Works by Patrick Bourgeois
83 found
Order:
1 filter applied
DisambiguationsDisambiguations:
| Patrick L. Bourgeois [78] | Patrick Bourgeois [13] | Patrick Lyall Bourgeois [3] |
- Mead and Merleau-Ponty: Toward a Common Vision.Sandra B. Rosenthal &Patrick L. Bourgeois -1991 - State University of New York Press.Unites George Herbert Mead and Maurice Merleau-Ponty in a shared rejection of substance philosophy as well as spectator theory of knowledge, in favor of a focus on the ultimacy of temporal process and the constitutive function of social praxis.
- Pragmatism and Phenomenology: A Philosophic Encounter.Sandra B. Rosenthal &Patrick L. Bourgeois -1980 -Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 17 (3):276-279.No categories
- Naturalism Reconsidered.Robert G. Brice &Patrick L. Bourgeois -2012 -Philosophy Today 56 (1):78-83.While naturalism is used in positive senses by the tradition of analytical philosophy, with Ludwig Wittgenstein its best example, and by the tradition of phenomenology, with Maurice Merleau-Ponty its best exemplar, it also has an extremely negative sense on both of these fronts. Hence, both Merleau-Ponty and Wittgenstein in their basic thrusts adamantly reject reductionistic naturalism. Although Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology rejects the naturalism Husserl rejects, he early on found a place for the “truth of naturalism.” In a parallel way, Wittgenstein accepts (...) a certain positive sense of naturalism, while rejecting Quine’s kind of naturalism. It is the aim of this paper to investigate the common ground in the views of Wittgenstein and Merleau-Ponty regarding the naturalism that they each espouse and that which they each reject. (shrink)
- Merleau-Ponty, Scientific Method, and Pragmatism.Patrick L. Bourgeois -1996 -Journal of Speculative Philosophy 10 (2):120 - 127.
- From Common Roots to a Broader Vision.Patrick L. Bourgeois -1996 -American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 70 (3):381-396.
- Phenomenology, Pragmatism and the Backdrop of Naturalism.Patrick L. Bourgeois &Sandra B. Rosenthal -1979 -Philosophy Today 23 (4):329-336.
- Role Taking, Corporeal Intersubjectivity, and Self: Mead and Merleau-Ponty.Patrick L. Bourgeois &Sandra B. Rosenthal -1990 -Philosophy Today 34 (2):117-128.
- Marcel and Ricoeur.Patrick L. Bourgeois -2006 -American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (3):421-433.This article on mystery and hope at the boundary of reason in the postmodern situation responds to the challenge of postmodern thinking to philosophyby a recourse to the works of Gabriel Marcel and his best disciple, Paul Ricoeur. It develops along the lines of their interpretation of hope as a central phenomenon in human experience and existence, thus shedding light on the philosophical enterprise for the future. It is our purpose to dwell briefly on this postmodern challenge and then, incorporating (...) its positive contribution, to present theirs as an alternative philosophy at the boundary of reason. (shrink)
- Wittgenstein and Merleau-Ponty on the Pre-Reflective Level.Patrick Bourgeois &Robert Greenleaf Brice -2019 -Philosophy Today 63 (2):335-345.The philosophies of Ludwig Wittgenstein and Maurice Merleau-Ponty may seem at first glance to be mutually exclusive. On further examination, however, they can be seen to share some fundamental points of view. For instance, they both share a common rejection of a modern mechanistic explanation of nature, and both endorse what we might call a pre-linguistic level of meaning. In this paper, we show that these thinkers not only share some fundamental philosophical views, but also had, for many years, contemplated (...) what cognitive scientists today call “embodied cognition.”. (shrink)No categories
- Paul Ricoeur: Honoring and Continuing the Work.Lorenzo Altieri,Pamela Anderson,Patrick Bourgeois,Fred Dallmayr,Gregory Hoskins,Domenico Jervolino,Morny Joy,David M. Kaplan,Richard Kearney,Peter Kemp,Jason Springs,Henry Venema,John Wall &John Whitmire -2011 - Lexington Books.This collection of essays is dedicated to the prolific career of Paul Ricoeur. Honoring his work, this anthology addresses questions and concerns that defined Ricoeur’s.
- Alvin Jacob Holloway, S.J., 1926-2004.Patrick L. Bourgeois &Constance L. Mui -2004 -Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 78 (2):141 -.No categories
- Catholic Author, Musician, Philosopher.Patrick L. Bourgeois -2003 -Renascence 55 (3):193-209.
- Critical Philosophy and Post-Critical Faith.Patrick L. Bourgeois -2002 -American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (3):431-450.This paper focuses on the intertwining of philosophy and Christian faith in the concrete life of the Christian philosopher, with a view toward the compatibility of critical philosophy and a post-critical faith. Philosophy, as an enterprise of reason alone, is independent of Christian faith and theology. In accord with its definition, philosophy seeks evidence along the lines of reason independent of outside authority, and thus is autonomous from such faith. Yet, for the Christian philosopher, without jeopardizing this autonomy and independence, (...) faith and theology do enter the picture in some sense. For, unless the individual is completely dichotomized in personality, her/his concrete life and existence must involve commitments both to the Christian faith and to philosophy, even though the commitment of faith is more basic. This paper explores this paradox of the independence and mutual intertwining of these two poles; then, focuses on the philosophical pole of the tension; and finally, resolves the tension for the Christian philosopher. (shrink)
- Critical Reflections on “Object and Phenomenon and the Deconstructed Present”.Patrick Bourgeois -1993 -American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 67 (2):253-256.
- Deconstruction or Reconstruction of The Living Present: Derrida or Merleau-Ponty and Mead.Patrick L. Bourgeois &Sandra B. Rosenthal -1994 -International Studies in Philosophy 26 (4):1-16.
- (1 other version)Ethics at the Limit of Reason.Patrick L. Bourgeois -1997 -Philosophy Today 41 (Supplement):142-152.No categories
- Extension of Ricoeur's hermeneutic.Patrick Bourgeois -1975 - The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM RECENT EXPANSION Few thinkers take their initial ideas or insights through different stages of development without some deepening, ...
- Freedom, Finitude, and Totality: Ricoeur and Heidegger.Patrick L. Bourgeois &Frank Schalow -1987 -Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 18 (3):263-271.
- Fundamental Ontology and Epistemic Foundations.Patrick L. Bourgeois -1981 -New Scholasticism 55 (3):373-380.
- Fundamental Ontology, Scientific Methods, and Epistemic Foundations.Patrick Lyall Bourgeois -1982 -New Scholasticism 56 (4):471-479.
- Gabriel Marcel Today.Patrick L. Bourgeois -2014 -Comparative and Continental Philosophy 6 (1):99-108.Tattam's study of the work of Gabriel Marcel attempts to come to grips with Marcel's thought without a prejudice of identifying him as a Christian existentialist or as a contemporary French existentialist. It is an attempt to come to grips with Marcel's work in relation to the nature of philosophy, especially as he conceives it. This book shows that the creative work of Marcel can shed light on our culture and its future because of the renewed relevance and importance of (...) his works to the postmodern situation. For, with his view of existence as mystery approached in a second reflection, Marcel has turned toward its fullness that eludes, and is irreducible to, first reflection, and as such manifests elements shared with the viable elements of postmodernism. Yet, the need for a renewal of his call to a sense of being becomes more acute in light of the serious danger of suppression of this very sense in postmodernity. It is clear that the loss of this sense of being today in postmodern reductionism is in a way more threatening than in Marcel's own time. (shrink)
- Hermeneutics of Existence: Conflict and Resolution.Patrick L. Bourgeois &Frank Schalow -1987 -Philosophy Today 31 (1):45-53.
- Hermeneutics of Symbols and Philosophical Reflection: Paul Ricoeur.Patrick Bourgeois -1971 -Philosophy Today 15 (4):231-241.
- Imagination and Postmodernity.Patrick L. Bourgeois -2013 - Lanham: Lexington Books.This book, focusing on the central role of the imagination in contemporary philosophy, addresses challenges and problems that emerge today in conflicting positions, including a concentration on the role of the imagination in the work of Paul Ricoeur in contrast and in opposition to its role in such postmodern thinkers as Derrida and Lyotard.
- Introduction: VIolence: And Postmodernity.Patrick L. Bourgeois -1998 -Bulletin de la Société Américaine de Philosophie de Langue Française 10 (2):5-31.
- Kierkegaard: Ethical Marriage or Aesthetic Pleasure?Patrick Bourgeois -1976 -The Personalist (4):370-375.Export citation
Bookmark - Misplaced Alterity.Patrick L. Bourgeois -1995 -Southwest Philosophy Review 11 (2):161-169.
- Merleau-Ponty and Heidegger: the intentionality of transcendence, the being of intentionality.Patrick L. Bourgeois -1994 -Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 25 (1):27-33.
- Martin Heidegger.Patrick Bourgeois -1986 -Southwest Philosophy Review 3:132-143.
- Merleau-Ponty, Lewis and Kant.Patrick L. Bourgeois &Sandra B. Rosenthal -1983 -International Studies in Philosophy 15 (3):13-23.
- Phenomenology and the sciences of language.Patrick L. Bourgeois -1971 -Research in Phenomenology 1 (1):119-136.
- Philosophy at the Boundary of Reason: Ethics and Postmodernity.Patrick L. Bourgeois -2000 - State University of New York Press.Using Ricoeur's ethicomoral position, advances an alternative, more viable ethics than that of deconstruction.
- The Paradox at Reason’s Boundary.Patrick L. Bourgeois -2002 -Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:125-136.Central to Kierkegaard’s account of religious existence is his critique of speculative reason. This critique begins with the distinction between subjective and objective reflection. Its most radical aspects appear in Kierkegaard’s discussions of the paradox. In spite of Kierkegaard’s frequent comments on this notion, it is not readily understood. I want to argue against a common reading of this notion and propose an alternative reading. This alternative reading allows for a conceptually quite plausible account of the manner in which the (...) paradox presents reason with a boundary, in virtue of its relation to objective reflection and to subjective reflection as well. Because of this boundary, reason points beyond its own achievements to a domain of contemplation and appropriation. This is a domain that reason itself identifies in connection with the paradox. It both surpasses rational achievements and integrates them into itself. (shrink)No categories
- Philosophy at the Limit.Patrick Bourgeois -1997 -Southwest Philosophy Review 13 (2):153-170.No categories
- Phenomenology and the Fundamental Structure of Experience.Patrick L. Bourgeois -1985 -Philosophy Today 29 (2):135-141.
- Practical reasoning.Patrick L. Bourgeois -1984 -Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 58:165-172.
- Paul Ricoeur's Hermeneutical Phenomenology.Patrick Bourgeois -1972 -Philosophy Today 16 (1):20-27.
- (1 other version)Ricoeur and Marcel: An Alternative to Postmodern Deconstruction.Patrick L. Bourgeois -1995 -Bulletin de la Société Américaine de Philosophie de Langue Française 7 (1-2):164-175.
- (1 other version)Ricoeur Between Levinas and Heidegger: Another Furtlher Alterity.Patrick L. Bourgeois -1999 -Bulletin de la Société Américaine de Philosophie de Langue Française 11 (2):33-52.
- Religious Experience and the Philosophical Radicalization of Phenomenological Theology.Patrick L. Bourgeois -1981 -Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 55:172.
- Ricoeur's Hermeneutical Phenomenology.Patrick Lyall Bourgeois -1970 - Dissertation, Duquesne UniversityExport citation Bookmark
- Ricoeur in Postmodern Dialogue.Patrick L. Bourgeois -2001 -International Philosophical Quarterly 41 (4):421-438.
- Recognizing Ricoeur: In memoriam.Patrick L. Bourgeois -2007 -Research in Phenomenology 37 (2):175-194.My aim in this memorial paper is to recall two essential Ricoeurean themes that underlie his entire philosophical orientation and that respond well to specific challenges today from post-modern deconstruction. At question is whether Ricoeur's account of sign in language and the living present in time can adequately respond to and meet the recent challenge from postmodern deconstruction, which radically challenges the very root of his phenomenological and hermeneutic orientation: the priority of the semantic in language and the priority of (...) the living present. Although Ricoeur and Derrida will be seen to address the same problems of decentering consciousness, their accounts, although agreeing on important issues, quickly become mutually exclusive and deconstruction becomes a challenge to Ricoeurean hermeneutics. I will turn first to the postmodern deconstruction of Jacques Derrida before turning to Ricoeur's response with a more viable view of language, sense, and lived time. (shrink)
- Semiotics and the Deconstruction of Presence.Patrick L. Bourgeois -1992 -American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 66 (3):361-379.
- Schemata.Patrick L. Bourgeois &Sandra B. Rosenthal -1987 -International Philosophical Quarterly 27 (2):135-149.No categories
- Scientific time and the temporal sense of human existence: Merleau-ponty and Mead.Patrick L. Bourgeois &Sandra B. Rosenthal -1990 -Research in Phenomenology 20 (1):152-163.
- The Epistemic Dimensions of Existential Phenomenology.Patrick L. Bourgeois -1986 -Philosophy Today 30 (1):43-47.
- The integrity and fallenness of human existence.Patrick L. Bourgeois &Frank Schalow -1987 -Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):123-132.
- The instant and the living present.Patrick Bourgeois -1993 -Philosophy Today 37 (1):31-37.
- The Integration of Merleau-Ponty’s Philosophy.Patrick Bourgeois -1989 -Southwest Philosophy Review 5 (2):37-50.
| 1 — 50 / 83 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5b9ff6f457-lclbd uwo