Results for 'S. J. Arthur Madigan'
968 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- Robert Spaemann’s Philosophische Essays.S. J.ArthurMadigan -1997 -Review of Metaphysics 51 (1):105-132.IN 1983 THE STUTTGART PUBLISHING FIRM OF PHILIPP RECLAM brought out a slim volume containing an introduction and seven essays by Robert Spaemann, then Professor of Philosophy at the University of Munich. Entitled Philosophische Essays, it presents and illustrates Spaemann’s philosophical project: to understand the phenomenon of modernity, to criticize the deficiencies of modern thought, and to preserve what is good in modernity by rehabilitating the teleological understanding of nature that modernity largely rejected. A second edition in 1994 included three (...) more essays. As little of Spaemann’s work has yet appeared in English, the aim of this paper is modest: to present as clearly and accurately as possible his position in the Philosophische Essays. (shrink)No categoriesExport citation
Bookmark - Alasdair MacIntyre on political thinking and the tasks of politics.S. J.ArthurMadigan -2011 - In Catherine H. Zuckert,Political Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: Authors and Arguments. New York: Cambridge University Press.Export citation Bookmark
- Commentaries on Aristotle’s “On Sense and What Is Sensed” and “On Memory and Recollection”. [REVIEW]S. J.ArthurMadigan -2005 -Review of Metaphysics 59 (2):403-403.These commentaries will obviously be of interest to students of Aquinas. They should also be of interest to students of Aristotle, but with one caveat. The translators have had the delicate task of rendering into English not Aristotle’s Greek but the Latin translation of it on which Aquinas is commenting. As the Latin translates Aristotle on something close to a word-for-word basis, so the translators have translated the Latin version of Aristotle into English almost word-for-word. Further, as Macierowski explains, they (...) have taken care to preserve the opacity of terms that Aquinas explains in his commentary; to have clarified these opaque terms in the initial translation of Aristotle’s text would have made Aquinas’s later clarifications nugatory. The rationale is clear and the policy defensible, but the resulting translation of Aristotle can be rough going, for example, “for it is not just from a distance, and not close up, that one of the mixed colors appears, but from anywhere” ; “Therefore they seek in this way, and, not seeking, they still recollect in this way, when that motion comes into being after the other one; but it used to come about when the other motions such as we have. (shrink)No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Animal Minds and Human Morals. The Origins of the Western Debate. [REVIEW]S. J.ArthurMadigan -1995 -Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 18 (2):241-244.This is a learned and informative study in ancient philosophy of mind and in ancient ethics and religious practice. It consists of two parts. Chapters 1-8 are a study in ancient philosophy of mind, and in particular in ancient views about the mental or psychological capacities of animals. Sorabji begins with the claims of Aristotle and the Stoics that animals do not have reason or belief. This denial of reason and belief to animals led Aristotle and the Stoics to reexamine (...) such psychological capacities as perception, perceptual appearance, belief, concept-possession, memory, intention, preparation, anger and other emotions, and speech. Sorabji also shows how Pythagoreans, Platonists, and some of Aristotle’s successors, such as Theophrastus, contested the Aristotelian and Stoic denial of reason to animals. Aristotle’s interests in these matters were mainly scientific, but for the Stoics and for their opponents the question about animal rationality raised religious and ethical issues, which Sorabji explores in chapters 9-15. He surveys Stoic, Epicurean, Neoplatonist, and Christian discussions of the treatment of animals, and in particular of the eating of meat and of animal sacrifice. He finds that the moral status of animals and their claims on humans were the matter of a serious and extended debate in pagan philosophy, a debate that has been largely overlooked ever since Western Christianity accepted the Stoic denial of reason to animals and its supposed consequence, the denial that animals have any claims on humans. Sorabji finds the Aristotelian and Stoic arguments against animal rationality less than persuasive, but his more substantive philosophical contention is that even if these arguments worked they would not be relevant to the moral issue of how humans should treat animals; what is relevant is that animals can feel pain. (shrink)No categories
- Review Article — Aristotelians Meet Liberals.S. J.ArthurMadigan -2003 -Polis 20 (1-2):138-151.No categories
- Plato and Aristotle in agreement?: Platonists on Aristotle from antiochus to porphyry—george E. Karamanolis.S. J.ArthurMadigan -2007 -International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (2):243-245.
- Book review: The Reception of Aristotle’s Ethics, written by Jon Miller. [REVIEW]S. J.ArthurMadigan -2014 -Polis 31 (2):443-449.
- Legor et Legar.Timothy J.Madigan -1998 -Philo 1 (2):36-48.Friedrich Nietzsche referred toArthur Schopenhauer as the first inexorable atheist among German philosophers. Yet Schopenhauer’s philosophy---in particular his discussion of “compassion” as the basis of morality---can serve as a starting point for dialogue among Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, Christians, Muslims, and atheistic humanists, all of whom need to address what Raimundo Panikkar calls “The Silence of God.”.
- Aristotle’s De anima.S.ArthurMadigan -2009 -International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (3):402-404.
- Graceful Reason: Essays in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy Presented to Joseph Owens, CSSR. [REVIEW]S.ArthurMadigan -1985 -Ancient Philosophy 5 (1):136-140.
- Plato, Aristotle and Professor MacIntyre.S.ArthurMadigan -1983 -Ancient Philosophy 3 (2):171-183.
- Dimensions of Voluntariness in EN iii 12.1119a 21-23.S.ArthurMadigan -1986 -Ancient Philosophy 6:139-152.
- The Mind of Aristotle. [REVIEW]S.ArthurMadigan -1993 -Ancient Philosophy 13 (2):435-439.
- On Aristotle's Metaphysics: On Aristotle's metaphysics 2 & 3.W. E. Alexander,Arthur Dooley &Madigan -1989
- Degeneracy: Its Causes, Signs, and Results. Eugene S. Talbot.J.Arthur Thomson -1899 -International Journal of Ethics 9 (4):524-526.
- Stimulus probability and sequential effect in recognition memory.Richard S. Marken &Arthur J. Sandusky -1974 -Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 4 (1):49-51.
- Mrs Henry Sidgwick, A Contribution to the Study of the Psychology of Mrs Piper's Trance Phenomena. [REVIEW]J.Arthur Hill -1915 -Hibbert Journal 14:845.Export citation Bookmark
- Aristotle: Metaphysics Books B and K 1-2.ArthurMadigan (ed.) -1999 - Oxford University Press.ArthurMadigan presents a clear, accurate new translation of the third book of Aristotle's Metaphysics, together with two related chapters from the eleventh book.Madigan's accompanying introduction and commentary give detailed guidance to these texts, in which Aristotle sets out the main questions of metaphysics and assesses the main answers to them, and which serve as a useful introduction not just to Aristotle's own work on metaphysics but to classical metaphysics in general.
- The Knowledge of Good: Critique of Axiological Reason.Robert S. Hartman,Arthur R. Ellis &Rem B. Edwards (eds.) -2002 - BRILL.This book presents Robert S. Hartman’s formal theory of value and critically examines many other twentieth century value theorists in its light, including A.J. Ayer, Kurt Baier, Brand Blanshard, Paul Edwards, Albert Einstein, William K. Frankena, R.M. Hare, Nicolai Hartmann, Martin Heidegger, G.E. Moore, P.H. Nowell-Smith, Jose Ortega y Gasset, Charles Stevenson, Paul W. Taylor, Stephen E. Toulmin, and J.O. Urmson.
- Sex in Man and Animals. By John R. Baker. With a Preface by Julian S. Huxley. [REVIEW]J.Arthur Thomson -1927 -Philosophy 2 (8):572.
- Philosophy in american colleges and universities.John Dewey,G. H. Howison,Geo S. Fullerton,Arthur MacDonald,J. W. Stearns &B. P. Bowne -1890 -The Monist 1 (1):148 - 156.
- Contemporary Aristotelian ethics: Alasdair MacIntyre, Martha Nussbaum, Robert Spaemann.ArthurMadigan -2024 - Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.ArthurMadigan's Contemporary Aristotelian Ethics examines the work of Alasdair MacIntyre, Martha Nussbaum, and Robert Spaemann in the context of twentieth-century Anglo-American moral philosophy. By surveying the ways in which these three philosophers appropriate Aristotle,Madigan illustrates two important points: first, that the most pressing problems in contemporary moral philosophy can be addressed using the Aristotelian tradition and, second, that the Aristotelian tradition does not speak with one voice.Madigan demonstrates that Aristotelian moral philosophy is divided (...) on important issues, such as the value of liberal modernity, the character and provenance of our current moral landscape, and the role of nature in Aristotle's ethics. Through his examination of MacIntyre, Nussbaum, and Spaemann,Madigan offers a vision for the future of Aristotelian moral philosophy, urging today's philosophers to set a clear educational agenda, to continue refining their concepts and intuitions, and to engage with new conversation partners from other philosophical traditions. (shrink)No categories
- Phenomenology of Religion and the Art of Story-Telling: The Relevance of William Golding'S ‘The Inheritors’ To Religious Studies*: C. J.ARTHUR.C. J.Arthur -1987 -Religious Studies 23 (1):59-79.One of the most extensive yet least conclusive methodological debates within religious studies revolves around the question of what, precisely, the phenomenology of religion is and what contribution it can make to the study of religion. I do not intend to answer this important question here. To do so satisfactorily would require a range of historical, philosophical and methodological inquiry which would go quite beyond the bounds of a single article. My intention in this paper is, by comparison, unambitious. It (...) is to take one view of what phenomenology of religion is and to consider an area outside that usually explored by students of religion which can, nonetheless, shed some light on how religions might be studied in a way which is in accordance with the phenomenology of religion so understood. What follows will offer an answer to the question of what contribution one particular understanding of phenomenology might make to the study of religion, but no attempt will be made to establish whether or not this particular understanding ought to be regarded as normative. (shrink)
- Automatic analyses of language, discourse, and situation models.Arthur C. Graesser,Moongee Jeon,Zhiqiang Cai,Danielle S. McNamara,J. Auracher &W. van Peer -2008 - In Jan Auracher & Willie van Peer,New Beginnings in Literary Studies. Cambridge Scholars Press.
- State, ethics and public morality in American sociological thought.Arthur J. Vidich &S. Lyman -1986 - In Mark L. Wardell & Stephen P. Turner,Sociological theory in transition. Boston: Allen & Unwin. pp. 44--56.No categories
- Effect of alcohol on running-wheel activity in rats.Arthur S. Wilson &Richard J. Carter -1973 -Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1 (4):233-234.
- Metaphysics Books B and K 1-2.ArthurMadigan (ed.) -1999 - Oxford University Press UK.ArthurMadigan presents a clear, accurate new translation of the third book of Aristotle's Metaphysics, together with two related chapters from the eleventh book.Madigan's accompanying introduction and commentary give detailed guidance to these texts, in which Aristotle sets out what he takes to be the main problems of metaphysics or 'first philosophy' and assesses possible solutions to them; he takes his starting-point from the work of earlier philosophers, especially Plato and some of the Presocratics. These texts (...) serve as a useful introduction both to Aristotle's own work on metaphysics and to classical metaphysics in general; they are also a good example of Aristotle's dialectical method, which reasons not from known truths but from reputable opinions. (shrink)
- Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, Deafness and the Body.S. Kay Toombs,Lisa Sowle Cahill,Margaret A. Farley,Paul A. Komesaroff,Arthur W. Frank &Lennard J. Davis -1997 -Hastings Center Report 27 (5):39.
- Commentaries on Aristotle’s “On Sense and What Is Sensed” and “On Memory and Recollection”.ArthurMadigan -2005 -Review of Metaphysics 59 (2):403-404.
- Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Metaphysics 4.ArthurMadigan,William E. Dooley,Charles Hagen,Paul Lettick &J. Urmson -1995 -Philosophical Quarterly 45 (179):260-264.No categories
- University of Pennsylvania Bicentennial Conference. Studies in Civilization.Studies in the History of Science. [REVIEW]E. N.,Alan J. B. Wace,Otto E. Neugebauer,William S. Ferguson,Arthur E. R. Boak,Edward K. Rand,Arthur C. Howland,Charles G. Osgood,William J. Entwistle,John H. Randall,Carlton J. H. Hayes,Charles H. McIlwain,Arthur M. Schlesinger,Charles Cestre,Stanley T. Williams,E. A. Speiser,Hermann Ranke,Henry E. Sigerist,Richard H. Shryock,Evarts A. Graham,A. Graham,Edgar A. Singer &Hermann Weyl -1941 -Journal of Philosophy 38 (21):586.No categories
- Panentheism and the Classical God-World Relationship: A Systems-Oriented Approach.S. J. Joseph A. Bracken -2015 -American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 36 (3):207-225.Panentheism has become a familiar term in contemporary Christian systematic theology and philosophy, for it is widely believed to be an appropriate way to overcome the alleged dualism found in the classical God-world relationship. But what is meant by the term panentheism, and how does it work so as to avoid becoming still another form of pantheism or cosmic monism? In 2004 Philip Clayton and the lateArthur Peacocke published a set of papers on the topic of panentheism that (...) came from a conference in England on that topic in 2001.1 Yet, while there were certain broad affinities in approach and content among many of the papers, none of them used precisely the same conceptual model for analysis of the concept. As.. (shrink)
- Fair, just and compassionate: A pilot for making allocation decisions for patients requesting experimental drugs outside of clinical trials.Arthur L. Caplan,J. Russell Teagarden,Lisa Kearns,Alison S. Bateman-House,Edith Mitchell,Thalia Arawi,Ross Upshur,Ilina Singh,Joanna Rozynska,Valerie Cwik &Sharon L. Gardner -2018 -Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (11):761-767.Patients have received experimental pharmaceuticals outside of clinical trials for decades. There are no industry-wide best practices, and many companies that have granted compassionate use, or ‘preapproval’, access to their investigational products have done so without fanfare and without divulging the process or grounds on which decisions were made. The number of compassionate use requests has increased over time. Driving the demand are new treatments for serious unmet medical needs; patient advocacy groups pressing for access to emerging treatments; internet platforms (...) enabling broad awareness of compelling cases or novel drugs and a lack of trust among some that the pharmaceutical industry and/or the FDA have patients’ best interests in mind. High-profile cases in the media have highlighted the gap between patient expectations for compassionate use and company utilisation of fair processes to adjudicate requests. With many pharmaceutical manufacturers, patient groups, healthcare providers and policy analysts unhappy with the inequities of the status quo, fairer and more ethical management of compassionate use requests was needed. This paper reports on a novel collaboration between a pharmaceutical company and an academic medical ethics department that led to the formation of the Compassionate Use Advisory Committee. Comprising medical experts, bioethicists and patient representatives, CompAC established an ethical framework for the allocation of a scarce investigational oncology agent to single patients requesting non-trial access. This is the first account of how the committee was formed and how it built an ethical framework and put it into practice. (shrink)
- The Interpreter's Bible.GeorgeArthur Buttrick,O. S. Rankin,Gaius Glenn Atkins,Theophile J. Meek,Hugh Thomson Kerr,R. B. Y. Scott,G. G. D. Kilpatrick,James Muilenberg,Henry Sloane Coffin,James Philip Hyatt &Stanley Romaine Hopper -1956No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- On the Trinity, Books 8–15. [REVIEW]S. J. David Vincent Mecone -2003 -Review of Metaphysics 57 (1):140-140.St. Augustine tells us that he worked on the De Trinitate on and off between 400 and 416. The aim of this work is basically twofold: to examine both how the absolute monotheism of Christianity can speak of three divine persons as well as to examine how humanity images this triune God. A rare treasure of theology and psychology, the DT has shaped most of the West’s talk about the Trinity. For how we read Scripture’s often oblique references to the (...) Trinity, how we understand the Trinitarian relations within God as well as what it means that the human person is created in this divine image, have been largely determined by Augustine. Given the importance and influence of the DT, it is curious that an English edition did not appear until the late nineteenth century when Philip Schaff includedArthur West Haddan’s translation in the 1887 Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers series. Since then only two more full English translations have appeared: Stephen McKenna’s in 1963 and Edmund Hill’s in 1991. (shrink)No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Metaphysics 4.Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Metaphysics 5.Simplicius. On Aristotle Physics 7.Philoponus. On Aristotle Physics 5-8.Simplicius. On Aristotle on the Void. [REVIEW]Lloyd P. Gerson,ArthurMadigan,William E. Dooley,Charles Hagen,Paul Lettick &J. O. Urmson -1995 -Philosophical Quarterly 45 (179):260.
- The diffusion (nt, mobility and lifetime of minority carriers in germanium containing parallel arrays of dislocations.J. B.Arthur,A. F. Gibson,J. W. Granvtlle &E. G. S. Paige -1958 -Philosophical Magazine 3 (33):940-949.No categories
- Socrates Dissatisfied: An Analysis of Plato’s Crito. [REVIEW]ArthurMadigan -1999 -International Philosophical Quarterly 39 (2):237-238.
- Book Review:Crime in Its Relation to Social Progress.Arthur Cleveland Hall. [REVIEW]S. J. Barrows -1903 -International Journal of Ethics 13 (2):254-.
- Robert Spaemann’s Philosophische Essays.ArthurMadigan -1997 -Review of Metaphysics 51 (1):105-132.
- (1 other version)The world as will and representation.Arthur Schopenhauer &E. F. J. Payne -1958 - New York,: Dover Publications. Edited by Judith Norman, Alistair Welchman & Christopher Janaway.First published in 1818, The World as Will and Representation contains Schopenhauer's entire philosophy, ranging through epistemology, metaphysics, philosophy of mind and action, aesthetics and philosophy of art, to ethics, the meaning of life and the philosophy of religion, in an attempt to account for the world in all its significant aspects. It gives a unique and influential account of what is and is not of value in existence, the striving and pain of the human condition and the possibility of (...) deliverance from it. This new translation of the first volume of what later became a two-volume work reflects the eloquence and power of Schopenhauer's prose and renders philosophical terms accurately and consistently. It offers an introduction, glossary of names and bibliography, and succinct editorial notes, including notes on the revisions of the text which Schopenhauer made in 1844 and 1859. (shrink)
- One and Many in Aristotle's Metaphysics. [REVIEW]ArthurMadigan -1992 -Review of Metaphysics 46 (1):157-158.This is the second volume of a three-volume study of one and many in Aristotle's Metaphysics. It covers Metaphysics 6, 7, 8, and 9. Chapter 4 summarizes the results of the textual analysis. Halper argues against three interpretations of form. Against the view that form is individual, he presents texts showing the universality and knowability of form. Form is universal because it is one in formula. Against the view that form is a kind of universal, he presents texts which insist (...) on the numerical unity of form. Form is individual because it is numerically one. The view that form is neither universal nor individual does not square with the requirement that form be the cause of unity in a thing. (shrink)
- Further analysis of active and passive touch in pattern discrimination.Arthur S. Schwartz,Alan J. Perey &Alan Azulay -1975 -Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 6 (1):7-9.
- Plato's Protagoras. A Socratic Commentary. By B. A. F. Hubbard and E. S. Karnofsky. [REVIEW]ArthurMadigan -1987 -Modern Schoolman 64 (3):227-228.
- Baudrillard's America: Lost in the Ultimate Simulacrum.Arthur J. Vidich -1991 -Theory, Culture and Society 8 (2):135-144.
- Special editor's note.Arthur J. Vidich -forthcoming -Social Research: An International Quarterly.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Stimulus area, stimulus dispersion, flash duration, and the scotopic threshold.Oscar S. Adams,Davis J. Chambliss &Arthur J. Riopelle -1955 -Journal of Experimental Psychology 49 (6):428.
- Fabius and minucius in tacitus: Intertextuality and allusion in annals book 15.Arthur J. Pomeroy -2017 -Classical Quarterly 67 (2):583-596.Roman conflict with Parthia in the mid first century for control of Armenia and Domitius Corbulo's exploits in the East, culminating in the Parthian candidate for the throne, Tiridates, receiving his diadem from the hands of the Emperor Nero in Rome, have frequently been studied for what they reveal about military and diplomatic manoeuvres under the later Julio-Claudians. The historiographical investigation of our main source, Tacitus, particularly through comparison with the fragments of Cassius Dio, is also important for the light (...) this sheds on the Roman senator's methods. The intention of this paper is to draw attention to the complexity of Tacitus’ account by indicating his use of multiple and sometimes contradictory viewpoints in his narration of Caesennius Paetus’ unsuccessful Armenian campaign of a.d. 62–63 and to highlight an unrecognized echoing of his predecessor Livy by the historian. The examination of a text that is as elusive as it is allusive will require a careful study of what must have been a debated incident, but, as I hope to show, will give a broader insight into the historian's methods and, perhaps, wider intentions. I begin with an outline of historical events and the sources available to the historian. Next, I present a narratological examination of the text to show how differing viewpoints are highlighted within a contested storyline. I then show how this confusion may appear to be dispelled by a strong plot-line that borrows heavily from Livy, wherein the actions of an older, experienced general are contrasted with those of his subordinate. However, aspects of this account suggest that the tensions within the narrative are not resolved and that this has wider implications for our understanding of the historian and his work. (shrink)No categories
- The morality of leadership: more than ethics: the leader's response to unethical conduct.William J.Arthur -1992 - New York: Vantage Press.
- Friar, Scientist and Philosopher.Arthur J. Walter -1926 -Modern Schoolman 3 (6):85-86.ANNOUNCEMENT has just recently come from the University of Pennsylvania that one of the professors in the University is preparing the first English translationof the eminent Franciscan's "opus magniam". The Editor.No categories
| 1 — 50 / 968 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-v2wt2 uwo