Results for 'R. F. Pettifer'
934 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- Phase-shift calculations for extended X-ray absorption fine structure and the fine structure of As2O3.R. F.Pettifer &P. W. McMillan -1977 -Philosophical Magazine 35 (4):871-882.
- Utilitarianism revised.R. F. Harrod -1936 -Mind 45 (178):137-156.
- Against Empiricism. On Education, Epistemology, and Value.R. F. Holland -1980 -Philosophy 57 (222):553-555.No categories
- How emotions facilitate and impair self-regulation.R. F. Baumeister,Anne L. Zell,Dianne M. Tice &J. J. Gross -2007 - In James J. Gross,Handbook of Emotion Regulation. Guilford Press.
- Deride.R. Hauptman &F. Hill -1991 -Abide or Dissent: On the Ethics of Professional Conduct', _/Omr «D/of Business Ethics 10.No categoriesExport citation
Bookmark - Quando uno psichiatra parla di psicosi ha già di fatto nella sua mente una distinzione, una scelta di campo, che esclude tutte le condizioni di disturbo psichico chiaramente connesse e derivanti da alterazioni organi-che del Sistema Nervoso e ovviamente il più spesso intrise di alterazioni delle funzioni mnestiche. La attenzione è cioè rivolta, in termini jasper.R. Bodei,G. M. Edelntann,F. Petrella,G. E. Rusconi &O. Sacks -1995 -Iride: Filosofia e Discussione Pubblica 8:46.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Practical plant breeding.F. R. Simpson -1938 -The Eugenics Review 30 (3):210.
- Memory.R. F. Harrod -1942 -Mind 51 (January):47-68.
- Bosnia: A Cultural History. By Ivan Lovrenovic.F. R. Jones -2004 -The European Legacy 9 (2):254-254.Export citation Bookmark
- 290/Name Index Bouchaud, JP 112,116 Bousquet, GH 230 Bovens. L. 3, 61,139 Bowles, S. 216,229.R. Boyd,M. Brown,S. C. Brown,J. C. Bryce,J. Buchanan,C. Bulcaen,S. Burks,M. F. Bumyeat,G. Busino &C. Castelfranchi -2008 - In Maria-Carla Galavotti,Reasoning, Rationality and Probability. CSLI Publications. pp. 289.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Trinitarian faith-seeking transformative understanding.F. R. Shults -2006 - In Philip Clayton & Zachory Simpson,The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press.
- Happiness and education.R. F. Dearden -1968 -Journal of Philosophy of Education 2 (1):17–29.R F Dearden; Happiness and Education, Journal of Philosophy of Education, Volume 2, Issue 1, 30 May 2006, Pages 17–29, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.1968.
- Position and Change: A Study in Law and Logic.R. F. Atkinson -1979 -Philosophical Quarterly 29 (115):183-185.No categories
- Calmodulin's warm embrace.F. Friedberg &A. R. Rhoads -1994 -Bioessays: News and Reviews in Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology 16 (11):853.No categories
- Autonomy as an educational ideal.R. F. Dearden -1975 - In Stuart C. Brown,Philosophers discuss education. London: Macmillan Press. pp. 3--18.
- Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle. (From Vol. 8. Of the Collected Works of C. G. Jung).R. F. C. Hull (ed.) -2010 - Princeton University Press.Jung was intrigued from early in his career with coincidences, especially those surprising juxtapositions that scientific rationality could not adequately explain. He discussed these ideas with Albert Einstein before World War I, but first used the term "synchronicity" in a 1930 lecture, in reference to the unusual psychological insights generated from consulting the I Ching. A long correspondence and friendship with the Nobel Prize-winning physicist Wolfgang Pauli stimulated a final, mature statement of Jung's thinking on synchronicity, originally published in 1952 (...) and reproduced here. Together with a wealth of historical and contemporary material, this essay describes an astrological experiment Jung conducted to test his theory. Synchronicity reveals the full extent of Jung's research into a wide range of psychic phenomena. This paperback edition of Jung's classic work includes a new foreword by Sonu Shamdasani, Philemon Professor of Jung History at University College London. (shrink)No categories
- (1 other version)Suicide.R. F. Holland -1968 -Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 2:72-85.I am concerned with the subject as an ethico-religious problem. Is suicide all right or isn't it; and if it isn't, why not?The question should not be assumed to be susceptible of an answer in the way the question whether arsenic is poisonous is susceptible of an answer. Moreover in the case of arsenic the question what it is, and the question whether it is poisonous, are separable questions: you can know that arsenic is poisonous without having analysed its nature. (...) But to know or believe that suicide is objectionable is to have analysed its nature or construed its significance in one way rather than another. (shrink)
- VIII*—Plato's Doctrine Of Freedom.R. F. Stalley -1998 -Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98 (1):145-158.R. F. Stalley; VIII*—Plato's Doctrine Of Freedom, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume 98, Issue 1, 1 June 1998, Pages 145–158, https://doi.org/10.11.
- The Foundation and Construction of Ethics.R. F. Atkinson -1975 -Philosophical Quarterly 25 (99):169-170.No categories
- In Defence of Children's Enquiry.R. F. Dearden -1977 -Journal of Philosophy of Education 11 (1):170-175.R F Deaden; In Defence of Children's Enquiry, Journal of Philosophy of Education, Volume 11, Issue 1, 30 May 2006, Pages 170–175, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467.
- Competition in education.R. F. Dearden -1972 -Journal of Philosophy of Education 6 (1):119–133.R F Dearden; Competition in Education, Journal of Philosophy of Education, Volume 6, Issue 1, 30 May 2006, Pages 119–133, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.19.
- Linear Läuchli semantics.R. F. Blute &P. J. Scott -1996 -Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 77 (2):101-142.We introduce a linear analogue of Läuchli's semantics for intuitionistic logic. In fact, our result is a strengthening of Läuchli's work to the level of proofs, rather than provability. This is obtained by considering continuous actions of the additive group of integers on a category of topological vector spaces. The semantics, based on functorial polymorphism, consists of dinatural transformations which are equivariant with respect to all such actions. Such dinatural transformations are called uniform. To any sequent in Multiplicative Linear Logic (...) , we associate a vector space of“diadditive” uniform transformations. We then show that this space is generated by denotations of cut-free proofs of the sequent in the theory MLL + MIX. Thus we obtain a full completeness theorem in the sense of Abramsky and Jagadeesan, although our result differs from theirs in the use of dinatural transformations.As corollaries, we show that these dinatural transformations compose, and obtain a conservativity result: diadditive dinatural transformations which are uniform with respect to actions of the additive group of integers are also uniform with respect to the actions of arbitrary cocommutative Hopf algebras. Finally, we discuss several possible extensions of this work to noncommutative logic.It is well known that the intuitionistic version of Läuchli's semantics is a special case of the theory of logical relations, due to Plotkin and Statman. Thus, our work can also be viewed as a first step towards developing a theory of logical relations for linear logic and concurrency. (shrink)
- Plato.R. F. Stalley -1983 -The Classical Review 33 (02):222-.
- Lawrimore.F. R. David,L. Anderson &K. W. McTier -1990 -Perspectives on Business Ethics in Management Education, Sam Advanced Management Journal 55 (4):26-32.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Critical notices.R. F. Alfred Hoernlé -1921 -Mind 30 (119):333-339.No categories
- Kant's concept of the "intrinsic worth" of every "rational being".R. F. Alfred Hoernlé -1943 -Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 24 (2):130.Export citation Bookmark
- Fanciful fates.R. F. Holland -1997 -Philosophical Investigations 20 (3):246–256.Fanciful fates is a discussion of ideas put forward by D.Z. Phillips in his book Wittgenstein and Religion, Ch. 13 –‘Authorship and Authenticity: Kierkegaard and Wittgenstein’. I begin by opposing the contention that Kierkegaard attacked Socrates (and that Josiah Thompson, one of Kierkegaard’s biographers, attacked Kierkegaard) because of a worry connected with the ‘the demise of foundationalism’. I then deal with Phillips's claim that a similarly motivated attack on Wittgenstein has been undertaken by me. I show that Phillips’s account of (...) my treatment of two problematic remarks by Wittgenstein is radically misconceived and I argue that his own approach to the problem is unsatisfactory. (shrink)No categories
- Factors influencing truth-telling by healthcare providers to terminally ill cancer patients at Ocean Road Cancer Institute in Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania.R. Athanas,F. Gasto &S. J. Renatha -2020 -South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 13 (2):108.No categories
- Problématique et méthodes d'étude des lignes de rivage holocènes le long de l'arc dinaro-helléno-taurique.F. Fouache &R. Dalongeville -2003 -Topoi 2 (2):579-597.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Natural selection and neoteny.R. F. Ewer -1960 -Acta Biotheoretica 13 (4):161-184.Even today, a century after the publication of the “Origin of Species”, current zoological literature often reveals an insufficient grasp of the implications of the now generally accepted view that it is natural selection that confers direction on the evolutionary process.This is, in part, due to a reaction against oversimplified teleology and against Lamarckism. In rejecting Lamarck's thesis that the activities of an animal directly affect its hereditary characters it is frequently assumed that this implies that such activities are irrelevant (...) to the study of evolution. This is a non-sequitur, for activities may affect evolution not directly, through heredity, but indirectly, by influencing the direction of the selective forces impinging on the organism. Reasons are given for concluding that changes in habits and behaviour frequently precede structural change and, in fact, determine the direction of the latter.As an example of a concept which deserves a more evolutionary treatment than it commonly receives, the subject of neoteny is considered. It appears that failure to think in terms of the selective forces involved has frequently led to error. An analysis in functional terms is made of the theory that the chordates represent secondarily glorified sea-squirts and it is concluded that this idea is unlikely to be correct. The characteristics of man that are commonly considered to be neotenous are also discussed. It is concluded that a facile and unanalytical application of the label “neoteny” to many of the evolutionary changes involved has tended to obscure rather than to clarify their significance: the neotenous features of man are not those that have been of primary importance in human evolution, but are secondary to the acquisition of new characters which are not to be found in either the adult or the young stages of any other primate.Aujourd'hui, un siècle après l'apparition de l'Originedes Espèces, la conviction est presque générale que la sélection naturelle dirige le procès de l'évolution. Néanmoins, les publications zoologiques actuelles révèlent souvent une compréhension insuffisante de ce qui en résulte.Ceci doit en partie être considéré comme réaction contre une téléologie simpliste et contre le Lamarckisme. En rejetant la thèse de Lamarck, que les activités d'un animal ont une influence directe sur ses caractéristiques héréditaires, on admet fréquemment que de pareilles activités n'ont rien à voir avec l'étude le l'évolution. Cependant, une telle conclusion n'est pas justifiée, car les activités peuvent influer sur l'évolution non pas directement, par la voie de l'hérédité, mais indirectement en agissant sur la direction des forces sélectives que l'organisme rencontre. Des raisons ont été données qui mènent à conclure que des changements dans les habitudes et dans le comportement précèdent maintes fois le changement structural et même déterminent la direction de celui-ci.Comme exemple d'un concept qui mérite un traitement plus évolutionniste qu'il ne reçoive en général, la néoténie a été examinée. Il paraît que l'on a fait beaucoup d'erreurs en ne tenant pas compte des forces sélectives engagées. Une analyse au pointde-vue de la fonction a été appliquée à la théorie que les chordées ne sont que des ascidies néoténiques transfigurées par après, et il s'ensuit que cette idée n'est probablement pas correcte. Aussi les caractéristiques de l'homme généralement regardées comme neoténiques ont été discutées. Il en résulte que, en désignant légèrement et sans analyse plusieurs changements évolutionnaires comme néoténie, on a plutôt obsurci qu'éclairci leur signification. Ce ne sont pas les traits néoteniques de l'homme qui ont joué le rôle principal dans l'évolution humaine; au contraire, ils n'apparaissent qu'après l'acquisition de quelques nouvelles caractéristiques qui ne se trouvent ni dans l'adulte ni dans les phases plus jeunes des autres primates.Sogar heutzutage, ein Jahrhundert nach dem Erscheinen der „Origin of Species”, zeigt die jetzige zoologische Literatur oft eine unzulängliche Einsicht in die Folgerungen, zu denen die jetzt allgemein akzeptierte Annahme leitet, dass die natürliche Selektion die Richtung des Evolutionsprozesses bedingt.Dies ist teilweise zu sehen als eine Reaktion gegen eine einseitige Teleologie und gegen das Lamarckismus. Bei der Ablehnung der TheseLamarck's, dass die Aktivitäten eines Tieres einen direkten Einfluss ausüben auf seine erbliche Konstitution, nimmt man oft an, dass dies bedeutet, dass derartige Aktivitäten demnach nichts zur Sache tun bei dem Studium der Evolution. Zu einer derartigen Konklusion ist man jedoch nicht berechtigt, denn, obwohl die Aktivitäten die Evolution nicht direkt beeinflussen können mittels der Erblichkeit, so können sie dies jedoch indirekt, weil sie die Richtung der selektiven Kräfte, welche auf das Organismus einwirken, bestimmen. Es werden Argumente gegeben, welche die Konklusion rechtfertigten, dass Änderungen in Gewohnheit und Verhalten oft Strukturänderungen vorhergehen und tatsächlich die Richtung dieser letztgenannten bestimmen. Die Neotenie wirdt als ein Beispiel eines Begriff betrachtet, welcher eine mehr evolutionäre Behandlung verdient als bisher geschehen ist. Es ergibt sich dass man viele Irrtümer hat gemacht, indem man den betreffenden selektiven Kräften keine Rechnung getragen hat. Eine Analyse der Theorie, welche die Chordaten als neotenische Ascidien betrachtet, wird von einem funktionellen Gesichtspunkt aus durchgeführt. Daraus scheint der Schluss berechtigt, dass diese Theorie falsch ist. Auch werden die menschlichen Kennzeichen, welche gewöhnlich als neotenische betrachtet werden, besprochen. Die Konklusion lautet, dass, wenn man leichtfertig und ohne genügende Analyse den Zettel „Neotenie“ für mancherlei evolutive Änderungen anwendet, man die richtige Bedeutung dieser Erscheinung vielmehr verdunkelt als aufklärt: nicht die neotenische Kennzeichen des Menschen sind am wichtigsten in seiner Evolution; in Gegenteil sie erscheinen nur sekundär, nachdem die neuen Kennzeichen, welche sich weder in den Erwachsenen noch in den jüngeren Stadien von den anderen Primaten finden lassen, erschienen sind. (shrink)
- The shuffle Hopf algebra and noncommutative full completeness.R. F. Blute &P. J. Scott -1998 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (4):1413-1436.We present a full completeness theorem for the multiplicative fragment of a variant of noncommutative linear logic, Yetter's cyclic linear logic (CyLL). The semantics is obtained by interpreting proofs as dinatural transformations on a category of topological vector spaces, these transformations being equivariant under certain actions of a noncocommutative Hopf algebra called the shuffie algebra. Multiplicative sequents are assigned a vector space of such dinaturals, and we show that this space has as a basis the denotations of cut-free proofs in (...) CyLL + MIX. This can be viewed as a fully faithful representation of a free *-autonomous category, canonically enriched over vector spaces. This paper is a natural extension of the authors' previous work, "Linear Lauchli Semantics", where a similar theorem is obtained for the commutative logic MLL + MIX. In that paper, we interpret proofs as dinaturals which are invariant under certain actions of the additive group of integers. Here we also present a simplification of that work by showing that the invariance criterion is actually a consequence of dinaturality. The passage from groups to Hopf algebras in this paper corresponds to the passage from commutative to noncommutative logic. However, in our noncommutative setting, one must still keep the invariance condition on dinaturals. (shrink)
- Religious discourse and theological discourse.R. F. Holland -1956 -Australasian Journal of Philosophy 34 (3):147 – 163.
- The Cambridge Ancient History.R. F. Flint,D. L. Linton &F. Moseley -1969 -Journal of the American Oriental Society 89 (4):833.No categories
- The Control of Parenthood. By various writers, edited by James Marchant, by F. B.R. F. Alfred Hoernle -1920 -International Journal of Ethics 31:443.Export citation Bookmark
- On Being Present to the Mind: A Reply.R. F. McRae -1975 -Dialogue 14 (4):664-666.
- I*—The Presidential Address: Euthyphro.R. F. Holland -1982 -Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 82 (1):1-16.R. F. Holland; I*—The Presidential Address: Euthyphro, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume 82, Issue 1, 1 June 1982, Pages 1–16, https://doi.org/10.No categories
- Philosophers Discuss Education.R. F. Holland -1977 -Philosophy 52 (199):63 - 81.It has come to be expected that collections issued by the Royal Institute of Philosophy will contain work that has quality or is otherwise interesting. This volume runs true to form and presents plenty of both. It gives the proceedings of the conference arranged by the Institute at Exeter in 1973, consisting of five symposia together with Chairman's remarks of about eight pages or so for each symposium, and in three cases postscripts by the first speaker. The contributors and topics (...) are: R. F. Dearden and Elizabeth Telfer on ‘Autonomy as an Educational Ideal’ with R. M. Hare as Chairman; R. K. Elliott and Glenn Langford on ‘Education and the Development of the Understanding’ with Paul Hirst as Chairman; David Cooper and Timothy O'Hagan on ‘Quality and Equality in Education’ with R. F. Atkinson as Chairman; Mary Warnock and Richard Norman on ‘The Neutral Teacher’ with Alan Montefiore as Chairman; Stuart Brown and A. Phillips Griffiths on ‘Academic Freedom’ with R. S. Peters as Chairman. (shrink)
- The End of Time. A Meditation on the Philosophy of History.R. F. Arragon,Josef Pieper &Michael Bullock -1955 -Philosophical Review 64 (4):667.
- The mechanism of consciousness: Images.F. R. Bichowsky -1926 -American Journal of Psychology 37:557-564.
- Hume and Reid on the Nature of Action.R. F. Stalley -1998 -Reid Studies 1 (2):33-48.
- Inquiry in science education: Intemational perspectives.F. Abd-Ei-Khalick,S. Boujaoude,N. G. Lederman,R. Mamilok-Naaman,A. Hofstein &M. Niaz -2004 -Science Education 88:397-419.No categories
- J. S. Mill's "Proof" of the Principle of Utility.R. F. Atkinson -1957 -Philosophy 32 (121):158 - 167.In Chapter 4 of his essay Utilitarianism, “Of what sort of Proof the Principle of Utility is susceptible,” J. S. Mill undertakes to prove, in some sense of that term, the principle of utility. It has very commonly been argued that in the course of this “proof” Mill commits two very obvious fallacies. The first is the naturalistic fallacy which he is held to commit when he argues that since “the only proof capable of being given that an object is (...) visible, is that people actually see it. The only proof that a sound is audible is that people hear it: and so of the other sources of our experience. In like manner … the sole evidence it is possible to produce that anything is desirable, is that people do actually desire it.”1 Here Mill appears to hold that “X is desirable ”—a value judgment—follows deductively from “People desire x”—a factual statement. And the second is the fallacy of composition which seems to be involved in Mill'zs argument that since “each person's happiness is a good to that person … the general happiness, therefore, a good to the aggregate of all persons.”2. (shrink)
- Review. Realism rescued: How scientific progress is possible. Jerrold L Aronson, R harré, Eileen Cornell way.R. F. Hendry &D. J. Mossley -1999 -British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (1):175-179.
- Mitosis at st andrews: Pulling the treads together.R. F. Brooks -1989 -Bioessays 11 (1):35-38.The following is a report of a meeting of the British Society for Cell Biology on ‘The Cell Cycle’, at St Andrews University, 4‐6 April, 1989.
- Morality and Moral Reasoning.R. F. Holland -1972 -Philosophy 47 (181):264-275.
- The Man of Galilee.F. R. Hancock -1958 -Hibbert Journal 57:223.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Education in Modern China.R. F. Price &Jan-Ingvar Lofstedt -1982 -Science and Society 46 (1):109-111.
- Play and Pleasure.R. F. Dearden -1971 -Journal of Philosophy of Education 5 (1):37-41.R F Dearden; Play and Pleasure, Journal of Philosophy of Education, Volume 5, Issue 1, 30 May 2006, Pages 37–41, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.1971.tb0044.
- Education and the ethics of belief.R. F. Dearden -1974 -British Journal of Educational Studies 22 (1):5-17.
- ‘Needs’ in education.R. F. Dearden -1966 -British Journal of Educational Studies 14 (3):5-17.
| 1 — 50 / 934 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-72j75 uwo