Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs
Order:

1 filter applied
  1.  195
    Dialogue structure and logical expressivism.Paul Piwek -2011 -Synthese 183 (S1):33-58.
    This paper aims to develop the implications of logical expressivism for a theory of dialogue coherence. I proceed in three steps. Firstly, certain structural properties of cooperative dialogue are identified. Secondly, I describe a variant of the multi-agent natural deduction calculus that I introduced in Piwek (J Logic Lang Inf 16(4):403–421, 2007 ) and demonstrate how it accounts for the aforementioned structures. Thirdly, I examine how the aforementioned system can be used to formalise an expressivist account of logical vocabulary that (...) is inspired by Brandom (Making it explicit: reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment, 1994 ; Articulating reasons: an introduction to inferentialism, 2000 ). This account conceives of the logical vocabulary as a tool which allows speakers to describe the inferential practices which underlie their language use, i.e., it allows them to make those practices explicit. The rewards of this exercise are twofold: (1) We obtain a more precise account of logical expressivism which can be defended more effectively against the critique that such accounts lead to cultural relativism. (2) The formalised distinction between engaging in a practice and expressing it, opens the way for a revision of the theory of dialogue coherence. This revision eliminates the need for logically complex formulae to account for certain structural properties of cooperative dialogue. (shrink)
    Direct download(7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  2.  369
    Towards a Computational Account of Inferentialist Meaning.Paul Piwek -2014
    Both in formal and computational natural language semantics, the classical correspondence view of meaning – and, more specifically, the view that the meaning of a declarative sentence coincides with its truth conditions – is widely held. Truth (in the world or a situation) plays the role of the given, and meaning is analysed in terms of it. Both language and the world feature in this perspective on meaning, but language users are conspicuously absent. In contrast, the inferentialist semantics that Robert (...) Brandom proposes in his magisterial book ‘Making It Explicit’ puts the language user centre stage. According to his theory of meaning, the utterance of a sentence is meaningful in as far as it is a move by a language user in a game of giving and asking for reasons (with reasons underwritten by a notion of good inferences). In this paper, I propose a proof-theoretic formalisation of the game of giving and asking for reasons that lends itself to computer implementation. In the current proposal, I flesh out an account of defeasible inferences, a variety of inferences which play a pivotal role in ordinary (and scientific) language use. (shrink)
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  3.  144
    (1 other version)Meaning and dialogue coherence: A proof-theoretic investigation.Paul Piwek -2007 -Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (4):403-421.
    This paper presents a novel proof-theoretic account of dialogue coherence. It focuses on an abstract class of cooperative information-oriented dialogues and describes how their structure can be accounted for in terms of a multi-agent hybrid inference system that combines natural deduction with information transfer and observation. We show how certain dialogue structures arise out of the interplay between the inferential roles of logical connectives (i.e., sentence semantics), a rule for transferring information between agents, and a rule for information flow between (...) agents and their environment. The order of explanation is opposite in direction to that adopted in game-theoretic semantics, where sentence semantics (or a notion of valid inference) is derived from winning dialogue strategies. That approach and the current one may, however, be reconcilable, since we focus on cooperative dialogue, whereas the game-theoretic tradition concentrates on adversarial dialogue. (shrink)
    Direct download(8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  4.  317
    Fully generated scripted dialogue for embodied conversational agents'.Kees van Deemter,Brigitte Krenn,Paul Piwek,Marc Schroeder,Martin Klesen &Stefan Baumann -manuscript
    (Near-final version.) Accepted for publication in Artificial Intelligence Journal.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  71
    Introduction.Rodger Kibble,Paul Piwek &Ielka van der Sluis -2007 -Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (4):361-363.
  6.  22
    Introduction.Rodger Kibble,Paul Piwek &Ielka Sluis -2007 -Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (4):361-363.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  20
    Fully generated scripted dialogue for embodied agents.Kees van Deemter,Brigitte Krenn,Paul Piwek,Martin Klesen,Marc Schröder &Stefan Baumann -2008 -Artificial Intelligence 172 (10):1219-1244.
Export
Limit to items.
Filters





Configure languageshere.Sign in to use this feature.

Viewing options


Open Category Editor
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?

Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp