Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs
Order:

1 filter applied
Disambiguations
Peter Cane [17]P. Cane [2]
  1.  111
    Role Responsibility.Peter Cane -2016 -The Journal of Ethics 20 (1-3):279-298.
    This article is about ‘role responsibility’ as understood by H. L. A. Hart in his taxonomy of responsibility concepts in his book, Punishment and Responsibility. More particularly, it focuses on what I call ‘public, institutional role responsibility’. The main arguments are that such role responsibility is based on authority and power rather than physical and mental capacity; and the foundation of role responsibility in authority has significant implications for what Hart referred to as ‘liability–responsibility’, which I unpack in terms of (...) ‘attribution’, ‘accountability’ and ‘liability’. The article addresses possible objections to the authority-based analysis of role responsibility based on the concept of ‘moral’ responsibility, and on understandings of what types of question are ‘philosophical.’. (shrink)
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  2.  118
    Taking Law Seriously: Starting Points of the Hart/Devlin Debate.Peter Cane -2006 -The Journal of Ethics 10 (1-2):21-51.
    The famous mid-20th century debate between Patrick Devlin and Herbert Hart about the relationship between law and morality addressed the limits of the criminal law in the context of a proposal by the Wolfenden Committee to decriminalize male homosexual activity in private. The original exchanges and subsequent contributions to the debate have been significantly constrained by the terms in which the debate was framed: a focus on criminal law in general and sexual offences in particular; a preoccupation with the so-called (...) “harm principle,” a sharp delineation of the realms of law and morality, and a static conception of the relationship between them. This article explores the limitations imposed by these various starting-points and argues for a holistic and symbiotic understanding of the relationship between law and morality. (shrink)
    Direct download(4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  3.  16
    Responsibility in law and morality.Peter Cane -2002 - Portland, Or.: Hart.
    Lawyers who write about responsibility tend to focus on criminal law at the expense of civil and public law; while philosophers tend to treat responsibility as a moral concept,and either ignore the law or consider legal responsibility to be a more or less distorted reflection of its moral counterpart. This book aims to counteract both of these biases. By adopting a comparative institutional approach to the relationship between law and morality, it challenges the common view that morality stands to law (...) as critical standard to conventional practice. It shows how law and morality interact symbiotically, and how careful study of legal concepts of responsibility can add significantly to our understanding of responsibility more generally. Central to this project is a distinction between two paradigms of responsibility -- the criminal law paradigm and the civil law paradigm. Whereas theoretical discussions of responsibility tend focus on conduct and agency, taking account of civil law reveals the importance of outcomes and the interests of victims and society to ideas of responsibility. The book examines from a distinctively legal point of view central philosophical questions about responsibility such as its relationship with culpability (challenging the common view that moral responsibility requires fault), causation and personality. It explores the relevance of sanctions and problems of proof and enforcement to ideas of responsibility, as well as the relationship between responsibility and distributive justice, and the role of concepts of responsibility in public law. At the heart of this book lie two questions: what does it mean to say we are responsible? and, what are our responsibilities? Its aim is not to answer these questions but to challenge some traditional approaches to answering them and more importantly, to suggest fruitful alternative approaches that take law seriously. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  4.  26
    The Hart-Fuller debate in the twenty-first century.Peter Cane (ed.) -2010 - Portland, Or.: Hart.
    This book presents the papers and comments on those papers delivered at a colloquium held at the Australian National University in December 2008 to celebrate 50 years since the publication in the Harvard Law Review of the famous and wide-ranging debate between H.L.A. Hart and Lon L. Fuller.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  5.  43
    Public Law in The Concept of Law.Peter Cane -2013 -Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 33 (4):649-674.
    This article adopts what Frederick Schauer calls a ‘non-essentialist’ approach to understanding the nature of law, which can be contrasted with the widely practised method of ‘conceptual analysis’. Instead of seeking a set of necessary conditions for the existence of law in all possible worlds, non-essentialism reflects upon pervasive features of actual legal systems. The article focuses on constitutional and administrative law and contrasts modern standard accounts of public law with HLA Hart’s highly influential threefold list of ‘necessary’ types of (...) public ‘secondary rules’: rules of recognition, change and adjudication. The argument is that non-essentialist methodology not only yields a rich descriptive account of certain fundamental characteristics of modern legal systems but also provides theoretically significant insights into how law is conceived in many contemporary societies. Because the resulting account is firmly rooted in actual social and legal practices, it provides a more fine-grained and less abstract theory of those practices than is offered by Hart’s approach, based as it is on hypothetical stories about how law ‘might have developed’. (shrink)
    Direct download(7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  6.  73
    The general/special distinction in criminal law, tort law and legal theory.Peter Cane -2007 -Law and Philosophy 26 (5):465-500.
    Direct download(4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  7.  30
    Taking Disagreement Seriously: Courts, Legislatures and the Reform of Tort Law.Peter Cane -2005 -Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 25 (3):393-417.
    This article explores the relevance of disagreement about values and about the functions and effects of law to debates concerning the appropriate relationship between courts and legislatures, common law and statute. Recent developments in tort law provide a context for the discussion. The argument is that in general, political processes of law-making should be preferred judicial processes.
    Direct download(5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  8.  25
    Essays for Patrick Atiyah.Peter Cane &Jane Stapleton -1991 - Oxford University Press on Demand. Edited by Peter Cane & Jane Stapleton.
    Contents: LEGAL THEORY 1. Reflections on law in context / William Twining -- 2. Are omissions less culpable? / Tony Honore -- 3. Scandinavian legal realism in the law of contract / Jan Hellner -- 4. Statutes and contracts as founts of formal reasoning / Robert S. Summers -- 5. Conceptions of public policy / John Bell LEGAL HISTORY 6. Aftermath / Paul D. Carrington -- 7. The role of the judiciary: lessons from the end of empire / Robert Stevens (...) -- 8. The Origins of futures trading in the Liverpool Cotton Market COMMON LAW 9.payment undertakings / Roy Goode -- 10. Pre-contractual duties of disclosure / S.M. Waddams -- 11. Three problems with the new product liability / Jane Stapleton -- 12. Evaluating the goals of personal injury law: some empirical evidence / Donald Harris -- 13. Negligence and economic loss / John Dwyer -- 14. Libel and constitutional free speech / John Fleming -- 15. The basis of tortious liability / Peter Cane. (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  9. Economic, Moral Philosophy, and the Positive Analysis of Tort Law.P. Belli,G. Calabresi,P. Cane,R. Cooter,R. Dworkin,D. Fairgrieve &M. Faure -2001 - In Gerald J. Postema,Philosophy and the Law of Torts. Cambridge University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Risk, Harm, Interests and Rights.P. Belli,G. Calabresi,P. Cane,R. Cooter,R. Dworkin,D. Fairgrieve &M. Faure -2007 - In Tim Lewens,Risk: Philosophical Perspectives. New York: Routledge.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. Rights in private law.Peter Cane -2011 - In Donal Nolan & Andrew Robertson,Rights and private law. Portland, Oregon: Hart.
  12.  31
    The anatomy of private law theory: A 25th anniversary essay.Peter Cane -2005 -Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 25 (2):203-217.
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  36
    The New Oxford Companion to Law.Peter Cane &Joanne Conaghan (eds.) -2008 - Oxford University Press UK.
    For any reader needing a concise explanation of a subject in law The New Oxford Companion to Law is the ideal reference work. Providing greater depth than legal dictionaries but always accessible to the non-expert, entries in the Companion cover all areas of law and legal systems and are extensively cross-referenced for ease of navigation.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  64
    The Oxford handbook of legal studies.Peter Cane &Mark V. Tushnet (eds.) -2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
    This volume in the prestigious series of Oxford Handbooks provides a widely accessible overview of legal scholarship at the start of the 21st century. Through 43 essays by leading legal scholars based in the USA, the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and Germany, it offers original and interpretative accounts of the nature, themes and trends of research and writing about all areas of the law.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  15.  130
    The Oxford handbook of empirical legal research.Peter Cane &Herbert M. Kritzer (eds.) -2010 - New York: Oxford University Press.
    The art, craft, and science of policing -- Crime and criminals -- Criminal process and prosecution -- The crime-preventive impact of penal sanctions -- Contracts and corporations -- Financial markets -- Consumer protection -- Bankruptcy and insolvency -- Regulating the professions -- Personal injury litigation -- Claiming behavior as legal mobilization -- Families -- Labor and employment laws -- Housing and property -- Human rights instruments -- Constitutions -- Social security and social welfare -- Occupational safety and health -- Environmental (...) regulation -- Administrative justice -- Access to civil justice -- Judicial recruitment, training, and careers -- Trial courts and adjudication -- Appellate courts -- Dispute resolution -- Lay decision-makers in the legal process -- Evidence law -- Civil procedure and courts -- Collective actions -- Law and courts on development and democratization -- How does international law work? -- Lawyers and other legal service providers -- Legal pluralism -- Public images and understandings of courts -- Legal education and the legal academy -- The (nearly) forgotten early empirical legal research -- Quantitative approaches to empirical legal research -- Qualitative approaches to empirical legal research -- The need for multi-method approaches in empirical legal research -- Legal theory and empirical research -- Empirical legal research and policy-making -- The place of empirical legal research in the law school curriculum -- Empirical legal training in the US academy. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  16.  8
    Introduction.Herbert M. Kritzer &Peter Cane -2010 - In Peter Cane & Herbert M. Kritzer,The Oxford handbook of empirical legal research. New York: Oxford University Press.
    The Introduction starts by discussing the history of Empirical Legal Studies. It explains how the editors came about compiling this book. It talks about interest in empirical legal research and how it is not confimed to the United States, the UK or common law countries. Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Spain, Israel, Russia, and Japan are mentioned. This book aims to provide succinct discussions and analyses of debates, controversies, methods, and trends in scholarship that are original and searching but (...) also easily accessible. The Introduction goes on to explain the perspective taken and coverage given in this book. (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  40
    Two understandings of morality and their relationship to politics.Peter Cane -2008 -Criminal Justice Ethics 27 (1):34-44.
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. Autonomous Action: Self-Determination in the Passive Mode Autonomous Action: Self-Determination in the Passive Mode (pp. 647-691). [REVIEW]Two-Level Eudaimonism,Second-Personal Reasons Two-Level Eudaimonism,Second-Personal Reasons,Anita L. Allen,Jack Balkin,Seyla Benhabib,Talbot Brewer,Peter Cane,Thomas Hurka &Robert N. Johnson -2012 -Ethics 122 (4).
  19.  71
    Book ReviewsGerald J. Postema,, ed. Philosophy and the Law of Torts.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. Pp. 336. $65.00. [REVIEW]Peter Cane -2004 -Ethics 114 (2):368-372.
    Direct download(4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
Export
Limit to items.
Filters





Configure languageshere.Sign in to use this feature.

Viewing options


Open Category Editor
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?

Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp