Works by Ramon M. Lemos
49 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy.Ramon M. Lemos -1998 -Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 62 (2):483-487.No categories
- Bearers of value.Ramon M. Lemos -1991 -Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (4):873-889.No categories
- Hobbes and Locke: Power and Consent.Ramon M. Lemos -1978 -International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 12 (3):189-189.
- Duty and ignorance.Ramon M. Lemos -1980 -Southern Journal of Philosophy 18 (3):301-312.
- The Politics of Autonomy: A Kantian Reading of Rousseau’s Social Contract.Ramon M. Lemos -1980 -Noûs 14 (3):483-487.No categories
- Bertrand Russell's Philosophy of Morals.Ramon M. Lemos -1964 -Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 25 (2):284-284.No categories
- The Self Imagined: Philosophical Reflections on the Social Character of Psyche.Ramon M. Lemos -1991 -Noûs 25 (2):250-253.No categories
- Anthropomorphism and Analogy.Ramon M. Lemos -1966 -Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 47 (1):112.No categories
- A defense of retributivism.Ramon M. Lemos -1977 -Southern Journal of Philosophy 15 (1):53-65.
- A Neomedieval Essay in Philosophical Theology.Ramon M. Lemos -2001 - Lexington Books.This extended essay presents the meditations of an eminent scholar on medieval philosophical theology. Beginning with a discussion of faith and reason, Ramon M. Lemos argues that we can be practically justified in accepting certain religions even though we may not know that their central claims are true. Lemos moves on to his operational definition of God, based on St. Anselm's concept of God as a being that which no greater can be conceived. From this ground, he considers various medieval (...) arguments for the existence of God and refutes the ability of the major arguments to succeed in demonstrating God's existence. He concludes that it is impossible to demonstrate the existence of God philosophically. This provocative book addresses the fundamental issues in the philosophy of religion—from a Christian perspective—while maintaining the necessary intellectual distance between revealed theology and philosophy. (shrink)
- A reply to professor Hodges.Ramon M. Lemos -1961 -Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 22 (2):249-250.No categories
- Books in Review.Ramon M. Lemos -1984 -Political Theory 12 (3):457-460.
- Butlerian Meditations.Ramon M. Lemos -2003 -Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (2):199-221.
- Egoism and non-egoism in ethics.Ramon M. Lemos -1971 -Southern Journal of Philosophy 9 (4):381-392.
- Emotion, Feeling, and Behavior.Ramón M. Lemos -1970 -Critica 4 (10):97-122.
- Experience, mind, and value.Ramon M. Lemos -1969 - Leiden,: Brill.Export citation
Bookmark - Edith Watson Schipper Lathrop, 1909-2002.Ramon M. Lemos -2003 -Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 76 (5):162 - 163.
- Freedom and Power.Ramon M. Lemos -2002 -Southwest Philosophy Review 18 (2):11-24.
- Gregory A. Young 1947-1975.Ramon M. Lemos -1975 -Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 49:164 -.No categories
- Gerrit Schipper 1905 - 1986.Ramon M. Lemos -1987 -Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 60 (4):673 - 674.No categories
- Ideas, images, and sensations.Ramon M. Lemos -1963 -Theoria 29 (1):56-69.
- Immediacy, privacy, and ineffability.Ramon M. Lemos -1965 -Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 25 (June):500-515.
- John H. Knoblock, 1938-1999.Ramon M. Lemos -2000 -Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 73 (5):250 - 251.
- Objectivism, Relativism, and Subjectivism in Ethics.Ramon M. Lemos -1965 -International Philosophical Quarterly 5 (1):56-65.The relativist contends that one has a duty to do something if and only if one's society holds that one does. The subjectivist maintains that one has a duty to do something if and only if one believes that one does. The objectivist argues that men have objective duties which are sometimes independent of what either they or their societies believe they are. My object is to indicate what seem to be some obvious, Yet fatal, Objections to relativism and subjectivism, (...) And to show how objectivists can take account of certain of the insights of relativists and subjectivists. I seek to show that relativists and subjectivists misunderstand the import of their insights, And that it is because of this that they suppose that these insights provide support for relativism or subjectivism when in fact they do not, And can be, Indeed need to be, Incorporated into a sound objectivist position. (shrink)
- Psychological egoism.Ramon M. Lemos -1959 -Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 20 (4):540-546.
- (1 other version)Propositions, states of affairs, and facts.Ramon M. Lemos -1986 -Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (4):517-530.
- Rousseau's Animadversions on Representative Democracy.Ramon M. Lemos -1975 -Social Theory and Practice 3 (3):367-378.
- Reply to “Private Languages and Skepticism”.Ramon M. Lemos -1977 -Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 8 (2):51-52.
- Sensation, perception, and the given.Ramon M. Lemos -1964 -Ratio (Misc.) 6 (June):63-80.Export citation Bookmark
- Two concepts of natural right.Ramon M. Lemos -1974 -Southern Journal of Philosophy 12 (1):55-64.
- Tokens, Types, and Nominalism.Ramon M. Lemos -1984 -Critica 16 (46):31-45.
- The Concept of Natural Right.Ramon M. Lemos -1982 -Midwest Studies in Philosophy 7 (1):133-150.No categories
- The Existence of the World. [REVIEW]Ramon M. Lemos -1995 -Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (2):481-484.No categories
- (1 other version)[Book review] democratic liberalism and social union. [REVIEW]Ramon M. Lemos -1987 -Ethics 100 (4):755-758.
- Desire: Its Role in Practical Reason and the Explanation of Action. [REVIEW]Ramon M. Lemos -1996 -Review of Metaphysics 50 (2):423-423.One of the author's central theses in this admirable book is that in order to explain adequately the role of desire in practical reasoning and the explanation of action, it is necessary to distinguish between a broad sense of "desire," which "might be called the philosopher's sense," according to which the term applies to whatever moves a person to act, and a narrower, "more ordinary sense," according to which a person can decide to do things he has no desire to (...) do and also decide not to do other things he does have a desire to do. Since, Schueler argues, we do sometimes do things which we do not want to do, and we do not do other things which we do want to do and can do, the first sense of "desire" is too broad to enable us to explain how this is possible. This is because those who use "desire" only in the broad sense fail to distinguish between what Schueler terms "pro attitudes" and "desires proper" and in effect maintain that it is only desires proper, never pro attitudes by themselves, that move us to act. Thus, to use an example from Schueler, my belief that I have a duty to do something, such as attend a meeting at my son's school, might lead me to have a pro attitude toward attending it and to decide to do so even though I do not want to do it but instead want to stay home and read. Schueler's distinction between pro attitudes and desires proper has obvious implications for moral philosophy, some of which he discusses briefly. (shrink)
- Hobbes and Locke. [REVIEW]Ramon M. Lemos -1987 -International Studies in Philosophy 19 (1):103-104.
- Jean-Jacques Rousseau. [REVIEW]Ramon M. Lemos -1985 -Teaching Philosophy 8 (1):68-69.
- On the Edge of Anarchy. [REVIEW]Ramon M. Lemos -1998 -International Studies in Philosophy 30 (4):148-149.
- On the Social Contract, Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, Discourse on Political Economy. [REVIEW]Ramon M. Lemos -1984 -Teaching Philosophy 7 (2):183-185.
- On the Social Contract with Geneva Manuscripts and Political Economy. [REVIEW]Ramon M. Lemos -1979 -Teaching Philosophy 3 (1):123-125.
- Property. [REVIEW]Ramon M. Lemos -1989 -Teaching Philosophy 12 (3):317-319.
- Philosophy and Ideology in Hume’s Political Thought. [REVIEW]Ramon M. Lemos -1986 -International Studies in Philosophy 18 (1):103-105.
- P. Caws' "The Philosophy of Science". [REVIEW]Ramon M. Lemos -1966 -Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 26 (4):608.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Private Ownership. [REVIEW]Ramon M. Lemos -1989 -Teaching Philosophy 12 (1):66-69.
- Rethinking Democracy: Freedom and Social Cooperation in Politics, Economy, and Society. [REVIEW]Ramon M. Lemos -1993 -Noûs 27 (4):525.No categories
- The Invention of Autonomy. [REVIEW]Ramon M. Lemos -2001 -Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (2):483-487.In this magisterial book Professor Schneewind traces the history of moral, political, and legal philosophy from late medieval scholasticism through the sixteenth, seventeenth, and eighteenth centuries to the development of Kant’s moral philosophy and concept of autonomy. The range of thinkers discussed is astounding. Almost every important—and many not so important—moral philosopher from the beginning of the sixteenth to the end of the eighteenth century has at least one of the many sections of the book devoted to a discussion of (...) his views. There are, however, some omissions, perhaps the most important being that of the Anglican philosopher and theologian Richard Hooker, but he too is mentioned at a number of places. The knowledge Schneewind manifests of the moral, legal, and political philosophy of the three centuries he covers in detail is nothing less than astonishing. (shrink)
- The Political Animal. [REVIEW]Ramon M. Lemos -1982 -Teaching Philosophy 5 (4):332-334.
- The Vindication of Absolute Idealism. [REVIEW]Ramon M. Lemos -1986 -Review of Metaphysics 39 (3):587-588.This is a work in speculative metaphysics in the grand manner. The type of absolute idealism Sprigge endeavors to vindicate is monistic panpsychism. This he does not only by means of detailed sustained argument but also by informed discussions, manifesting admirable erudition, of recent analytic philosophers such as Russell, Feigl, Quine, Armstrong, and Williams and of philosophers such as Spinoza, Leibniz, Berkeley, Hume, Kant, Fichte, Schopenhauer, Bradley, Royce, James, Santayana, Husserl, Whitehead, and Hartshorne.
- Book reviews. [REVIEW]Stephen Skousgaard,James L. Marsh,Clark Butler,Paul D. Simmons,John T. Granrose,Ramon M. Lemos &Robert J. Fornaro -1982 -International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13 (1):43-52.
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5b9ff6f457-t4pt2 uwo