomedical Investigations); a web-based communal resource for such checklists, designed to act as a ‘one-stop shop’ for those exploring the range of extant checklist projects, and to foster collaborative, integrative development and ultimately promote gradual integration of checklists. (shrink)
- New books. [REVIEW]A. E.Taylor,JohnAdams,P. E. Winter,F. C. S. Schiller,M. L.,S. R.,J. Waterlow,Francis Jones,B. Russell,E. M. Smith &A. D. Lindsay -1910 -Mind 19 (75):422-442.
- New books. [REVIEW]A. E.Taylor,S. F.,T. W. Levin,J. Adam,G. Heymans &C. A. F. Rhys Davids -1897 -Mind 6 (23):420-435.No categories
- When do bystanders get help from teachers or friends? Age and group membership matter when indirectly challenging social exclusion.Ayşe Şule Yüksel,Sally B. Palmer,Eirini Ketzitzidou Argyri &Adam Rutland -2022 -Frontiers in Psychology 13:833589.We examined developmental changes in British children’s (8- to 10-year-olds) and adolescents’ (13- to 15-year-olds,N = 340; FemaleN = 171, 50.3%) indirect bystander reactions (i.e., judgments about whether to get help and from whom when witnessing social exclusion) and their social-moral reasoning regarding their reactions to social exclusion. We also explored, for the first time, how the group membership of the excluder and victim affect participants’ reactions. Participants read a hypothetical scenario in which they witnessed a peer being excluded from (...) a school club by another peer. We manipulated the group membership of the victim (either British or an immigrant) and the group membership of the excluder (either British or an immigrant). Participants’ likelihood of indirect bystander reactions decreased from childhood into adolescence. Children were more likely to get help from a teacher or an adult than getting help from a friend, whereas adolescents were more likely to get help from a friend than getting help from a teacher or an adult. For both indirect bystander reactions, children justified their likelihood of responding by referring to their trust in their teachers and friends. Adolescents were more likely to refer to group loyalty and dynamics, and psychological reasons. The findings support and extend the Social Reasoning Developmental (SRD) approach by showing the importance of group processes with age in shaping children’s judgments about how to respond indirectly by asking for help from others, when they are bystanders in a situation that involves exclusion. The findings have practical implications for combating social exclusion and promoting prosocial bystander behavior in schools. (shrink)
- ADAM, A. M. -Plato: Moral and Political Ideals. [REVIEW]A. E.Taylor -1913 -Mind 22:585.Export citation
Bookmark - Effects of the serotonin transporter polymorphism and history of major depression on overgeneral autobiographical memory.Jennifer A. Sumner,Suzanne Vrshek-Schallhorn,Susan Mineka,Richard E. Zinbarg,Michelle G. Craske,Eva E. Redei,Kate Wolitzky-Taylor &Emma K. Adam -2014 -Cognition and Emotion 28 (5):947-958.
- Therapeutae J. E.Taylor: Jewish Women Philosophers of First-Century Alexandria. Philo's 'Therapeutae' Reconsidered . Pp. xvi + 417, map, ills. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. Cased, £70. ISBN: 0-19-925961-. [REVIEW]Adam Kamesar -2005 -The Classical Review 55 (02):596-.
- ADAM, JAMES.-The Vitality of Platonism and Other Essays. [REVIEW]A. E.Taylor -1912 -Mind 21:117.Export citation Bookmark
- Market Freedom as Antipower.Robert S.Taylor -2013 -American Political Science Review 107 (3):593-602.Historically, republicans were of different minds about markets: some, such as Rousseau, reviled them, while others, like Adam Smith, praised them. The recent republican resurgence has revived this issue. Classical liberals such as Gerald Gaus contend that neo-republicanism is inherently hostile to markets, while neo-republicans like Richard Dagger and Philip Pettit reject this characterization—though with less enthusiasm than one might expect. I argue here that the right republican attitude toward competitive markets is celebratory rather than acquiescent and that republicanism demands (...) such markets for the same reason it requires the rule of law: because both are essential institutions for protecting individuals from arbitrary interference. I reveal how competition restrains—and in the limit, even eradicates—market power and thereby helps us realize “market freedom,” i.e., freedom as non-domination in the context of economic exchange. Finally, I show that such freedom necessitates “Anglo-Nordic” economic policies. (shrink)
- Socrates, 'Qvantvm Mvtatvs Ab Illo'.Adela Marion Adam -1918 -Classical Quarterly 12 (3-4):121-.The Times Literary Supplement of November 8, 1917, contained, under the title of Socrates recognitns, a review of Plato's Biography of Socrates, a lecture delivered by Professor A. E.Taylor to the British Academy in the early part of last year. The opening sentence of the review is as follows: ‘Next to the problem of the Gospels ranks that of the Platonic dialogues amongst those most vital to the history of the human spirit.’ A little further down the reviewer (...) says: ‘It is much to the credit of British scholarship—and especially to that of the University of St. Andrews—that it should have attacked these problems with untiring energy, and propounded solutions which, although they run counter to most of the traditional tendencies of historical and philosophical criticism, have not only challenged attention, but are carrying conviction even to unlikely quarters.’ And again, at the end of the article, we read this passage: ‘It is scarcely to be thought that the ground won by the scholars of St. Andrews will be held without counter-attack; but this is slow to mature, and in the meanwhile such essays as the subject of this notice, with which we may couple the paper recently read to the British Academy by Professor Burnet on the Socratic doctrine of the soul, serve to buttress and consolidate the position.’. (shrink)
- Commercial Republicanism.Robert S.Taylor -2024 - In Frank Lovett & Mortimer Sellers,Oxford Handbook of Republicanism. Oxford University Press.Commercial republicanism is the idea that a properly-structured commercial society can serve the republican end of minimizing the domination of citizens by states (imperium) and of citizens by other citizens (dominium). Much has been written about this idea in the last half-century, including analyses of individual commercial republicans (e.g., Adam Smith and Immanuel Kant) as well as discussions of national traditions of the same (e.g., in America, Britain, France, the Netherlands, and Italy). In this chapter, I review five kinds of (...) arguments that have been historically offered for how commercial society so understood advances the republican ideal of non-domination: first, by simply realizing non-dominating relationships in the marketplace itself (Instantiation); second, by encouraging the growth of a wide middle class that can offer a counterweight to other, dominating classes (Internal Check-and-Balance); third, by increasing the wealth and power of republics vis-à-vis other, dominating states in the international arena (External Check-and-Balance); fourth, by helpfully nurturing bourgeois-civic virtues in republican citizens (Cultivating Virtue); and finally, by transforming dangerous passions into more readily regulable, even socially beneficial material interests (Sublimating Vice). I end the chapter by briefly considering commercial republicanism’s prospects as a continuing research program. (shrink)
- The Ethical Doctrine of Hobbes.A. E.Taylor -1938 -Philosophy 13 (52):406 - 424.The moral doctrine of Hobbes, in many ways the most interesting of our major British philosophers, is, I think, commonly seen in a false perspective which has seriously obscured its real affinities. This is, no doubt, largely due to the fact that most modern readers begin and end their study of Hobbes's ethics with the Leviathan , a rhetorical and, in many ways, a popular Streitschrift published in the very culmination of what looked at the time to be a permanent (...) revolution, and do not pay such attention to the more calmly argued statements of the same doctrine contained in the Elements of Law , circulated before the outbreak of the Civil War, or the De Cive. (shrink)
- The problematic allure of the binary in nursing theoretical discourse.Sally E. Thorne,Angela D. Henderson,Gladys I. McPherson &Barbara K. Pesut -2004 -Nursing Philosophy 5 (3):208-215.Recent ideological positioning on the world stage has born a startling resemblance to a form of positioning within nursing theory – that of taking complex ideas, reducing them to a simplistic binary form, and uncritically adopting one half of that form. In some cases, this adoption of a binary position has led to a passionately held form of ‘othering’ that prohibits a healthy and critical engagement with ideas. As alluring as settling for the binary form may be – we argue (...) for holding binaries in tension as a catalyst for stimulating dialogue – reasoning and exploration of new ways of wrestling with the social and moral complexity of nursing. (shrink)
- Contemporary British Philosophy.A. E.Taylor -1927 -Mind 36:123.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- The "Parmenides" of Plato.A. E.Taylor -1935 -Philosophy 10 (38):230-231.No categories
- The problematic allure of the binary in nursing theoretical discourse.Sally E. Thorne R. N. PhD,Angela D. Henderson R. N. PhD,D. Ph &M. S. N. Rn -2004 -Nursing Philosophy 5 (3):208–215.
- Deflationism, Creeping Minimalism, and Explanations of Content.David E.Taylor -2019 -Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 101 (1):101-129.Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, EarlyView.No categories
- Speculations on Language in the Arts.Sally E. Mitchell -2001 -The Journal of Aesthetic Education 35 (2):87.
- People and their parts: Deconstructing the debates in theorizing nursing's clients.Sally E. Thorne RN PhD -2001 -Nursing Philosophy 2 (3):259–262.
- Concepts of God and their origins.James E.Taylor -2024 - In Mirosław Szatkowski,Ontology of Divinity. Boston: De Gruyter.Export citation Bookmark
- Mind and Nature.A. E.Taylor -1903 -Philosophical Review 12:86.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Learning to Fly: Vocabulary Acquisition and Extensive Reading in an Intermediate Classical Greek Class.AllisonTaylor-Adams -2016 -Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 109 (4):525-542.No categories
- Partial reason: critical and constructive transformations of ethics and epistemology.Sally E. Talbot -2000 - Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Proposes an original theory of the ethic of care, drawing insights from feminist and non-feminist critics of liberal moral theory, feminist ethics and ...
- Can Ordinary Materialists Be Autonomous?David Hershenov &Adam P.Taylor -2016 -Philosophia Christi 18 (2):411-431.We argue that the secular cannot offer a materialist response to “The Problem of Too Many Thinkers” that makes autonomy possible. The materialist can accommodate what truths about respecting personal freedom and autonomy only by accepting a counterintuitive sparse ontology. Immaterial accounts of the person look good by comparison. However, those immaterialist theories that don’t posit a divinely created soul suffer from certain metaphysical puzzles avoided by those who do claim divine creation. A soul that requires divine creation strongly suggests (...) that such immaterial beings were made for a purpose. Such purposeful creation makes theistic ethics seem far more plausible. (shrink)
- Plato.A. E.Taylor -1910 -Mind 19 (73):117-121.No categories
- Extinction effects following nondifferential reinforcement of an irrelevant stimulus.Sally E. Sperling -1962 -Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (1):50.
- People and their parts: deconstructing the debates in theorizing nursing's clients.Sally E. Thorne -2001 -Nursing Philosophy 2 (3):259-262.
- Plato. Philebus and Epinomis.A. E.Taylor -1956 -Philosophy 34 (129):182-183.
- (1 other version)The Faith of a Moralist.A. E.Taylor -1931 -Mind 40 (159):364-375.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- (1 other version)Plato.A. E.Taylor -1927 - New York,: L. MacVeagh, The Dial press.This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain (...) in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant. (shrink)
- The ore in simultaneous and differential reversal: Acquisition task, acquisition criterion, and reversal task.Sally E. Sperling -1970 -Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (2):349.No categories
- Freedom and Personality Again.A. E.Taylor -1942 -Philosophy 17 (65):26 - 37.In an essay entitled “Freedom and Personality” I have contended that “intelligence is a principle of indetermination within us.” As I find that my argument, though to myself it appears incontrovertible, has not produced conviction in some quarters where I had hoped it might be effective, I can only suppose that, presumably by my own fault, it was not stated as clearly as it should have been. This must be my excuse for returning to the subject; in doing so I (...) shall try to be, to the best of my power, at once brief and lucid. (shrink)
- Salvation in Indian Philosophy: Perfection and Simplicity for Vaiśeṣika. By Ionut Moise.Adam P.Taylor -2021 -Teaching Philosophy 44 (1):117-120.
- (1 other version)Elements of Metaphysics.A. E.Taylor -1903 - New York,: Routledge.First published in 1903,Taylor endeavours to provide a detailed study of metaphysic as a discipline. Opening with a brief history of metaphysics, the book explores topics including the problem of the metaphysician, the metaphysical method, subdivisions of metaphysics, ontology, reality, cosmology, rational psychology, morality, ethics and religion.
- Back to Descartes.A. E.Taylor -1941 -Philosophy 16 (62):126 - 137.I must explain at once that these few pages do not attempt or pretend to be anything like a formal review of the recently published posthumous volume of Professor Bowman with the same title. I am precluded from writing such a review partly by the wide range of problems attacked by the author, partly by my own insufficient familiarity with many of the positions of the most recent physical and natural science which are brought under review. I will therefore confine (...) myself, so far as the strict business of the reviewer is concerned, to the single remark that the editor, Professor J. W. Scott, has discharged his difficult task of preparing the book for publication—no easy matter, as will be seen from his Preface—with equal skill and devotion, and has laid himself open to no worse criticism than that there are less than a dozen obvious slight misprints which have escaped detection, but will readily be detected by a careful reader. What I propose to do in the remarks which follow is simply to indicate the very real importance of the book by saying something as to its main purpose and thesis, and the points where I still feel that there is some difficulty or ambiguity about the writer's position which would, no doubt, have been largely cleared up if he had lived to reconstruct the whole six of his Vanuxem Lectures for publication as he has done the first three. (shrink)
- Science and Morality.A. E.Taylor -1939 -Philosophy 14 (53):24 - 45.Can there be such a thing as moral science, or a science of morality? And if so, what sense has the word science in such a connection? In the middle of the last century such a question would probably have seemed superfluous. Utilitarians, Comtists, and not a few “evolutionists” would all have claimed to be moralists, with this advantage over the metaphysical or theological moralists of an earlier day that their own moral doctrines were “scientific”.
- Aristotle.A. E.Taylor -1944 -Philosophy 19 (73):159-159.No categories
- Varia Socratica.A. E.Taylor -1912 -Mind 21 (83):438-444.No categories
- Review of Idealism: New Essays in Metaphysics. [REVIEW]AdamTaylor -2018 -Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (2018).The familiar narrative about the early days of analytic philosophy tells us of its triumph over the needless metaphysical excesses of its immediate forerunners, the idealists. In one form or another, idealism was the paramount philosophical view of the 19th century. Nowadays, however, the bulwarks of idealism are largely abandoned. Few defend the view, and fewer still are willing to take the time to consider its claims seriously. Materialism and dualism dominate the philosophical landscape.
- Amount of position responding in discrimination reversal and speed of reversal.Sally E. Sperling &Stephen G. Yoder -1969 -Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (3p1):573.
- Epicurus.A. E.Taylor -1912 -International Journal of Ethics 22 (2):226-227.
- Plantinga's proper functioning analysis of epistemic warrant.James E.Taylor -1991 -Philosophical Studies 64 (2):185-202.No categories
- Freedom and Personality.A. E.Taylor -1939 -Philosophy 14 (55):259 - 280.Is it possible to say anything on the well-worn theme of human freedom or unfreedom which has not been ahready better said by someone else before us? It may be doubted; yet it is always worth while to see whether we cannot at least set what is perhaps already familiar to us in a fresh light and so come to a clearer comprehension of our own meaning. This, at any rate, is all that will be attempted in these pages; I (...) have spoken in an earlier essay of the “practical situation” in which we find ourselves whenever we have to make a decision as involving indetermination , and my purpose is simply to make it plainer to myself, and so incidentally perhaps to a reader, what I mean by such an expression. I shall start, then, by adopting what we may perhaps agree to call a phenomenological attitude to the subject; that is, I will try to describe the facts in a way which anyone who recalls occasions when he has been driven to take a decision will recognize as faithful to his experience, without imparting into the description any element of explanatory speculative hypothesis. The description is meant to be one which will be admitted to be true to the “appearances,” independently of any theory about the “freedom of the will”—to describe correctly that which it is the object of all such theories to explain. (shrink)
- Aristotle on His Predecessors, Being the First Book of His Metaphysics.A. E.Taylor -1908 -Mind 17 (65):110-113.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- On the Interpretation of Plato's Parmenides.A. E.Taylor -1897 -Philosophical Review 6:207.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
| 1 — 50 / 881 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6dc498764b-55mvq uwo