Seven Puzzles of Thought and How to Solve Them: An Originalist Theory of Concepts.Richard Mark Sainsbury &Michael Tye -2012 - Oxford, England and New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press. Edited by Michael Tye.detailsSainsbury and Tye present a new theory, 'originalism', which provides natural, simple solutions to puzzles about thought that have troubled philosophers for centuries. They argue that concepts are to be individuated by their origin, rather than epistemically or semantically. Although thought is special, no special mystery attaches to its nature.
Paradoxes.Richard Mark Sainsbury -1988 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.detailsA paradox can be defined as an unacceptable conclusion derived by apparently acceptable reasoning from apparently acceptable premises. Many paradoxes raise serious philosophical problems, and they are associated with crises of thought and revolutionary advances. The expanded and revised third edition of this intriguing book considers a range of knotty paradoxes including Zeno's paradoxical claim that the runner can never overtake the tortoise, a new chapter on paradoxes about morals, paradoxes about belief, and hardest of all, paradoxes about truth. The (...) discussion uses a minimum of technicality but also grapples with complicated and difficult considerations, and is accompanied by helpful questions designed to engage the reader with the arguments. The result is not only an explanation of paradoxes but also an excellent introduction to philosophical thinking. (shrink)
Departing from Frege: essays in the philosophy of language.Richard Mark Sainsbury -2002 - New York: Routledge.detailsThis text argues that we must depart considerably from Frege's own views if we are to work towards an adequate conception of natural language.
(1 other version)Logical forms: an introduction to philosophical logic.Richard Mark Sainsbury -1991 - Cambridge: Blackwell.detailsLogical Forms examines the formal languages of classical first order logic and modal logic, and some alternatives and in each case takes as the central question: how can natural language best be formalized in this formal language? The approach involves close encounters with issues in the philosophy of logic and the philosophy of logic and the philosophy of language.
No categories