Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs
Order:

1 filter applied
  1.  18
    The principles and practices of educational neuroscience: Comment on Bowers (2016).Paul A. Howard-Jones,Sashank Varma,Daniel Ansari,Brian Butterworth,Bert De Smedt,Usha Goswami,Diana Laurillard &Michael S. C. Thomas -2016 -Psychological Review 123 (5):620-627.
    No categories
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  2.  131
    The need for interdisciplinary dialogue in developing ethical approaches to neuroeducational research.Paul A. Howard-Jones &Kate D. Fenton -2011 -Neuroethics 5 (2):119-134.
    This paper argues that many ethical issues in neuroeducational research cannot be appropriately addressed using the principles and guidance available in one of these areas alone, or by applying these in simple combination. Instead, interdisciplinary and public dialogue will be required to develop appropriate normative principles. In developing this argument, it examines neuroscientific and educational perspectives within three broad categories of ethical issue arising at the interface of cognitive neuroscience and education: issues regarding the carrying out of interdisciplinary research, the (...) scrutiny and communication of findings and concepts, and the application of research and associated issues of policy likely to arise in the future. To help highlight the need for interdisciplinary and public discussion, we also report the opinions of a group of educators (comprising trainee teachers, teachers and head teachers) on the neuroeducational ethics of cognitive enhancing drugs, infant screening, genetic profiling and animal research. (shrink)
    Direct download(5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  3.  115
    A Multiperspective Approach to Neuroeducational Research.Paul A. Howard-Jones -2011 -Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (1):24-30.
    There is increasing interest in research that combines neuroscientific and educational perspectives on learning, but significant philosophical issues divide these perspectives. This article examines the value of such neuroeducational research and how concepts from different perspectives may be interrelated through a ‘level of actions’ model. This model, which encourages a multiperspective approach, may be helpful in avoiding some of the worst transgressions of sense-making in constructing concepts that span neuroscience and education. Application of the model is explored in the context (...) of teaching strategies intended to foster creativity, and its affordances and limitations are discussed. (shrink)
    Direct download(8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4.  43
    Gamification of Learning Deactivates the Default Mode Network.Paul A. Howard-Jones,Tim Jay,Alice Mason &Harvey Jones -2015 -Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download(8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
Export
Limit to items.
Filters





Configure languageshere.Sign in to use this feature.

Viewing options


Open Category Editor
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?

Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp