Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs
Order:

1 filter applied
  1.  101
    Vision verbs dominate in conversation across cultures, but the ranking of non-visual verbs varies.Lila San Roque,Kobin H. Kendrick,Elisabeth Norcliffe,Penelope Brown,Rebecca Defina,Mark Dingemanse,Tyko Dirksmeyer,N. J. Enfield,Simeon Floyd,Jeremy Hammond,Giovanni Rossi,Sylvia Tufvesson,Saskia van Putten &Asifa Majid -2015 -Cognitive Linguistics 26 (1):31-60.
    To what extent does perceptual language reflect universals of experience and cognition, and to what extent is it shaped by particular cultural preoccupations? This paper investigates the universality~relativity of perceptual language by examining the use of basic perception terms in spontaneous conversation across 13 diverse languages and cultures. We analyze the frequency of perception words to test two universalist hypotheses: that sight is always a dominant sense, and that the relative ranking of the senses will be the same across different (...) cultures. We find that references to sight outstrip references to the other senses, suggesting a pan-human preoccupation with visual phenomena. However, the relative frequency of the other senses was found to vary cross-linguistically. Cultural relativity was conspicuous as exemplified by the high ranking of smell in Semai, an Aslian language. Together these results suggest a place for both universal constraints and cultural shaping of the language of perception. (shrink)
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  2.  45
    Immanuel Kant among the Tenejapans: Anthropology as Empirical Philosophy.Stephen C. Levinson &Penelope Brown -1994 -Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 22 (1):3-41.
  3.  18
    ‘She had just cut/broken off her head’: Cutting and breaking verbs in Tzeltal.Penelope Brown -2007 -Cognitive Linguistics 18 (2).
  4.  79
    Making sense of causal relations. A cross-cultural and cross-linguistic study.Olivier Le Guen,Jana Samland,Thomas Friedrich,Daniel Hanus &Penelope Brown -2015 -Frontiers in Psychology 6.
  5.  46
    Anticipatory Processing in a Verb‐Initial Mayan Language: Eye‐Tracking Evidence During Sentence Comprehension in Tseltal.Gabriela Garrido Rodriguez,Elisabeth Norcliffe,Penelope Brown,Falk Huettig &Stephen C. Levinson -2023 -Cognitive Science 47 (1):e13292.
    We present a visual world eye-tracking study on Tseltal (a Mayan language) and investigate whether verbal information can be used to anticipate an upcoming referent. Basic word order in transitive sentences in Tseltal is Verb–Object–Subject (VOS). The verb is usually encountered first, making argument structure and syntactic information available at the outset, which should facilitate anticipation of the post-verbal arguments. Tseltal speakers listened to verb-initial sentences with either an object-predictive verb (e.g., “eat”) or a general verb (e.g., “look for”) (e.g., (...) “Ya slo’/sle ta stukel on te kereme,” Is eating/is looking (for) by himself the avocado the boy/ “The boy is eating/is looking (for) an avocado by himself”) while seeing a visual display showing one potential referent (e.g., avocado) and three distractors (e.g., bag, toy car, coffee grinder). We manipulated verb type (predictive vs. general) and recorded participants' eye movements while they listened and inspected the visual scene. Participants’ fixations to the target referent were analyzed using multilevel logistic regression models. Shortly after hearing the predictive verb, participants fixated the target object before it was mentioned. In contrast, when the verb was general, fixations to the target only started to increase once the object was heard. Our results suggest that Tseltal hearers pre-activate semantic features of the grammatical object prior to its linguistic expression. This provides evidence from a verb-initial language for online incremental semantic interpretation and anticipatory processing during language comprehension. These processes are comparable to the ones identified in subject-initial languages, which is consistent with the notion that different languages follow similar universal processing principles. (shrink)
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  16
    To 'put'or to 'take'?Penelope Brown -2012 - In Anetta Kopecka & Bhuvana Narasimhan,Events of Putting and Taking: A Crosslinguistic Perspective. John Benjamins. pp. 100--55.
    No categories
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  49
    Gesichtsbedrohende Akte.Stephen C. Levinson &Penelope Brown -2007 - In Hannes Kuch, Sybille Krämer & Steffen K. Herrmann,Verletzende Worte: Die Grammatik Sprachlicher Missachtung. Transcript Verlag. pp. 59-88.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
Export
Limit to items.
Filters





Configure languageshere.Sign in to use this feature.

Viewing options


Open Category Editor
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?

Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp