Results for 'S. C. Vidyabhusana'
949 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- Tattvacintāmaṇiḥ: Upādhyādibādhāntaḥ.S. C.Vidyabhusana &Nagin J. Shah -2005 - DillI: Motilal Banarsidass. Edited by Nagīna Jī Śāha & Guṇaratnagaṇi.The present commentary on it greatly contributes to the understanding of thisvery important work. In fact, it is a good expositary commentary, lucidly explaning the knotty points. It evinces deep study and understanding of Navya-Nyaya and its methodology.yhus, the sukhabodhika Tippanika represents a positive and distinctive contribution to the vast commercial literature on the Tattvacimtamani.
- S. C. Kleene. General recursive functions of natural numbers. Mathematische Annalen, Bd. 112 (1935–1936), S. 727–742.S. C. Kleene -1937 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 2 (1):38-38.
- The mathematical work of S. C. Kleene.J. R. Shoenfield &S. C. Kleene -1995 -Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 1 (1):8-43.§1. The origins of recursion theory. In dedicating a book to Steve Kleene, I referred to him as the person who made recursion theory into a theory. Recursion theory was begun by Kleene's teacher at Princeton, Alonzo Church, who first defined the class of recursive functions; first maintained that this class was the class of computable functions ; and first used this fact to solve negatively some classical problems on the existence of algorithms. However, it was Kleene who, in his (...) thesis and in his subsequent attempts to convince himself of Church's Thesis, developed a general theory of the behavior of the recursive functions. He continued to develop this theory and extend it to new situations throughout his mathematical career. Indeed, all of the research which he did had a close relationship to recursive functions.Church's Thesis arose in an accidental way. In his investigations of a system of logic which he had invented, Church became interested in a class of functions which he called the λ-definable functions. Initially, Church knew that the successor function and the addition function were λ-definable, but not much else. During 1932, Kleene gradually showed1 that this class of functions was quite extensive; and these results became an important part of his thesis 1935a. (shrink)
- Kinesthesia and unique solutions for control of multijoint movements.S. C. Gandevia -1992 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (2):335-335.
- The Upper Semi-Lattice of Degrees of Recursive Unsolvability.S. C. Kleene &Emil L. Post -1956 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 21 (4):407-408.
- Hume's Bundles, Self-Consciousness and Kant.S. C. Patten -1976 -Hume Studies 2 (2):59-75.In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:HUME'S BUNDLES, SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS AND KANT Even if we are inclined to view Hume's attempt to explain ascriptions of personal identity as an abysmal failure, we might still be sympathetic toward his proposal to replace the going substance theory of the nature of mind with his bundle account. Thus we might fault Hume for erecting an unachievably high standard for personal identity, or round on him for excluding bodily criteria (...) 2... from his solution, but nonetheless applaud his spiriting away of the Cartesian soul substance leaving his "true idea of the human mind" (261) as a collection of perceptions in its stead. However, Hume's concern to give an account of the idea of the unity of a human mind in terms of related perceptions has run into notoriously rough sledding, not the least of which is the fact that Hume himself in his Appendix to "Of Personal Identity" seems to abandon his bundle theory in despair. In this paper I shall first be concerned to examine the criticism of his bundle theory which Hume brings forth in the Appendix and explain why I think the core difficulty remains insoluble for Hume. I shall then go on to suggest that the unworkability of Húmete bundle theory is directly tied to his failure to appreciate certain features of the peculiarly first person nature of his question about the make-up of minds. In thus emphasizing the place of the first person voice in my interpretation I am stealing a leaf, if not a chapter, from Kant. But this is as it should be since one of the aims of this essay is to provide an interpretation of Hume's difficulties with his account of the nature of mind which explains part of the reason why 'self-consciousness' (or 'apperception') looms so very large in the Critique of Pure Reason attack upon Hume's type of bundle theory. 60. 1. Hume's Second Thoughts In a burst of self criticism at the Appendix to the section on personal identity, Hume brings forth this objection to his own efforts:...Having thus loosen' d all our particular perceptions, when I proceed to explain the principle of connexion, which binds them together, and makes us attribute to them a real simplicity and identity; I am sensible, that my account is very defective, and that nothing but the seeming evidence of the precedent reasonings cou'd have indue' d me to receive it (635). After additional reflections Hume encapsulates his objection thus:...All my hopes vanish, when I come to explain the principles, that unite our successive perceptions in our thought or consciousness (6SS-6). What is the defect Hume calls to our attention? Notice first that the footnote on page 635 explicitly refers us back to that part of his account Hume considers defective; and when we look back to the text of the Treatise in question, page 260, we find it is precisely there that Hume uses the analogy of a republic to sketch his bundle theory of the unity of mind in terms of the two associative principles, resemblance and causation. So it must somehow be that this account in terms of the associative principles is mistaken. But what then is the mistake? According to Hume it is that he cannot 'explain' the principles which unite the discrete percepts. Now it seems to me there are only two possible things Hume could mean in saying this. He could mean either (1) that the principles which connect the percepts of one mind are instances of the associative principles, but he cannot explain them; or (2) there must be other, non-associative, principles which connect the percepts of a single mind and these he cannot explain. 61. I think we can safely conclude (1) cannot represent Hume's misgivings when he says he is unable to explain the uniting principles of the mental bundles. There is first the fact that he does not call into question his general programme of accounting for the nature of the unity of complex things by the principles of causation, resemblance and contiguity — for example, ships, plants, animals, houses and rivers (e.g. 257f) — but only his... (shrink)
- An Introduction to the Philosophical Works of F. S. C. Northrop.F. S. C. Northrop &Fred Seddon -1996 -Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 32 (2):336-339.Export citation
Bookmark - Philosophy of Psychology.S. C. Brown -1977 -Critica 9 (25):99-106.No categories
- How Metaphors About the Genome Constrain CRISPR Metaphors: Separating the “Text” From Its “Editor”.S. C. Nelson,J.-H. Yu &L. Ceccarelli -2015 -American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):60-62.
- The psychological profile of parents who volunteer their children for clinical research: a controlled study.S. C. Harth,R. R. Johnstone &Y. H. Thong -1992 -Journal of Medical Ethics 18 (2):86-93.Three standard psychometric tests were administered to parents who volunteered their children for a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial of a new asthma drug and to a control group of parents whose children were eligible for the trial but had declined the invitation. The trial took place at a children's hospital in Australia. The subjects comprised 68 parents who had volunteered their children and 42 who had not, a participation rate of 94 per cent and 70 per cent, respectively. The responses (...) of these parents to the Gordon Survey of Interpersonal Values Questionnaire, the Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory and the Cattell Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire were analysed by computer. There was a marked difference between the psychological profiles of the two groups of parents. Volunteering parents put more value on benevolence while non-volunteering parents were more concerned with power and prestige. The self-esteem of volunteering parents was much lower than that of non-volunteering parents. Finally, volunteering parents were more introverted, exhibited greater anxiety and low supergo, while non-volunteering parents appeared to have greater social confidence and emotional stability. Since an individual's values, self-esteem and personality may be important antecedents of behaviour, these findings suggest that parents who volunteer their children for clinical research are not only socially disadvantaged and emotionally vulnerable, but may also be psychologically predisposed to volunteering. Furthermore, these findings provide evidence for the existence of a psychosocial 'filter' effect of the informed consent procedure, which may be discouraging the better educated, more privileged and psychologically resilient members of society from participation as research subjects. (shrink)
- Village India: Studies in the Little Community.S. C. Dube &McKim Marriott -1956 -Journal of the American Oriental Society 76 (3):196.No categories
- The Hindu Quest for the Perfection of Man.S. C. Thakur -1971 -Philosophical Quarterly 21 (84):284.
- (1 other version)No Title available: REVIEWS.S. C. Brown -1971 -Religious Studies 7 (3):276-278.
- Medicine : Science or Art?S. C. Panda -2006 -Mens Sana Monographs 4 (1):127.Debate over the status of medicine as an Art or Science continues. The aim of this paper is to discuss the meaning of Art and Science in terms of medicine, and to find out to what extent they have their roots in the field of medical practice. What is analysed is whether medicine is an "art based on science"; or, the "art of medicine" has lost its sheen (what with the rapid advancements of science in course of time, which has (...) made present day medicine more sophisticated). What is also analysed is whether the "science of medicine" is a pure one, or merely applied science; or the element of science in it is full of uncertainty, simply because what is accepted as "scientific" today is discarded by medical practitioners tomorrow in the light of newer evidence. The paper also briefly touches upon how, in the field of present medical education, the introduction of medical humanities or humanistic education has the potential to swing the pendulum of medicine more towards the lost "art of medicine". The paper concludes by saying that the art and science of medicine are complementary. For successful practice, a doctor has to be an artist armed with basic scientific knowledge in medicine. (shrink)
- The Block-Design Tests.S. C. Kohs -1920 -Journal of Experimental Psychology 3 (5):357.
- Magnetic properties of copper acetate at low temperatures.S. C. Mathur -1965 -Philosophical Magazine 12 (116):431-432.
- A Philosophy of Mathematics.S. C. Kleene -1949 -Philosophical Review 58 (2):187.
- The Law of Habituation.S. C. Pepper -1921 -Psychological Review 28 (1):61-71.
- Errata in the December Number.S. C. R. -1894 -The Classical Review 8 (1-2):78-.
- Western, Chinese, and Universal Values.S. C. Angle -2015 -Télos 2015 (171):112-117.
- Religion and Rational Choice.S. C. Thakur -1983 -Religious Studies 19 (2):264-265.Export citation Bookmark
- Pleasures and Pains: A Theory of Qualitative Hedonism By Rem B. Edwards. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 1979.S. C. Patten -1981 -Dialogue 20 (4):799-803.
- Change, Identity and Hume.S. C. Patten -1976 -Dialogue 15 (4):664-672.
- Deceiving Subjects.S. C. Patten -1978 -Hastings Center Report 8 (2):39-39.
- Āpta-mīmāṁsā of Āchārya Samantabhadra.S. C. Samantabhadrasvami, Ghoshal &Bharatiya Jñanapitha -2002 - New Delhi: Bharatiya Jnanpith. Edited by S. C. Ghoshal.
- Jou Pu Tan.S. C. S.,Li Yu &Richard Martin -1963 -Journal of the American Oriental Society 83 (2):281.No categories
- Influence of heterogeneities on the electronic properties of hydrogenated amorphous silicon.S. C. Agarwal -2014 -Philosophical Magazine 94 (15):1642-1660.No categories
- In Memoriam.S. C. R. -1914 -Classical Quarterly 8 (4):253-253.
- "Filosofia e linguistica" di A. Pagliaro.C. P. P. S. -1970 -Giornale Critico Della Filosofia Italiana:598.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Referential processing in monologue and dialogue with and without access to real world referents.S. C. Garrod -2011 - In Edward Gibson & Neal J. Pearlmutter,The Processing and Acquisition of Reference. MIT Press. pp. 273--294.This chapter examines the role of the situation model in referential processing and how it can link what appear to be incompatible results from studies of monologue and dialogue as well as studies of reading and visual-world eye tracking. It shows that data from experiments on pronoun resolution in reading indicate a two-step model, in which candidate antecedents for an anaphor are first identified on the basis of gender matching and number matching, then evaluated with respect to the overall situation (...) model. In similar visual-world studies, these stages are seemingly collapsed together, which can be explained in terms of differences in how the situation model is related to the text versus the visual display of potential referents. The chapter suggests that comparing these different types of studies can elucidate the processes of reference resolution. (shrink)
- Note on Thucydides VII. 28. 3.S. C. Booker -1914 -Classical Quarterly 8 (02):104-.ὃσον κατ’ ⋯ρχ⋯ς το⋯ πολ⋯μου οἱ μ⋯ν ⋯νιαυτ⋯ν, οἱ δ⋯ δ⋯ο,οἱ δ⋯ τρι⋯ν γε ⋯τ⋯ν οὐδε⋯ς πλε⋯ω χρ⋯μιζον περο⋯σειν αὐτοὺς, εἰ οἱ Πελοπονν⋯σιοι ⋯σβ⋯λοιεν ⋯ς τ⋯ν χώραν.No categories
- No VII Centenario de Tomas de Aquino.C. S. -1975 -Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 31 (1):99 -.
- The Problem of Identity of objects in Hume's Philosophy.S. C. Daniel -1985 -Indian Philosophical Quarterly 12 (2):191.Export citation Bookmark
- Berkeley on the Unity of the Self.S. C. Brown -1971 -Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 5:64-87.That the legacy of Berkeley's philosophy has been a largely sceptical one is perhaps rather surprising. For he himself took it as one of his objectives to undermine scepticism. He roundly denied that there were ‘any principles more opposite to Scepticism than those we have laid down’ . Yet Hume was to write of Berkeley that ‘most of the writings of that very ingenious author form the best lessons of scepticism, Bayle not excepted’. And it has become something of a (...) commonplace to say that Berkeley's philosophy is sceptical in direction, if not in intention. He is represented as a half-hearted sceptic, applying radical empiricist principles in his treatment of matter but baulking at their implications when he came to consider spirits. Hume is credited with being the more thoroughgoing of the two. Berkeley had denied the substantiality of extended things. Hume felt obliged, by parity of reasoning, to deny the substantiality of the self. On his account of the mind there is ‘properly no simplicity in it at one time, nor identity in different’ . It is commonly supposed that Berkeley, in maintaining the quite contrary view that we know ourselves to be simple, undivided beings , showed a lack of rigour or consistency. (shrink)
- Le mariage du prophète Osée (Osée 1, 2) dans la littérature patristique.S. C. Kessler -1999 -Revue des Sciences Religieuses 73 (2):251-252.No categories
- A. E. Codd.S. C. R. -1917 -The Classical Review 31 (08):203-.
- Popper on Scientific Method.S. C. Thakur -1970 -Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 19:71-82.SIR KARL POPPER is a thinker and writer of some distinction, and it is extremely difficult to state the numerous strands of his thought in a short article. But there is one fundamental theme which seems to run through all his works relating to scientific method, and it is impossible to miss this theme if only because it is so forcefully stated. This article attempts to analyse the basic elements of this theme in order to assess its significance for students (...) of scientific method. (shrink)
- Appendix: ‘Doing Good and Suffering Evil’.S. C. Brown -1970 -Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 1 (3):77-78.
- Objectivity and Cultural Divergence.S. C. Brown -1986 -Philosophy 61 (236):274-276.No categories
- No confidentiality. Assam.S. C. Sarma -forthcoming -Nexus.Export citation Bookmark
- Studien zur Lateinischen und Griechischen Sprachgeschicte. Von Emil Thomas. Berlin, 1912. M. 4.S. C. R. -1914 -The Classical Review 28 (08):283-.
- Political and economic theory in the 18th century.S. C. Stimson -2008 -History of the Human Sciences 21 (1):161-165.
- Bradley's Metaphysics and the Self. [REVIEW]S. C. A. -1971 -Review of Metaphysics 25 (2):373-373.An able and clear defense of Bradley's principal theses and the underlying conception of metaphysical enterprise. "This is a book about a metaphysician, about metaphysics, and, most importantly, it attempts to develop elements of a metaphysical position long the lines of what is called Absolute Idealism." The Introduction takes up the Verificationists [[sic]] argument and two recent accounts of metaphysics. Part I devotes ten Chapters to the elucidation and defense of Bradley's conception of reality. It culminates in examining three alternative (...) accounts of "Real". Part II considers "the major philosophical theories of the self in order to defend Bradley's Theory of the self within his metaphysical scheme."--A. S. C. (shrink)
- The needed reform in philosophy.S. C. Chatterjee -1951 -Philosophy East and West 1 (3):50-57.
- Towards a Psychological Transformation of Man.S. C. Malik -1990 - In Kishor Gandhi,The Odyssey of science, culture, and consciousness. New Delhi: Abhinav Publications. pp. 153.No categories
- Quotient Rings of Noncommutative Rings in the First Half of the 20th Century.S. C. Coutinho -2004 -Archive for History of Exact Sciences 58 (3):255-281.Abstract.A keystone of the theory of noncommutative noetherian rings is the theorem that establishes a necessary and sufficient condition for a given ring to have a quotient ring. We trace the development of this theorem, and its applications, from its first version for noncommutative domains in the 1930s to Goldie’s theorems in the late 1950s.No categories
- (1 other version)On notation for ordinal numbers.S. C. Kleene -1938 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 3 (4):150-155.
- Palynological studies on the green alga Stigeoclonium pascheri (Vischer) Cox and Bold.S. C. Agrawal -forthcoming -Pli. D. Thesis, Banaras Hindu University.Export citation Bookmark
- (1 other version)An Anti-Skeptical Argument at the Deduction.S. C. Patten -1976 -Kant Studien 67 (1-4):550-569.
- Deus em Sartre: Má-Fé e Aspiração.S. C. N. Erculino -2013 -Páginas de Filosofía 5 (1):17-44.No categories
| 1 — 50 / 949 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-sq5lk uwo