Works by Robert Pargetter
63 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- Three theses about dispositions.Elizabeth W. Prior,Robert Pargetter &Frank Jackson -1982 -American Philosophical Quarterly 19 (3):251-257.I. Causal Thesis: Dispositions have a causal basis. II. Distinctness Thesis: Dispositions are distinct from their causal basis. III. Impotence Thesis: Dispositions are not causally active.
- Functions.John Bigelow &Robert Pargetter -1987 -Journal of Philosophy 84 (4):181-196.
- Oughts, options, and actualism.Frank Jackson &Robert Pargetter -1986 -Philosophical Review 95 (2):233-255.
- Science and Necessity.John Bigelow &Robert Pargetter -1990 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Robert Pargetter.This book espouses a theory of scientific realism in which due weight is given to mathematics and logic. The authors argue that mathematics can be understood realistically if it is seen to be the study of universals, of properties and relations, of patterns and structures, the kinds of things which can be in several places at once. Taking this kind of scientific platonism as their point of departure, they show how the theory of universals can account for probability, laws of (...) nature, causation and explanation, and explore the consequences in all these fields. This will be an important book for all philosophers of science, logicians and metaphysicians, and their graduate students. The readership will also include those outside philosophy interested in the interrelationship of philosophy and science. (shrink)
- An objectivist's guide to subjectivism about color.Frank Jackson &Robert Pargetter -1987 -Revue Internationale de Philosophie 41 (1):127-141.
- The big bad bug: What are the humean's chances?John Bigelow,John Collins &Robert Pargetter -1993 -British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (3):443-462.Humean supervenience is the doctrine that there are no necessary connections in the world. David Lewis identifies one big bad bug to the programme of providing Humean analyses for apparently non-Humean features of the world. The bug is chance. We put the bug under the microscope, and conclude that chance is no special problem for the Humean.
- Forces.John Bigelow,Brian Ellis &Robert Pargetter -1988 -Philosophy of Science 55 (4):614-630.Traditionally, forces are causes of a special sort. Forces have been conceived to be the direct or immediate causes of things. Other sorts of causes act indirectly by producing forces which are transmitted in various ways to produce various effects. However, forces are supposed to act directly without the mediation of anything else. But forces, so conceived, appear to be occult. They are mysterious, because we have no clear conception of what they are, as opposed to what they are postulated (...) to do; and they seem to be hidden from direct observations. There is, therefore, strong initial motivation for trying to eliminate forces from physics. Furthermore, as we shall explain, powerful arguments can be mounted to show that theories with forces can always be recast as theories without them. Hence it seems that forces should be eliminated, in the interests of simplicity. We argue, however, that forces should not be eliminated--just differently construed. For the effect of elimination is to leave us without any adequate account of the causal relationships forces were postulated to explain. And this would remain the case, even if forces could be identified with some merely dispositional properties of physical systems. In our view, forces are species of the causal relation itself, and as such have a different ontological status from the sorts of entities normally considered to be related as causes to effects. (shrink)
- Quantities.John Bigelow,Robert Pargetter &D. M. Armstrong -1988 -Philosophical Studies 54 (3):287 - 304.
- An objection to possible-world semantics for counterfactual logics.Brian Ellis,Frank Jackson &Robert Pargetter -1977 -Journal of Philosophical Logic 6 (1):355 - 357.
- The scientific inference to other minds.Robert Pargetter -1984 -Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62 (2):158-63.
- A theory of structural universals.John Bigelow &Robert Pargetter -1989 -Australasian Journal of Philosophy 67 (1):1 – 11.
- Acquaintance with qualia.Robert Pargetter &John Bigelow -1990 -Theoria 56 (3):129-147.
- Metaphysics of causation.John Bigelow &Robert Pargetter -1990 -Erkenntnis 33 (1):89 - 119.The world contains not only causes and effects, but also causal relations holding between causes and effects. Because causal relations enter into the structure of the world, their presence has various modal and probabilistic consequences. Causation and “necessary and sufficient conditions” do often go hand in hand. Causation, however, is a robust ingredient within the world itself, whereas modalities and probabilities supervene on the nature of the world as a whole, and on the resulting relations between one possible world and (...) others. Some modalities, therefore, are essentially causal; but causation is not essentially modal.19. (shrink)
- Functionalism and type-type identity theories.Frank Jackson,Robert Pargetter &Elizabeth W. Prior -1982 -Philosophical Studies 42 (September):209-25.
- Morality, Potential Persons and Abortion.John Bigelow &Robert Pargetter -1988 -American Philosophical Quarterly 25 (2):173 - 181.
- Laws and modal realism.Robert Pargetter -1984 -Philosophical Studies 46 (3):335-347.It is widely agreed that constant conjunction is a necessary condition for a proposit'2on such as 'Every A is a B' being a law) That is each A is also a B (where A and B are kinds of events, objects states of affairs, or whatever) or the property of being an A is always conjoined with the property of being a B. It is also widely agreed that this cannot be the whole story. How can we distinguish accidental generalisations (...) from laws? Why is it that 'Every massive object attracts every other massive object' is taken as a law, while 'Every golden object is less than a million kilograms (say) in mass' is not? Both are true universally, do not make reference to particular entities or places or times, and so on and so forth, and yet they are given vastly different ontological and/or epistemic status. This is the problem of laws. (shrink)
- Vectors and change.John Bigelow &Robert Pargetter -1989 -British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (3):289-306.Vectors, we will argue, are not just mathematical abstractions. They are also physical properties--universals. What make them distinctive are the rich and varied essences of these universals, and the complex pattern of internal relations which hold amongst them.
- Confirmation and the Nomological.Frank Jackson &Robert Pargetter -1980 -Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):415 - 428.We argue that it is a mistake to approach goodman's new riddle of induction by demarcating projectible from non-Projectible predicates and hypotheses, And put forward an alternative way of looking at the whole question.
- A modified dutch book argument.Frank Jackson &Robert Pargetter -1976 -Philosophical Studies 29 (6):403 - 407.
- Beyond the blank stare.John Bigelow &Robert Pargetter -1987 -Theoria 53 (2-3):97-114.
- Death and Well-Being.John Bigelow,John Campbell &Robert Pargetter -1990 -Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 71 (2):119-40.
- Re-acquaintance with qualia.John Bigelow &Robert Pargetter -2006 -Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (3):353 – 378.Frank Jackson argued, in an astronomically frequently cited paper on 'Epiphenomenal qualia '[Jackson 1982 that materialism must be mistaken. His argument is called the knowledge argument. Over the years since he published that paper, he gradually came to the conviction that the conclusion of the knowledge argument must be mistaken. Yet he long remained totally unconvinced by any of the very numerous published attempts to explain where his knowledge argument had gone astray. Eventually, Jackson did publish a diagnosis of the (...) reasons why, he now thinks, his knowledge argument against materialism fails to prove the falsity of materialism [Jackson 2005. He argues that you can block the knowledge argument against materialism - but only if you tie yourself to a dubious doctrine called representationalism. We argue that the knowledge argument fails as a refutation of either representational or nonrepresentational materialism. It does, however, furnish both materialists and dualists with a successful argument for the existence of distinctively first-person modes of acquaintance with mental states. Jackson's argument does not refute materialism: but it does bring to the surface significant features of thought and experience, which many dualists have sensed, and most materialists have missed. (shrink)
- Temptation and the Will.John Bigelow,Susan M. Dodds &Robert Pargetter -1990 -American Philosophical Quarterly 27 (1):39-49.The authors argue, against Frank Jackson, that weakness (and strength) of will involves higher-order mental states. The authors hold that this is compatible with a decision-theoretic belief-desire psychology of human action.
- Colouring in the world.John Bigelow &Robert Pargetter -1990 -Mind 99 (394):279-88.
- Integrity and Autonomy.John Bigelow &Robert Pargetter -2007 -American Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1):39-49.
- Goodness and Fragility.John Campbell &Robert Pargetter -1986 -American Philosophical Quarterly 23 (2):155 - 165.
- A question about rest and motion.Frank Jackson &Robert Pargetter -1988 -Philosophical Studies 53 (1):141 - 146.No categories
- Parental Autonomy.John Bigelow,John Campbell,Susan M. Dodds,Robert Pargetter,Elizabeth W. Prior &Robert Young -1988 -Journal of Applied Philosophy 5 (2):183-196.ABSTRACT We argue that in societies like our own the prevailing view that parents have both special responsibilities for and special rights over their children fails to give a proper understanding of the autonomy both of parents and of children. It is our claim that there is a logical priority of the separable interests of a child over the autonomy of its parents in the fulfilment of their special responsibilities for and the exercise of their special rights over their children. (...) However, we believe that in acknowledging the child as a distinct locus of interests appropriate weight can still be given to parental autonomy. In particular, since raising a child is a long‐term commitment which plays a central role in the life‐plans of many adults it will be a legitimate exercise of an adult's autonomy strongly to influence the future of any children involved in such a plan. Such influence will be quite separate from paternalistic concern for those children. But the logical priority of the child's interests will at the same time show why parents are not entitled to behave proprietorially toward their children, even when paternalistic concern is called for. (shrink)
- Evil as evidence against the existence of God.Robert Pargetter -1976 -Mind 85 (338):242-245.
- Where the Tickle defence goes wrong.Frank Jackson &Robert Pargetter -1983 -Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (3):295 – 299.
- The validation of induction.John Bigelow &Robert Pargetter -1997 -Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75 (1):62 – 76.
- The Dispositional and the Categorical.Robert Pargetter -1982 -Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 63 (4):366-370.
- Real work for aggregates.John Bigelow &Robert Pargetter -2006 -Dialectica 60 (4):485–503.
- Guilt beyond reasonable doubt.Barbara Davidson &Robert Pargetter -1987 -Australasian Journal of Philosophy 65 (2):182 – 187.
- Relative simultaneity in the special relativity.Frank Jackson &Robert Pargetter -1977 -Philosophy of Science 44 (3):464-474.In this paper a method is proposed for empirically determining simultaneity at a distance within the special theory of relativity. It is argued that this method is independent of Einstein's signalling method and provides a basis for denying the conventionality of distant simultaneity.
- In Defence of the Dutch Book Argument.Barbara Davidson &Robert Pargetter -1985 -Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15 (3):405 - 423.A starting point for this paper is that there is at least one concept of probability, call it epistemic probability, which can be identified with belief or some sort of idealised belief. If this identification is to be of any significance, then it needs to be shown that epistemic probability is a ‘true’ probability concept and is subject to those restrictions and requirements which relate and govern probabilities, which we call the probability calculus.The most rehearsed argument to establish the probability (...) calculus for epistemic probabilities is the Dutch Book Argument. There are two intuitions behind the DBA. The first is that if we can find some fine-grained behavioural measure of epistemic probability, then we may be able to show that epistemic probabilities obey the probability calculus by showing that the behaviour is of a kind which is, as a matter of necessity, subject to certain limitations and restrictions. (shrink)
- Indefinite probability statements.Frank Jackson &Robert Pargetter -1973 -Synthese 26 (2):205 - 217.Indefinite probability statements can be analysed in terms of statements which attribute probability to propositions. Therefore, there is no need to find a special place in probability theory for them; once we have an adequate account of statements that straightforwardly attribute probability to propositions, we will automatically have an adequate account of indefinite probability statements.
- From extroverted realism to correspondence: A modest proposal.John Bigelow &Robert Pargetter -1990 -Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50 (3):435-460.No categories
- Experience, proper basicality and belief in God.Robert Pargetter -1990 -International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 27 (3):141 - 163.
- No logic of cogency: Reply to Oakley.John Bigelow &Robert Pargetter -1998 -Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (3):464 – 472.No categories
- The two puzzles about conditional obligation.Frank Jackson &Robert Pargetter -1987 -Philosophical Papers 16 (2):75-83.
- Physical probability as a propensity.Frank Jackson &Robert Pargetter -1982 -Noûs 16 (4):567-583.
- Evil as evidence.Robert Pargetter -1982 -Sophia 21 (2):11-15.
- Goodness and redness.Robert Pargetter -1988 -Philosophical Papers 17 (2):113-126.
- Against the Will.Robert Pargetter,Susan Dodds &John Bigelow -1988 -Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 69 (4):307-324.No categories
- Sexual Harassment.Susan M. Dodds,Lucy Frost,Robert Pargetter &Elizabeth W. Prior -1988 -Social Theory and Practice 14 (2):111-130.
- Fitness.Robert Pargetter -1987 -Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 68 (1):44-56.
- L22000. 00.Peter Achinstein,Brian Barry,Clarendon Press Oxford,John Bigelow,Robert Pargetter,Cambridge Uni Cambridge,H. James Birx,Richard J. Blackwell,Univer Indiana &C. Blok -1991 -Mind 100:399.No categories
- An analysis of indefinite probability statements.John Bigelow &Robert Pargetter -1987 -Synthese 73 (2):361 - 370.An analysis of indefinite probability statements has been offered by Jackson and Pargetter (1973). We accept that this analysis will assign the correct probability values for indefinite probability claims. But it does so in a way which fails to reflect the epistemic state of a person who makes such a claim. We offer two alternative analyses: one employing de re (epistemic) probabilities, and the other employing de dicto (epistemic) probabilities. These two analyses appeal only to probabilities which are accessible to (...) a person who makes an indefinite probability judgment, and yet we prove that the probabilities which either of them assigns will always be equivalent to those assigned by the Jackson and Pargetter analysis. (shrink)No categories
- The Epistemology of the Fragile and the God.John Campbell &Robert Pargetter -1985 -Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 66 (1-2):154-169.
| 1 — 50 / 63 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-72j75 uwo