Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs

Results for 'Philosophy of science'

934 found
Order:

1 filter applied
See also
  1.  6
    Mathematical sciences as symbolic form: the objects and objectivity ofscience in Ernst Cassirer’sphilosophy ofscience and culture.Jørgen Røysland Aarnes -2024 -Continental Philosophy Review 57 (3):305-324.
    In this paper, I explore how Cassirer’s early and mature epistemology,philosophy ofscience, andphilosophy of culture make up a coherent and comprehensive view of the mathematical sciences that is fruitful for understanding contemporaryscience. In Cassirer’s first systematic work, Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff, the mathematical sciences are understood through the concept of function. This implies that scientific investigation aims at increased unity in a system of functional concepts, rather than at answering the substance-rooted question of (...) what is. In his mature work, Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, Cassirer expands his inquiry to diverse notions of objects and principles of symbolic forming, recognizing the mathematical sciences as one of many ways of structuring experience, alongside other symbolic forms such as myth and ordinary language. Together, Cassirer’s early and mature works detail the preconditions and idiosyncrasies of the unfolding of scientific objects and situate the mathematical sciences within the totality of human experience. Applying these insights to contemporary interpretations ofscience suggests connecting common misconceptions ofscience to challenges in translating objects between symbolic forms. I propose the concepts of domestication and mythification ofscience as instructive for clearing up such misunderstandings. (shrink)
    Direct download(4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  25
    British journal for thephilosophy ofscience.Andrew G. Pikler -1954 -Dialectica 8 (4):369-370.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Ferment inPhilosophy ofScience: A Review Discussion.Paul Durbin -1986 -The Thomist 50 (4):690.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  46
    (1 other version)Economics andphilosophy ofscience.Wenceslao J. González -1991 -Theoria 6 (1):299-302.
  5.  26
    Italian Studies in thePhilosophy ofScience. Maria Luisa Dalla Chiara, Carolyn R. Fawcett.Maurice Finocchiaro -1982 -Isis 73 (2):284-285.
  6. Boston Studies in thePhilosophy ofScience, Vol.236.Dimitri Ginev (ed.) -2003 - Springer.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. Logic, Methodology andPhilosophy ofScience IV, Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress for Logic, Methodology andPhilosophy ofScience, Bucharest, 1971.P. Suppes,L. Henkin,A. Joja &Gr C. Moisil -1975 -Synthese 31 (1):161-186.
  8.  22
    Berkeley'sphilosophy ofscience in theSiris.J. O. Urmson -1986 -History of European Ideas 7 (6):563-566.
  9.  22
    The Historian and thePhilosophy ofScience.Thomas Cowan -1947 -Isis 38 (1/2):11-18.
  10.  69
    Bioethics andphilosophy ofscience.Robert M. Veatch -1995 -Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (3):227-231.
    Direct download(4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  15
    The historical approach tophilosophy ofscience Toulmin in perspective.Vivien Schmidt -1988 -Metaphilosophy 19 (3-4):223-236.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. Whitehead and thephilosophy ofscience.Ann Plamondon -1977 - In John B. Cobb & David Ray Griffin,Mind in Nature. University Press of America. pp. 109.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  15
    Locke'sPhilosophy ofScience and Knowledge: A Consideration of Some Aspects of An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.John W. Yolton -1972 -Philosophical Quarterly 22 (88):269-271.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14. Logic, Methodology andPhilosophy ofScience, Proceedings of the 14th International Congress.Peter Schroeder-Heister,Gerhard Heinzmann,Wilfred Hodges &Pierre Edouard Bour (eds.) -2014 - London, UK:
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. On Method in thePhilosophy ofScience.Mario Bunge -1971 -Archives de Philosophie 34 (4):551.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  23
    Whitehead's OrganicPhilosophy ofScience.T. E. Burke -1981 -Philosophical Books 22 (2):123-126.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  16
    Abstracts from "Philosophy ofScience".B. Juhos -1970 -Synthese 21 (3/4):496.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. Logic andPhilosophy ofScience in Québec.Fisette Denis -1995 - Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  31
    From the traditionalphilosophy ofscience towards the contemporaryphilosophy ofscience.Svetozar Sinđelić -2009 -Theoria: Beograd 52 (2):5-35.
  20. Logic, Methodology andPhilosophy ofScience at Warsaw University, Warszawa 2013.Anna Brożek (ed.) -2013
  21. Studies in thePhilosophy ofScience Essays by Peter Achinstein [and Others]. --.Peter Achinstein -1969 - Blackwell.
  22. Einstein'sPhilosophy ofScience.N. Griffin -1971 -Scientia 65 (6):25.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23. (1 other version)Recent publications on thephilosophy ofscience.J. W. N. Watkins -1958 -British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 9 ([33/36]):349.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24. Boston colloquium forphilosophy ofscience forty-fifth annual program 2004–2005.Editorial Board -2004 -Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 35 (2):413-417.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  41
    Some Current Trends inPhilosophy ofScience: With Special Attention to Confirmation, Theoretical Entities, and Mind-Body.Grover Maxwell -1974 -PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1974:565 - 584.
  26.  17
    An Introduction to thePhilosophy ofScience.Keekok Lee -1990 -Philosophical Books 31 (1):59-61.
  27.  25
    From the Dual Character of Chemistry to Practical Realism and Back Again:Philosophy ofScience of Rein Vihalemm.Peeter Müürsepp,Gulzhikhan Nurysheva,Zhumagul Bekenova &Galymzhan Usenov -2019 -Problemos 96:107-120.
    The focus of the paper is on Rein Vihalemm’s novel approach toscience called practical realism. From the perspective of Vihalemm,science is not only theoretical but first and foremost a practical activity. This kind of approach puts chemistry rather than physics into the position of a typicalscience as chemistry has a dual character resting on both constructive-hypothetico-deductive and classifying-historico-descriptive types of cognition. Chemists deal with finding out the laws of nature like the physicists. However, in (...) addition to this they deal with substances or stuff that is rather an activity typical to natural history. The analysis of the dual character of chemistry brings about the need to analyse philosophically the reasons why physics has held the position of the onlyscience proper so far. The comparative analysis of physics and chemistry at the basis of practical realism suggests that it is chemistry rather than physics that should hold a special position among sciences. Perhaps we should exchange ϕ-science for χ-science. (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download(4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  34
    The Roles that Otto Selz and Karl Popper Played in 20th-Century Psychology andPhilosophy ofScience.John Wettersten -2017 -Philosophy of the Social Sciences 47 (3):255-279.
    The early research of Karl Popper both in psychology and inphilosophy ofscience is described; its basis for his later breakthroughs in thephilosophy ofscience is explained. His debt to Otto Selz’s thought psychology is thereby detailed. Otto Selz’sphilosophy ofscience is then explained, and its conflict with Popper’s early as well as his later views is portrayed. These studies of the conflicting views of Popper’s early views and Selz’sphilosophy (...) ofscience provide the basis for demonstrating the mistakes that Michel ter Hark has made in claiming that the alleged originality of Popper’s views occurred only in the 1970s and are little more than a rehash of Selz’s alleged evolutionary epistemology. (shrink)
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  23
    Epistemological Problems in thePhilosophy ofScience, II.Edward MacKinnon -1968 -Review of Metaphysics 22 (2):329 - 358.
    This article completes the study begun in I by a detailed consideration of errol harris's, "the foundations of metaphysics inscience" and by an independent interpretation of the epistemological foundations of scientific theories. This is done in terms of two components labelled 'a physical language' and 'a mathematical language'. A physical language is conceived as a transformed extension of ordinary language which preserves its basic structural principles while modifying its descriptive metaphysics. The relation between such a physical language and (...) a mathematical system is explained by a correspondence between second order physical predicates and first order mathematical predicates. (shrink)
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  5
    (1 other version)Probabilistic Thinking, Thermodynamics and the Interaction of the History andPhilosophy ofScience: Proceedings of the 1978 Pisa Conference on the History andPhilosophy ofScience.Evandro Agazzi,David Gruender &Jaakko Hintikka -1980 - Springer.
    The two volumes to which this is apreface consist of the Proceedings of the Second International Conference on History andPhilosophy ofScience. The Conference was organized by the Joint Commission of the International Union of History andPhilosophy ofScience (IUHPS) under the auspices of the IUHPS, the Italian Society for Logic andPhilosophy ofScience, and the Domus Galilaeana of Pisa, headed by Professor Vincenzo Cappelletti. Domus Galilaeana also served as the host (...) institution, with some help from the University of Pisa. The Conference took place in Pisa, Italy, on September 4-8, 1978. The editors of these two volumes of the Proceedings of the Pisa Conference acknowledge with gratitude the help by the different sponsoring organizations, and in the first place that by both Divisions of the IUHPS, which made the Conference possible. A special recognition is due to Professor Evandro Agazzi, President of the Italian Society for Logic andPhilosophy ofScience, who was co opted as an additional member of the Organizing Committee. This committee was otherwise identical with the Joint Commission, whose members were initially John Murdoch, John North, Arpad Szab6, Robert Butts, Jaakko Hintikka, and Vadim Sadovsky. Later, Erwin Hiebert and Lubos Novy were appointed as additional members. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  62
    F. H. Bradley and thephilosophy ofscience.W. J. Mander -1991 -International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (1):65 – 78.
    Abstract It is sometimes thought that Absolute Idealism was undermined by its inability to deal withscience. Through a critical discussion of F. H. Bradley'sphilosophy ofscience, this idea is challenged. His views onscience are divided into a positive and a negative part, and it is argued that, although he found the scientific world view to be essentially false, he was nonetheless able to develop a sympathetic and intelligentphilosophy ofscience. This (...) was basically pragmatic and instrumental in tone, and gave toscience a large measure of autonomy fromphilosophy. His doctrine is connected with certain contemporary ideas in thephilosophy ofscience. (shrink)
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  24
    Boston studies in thephilosophy ofscience: Proceedings of the boston colloquium for thephilosophy ofscience, 1961/1962.Marjorie Grene -1963 -Philosophical Books 4 (3):31-32.
    No categories
    Direct download(4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33. Preti, Giulio lessons inphilosophy-of-science.Pier Luigi Lecis -1990 -Giornale Critico Della Filosofia Italiana 10 (3):393-399.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  34
    An Introduction to thePhilosophy ofScience.Peter Machamer -2012 - In[no title].
    No categories
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35.  18
    Russell'sPhilosophy ofScience.Ernest Nagel -1944 -Journal of Symbolic Logic 9 (3):79-80.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  36.  24
    (2 other versions)Minnesota Studies in thePhilosophy ofScience, Volume I. The Foundations ofScience and the Concepts of Psychology and Psychoanalysis.Edward H. Madden -1957 -Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 17 (4):560-562.
    No categories
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  31
    Where thephilosophy ofscience should go from here.Hugo Meynell -1982 -Heythrop Journal 23 (2):123–138.
  38.  11
    Nietzsche’s „Philosophy ofScience“.Dirk Johnson -2016 -Nietzsche Studien 45 (1):268-279.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Nietzsche-Studien Jahrgang: 45 Heft: 1 Seiten: 268-279.
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  93
    Hidden entities and experimental practice: Towards a two-way traffic between history andphilosophy ofscience.Theodore Arabatzis -unknown
    In this paper I investigate the prospects of integrated history andphilosophy ofscience, by examining how philosophical issues concerning experimental practice and scientific realism can enrich the historical investigation of the careers of "hidden entities", entities that are not accessible to unmediated observation. Conversely, I suggest that the history of those entities has important lessons to teach to thephilosophy ofscience. My overall aim is to illustrate the possibility of a fruitful two-way traffic between (...) history andphilosophy ofscience. (shrink)
    Direct download(4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  4
    Synopsis ofScience: Volume 2: From the Standpoint of the NyayaPhilosophy.James R. Ballantyne -2012 - Cambridge University Press.
    James Robert Ballantyne taught oriental languages in India for sixteen years, compiling grammars of Hindi, Sanskrit and Persian, along with translations of Hinduphilosophy. In 1859, for the use of Christian missionaries, he prepared a guide to Hinduism, in English and Sanskrit. Published in two volumes in 1852, Synopsis ofScience was intended to introduce his Indian pupils to Westernscience by using the framework of Hindu Nyayaphilosophy, which was familiar to them and which Ballantyne (...) greatly respected. This second volume proceeds in similar style to the first: through a series of short paragraphs, Ballantyne introduces arithmetic, algebra, calculus, chemistry, botany, zoology, anatomy, physiology, mineralogy and geology. The second part of the volume is a Sanskrit translation. Overall, the work serves as an excellent primary source on the educational aspects of British imperialism. (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  37
    Ontology and thephilosophy ofscience: A reply.Frederick Sontag -1958 -Journal of Philosophy 55 (8):337-339.
  42.  82
    (1 other version)Normatividad en filosofia de la ciencia: El Caso de la ciencia reguladora (normativity in thephilosophy ofscience: The case of regulatoryscience).Alcázar Francisca Javier Rodríguez -2004 -Theoria 19 (2):173-190.
    En este articulo se examina la tradicional caracterización de la filosofía de la ciencia como una disciplina normativa. Se discuten varias concepciones de esta disciplina, cada una de las cuales ofrece una respuesta diferente a la pregunta de si es posible, y cómo, una filosofía de la ciencia genuinamente normativa. De entre esas concepciones, se opta por una forma de naturalismo que se diferencia de otras en la exigeneia de que la normatividad de la filosofía de la ciencia inc!uya la (...) discusión de los objetivos y valores, epistémicos o no, de la ciencia. La necesidad de esta inc!usión se ilustra, finalmente, con el ejemplo de la aetividad conocida como “cicncia reguladora”.This article examines the traditional characterization of thephilosophy ofscience as a normative discipline. Several understandings of this discipline are discussed; each of them offering a different answer to the question whether, and how, a genuinely normativephilosophy ofscience might be possible. Among these views, I choose one variety of naturalism that differs from others in its commitment with the discussion ofscience’s aims and values, either epistemic or non-epistemic. Finally, the need for this inclusion is illustrated with the example of the so-called “regulatoryscience”. (shrink)
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  11
    The Origins of ModernPhilosophy ofScience 1830-1914.Andrew Pyle (ed.) -1996 - Routledge.
    First published in 1996. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44. Rorty, language and thephilosophy ofscience.I. Hanzel -2005 -Filozofia 60 (9):656-667.
    The aim of the paper is to analyze the consequences of R. Rorty’s pragmatic cum linguistic turn for the understanding of natural and human sciences. The author analyzes first this turn and tries to show that it represents an intersubjectivist type of antirealism. Then he deals with Rorty’s approach to hermeneutics and his understanding of its place in natural and human sciences. Finally, he discusses the consequences of Rorty’s intersubjectivist antirealism for human sciences and tries to show that, on one (...) hand, it represents the philosophical basis of the so-called idea-lism of interpretative humanscience and on the other hand, it enables us to see the latter’s foundations from a new, fresh perspective. (shrink)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45. Maya Cosmology andPhilosophy ofScience.Charles R. Twardy -manuscript
    Part of our fascination with the Maya can be attributed to the fact that they were literate . . . that is, the Classic Maya possessed a visible language that consisted of letters and a grammar, and one of the products of their literacy was the book. (Aveni 1992b, p.3).
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  25
    What’s New inPhilosophy ofScience?Bora Dogan -2002 -Philosophy Now 38:14-15.
  47.  21
    Current research inphilosophy ofscience: proceedings of the P.S.A. Critical Research Problems Conference.Peter D. Asquith &Henry Ely Kyburg (eds.) -1979 - East Lansing, Mich.: Philosophy of Science Association.
  48.  13
    Values and thePhilosophy ofScience.David Gruender -1998 -ProtoSociology 12:319-332.
    No categories
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  67
    Logic, Methodology, andPhilosophy ofScience. Three ReviewsLogic, Methodology, andPhilosophy ofScience.Elliott Mendelson,Richard C. Jeffrey,Ernest Adams,Ernest Nagel,Patrick Suppes &Alfred Tarski -1964 -Journal of Philosophy 61 (2):76.
  50.  23
    (1 other version)Minnesota Studies in thePhilosophy ofScience. [REVIEW]Robert Ackermann -1974 -Journal of Philosophy 71 (13):424-432.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
1 — 50 / 934
Export
Limit to items.
Filters





Configure languageshere.Sign in to use this feature.

Viewing options


Open Category Editor
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?

Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.

Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:

Email RSS feed
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct

CDPPhiosophy Documentation Center
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).

Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation

Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-k24bk uwo
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp