Results for 'Richard C. Francis'
964 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- Causes, proximate and ultimate.Richard C.Francis -1990 -Biology and Philosophy 5 (4):401-415.Within evolutionary biology a distinction is frequently made between proximate and ultimate causes. One apparently plausible interpretation of this dichotomy is that proximate causes concern processes occurring during the life of an organism while ultimate causes refer to those processes (particularly natural selection) that shaped its genome. But ultimate causes are not sought through historical investigations of an organisms lineage. Rather, explanations referring to ultimate causes typically emerge from functional analyses. But these functional analyses do not identify causes of any (...) kind, much less ultimate ones. So-called ultimate explanations are not about causes in any sense resembling those of proximate explanations. The attitude, implicit in the term ultimate cause, that these functional analyses are somehow superordinate to those involving proximate causes is unfounded. Ultimate causes are neither ultimate nor causes. (shrink)
- Contra scientism. [REVIEW]Richard C.Francis -2005 -Biology and Philosophy 20 (4):893-900.
- Literary Chinese by the Inductive Method, Volume III, the Mencius, Books I-IIITalks on Chinese History (Jūnggwo Lìshř Jyǎnghwà)Ch'ing Documents. An Introductory SyllabusTalks on Chinese History.George A. Kennedy,Herrlee Glessner Creel,Chang Tsung-Ch'ien,Richard C. Rudolf,John deFrancis,Elizabeth Jen Young &John K. Fairbank -1953 -Journal of the American Oriental Society 73 (1):27.
- Mind-on-the-drive: real-time functional neuroimaging of cognitive brain mechanisms underlying driver performance and distraction.Richard A. Young,Li Hsieh,Francis X. Graydon,I. I.Richard Genik,Mark D. Benton,Christopher C. Green,Susan M. Bowyer,John E. Moran &Norman Tepley -manuscriptExport citation
Bookmark - Oakeshott.Polanyi.Carl Schmitt.Chesterton.Scheler.Santayana.C. A. J. Coady,Robert Grant,Richard Allen,Paul Gottfried,Ian Crowther,Francis Dunlop &Noel O'Sullivan -1995 -Philosophical Quarterly 45 (179):273.No categories
- Catholicism Engaging Other Faiths: Vatican Ii and its Impact.Michael Amaladoss S. J.,Roberto Catalano,Francis X. Clooney S. J.,Archbishop Michael L. Fitzgerald,Richard Girardin,Roger Haight S. J.,Sallie B. King,Vladimir Latinovic,Leo D. Lefebure,Archbishop Felix Machado,Gerard Mannion,Alexander E. Massad,Sandra Mazzolini,Dawn M. Nothwehr O. S. F.,John T. Pawlikowski O. S. M.,Peter C. Phan,Jonathan Ray,William Skudlarek O. S. B.,Cardinal Jean-Louis Tauran,Jason Welle O. F. M. &Taraneh R. Wilkinson (eds.) -2018 - Springer Verlag.This book assesses how Vatican II opened up the Catholic Church to encounter, dialogue, and engagement with other world religions. Opening with a contribution from the President of the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue, Cardinal Jean-Louis Tauran, it next explores the impact, relevance, and promise of the Declaration Nostra Aetate before turning to consider how Vatican II in general has influenced interfaith dialogue and the intellectual and comparative study of world religions in the postconciliar decades, as well as the contribution (...) of particular past and present thinkers to the formation of current interreligious and comparative theological methods. Additionally, chapters consider interreligious dialogue vis-à-vis theological anthropology in conciliar documents; openness to the spiritual practices of other faith traditions as a way of encouraging positive interreligious encounter; the role of lay and new ecclesial movements in interreligious dialogue; and the development of Monastic Interreligious Dialogue. Finally, it includes a range of perspectives on the fruits and future of Vatican’s II’s opening to particular faiths such as Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, and Buddhism. (shrink)No categories
- A critique ofRichard Rorty on post-philosophical culture: (an essay in contemporary socio-political philosophy).Francis O. C. Njoku -2019 - Enugu State, Nigeria: University of Nigeria Press.
- The Domestication of Animals and the Roots of the Anthropocene: Lee Ann Dugatkin and Lyudmila Trut, How To Tame a Fox : Visionary Scientists and a Siberian Tale of Jump-Started Evolution , viii + 216 pp., 16 color illus., $26.00 Cloth, ISBN: 9780226444185Richard C.Francis, Domesticated: Evolution in a Man-Made World , xii + 484 pp., 74 b&w illus., $17.95 Paperback, ISBN: 9780393353037 Pat Shipman, The Invaders: How Humans and Their Dogs Drove Neanderthals to Extinction , xvi + 266 pp., 23 b&w illus., $29.95 Cloth, ISBN: 9780674736764, $18.95 Paperback, ISBN: 9780674975415.William T. Lynch -2019 -Journal of the History of Biology 52 (1):209-217.
- Jung on Elementary Psychology: A Discussion Between C. G. Jung andRichard I. Evans.Richard I. Evans -1979 - Routledge.First published in 1979. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor &Francis, an informa company.
- Robert Orford’s Attack on Giles of Rome.Francis E. Kelley -1987 -The Thomist 51 (1):70-96.In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:ROBERT ORFORD'S ATTACK ON GILES OF ROME I N TWO PREVIOUS ARTICLES, I tried to demonstrate how Robert Orford drew upon the thought of Giles of Rome in order to formulate his own explanation of hylomorphism and the so-called real distinction between essence and existence.1 Orford, it will be remembered, was one of the earliest disciples of his colleague St. Thomas Aquinas, and-more important- is the first 'llhomist we (...) know of who turned to Giles in order to gain an understanding of these basic philosophic problems, and who wove Giles's ideas into his own elaboration of what he took to be St. Thomas's position regarding them. In view of this recognition of Giles as an appropriate guide to a Thomist grasp of these issues, it is surprising to find among Orford's works the Reprobationes dfotorUJn a fratre Egidio in primum Sententiarum.2 The Reprobationes is a strange document. In it, as I shall show later, Orford seeks every opportunity to find fault with Giles. Indeed, his criticisms, hardly ever of any substance, are at times so "picky" they cause the reader to wonder as to his real purpose in writing them down in the first place. In this article, I shall review the historical context of the Reprobationes and try to show what it was about Giles of Rome that so irritated the Dominican Orford. The early catalogues contain no more than two entries for 1 See F. Kelley, "The Egidean influence in Robert Orford's doctrine on Form", Thomist, 47, 1, January, 1983, pp. 77-99, and "Two early English Thomists: Thomas Sutton and Robert Orford vs. Henry of Ghent", Thomist, 45, 3, July, 1981, pp. 345-387. 2 This work is extant in one manuscript, viz. MS. Merton 276, fol. 20ra50ra. It has been edited by A. Vella: Robert d'Orford Reprobationes dictorum a fratre Egidio in primum Sententiarum, Paris, 1968. 70 ROBERT ORFORD'S ATTACK ON GILES OF ROME 71 Orford.3 However, from references he made in his extant writings, viz., Sciendum, Contra dicta Henrici and Reprobationes, we know the titles at least of some of his other writings. As one might have expected, Orford wrote commentaries on the books of the Sentences. In addition to the references to these commentaries he mentions also a De unitate formae, Super 2 de sommo et vigilia, Super 6 de M etaphysica and De generatione. We know of Orford's part in certain disputed questions and of his sermon in rn93. Finally, we have offered our reasons elsewhere for attributing to him the opuscule entitled De natura materiae et dimensionibus interminatis.4 From the mere fact that Orford saw the necessity of writing against Giles of Rome in defense of St. Thomas Aquinas, one might have thought that in Giles one had found an antagonist of the Angelic Doctor. For a long time Giles was taken to have been not an adversary but rather a stout defender of his teacher, St. Thomas.5 The picture of Giles of Rome as the loyal Thomist, the legend as it has more recently been labelled, derived in no small measure from the erroneous ascription to him of the work which is in factRichard Knapwell's, viz. Correctivum corruptorii 'Quare '.6 Once this mistaken ascription had been corrected and further study was done, mainly by E. Hocedez, Giles no longer appeared as having been the staunch and loyal Thomist of the legend. On the contrary, Hocedez says of him: Gilles decidement n'est pas le thomiste, clans le sens profond du mot, qui s'est donne Thomas pour Maitre et guide de sa pensee: a For a full account of what the catalogues have under Orford's name, see A. Vella, "Robert of Orford and his place in the scholastic controversies at Oxford in the late xiiith century" (Oxford Univ. B.Litt. thesis 1946), MS. B.Litt., c. 30, vol. 1, Bodleian Library, pp. 12-27. 4 See F. Kelley," The Egidean influence", pp. 90-96. 5 See F. Lajard, "Gilles de Rome", Histoire litteraire de la France, 30 (1888), pp. 421-566. 6 "Nous croyons que ce qui a le plus contribue a faire... (shrink)
- ?Bleeding hosts? And eucharistic theology.Francis Clark -1960 -Heythrop Journal 1 (3):214-228.Between the Testaments. By D. S. Russell The Trial of Jesus. By Josef Blinzler, translated by Isabel and Florence McHugh. The Trial of Jesus. By Josef Blinzler, translated by Isabel and Florence McHugh. The Trial of Jesus. By Josef Blinzler, translated by Isabel and Florence McHugh. The Trial of Jesus. By Josef Blinzler, translated by Isabel and Florence McHugh. Emperor Michael Palaeologus and the West, 1258–1282: A study in Byzantine‐Latin relations. By Deno John Geanakoplos Approaches to Christian Unity. By C. (...) J. Dumont, o.p. Translation and Introduction by Very Rev. Henry St John, o.p. Before Philosophy. By Henri Frankfort, Mrs H. A. Frankfort, John A. Wilson, Thorkild Jacobsen David Hume. By A. H. Basson F. H. Bradley. ByRichard Wollheim. (shrink)
- Hexaëmeron.Robert Grosseteste,Richard C. Dales &Servus Gieben -1996 -Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 186 (2):302-303.
- Plans for Completing the English Study Edition of Hegel’s Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion.Peter C. Hodgson -1980 -The Owl of Minerva 11 (4):6-7.In response to the proposal by Walter Jaeschke contained in the preceding paper, the Nineteenth Century Theology Group of the American Academy of Religion discussed plans, at the annual meeting of the Academy on 15–17 November 1979, to complete a new English study edition of Hegel’s Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion, and has agreed to sponsor its publication by Scholars Press in the AAR Texts & Translations Series. An Editorial Committee has been formed with the following membership: Robert F. (...) Brown,Richard Crouter, James O. Duke,Francis S. Fiorenza, Joseph Fitzer, Peter C. Hodgson, Walter Jaeschke, Darrell Jodock, O. Kem Luther, Dale M. Schlitt, John C. Shelley, James Yerkes. Many of these persons will be involved in the editing and translating process. (shrink)
- Issues in Medieval Philosophy: Essays in Honor ofRichard C. Dales.Richard C. Dales -2001
- Aspectus Et Affectus: Essays and Editions in Grosseteste and Medieval Intellectual Life in Honor ofRichard C. Dales.Richard C. Dales -1993 - Ams Pressinc.The 65th year of a scholar who has devoted 40 years to editing and elucidating Robert Grosseteste provides us with a collection of essays. Not surprisingly, they emanate from colleagues and former students ofRichard Dales and reflect his interest, among other concerns, in Grosseteste's aspectus et affectus - range of vision and disposition of mind - those twin peaks with which the 13th century thinker helped to get Christian thought through Aristotle without mutual destruction.
- Subjective Probability: The Real Thing.Richard C. Jeffrey -2002 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.This book offers a concise survey of basic probability theory from a thoroughly subjective point of view whereby probability is a mode of judgment. Written by one of the greatest figures in the field of probability theory, the book is both a summation and synthesis of a lifetime of wrestling with these problems and issues. After an introduction to basic probability theory, there are chapters on scientific hypothesis-testing, on changing your mind in response to generally uncertain observations, on expectations of (...) the values of random variables, on de Finetti's dissolution of the so-called problem of induction, and on decision theory. (shrink)
- The Principles of Statistical Mechanics.Richard C. Tolman -1939 -Philosophy of Science 6 (3):381-381.
- The Logic of Decision.Richard C. Jeffrey -1965 - New York, NY, USA: University of Chicago Press."[This book] proposes new foundations for the Bayesian principle of rational action, and goes on to develop a new logic of desirability and probabtility."—Frederic Schick, _Journal of Philosophy_.
- Elementary errors about evolution.Richard C. Lewontin -1983 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (3):367-368.
- (1 other version)Causal Necessity: A Pragmatic Investigation of the Necessity of Laws.Richard C. Jeffrey -1980 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (2):557-558.
- Optimizing the learning of a second-language vocabulary.Richard C. Atkinson -1972 -Journal of Experimental Psychology 96 (1):124.
- The triple helix: gene, organism, and environment.Richard C. Lewontin -2000 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Edited by Richard C. Lewontin.One of our most brilliant evolutionary biologists,Richard Lewontin has also been a leading critic of those--scientists and non-scientists alike--who would misuse the science to which he has contributed so much. In The Triple Helix, Lewontin the scientist and Lewontin the critic come together to provide a concise, accessible account of what his work has taught him about biology and about its relevance to human affairs. In the process, he exposes some of the common and troubling misconceptions that misdirect (...) and stall our understanding of biology and evolution.The central message of this book is that we will never fully understand living things if we continue to think of genes, organisms, and environments as separate entities, each with its distinct role to play in the history and operation of organic processes. Here Lewontin shows that an organism is a unique consequence of both genes and environment, of both internal and external features. Rejecting the notion that genes determine the organism, which then adapts to the environment, he explains that organisms, influenced in their development by their circumstances, in turn create, modify, and choose the environment in which they live.The Triple Helix is vintage Lewontin: brilliant, eloquent, passionate, and deeply critical. But it is neither a manifesto for a radical new methodology nor a brief for a new theory. It is instead a primer on the complexity of biological processes, a reminder to all of us that living things are never as simple as they may seem. (shrink)
- Averroes on psychology and the principles of metaphysics.Richard C. Taylor -1998 -Journal of the History of Philosophy 36 (4):507-523.Averroes asserts in his Long Commentary on the De Anima and in his Long Commentary on the Metaphysics that principles of the science of metaphysics are established in the science of psychology. In psychology, human intellectual understanding is found to require the separate agent intellect for the coming to be of knowledge. The analysis of human psychology establishes that intellect must exist and must be separate from the human being in existence. Moreover there exists potency in those things called intellect, (...) thanks to the argument for the existence of the material intellect. (shrink)
- Primary and Secondary Causality.Richard C. Taylor -unknownNo categories
- Probability and the Art of Judgment.Richard C. Jeffrey -1992 - New York: Cambridge University Press.Richard Jeffrey is beyond dispute one of the most distinguished and influential philosophers working in the field of decision theory and the theory of knowledge. His work is distinctive in showing the interplay of epistemological concerns with probability and utility theory. Not only has he made use of standard probabilistic and decision theoretic tools to clarify concepts of evidential support and informed choice, he has also proposed significant modifications of the standard Bayesian position in order that it provide a (...) better fit with actual human experience. Probability logic is viewed not as a source of judgment but as a framework for explaining the implications of probabilistic judgments and their mutual compatability. This collection of essays spans a period of some 35 years and includes what have become some of the classic works in the literature. There is also one completely new piece, while in many instances Jeffrey includes afterthoughts on the older essays. (shrink)
- Dolphin social intelligence: complex alliance relationships in bottlenose dolphins and a consideration of selective environments for extreme brain size evolution in mammals.Richard C. Connor -2007 - In Nathan Emery, Nicola Clayton & Chris Frith,Social Intelligence: From Brain to Culture. Oxford University Press.
- Contributions to the Theory of Inductive Probability.Richard C. Jeffrey -1957 - Dissertation, Princeton University
- To Treat or Not to Treat.Richard C. Sparks -forthcoming -Bioethics and the Handi.
- Ancient genomes, wise bodies, unhealthy people: limits of a genetic paradigm in biology and medicine.Richard C. Strohman -1993 -Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 37 (1):112.
- A Medieval View of Human Dignity.Richard C. Dales -1977 -Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (4):557.
- The effects of litter size on emotional reactivity in BALB/c mice.Richard C. LaBarba,Jerry L. White,Allen Stewart &Nancy Buckley -1973 -Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1 (1):37-38.
- Biology as ideology: the doctrine of DNA.Richard C. Lewontin -1991 - New York, NY: HarperPerennial.Following in the fashion of Stephen Jay Gould and Peter Medawar, one of the world's leading scientists examines how "pure science" is in fact shaped and guided by social and political needs and assumptions.
- Zande logic and western logic.Richard C. Jennings -1989 -British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (2):275-285.In this paper I discuss logic from a naturalist point of view, characterizing it as those shared patterns of thought which are socially selected from among the various patterns of thought to which we are naturally inclined. Drawing on Evans-Pritchard's anthropology. I discuss a particular example of Zande thought. I argue that Evans-Pritchard's and Timm Triplett's analyses of this example make the mistake of applying Western logic to Zande beliefs and thus find a contradiction. I argue that from the naturalistic (...) point of view. Zande logic is different from Western logic and that there is no contradiction in Zande thought. (shrink)
- The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy.Peter Adamson &Richard C. Taylor (eds.) -2004 - New York: Cambridge University Press.Philosophy written in Arabic and in the Islamic world represents one of the great traditions of Western philosophy. Inspired by Greek philosophical works and the indigenous ideas of Islamic theology, Arabic philosophers from the ninth century onwards put forward ideas of great philosophical and historical importance. This collection of essays, by some of the leading scholars in Arabic philosophy, provides an introduction to the field by way of chapters devoted to individual thinkers or groups, especially during the 'classical' period from (...) the ninth to the twelfth centuries. It also includes chapters on areas of philosophical inquiry across the tradition, such as ethics and metaphysics. Finally, it includes chapters on later Islamic thought, and on the connections between Arabic philosophy and Greek, Jewish, and Latin philosophy. The volume also includes a useful bibliography and a chronology of the most important Arabic thinkers. (shrink)
- Carnap's Empiricism.Richard C. Jeffrey -1975 -Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 6.
- Carnap’s Voluntarism.Richard C. Jeffrey -1994 - In Dag Prawitz, Brian Skyrms & Dag Westerståhl,Logic, methodology, and philosophy of science IX: proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, Uppsala, Sweden, August 7-14, 1991. New York: Elsevier. pp. 847--866.
- The Mathematics (and Metaphysics) of Identical Twins.Richard C. Playford -2020 -.The metaphysics of early embryos is a hotly debated topic in contemporary bioethics and metaphysics. Many contemporary Aristotelians believe that a human being is present from the moment of conception. At the same time, certain findings in modern embryology about the formation of identical twins challenge this belief. It becomes much harder when these theories are taken into account to understand the continued identity over time of the embryo(s) given the twinning process. In this article, I will consider the philosophical (...) implications of two models of monozygotic twinning within an Aristotelian metaphysical schema one of which is the standard, or traditional, model. The other of which is a new model recently put forward by Herranz. For the sake of completeness, I will also consider the philosophical implications of chimeras for the Aristotelian position. I will explain how Aristotelians can understand the process of twinning while holding on to their belief that a human being is present from the moment of conception. Summary: I will argue that a human being is present from the moment of conception. I will argue for this on Aristotelian grounds, and I will then defend this claim from criticisms based on a number of findings in modern embryology. (shrink)No categories
- The Organism as the Subject and Object of Evolution.Richard C. Lewontin -1983 -Scientia 77 (18):65.No categories
- Santayana.Richard C. Lyon -1986 -Overheard in Seville 4 (4):7-17.
- Untitled Review.Richard C. Jeffrey -1970 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):124-127.
- Gene, organismo e ambiente: i rapporti causa-effetto in biologia.Richard C. Lewontin -1998 - Roma: Laterza.
- The 'Self' as 'Saved'.Richard C. Prust -1978 -Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 59 (3):279.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Therapeutic privilege: between the ethics of lying and the practice of truth.C.Richard,Y. Lajeunesse &M. -T. Lussier -2010 -Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (6):353-357.The ‘right to the truth’ involves disclosing all the pertinent facts to a patient so that an informed decision can be made. However, this concept of a ‘right to the truth’ entails certain ambiguities, especially since it is difficult to apply the concept in medical practice based mainly on current evidence-based data that are probabilistic in nature. Furthermore, in some situations, the doctor is confronted with a moral dilemma, caught between the necessity to inform the patient (principle of autonomy) and (...) the desire to ensure the patient's well-being by minimising suffering (principle of beneficence). To comply with the principle of beneficence as well as the principle of non-maleficence ‘to do no harm’, the doctor may then feel obliged to turn to ‘therapeutic privilege’, using lies or deception to preserve the patient's hope, and psychological and moral integrity, as well as his self-image and dignity. There is no easy answer to such a moral dilemma. This article will propose a process that can fit into reflective practice, allowing the doctor to decide if the use of therapeutic privilege is justified when he is faced with these kinds of conflicting circumstances. We will present the conflict arising in practice in the context of the various theoretical orientations in ethics, and then we will suggest an approach for a ‘practice of truth’. Last, we will situate this reflective method in the broader clinical context of medical practice viewed as a dialogic process. (shrink)
- Is Litigation the Way to Combat the Opioid Crisis?Richard C. Ausness -2020 -Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 48 (2):293-306.This paper examines the lawsuits brought by state and local government entities against prescription opioid producers and sellers. It examines their potential liability as well as some of the defenses they might raise. The paper also discusses multidistrict litigation and government lawsuits in state court. It concludes that litigation is not the best solution to the opioid crisis.
- Effects of some sequential manipulations of relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions on concept learning.Richard C. Anderson &John T. Guthrie -1966 -Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (4):501.
- Letter to the Editor.Richard C. Carrier -2021 -Isis 112 (1):154-155.
- Encoding processes in the storage and retrieval of sentences.Richard C. Anderson -1971 -Journal of Experimental Psychology 91 (2):338.
- An analysis of the effect of nonreinforced trials in terms of statistical learning theory.Richard C. Atkinson -1956 -Journal of Experimental Psychology 52 (1):28.
- The use of models in experimental psychology.Richard C. Atkinson -1960 -Synthese 12 (2-3):162 - 171.
- Solving the Problem of Measurement: A Correction.Richard C. Jeffrey -1967 -Journal of Philosophy 64 (12):400.
| 1 — 50 / 964 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5b9ff6f457-xbt84 uwo