Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs
Order:

1 filter applied
Disambiguations
Paul F. Snowdon [32]Paul Francis Snowdon [1]
  1.  166
    Persons, Animals, Ourselves.Paul F. Snowdon (ed.) -2014 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    What kind of thing are we? Paul Snowdon's answer is that we are animals, of a sort. This view--'animalism'--may seem obvious but on the whole philosophers have rejected it. Snowdon argues that animalism is a defensible way of thinking about ourselves. Its rejection rests on the tendency when doing philosophy to mistake fantasy for reality.
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   43 citations  
  2.  40
    The Rediscovery of the Mind.Paul F. Snowdon -1994 -Philosophical Quarterly 44 (175):259-260.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   77 citations  
  3. (1 other version)Persons, animals, and ourselves.Paul F. Snowdon -1990 - In Christopher Gill,The Person and the human mind: issues in ancient and modern philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   66 citations  
  4.  66
    Animalism: New Essays on Persons, Animals, and Identity.Stephan Blatti &Paul F. Snowdon (eds.) -2016 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
    What are we? What is the nature of the human person? Animalism has a straightforward answer to these long-standing philosophical questions: we are animals. After being ignored for a long time in philosophical discussions of our nature, this idea has recently gained considerable support in metaphysics and philosophy of mind. Containing mainly new papers as well as two highly important articles that were recently published elsewhere, this volume's contributors include both emerging voices in the debate and many of those who (...) have been instrumental in shaping it. Some of their contributions defend animalism, others criticize it, still others explore its more general implications. The book also contains a substantial introduction by the editors explaining what animalism is, identifying leading issues that merit attention, and highlighting many of the issues that the contributors have raised. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  5.  364
    The formulation of disjunctivism: A response to fish.Paul F. Snowdon -2005 -Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (1):129-141.
    Fish proposes that we need to elucidate what 'disjunctivism' stands for, and he also proposes that it stands for the rejection of a principle about the nature of experience that he calls the decisiveness principle. The present paper argues that his first proposal is reasonable, but then argues, in Section II, that his positive suggestion does not draw the line between disjunctivism and non-disjunctivism in the right place. In Section III, it is argued that disjunctivism is a thesis about the (...) special nature of perceptual experience, and the thesis as elucidated here is then distinguished from and related to certain other ideas about perception, namely, direct realism and also McDowell's epistemological disjunctivism. (shrink)
    Direct download(6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   45 citations  
  6. How to interpret direct perception.Paul F. Snowdon -1992 - In Tim Crane,The Contents of Experience. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 48-78.
  7. Strawson on the concept of perception.Paul F. Snowdon -1998 - InThe Philosophy of P.F. Strawson. Chicago: Open Court.
  8.  89
    Persons, animals and bodies.Paul F. Snowdon -1995 - In José Luis Bermúdez, Anthony Marcel & Naomi Eilan,The Body and the Self. MIT Press.
  9.  277
    Some Reflections on an Argument from Hallucination.Paul F. Snowdon -2005 -Philosophical Topics 33 (1):285-305.
  10. Human Beings.Paul F. Snowdon -1991 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
  11.  27
    (1 other version)Rylean Arguments: Ancient and Modern.Paul F. Snowdon -2011 - In J. Bengson M. A. Moffett,Knowing How: Essays on Knowledge, Mind and Action. pp. 59-79.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  12. The Philosophy of P.F. Strawson.Paul F. Snowdon -1998 - Chicago: Open Court.
  13. On formulating materialism and dualism.Paul F. Snowdon -1989 - In John Heil,Cause, Mind, and Reality: Essays Honoring C.B. Martin. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  14.  163
    Wittgensteinian : Looking at the World From the Viewpoint of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy.A. C. Grayling,Shyam Wuppuluri,Christopher Norris,Nikolay Milkov,Oskari Kuusela,Danièle Moyal-Sharrock,Beth Savickey,Jonathan Beale,Duncan Pritchard,Annalisa Coliva,Jakub Mácha,David R. Cerbone,Paul Horwich,Michael Nedo,Gregory Landini,Pascal Zambito,Yoshihiro Maruyama,Chon Tejedor,Susan G. Sterrett,Carlo Penco,Susan Edwards-Mckie,Lars Hertzberg,Edward Witherspoon,Michel ter Hark,Paul F. Snowdon,Rupert Read,Nana Last,Ilse Somavilla &Freeman Dyson (eds.) -2019 - Springer Verlag.
    “Tell me," Wittgenstein once asked a friend, "why do people always say, it was natural for man to assume that the sun went round the earth rather than that the earth was rotating?" His friend replied, "Well, obviously because it just looks as though the Sun is going round the Earth." Wittgenstein replied, "Well, what would it have looked like if it had looked as though the Earth was rotating?” What would it have looked like if we looked at all (...) sciences from the viewpoint of Wittgenstein’s philosophy? Wittgenstein is undoubtedly one of the most influential philosophers of the twentieth century. His complex body of work has been analysed by numerous scholars, from mathematicians and physicists, to philosophers, linguists, and beyond. This volume brings together some of his central perspectives as applied to the modern sciences and studies the influence they may have on the thought processes underlying science and on the world view it engenders. The contributions stem from leading scholars in philosophy, mathematics, physics, economics, psychology and human sciences; all of them have written in an accessible style that demands little specialist knowledge, whilst clearly portraying and discussing the deep issues at hand. (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  15.  228
    (1 other version)McDowell on Skepticism, Disjunctivism, and Transcendental Arguments.Paul F. Snowdon -2009 -Philosophical Topics 37 (1):133-152.
  16.  106
    'Persons' and Persons.Paul F. Snowdon -2009 -Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 16 (4):449-476.
    In chapter 3 of Individuals, entitled ‘Persons’, Strawson argues against dualism and the no-ownership theory, and proposes instead that our concept of a person is a primitive concept. In this paper, it is argued that the basic questions that frame Strawson’s discussion, and some of his main arguments and claims, are dubious. A general diagnosis of the source of these problems is proposed. It is argued that despite these problems Strawson gives an accurate and very insightful description of the way (...) we think about ourselves, which should form the starting point for more speculative accounts of ourselves. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  17.  194
    Strawson’s Agnostic Materialism.Paul F. Snowdon &John McDowell -1998 -Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (2):455.
  18.  45
    II- Dainton on Subjects of Experience.Paul F. Snowdon -2016 -Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 90 (1):145-159.
    The paper discusses some of the themes in Professor Dainton’s article ‘The Sense of Self’. In the first part it is proposed that some of the arguments in favour of the theory that Dainton proposes are questionable, and that in its more extreme version there are features which look doubtful. A simpler account of subjects is then proposed. In the second part some aspects of Dainton’s discussion of the sense of self are analysed. It is argued that although Dainton’s own (...) account of our sense of self is not obviously correct, the views he is opposed to are not well supported, nor is the debate very clear. (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  19.  106
    (1 other version)Philosophy and the Mind/Body Problem.Paul F. Snowdon -2015 -Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 76:21-37.
    The thesis of the paper is that it is an illusion to think that the mind/body problem is one that philosophy can expect to solve. The basic reason is that the problem is one of determining the real nature of conscious states, and philosophy lacks the tools to work this out. It is argued that anti-materialist arguments in philosophy tend to rely on modal intuitions which lack any support. It is then argued that pro-materialist arguments, such as those of Smart (...) and of Papineau, are dubious because they either yield a conclusion that is too conditional on what other types of research might discover, or rely on premises that anyone who is not already a materialist can simply query. Even if these points are correct the main thesis remains fairly speculative, but at least some support for it is presented. (shrink)
    Direct download(4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  20. Ancient and Modern Philosophy.Paul F. Snowdon -1989 - New York: Clarendon Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  35
    Logical Forms. An Introduction to Philosophical Logic.Paul F. Snowdon -1993 -Philosophical Books 34 (3):157-158.
  22.  27
    Mcdowell sobre escepticismo, disyuntivismo y Argumentos trascendentales.Paul F. Snowdon -2012 -Azafea: Revista de Filosofia 14:23-48.
    La concepción disyuntiva del conocimiento perceptual de McDowell contiene una novedosa adición a su interesante respuesta al escepticismo introduciendo un argumento trascendental. No está claro que esta adición fortalezca su respuesta. El disyuntivismo de McDowell parece envolver compromisos tanto epistemológicos como teórico-empíricos. Se trata de una estructura de dos lados de la que surgen preguntas acerca de la supuesta relación entre ambos lados. El propósito de este trabajo es realizar algunos progresos en la evaluación de la contribución de McDowell a (...) la discusión sobre el conocimiento perceptual y aclarar aspectos más generales del debate en torno al disyuntivismo. (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23. Persons, animals, and ourselves in the person and the human mind: Issues.Paul F. Snowdon -1989 - InAncient and Modern Philosophy. New York: Clarendon Press.
  24.  89
    Personal Identity: Complex or Simple?Paul F. Snowdon -2015 -Philosophical Review 124 (3):425-430.
  25.  124
    Peacocke on musical experience and hearing metaphorically-as.Paul F. Snowdon -2009 -British Journal of Aesthetics 49 (3):277-281.
    Christopher Peacocke's paper presents a characteristically rich and original theory of the so-called expressive qualities of music. It is, surely, impossible to come to a verdict on such an interesting theory quickly, and it will, no doubt, attract continuing and merited attention. The purpose of my preliminary reflections is to raise some questions about the proposal and to express some reservations, but I see these remarks as simply opening and inconclusive ones in a longer dialogue. I am going to divide (...) my comments into two parts. The first set is brief and relates to the content of Peacocke's theory. The second set expresses doubts as to the importance in our musical life of anything corresponding to Peacocke's hearing metaphorically-as (allowing that we do understand what it is). (shrink)
    Direct download(6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  92
    Radical externalisms.Paul F. Snowdon -2006 -Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (7-8):187-198.
    Professor Honderich presents his account of consciousness boldly and informally, and his presentation merits a response in similar terms. I conceive of this response as simply the first move in a conversation, in the course of which misunderstandings might be removed and, just possibly, criticisms sharpened, and positions modified. I want to concentrate on two questions that his very interesting paper prompts me to ask. The first question is; what exactly is the thesis about consciousness that Professor Honderich is proposing? (...) The second question is; what are the main reasons he has for his proposal and are they persuasive? Although there are two questions, I shall mix considerations of them together in a way which I hope it is possible to follow. (shrink)
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  74
    Strawson on Philosophy – Three Episodes.Paul Francis Snowdon -2008 -South African Journal of Philosophy 27 (3):167-178.
    Strawson repeatedly wrote about the nature of philosophy. This article responds to three of his discussions. First, in his review of Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations Strawson expressed dissatisfaction with Wittgenstein’s philosophy of philosophy. It is argued that Strawson’s response very successfully brings out the arbitrariness of the conception. Second, in his contribution to The Revolution in Philosophy he characterises the task of analysis as he sees it. It is argued that, despite the care of his treatment, many aspects of analysis remain (...) unexplained. Finally, in Individuals , he proposed the descriptive/revisionary distinction within philosophy. It is argued that this brilliant and influential distinction is less helpful than normally thought. What each episode shares, however, are many insights and the power to stimulate thought. (shrink)
    Direct download(5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  28. The problem of other minds : some preliminaries.Paul F. Snowdon -2019 - In Anita Avramides & Matthew Parrott,Knowing Other Minds. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  32
    Wittgenstein on Seeing as; Some Issues.Paul F. Snowdon -2019 - In A. C. Grayling, Shyam Wuppuluri, Christopher Norris, Nikolay Milkov, Oskari Kuusela, Danièle Moyal-Sharrock, Beth Savickey, Jonathan Beale, Duncan Pritchard, Annalisa Coliva, Jakub Mácha, David R. Cerbone, Paul Horwich, Michael Nedo, Gregory Landini, Pascal Zambito, Yoshihiro Maruyama, Chon Tejedor, Susan G. Sterrett, Carlo Penco, Susan Edwards-Mckie, Lars Hertzberg, Edward Witherspoon, Michel ter Hark, Paul F. Snowdon, Rupert Read, Nana Last, Ilse Somavilla & Freeman Dyson,Wittgensteinian : Looking at the World From the Viewpoint of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy. Springer Verlag. pp. 453-471.
    In his middle and later periods one of Wittgenstein’s concerns was perception. This is, of course, precisely what one would expect given his obvious interest then in the notion of experience and in the language we employ to describe and express our experiences. However, the passage which has attracted most attention is the discussion in sec. XI of part II of Philosophical Investigations which is concerned with “seeing as”, or “aspect seeing”. In this paper the examples that Wittgenstein uses are (...) examined, and some puzzles about them raised. It is suggested that Wittgenstein’s aim is to discredit some supposedly mistaken accounts of what ‘seeing as’ is. These mistaken accounts are supposed to made by Gestalt psychologists such as Kohler, and traditional sense-datum theorists. It is further argued that Wittgenstein’s criticisms are not uniformly cogent. It is, though, conceded that this rich and original passage contains far more than the elements investigated here, so much more needs to be scrutinised. (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  15
    Wittgenstein on Seeing as; Some Issues.Paul F. Snowdon -2019 - In A. C. Grayling, Shyam Wuppuluri, Christopher Norris, Nikolay Milkov, Oskari Kuusela, Danièle Moyal-Sharrock, Beth Savickey, Jonathan Beale, Duncan Pritchard, Annalisa Coliva, Jakub Mácha, David R. Cerbone, Paul Horwich, Michael Nedo, Gregory Landini, Pascal Zambito, Yoshihiro Maruyama, Chon Tejedor, Susan G. Sterrett, Carlo Penco, Susan Edwards-Mckie, Lars Hertzberg, Edward Witherspoon, Michel ter Hark, Paul F. Snowdon, Rupert Read, Nana Last, Ilse Somavilla & Freeman Dyson,Wittgensteinian : Looking at the World From the Viewpoint of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy. Springer Verlag. pp. 453-471.
    In his middle and later periods one of Wittgenstein’s concerns was perception. This is, of course, precisely what one would expect given his obvious interest then in the notion of experience and in the language we employ to describe and express our experiences. However, the passage which has attracted most attention is the discussion in sec. XI of part II of Philosophical Investigations which is concerned with “seeing as”, or “aspect seeing”. In this paper the examples that Wittgenstein uses are (...) examined, and some puzzles about them raised. It is suggested that Wittgenstein’s aim is to discredit some supposedly mistaken accounts of what ‘seeing as’ is. These mistaken accounts are supposed to made by Gestalt psychologists such as Kohler, and traditional sense-datum theorists. It is further argued that Wittgenstein’s criticisms are not uniformly cogent. It is, though, conceded that this rich and original passage contains far more than the elements investigated here, so much more needs to be scrutinised. (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
Export
Limit to items.
Filters





Configure languageshere.Sign in to use this feature.

Viewing options


Open Category Editor
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?

Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp