Results for 'Ralph M. Siegel'
946 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- Is it really that complex? After all, there are no green elephants.Ralph M.Siegel -1990 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (3):453-453.
- Properties of neurons in the dorsal visual pathway of the monkey.Ralph M.Siegel -1990 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (3):555-556.
- Recommendations for Nanomedicine Human Subjects Research Oversight: An Evolutionary Approach for an Emerging Field.Leili Fatehi,Susan M. Wolf,Jeffrey McCullough,Ralph Hall,Frances Lawrenz,Jeffrey P. Kahn,Cortney Jones,Stephen A. Campbell,Rebecca S. Dresser,Arthur G. Erdman,Christy L. Haynes,Robert A. Hoerr,Linda F. Hogle,Moira A. Keane,George Khushf,Nancy M. P. King,Efrosini Kokkoli,Gary Marchant,Andrew D. Maynard,Martin Philbert,Gurumurthy Ramachandran,Ronald A.Siegel &Samuel Wickline -2012 -Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (4):716-750.Nanomedicine is yielding new and improved treatments and diagnostics for a range of diseases and disorders. Nanomedicine applications incorporate materials and components with nanoscale dimensions where novel physiochemical properties emerge as a result of size-dependent phenomena and high surface-to-mass ratio. Nanotherapeutics and in vivo nanodiagnostics are a subset of nanomedicine products that enter the human body. These include drugs, biological products, implantable medical devices, and combination products that are designed to function in the body in ways unachievable at larger scales. (...) Nanotherapeutics andin vivonanodiagnostics incorporate materials that are engineered at the nanoscale to express novel properties that are medicinally useful. These nanomedicine applications can also contain nanomaterials that are biologically active, producing interactions that depend on biological triggers. Examples include nanoscale formulations of insoluble drugs to improve bioavailability and pharmacokinetics, drugs encapsulated in hollow nanoparticles with the ability to target and cross cellular and tissue membranes and to release their payload at a specific time or location, imaging agents that demonstrate novel optical properties to aid in locating micrometastases, and antimicrobial and drug-eluting components or coatings of implantable medical devices such as stents. (shrink)
- Theories of Scientific Method. The Renaissance through the Nineteenth Century.Ralph M. Blake,Curt J. Ducasse &Edward H. Madden -1961 -British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 12 (46):173-176.
- Theories of Scientific Method the Renaissance Through the Nineteenth Century, byRalph M. Blake, Curt J. Ducasse, and Edward H. Madden. Edited by Edward H. Madden. --.Ralph M. Blake -1960 - University of Washington Press.Export citation
Bookmark - A Student's Guide to Philosophy: Philosophy.Ralph M. McInerny -1999 - ISI Books.Philosophy is the pursuit of wisdom. It concerns (or should concern) the big questions of life. To answer such questions, it helps to understand what the great thinkers of history have had to say. You’ll gain such an understanding from this helpful guide by one of America’s leading philosophers,Ralph M. McInerny of Notre Dame. Writing with humor and verve, McInerny in just seventy-five pages takes you on an enlightening tour of two and a half millennia of philosophy. From (...) Aristotle and Aquinas to Descartes, Kant, and Nietzsche, you’ll learn about the most important thinkers and schools of thought. (shrink)No categories
- Early childhood memories: Accuracy and affect.M. Howes,M.Siegel &F. Brown -1993 -Cognition 47 (2):95-119.
- Problem : Ethics and Subjectivity.Ralph M. Mcinerny -1962 -Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 36:111.Export citation Bookmark
- Theories of scientific method: the Renaissance through the nineteenth century.Ralph M. Blake -1960 - New York: Gordon & Breach. Edited by Curt John Ducasse & Edward H. Madden.This historical compendium investigates scientific methods conceived between the Renaissance and the nineteenth century. Beginning with attacks on Scholasticism and the rist of the New Science, the authors explain the roles of both major andminor figures in describing scientific methods. Although the chapters are interrelated and contain explicit comparisons, each chapter is a complete study in itself. The authors' emphasis on writing for the non-specialist and their liberal use of primary sources make this an outstanding textbook.
- PLUTUS M. C. Torchio (ed.): Aristofane : Pluto. Turin: Edizioni dell'Orsom, 2001. Paper. €22.66. ISBN: 88-7694-539-.Ralph M. Rosen -2003 -The Classical Review 53 (02):290-.
- Badness and intentionality in aristophanes'frogs.Ralph M. Rosen -2008 - In Ineke Sluiter & Ralph Mark Rosen,Kakos: badness and anti-value in classical antiquity. Boston: Brill. pp. 307--143.No categories
- Il ruolo delle organizzazioni volontarie in quattro welfare state: uno studio comparato.Ralph M. Kramer -1992 -Polis 3.Export citation Bookmark
- Theories of Scientific Method.Ralph M. Blake,Curt J. Ducasse &Edward H. Madden -1962 -Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):249-249.
- Problem : Metaphysics and Subjectivity: An Approach to Karl Jaspers.Ralph M. Mcinerny -1958 -Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 32:172.Export citation Bookmark
- The Ground of Moral Obligation.Ralph M. Blake -1928 -International Journal of Ethics 38 (2):129-140.
- Comparative Risk Assessment: Where Does the Public Fit In?Ralph M. Perhac -1998 -Science, Technology and Human Values 23 (2):221-241.Comparative risk assessment is playing an ever-increasing role in environmental policy priority setting, as manifested in national and numerous subnational comparative risk projects. It is widely accepted that public values, interests, and concerns should play an important role in CRA. However, the philosophical basis for public involvement in CRA has not been adequately explored, nor have comparative risk projects always made explicit their rationales for public involvement. The author examines the political, normative, and epistemic rationales for public involvement and explores (...) the case for public involvement in the making of ethical, valuation, and evidentiary judgments. The author considers key issues each rationale raises, problems eachfaces, and some of the implications of each for specific aspects of CRA. (shrink)
- The Languages of Aristophanes. Aspects of Linguistic Variation in Classical Attic Greek.Ralph M. Rosen -2005 -Journal of Hellenic Studies 125:164-166.
- (1 other version)Divine Carcasse by Dominique Loureau.Ralph M. Becker -2002 -Philosophia Africana 5 (1):55-58.
- The identity of indiscernibles and the principle of individuation.Ralph M. Blake -1927 -Philosophical Review 36 (1):44-57.
- The Realm of Matter.Ralph M. Blake &George Santayana -1931 -Philosophical Review 40 (6):581.
- The interpretation of similarity.Ralph M. Blake -1928 -Philosophical Review 37 (3):257-261.
- The Ground of Moral Obligation.Ralph M. Blake -1927 -International Journal of Ethics 38 (2):129.
- Poetry and Sailing in Hesiod's "Works and Days".Ralph M. Rosen -1990 -Classical Antiquity 9 (1):99-113.
- Can speculative philosophy be defended?Ralph M. Blake -1943 -Philosophical Review 52 (2):127-134.
- Life's an Art. Franc-Nohain.Ralph M. Blake -1932 -International Journal of Ethics 42 (3):343-344.
- (2 other versions)Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. New Series, Vol. XXVH.Ralph M. Blake -1928 -Philosophical Review 37 (6):621.No categories
- Report of the annual meeting of the eastern division of the american philosophical association.Ralph M. Blake -1929 -Journal of Philosophy 26 (5):124-134.No categories
- Sir Isaac Newton's theory of scientific method.Ralph M. Blake -1933 -Philosophical Review 42 (5):453-486.
- The Reinterment of Hedonism.Ralph M. Blake -1928 -International Journal of Ethics 39 (1):93-101.
- The World as an Organic Whole.L'Intuition, la Matiere et la Vie.Ralph M. Blake,N. O. Lossky,Natalie A. Duddington &N. Lossky -1930 -Journal of Philosophy 27 (8):216.No categories
- (1 other version)General Logic.Ralph M. Eaton -1932 -The Monist 42:155.No categories
- Case Studies: That Which Is Wanting..Ralph M. Crawshaw,Leslie S. Rothenberg,Cory Franklin &Barney Speight -1988 -Hastings Center Report 18 (6):34.
- The logic of probable propositions.Ralph M. Eaton -1920 -Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 17 (2):44-51.
- The Social Unrest of the Soldier.Ralph M. Eaton -1920 -International Journal of Ethics 31 (3):279.
- In which Henry James strikes bedrock.Ralph M. Berry -1997 -Philosophy and Literature 21 (1):61-76.In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:In Which Henry James Strikes BedrockRalph M. BerryIn Stanley Cavell’s account of Wittgenstein’s later philosophy, everything we know depends upon what Wittgenstein calls grammatical criteria. These criteria are what we go on when judging that something counts as an instance of our concept of a “chair,” “ardent love,” “headache,” etc. For the arts, Wittgenstein’s focus on criteria leads in two, apparently opposite, directions. First, by making the activity of (...) judging constitutive for language and culture, Wittgenstein makes aesthetics (or what is traditionally called aesthetics) a model for all philosophical activity. Determining the basis on which a phenomenon will count as an instance of any concept turns out to involve capacities that formerly seemed relevant only in cases of aesthetic judgment.But Wittgenstein’s focus on criteria also works against this centrality of aesthetics, for it makes an exceptional or limiting case of the art contemporary with Wittgenstein. According to Cavell, what modernist art reveals is that judging what counts as a novel, painting, sculpture, etc., is no longer determined by grammatical criteria, or none to which we have access as we do our criteria for “chair,” “ardent love,” “headache,” etc. This does not mean, or not quite, that nobody knows any longer what a novel is. It comes closer to meaning that the experience of modern art is of finding out what we know, what our criteria for sculptures, paintings, novels are. And it makes modernism the disclosure of a new artistic necessity: not merely to create a new work, but to create a new basis for work, a new medium for fiction. 1In what follows my aim is to see how this necessity arises. My focus is on a particular period of Henry James’s career, roughly from his review of Eliot’s Middlemarch in 1873 to his essay on Maupassant in 1888, a [End Page 61] period that surrounds his now famous response to Walter Besant in “The Art of Fiction.” I do not insist that this moment in James’s career is a founding moment for modernist fiction. My only insistence is that, whatever conditions do give rise to modernism—either for a whole culture or for an individual—they look like this moment.INear the end of “The Art of Fiction,” Henry James takes issue with Walter Besant (and the critic Andrew Lang) over the use of the word “story.” 2 His stated provocations are, first, that Besant (in his lecture) has distinguished between “a part of a novel which is the story and part of it which... is not” (“AF,” p. 178) and, second, that Besant and Lang (in his review of Besant’s lecture) have made “adventure” a defining feature of any story (p. 179). James’s procedure in the first case is to give examples of “the only [sense of ‘story’] that I see” in which it can be spoken of as different from the novel as a whole. His procedure in the second case is to give examples of what constitutes an adventure “for me” (or what “I should say” is an adventure) and to confess that he is “utterly at a loss to see why” the plot of his own novella “An International Episode” does not count as an adventure if the other examples cited by Lang and Besant do. James gives no reasons why anyone ought to use the words “story” and “adventure” as he does. If we see senses of “story” other than the ones that James sees, if the fact that he is “utterly at a loss” makes no impression on us, or if we just do not care what Henry James considers adventurous, nothing he says seems designed to change our minds. His whole case rests on nothing stronger than the likelihood that, in the circumstances he describes, we too will call or judge or find what he calls/judges/finds “a story,” “an adventure,” “exciting,” etc. If we don’t, of course, we just don’t, but the surprise is how often we do. 3Contrary to what James maintains, the problem with Besant and Lang’s definition of “story” is not that it is “altogether arbitrary” (p. 179... (shrink)
- What is the problem of knowledge?Ralph M. Eaton -1923 -Journal of Philosophy 20 (7):178-187.
- Euboulos'Ankylion and the Game of Kottabos.Ralph M. Rosen -1989 -Classical Quarterly 39 (02):355-.Euboulos' 'αγκελων is represented by only four fragments , all culled from Athenaeus, which tell us nothing about the plot of the play or about the identity of its titular character. R. L. Hunter, in his recent commentary on Euboulos, discusses at length the name 'αγκελων and concludes that it could belong to either a humble and poor man; ‘a character from folklore notorious for sexual relations with his mother’ ; or ’ a wily slave such as those foreshadowed in (...) Aristophanes and familiar from New Comedy'. In view of our ignorance of the play's plot, each of these possibilities has an equal claim to our consideration. I believe, however, that the context in which the fragments are embedded in Athenaeus allows us to refine our understanding of the name even further. (shrink)
- An artificial intelligence approach to language instruction.Ralph M. Weischedel,Wilfried M. Voge &Mark James -1978 -Artificial Intelligence 10 (3):225-240.
- Aquinas Against the Averroists : On There Being Only One Intellect.Ralph M. Mcinerny -1993 -Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (2):386-386.No categories
- Charles De Koninck.Ralph M. McInerny -1965 -New Scholasticism 39 (4):491-516.
- Hipponax and his Enemies in Ovid'sIbis.Ralph M. Rosen -1988 -Classical Quarterly 38 (02):291-.Among the many textual difficulties that beset Ovid's Ibis are two passages that allude, in an oblique fashion typical of the whole poem, to the iambographer Hipponax: et quae Pytheides fecit de fratre Medusae, eveniant capiti vota sinistra tuo, utque parum stabili qui carmine laesit Athenin, invisus pereas deficiente cibo.
- Math by Pure Thinking: R First and the Divergence of Measures in Hegel's Philosophy of Mathematics.Ralph M. Kaufmann &Christopher Yeomans -2017 -European Journal of Philosophy 25 (4):985-1020.We attribute three major insights to Hegel: first, an understanding of the real numbers as the paradigmatic kind of number ; second, a recognition that a quantitative relation has three elements, which is embedded in his conception of measure; and third, a recognition of the phenomenon of divergence of measures such as in second-order or continuous phase transitions in which correlation length diverges. For ease of exposition, we will refer to these three insights as the R First Theory, Tripartite Relations, (...) and Divergence of Measures. Given the constraints of space, we emphasize the first and the third in this paper. (shrink)
- Replication Rate, Framing, and Format Affect Attitudes and Decisions about Science Claims.Ralph M. Barnes,Stephanie J. Tobin,Heather M. Johnston,Noah MacKenzie &Chelsea M. Taglang -2016 -Frontiers in Psychology 7.
- Existential Personalism.Ralph M. McInerny -1986 -Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 60:111-119.No categories
- In Memoriam.Ralph M. McInerny -1977 -New Scholasticism 51 (3):276-276.No categories
- Kierkegaard and Speculative Thought.Ralph M. McInerny -1966 -New Scholasticism 40 (1):23-35.
- Practical reasoning.Ralph M. McInerny -1984 -Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 58:15-16.
- Twenty-eighth Award of the Aquinas Medal to Jean T. Oesterle.Ralph M. Mcinerny -1984 -Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 58:15.
- (1 other version)Truth in Ethics.Ralph M. McInerny -1969 -Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 43:71-82.No categories
- The Logic of Analogy: An Interpretation of St. Thomas.Ralph M. McInerny -1971 - The Hague, Netherlands: Springer Verlag.The need for another study on the doctrine of analogy in the writings ofSt Thomas may not be obvious, since a complete bibliography in this area would doubtless assume depressing proportions. The present work is felt to be justified because it attempts a full-fledged alternative to the interpretation given in Cajetan's De nominum analogia, an interpretation which has provided the framework for subsequent discussions of the question. Recently, it is true, there has been growing dissatisfaction with Cajetan's approach; indeed there (...) have been wholesale attacks on the great commentator who is alleged to have missed the clef de voute of the metaphysics of his master. Applied to our problem, this criticism leads to the view that Cajetan was not metaphysical enough, or that he was metaphysical in the wrong way, in his discussion of the analogy of names. As its title indicates, the present study is not in agreement with Cajetan's contention that the analogy of names is a metaphysical doctrine. It is precisely a logical doctrine in the sense that "logical" has for St Thomas. We have no desire to be associated with attacks on Cajetan, the meta physician, attacks we feel are quite wrongheaded. If Cajetan must be criticized for his interpretation of the analogy of names, it is imperative that he be criticized for the right reasons. Moreover, criticism ofCajetan in the present study is limited to his views on the analogy of names. (shrink)
| 1 — 50 / 946 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5b9ff6f457-cbsf4 uwo