Results for 'Noun Phrases'
975 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- Mats Rooth.Noun Phrase Interpretation In Montague,File Change Semantics Grammar &Situation Semantics -1987 - In Peter Gärdenfors,Generalized Quantifiers. Reidel Publishing Company. pp. 237.Export citation
Bookmark - Edward R. hope.Non-Syntactic Constraints On Lisu &Noun Phrase Order -1973 -Foundations of Language 10:79.Export citation Bookmark
- Jon Barwise.NounPhrases &Generalized Quantifiers -1987 - In Peter Gärdenfors,Generalized Quantifiers. Reidel Publishing Company. pp. 31--1.Export citation Bookmark
- Jan Tore l0nning.Collective Readings Of Definite &IndefiniteNounPhrases -1987 - In Peter Gärdenfors,Generalized Quantifiers. Reidel Publishing Company. pp. 203.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- GeneralNounPhrases.R. E. Jennings -1994 - In Raymond Earl Jennings,The genealogy of disjunction. New York: Oxford University Press.This chapter looks at ‘any’ as a quantifier. Ifnounphrases with ‘any’ are to be construed quantificationally, they must sometimes be represented by a universal quantifier, and sometimes by an existential. Earlier philosophers, notably Quine and Geach, hoped that the existentially representable cases might, when considerations of scope are taken into account, prove to be universal after all. Nevertheless, there are ineluctably ‘existential’ uses. In addition, if there are cases that must be represented existentially, then it is (...) useless to insist that all those cases that can be represented universally must be, even those for which a short-scope existential representation is available. However, the larger conclusion is that we should question the view that ‘any’ is essentially a quantifier in anything like the first-order logical understanding of that notion. (shrink)No categories
- Accessingnoun-phrase antecedents.Mira Ariel -1990 - New York: Routledge.Introduction Introducing Accessibility theory 0.1 On the role of context Utterances cannot be processed and interpreted on their own. ...
- Encuneralnounphrases.Thomas Hofweber &Jeff Pelletier -manuscriptThe semantics ofnounphrases (NPs) is of crucial importance for both philosophy and linguistics. Throughout much of the history of the debate about the semantics ofnounphrases there has been an implicit assumption about how they are to be understood. Basically, it is the assumption that NPs come only in two kinds. In this paper we would like to make that assumption explicit and discuss it and its status in the semantics of natural language. (...) We will have a look at how the assumption is to be understood more precisely, what its methodological status should be, whether it has been abandoned in recent work in semantics, and whether it should be abandoned in future work. To do all this, it’s best to start with some historical context. (shrink)
- Noun-Phrase Anaphor Resolution: Antecedent Focus, Semantic Overlap, and the Informational Load Hypothesis.H. Wind Cowles &Alan Garnham -2011 - In Edward Gibson & Neal J. Pearlmutter,The Processing and Acquisition of Reference. MIT Press. pp. 297.One area of language research that has received a great deal of attention, both theoretical and empirical, is the use of anaphoric expressions. Such expressions can be thought of as serving two functions: the primary function is to refer back to a referent from previous discourse, and the secondary, but no less important, function is to help provide discourse coherence and structure. Third person pronouns such as he or she are anaphoric expressions par excellence, but fuller anaphoric expressions, including demonstrative (...) and definitenounphrases (NPs) such as that woman and the woman are also used in natural discourse. In this chapter we shall focus primarily on issues concerning definite NP anaphor resolution, and in particular we shall examine the interaction of two factors that are related to the identification of antecedents: the focus status of the antecedent and the semantic relationship between the antecedent and the anaphor (including semantic overlap). After presenting these factors, we will discuss one particular approach to anaphor resolution, Almor's (1999) Informational Load Hypothesis (ILH), and present three experiments that examined the findings presented in Almor (1999). The results of these experiments will lead us to consider in more detail the secondary, discourse-structuring function of anaphoric expressions. (shrink)
- Complementnounphrases and prepositionalphrases, adjectives and verbs.Keith Allan -1973 -Foundations of Language 10 (3):377-397.
- NounPhrases, Quantifiers, and Generic Names, EJ LOWE Frege and Russell have taught us that indefinite and pluralnounphrases in natural language often function as quantifier expressions rather than as referring expressions, despite possessing many syntactical simi-larities with names. But it can be shown that in some of their most im.Catherine Jl Talmage &Mark Mercer -1991 -Philosophy 66 (257).
- False recognition of adjective-nounphrases.Moshe Anisfeld -1970 -Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (1):120.
- " Thenoun phrase", de Jan Rijkhoff.Guillermo José Lorenzo González -2004 -Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 23 (1):240-247.Export citation Bookmark
- Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: The informational load hypothesis.Amit Almor -1999 -Psychological Review 106 (4):748-765.
- Apulian Qualitative BinominalNounPhrases.Angelapia Massaro -2023 -Italian Journal of Linguistics 35.We investigate the morphosyntax of qualitative binominal constructions (QBCs) in a Southern Italo-Romance language from the Apulian town of San Marco in Lamis. QBCs are complexnounphrases like ‘a jewelN1 of a villageN2’, appearing here prepositionally (with the preposition də, ‘of’, allowing definites, indefinites, and demonstratives) and non-prepositionally (only allowing definites with definite articles and not proper names). We propose that in the latter, a categorial match in the determiner layer, which we call ‘match D’, relates N1 (...) and N2. N1 is embedded as anoun, allowing for: 1) the recursive DP strategy of non-prepositional genitives, and 2) the extension of this mechanism to QBCs. This leads to the impossibility of syntactic extraction, which we connect to the concept of phase. With non-denominal N1s, N1’s article is treated as a head-agreeing adjectival linker, forming a constituent with the modifier but agreeing with the head. A phrase is interpreted as a QBC if N1 and N2 share the same number features and if the features of N1 do not allow for it to be interpreted as the possessum of N2 . We also discuss external agreement with the construction, presenting data supporting the relevance of the [+HUMAN] feature for agreement relations. (forthcoming, Italian Journal of Linguistics). (shrink)
- Semantics:nounphrases, verbphrases and adjectives.Paul Portner,Klaus von Heusinger &Claudia Maienborn (eds.) -2019 - Boston: De Gruyter.Gain a deeper understanding of essential research on the semantics ofnounphrases and verbphrases. Clear explanations of significant recent research bring complex issues to life, with expert guidance on topics of debate within the field. The book gives readers valuable insights into topics such as definiteness, specificity, genericity aspect, aktionsart and mood. It also discusses directions for future research. Written by a world-class team of authors, these highly cited articles are here in paperback for the (...) first time since their original publication. An essential reference for researchers in the area. (shrink)
- Producing Pronouns and DefiniteNounPhrases: Do Speakers Use the Addressee’s Discourse Model?Kumiko Fukumura &Roger P. G. van Gompel -2012 -Cognitive Science 36 (7):1289-1311.We report two experiments that investigated the widely held assumption that speakers use the addressee’s discourse model when choosing referring expressions (e.g., Ariel, 1990; Chafe, 1994; Givón, 1983; Prince, 1985), by manipulating whether the addressee could hear the immediately preceding linguistic context. Experiment 1 showed that speakers increased pronoun use (and decreasednoun phrase use) when the referent was mentioned in the immediately preceding sentence compared to when it was not, even though the addressee did not hear the preceding (...) sentence, indicating that speakers used their own, privileged discourse model when choosing referring expressions. The same pattern of results was found in Experiment 2. Speakers produced more pronouns when the immediately preceding sentence mentioned the referent than when it mentioned a referential competitor, regardless of whether the sentence was shared with their addressee. Thus, we conclude that choice of referring expression is determined by the referent’s accessibility in the speaker’s own discourse model rather than the addressee’s. (shrink)
- Ellipsis in the macedoniannoun phrase.Blagojka Zdravkovska-Adamova -2017 -Seeu Review 12 (2):82-107.The aim of our paper is to presentnoun phrase ellipsis as a cohesive tie in the Macedonian language. We will start our paper briefly discussing a few definitions of the term ellipsis, emphasizing our understanding of this term, and more concretely its meaning when occurring in the NP. Namely, we define ellipsis as a complex phenomenon. In linguistics, it means the omitting of linguistic elements that need to be understood from the context, where the recipient should adequately fill (...) the grammatically allowable gap. Then we will refer to different kinds of ellipsis in Macedonian, starting with our main issue - ellipsis in thenoun phrase. Elliptical NP is cohesive and usually refers anaphorically to another NP. But the main question is how much of the fullnoun phrase is involved in the elliptical NP in Macedonian. For that purpose, we will analyze examples to define which elements of the NP can be omitted and under which conditions. Examples of cataphoric ellipsis are also included. When there is an ellipsis of the center of the phrase, the other element of the NP functions as the center of the phrase. For more precision research, we will use examples of different functional styles in Macedonian. The examples will be given first in Macedonian, and then translated into English. Our conclusion will be presented through graphs. (shrink)No categories
- Secondary determiners as markers of generalized instantiation in Englishnounphrases.Tine Breban -2011 -Cognitive Linguistics 22 (3):511-533.This paper is concerned with Englishnounphrases that denote generalized instances: they do not refer to actual spatio-temporal instances, but to virtual ones that are abstracted from a limited number of actual instances, e.g., a student in Three times, a student complained (Langacker, Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume II: Descriptive application, Stanford University Press, 1991, Dynamicity, fictivity, and scanning: The imaginative basis of logic and linguistic meaning, Cambridge University Press, 2005, forthcoming). Langacker likens generalized instances to generic (...) ones, which constitute “global” generalizations over all actual instances of a type. On the basis of authentic data, I argue that, even though the profiled instance denoted by generic and generalizednounphrases is similar, the way the respective instances are accessed in discourse is very different. My data set consists of Englishnounphrases that are explicitly marked for generalized instantiation by the addition of a secondary determiner such as same in The twin brothers bought the same car or kind of in There was no way we could match that kind of offer. I comparenounphrases of four sets of secondary determiners, viz. adjectives of multiple exposure (usual), of identity (same, identical), of similarity (similar, comparable) and typenoun constructions (kind of/type of/sort of). These data also allow me to refine the concept of generalized instantiation in terms of its semantic subtypes, the semantic interaction between secondary determiner and primary determiner, and the selection criteria for secondary determiners that can express it. (shrink)
- Barenounphrases, verbs and quantification in ASL.Karen Petronio -1995 - In Emmon W. Bach, Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer & Barbara H. Partee,Quantification in Natural Languages. Dordrecht, Netherland: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 603--618.
- Nounphrases, quantifiers, and generic names.E. J. Lowe -1991 -Philosophical Quarterly 41 (164):287-300.
- TheNoun Phrase in Ancient Greek (S.J.) Bakker TheNoun Phrase in Ancient Greek. A Functional Analysis of the Order and Articulation of NP Constituents in Herodotus. (Amsterdam Studies in Classical Philology 15.) Pp. xii + 322. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2009. Cased, €114, US$169. ISBN: 978-90-04-17722-2. [REVIEW]Robert Crellin -2011 -The Classical Review 61 (2):394-396.
- Clarifyingnoun phrase semantics.Purver Matthew &Ginzburg Jonathan -2004 -Journal of Semantics 21 (3):283-339.
- Uniqueness in definitenounphrases.Craige Roberts -2003 -Linguistics and Philosophy 26 (3):287-350.
- Processing Reflexives and Pronouns in PictureNoun Phrase.Jeffrey T. Runner,Rachel S. Sussman &Michael K. Tanenhaus -2006 -Cognitive Science 30 (2):193-241.Binding theory (e.g., Chomsky, 1981) has played a central role in both syntactic theory and models of language processing. Its constraints are designed to predict that the referential domains of pronouns and reflexives are nonoverlapping, that is, are complementary; these constraints are also thought to play a role in online reference resolution. The predictions of binding theory and its role in sentence processing were tested in four experiments that monitored participants' eye movements as they followed spoken instructions to have a (...) doll touch a picture belonging to another doll. The instructions used pronouns and reflexives embedded in picturenounphrases (PNPs) containing possessorphrases (e.g., Pick up Ken. Have Ken touch Harry's picture of himself). Although the interpretations assigned to pronouns were generally consistent with binding theory, reflexives were frequently assigned interpretations that violated binding theory. In addition, the timing and pattern of eye movements were inconsistent with models of language processing that assume that binding theory acts as an early filter to restrict the referential domain. The interpretations assigned to reflexives in PNPs with possessors suggest that they are binding‐theory‐exempt logophors, a conclusion that unifies the treatment of reflexives in PNPs. (shrink)
- The Structure of theNoun Phrase in English and Hindi.R. K. Barz,L. A. Schwarzschild &Manindra K. Verma -1974 -Journal of the American Oriental Society 94 (4):492.
- English indefinitenounphrases and plurality.Brendan S. Gillon -1999 - In Ken Turner,The semantics/pragmatics interface from different points of view. New York: Elsevier. pp. 127--147.Export citation Bookmark
- The Readings of pluralnounphrases in English.Brendan S. Gillon -1987 -Linguistics and Philosophy 10 (2):199 - 219.
- Scope of GenericNounPhrases and Its Correlation with the Verb Meaning in Russian.Igor Boguslavsky -1997 - In Leo Wanner,Recent trends in meaning-text theory. Philadelphia.: John Benjamins. pp. 39--137.
- Pluralnounphrases and their Readings: A reply to Lasersohn. [REVIEW]Brendan S. Gillon -1990 -Linguistics and Philosophy 13 (4):477 - 485.
- A cross-linguistic comparison of genericnounphrases in English and Mandarin.Susan A. Gelman &Twila Tardif -1998 -Cognition 66 (3):215-248.Genericnounphrases (e.g. 'bats live in caves') provide a window onto human concepts. They refer to categories as 'kinds rather than as sets of individuals. Although kind concepts are often assumed to be universal, generic expression varies considerably across languages. For example, marking of generics is less obligatory and overt in Mandarin than in English. How do universal conceptual biases interact with language-specific differences in how generics are conveyed? In three studies, we examined adults' generics in English (...) and Mandarin Chinese. The data include child-directed speech from caregivers interacting with their 19-23-month-old children. Examples of generics include: 'baby birds eat worms' (English) and da4 lao3shu3 yao3 bu4 yao3 ren2 ('do big rats bite people or not?') (Mandarin). Genericnounphrases were reliably identified in both languages, although they occurred more than twice as frequently in English as in Mandarin. In both languages, generic usage was domain-specific, with genericnounphrases used most frequently to refer to animals. This domain effect was specific to generics, as non-genericnounphrases were used most frequently for artifacts in both languages. In sum, we argue for universal properties of 'kind' concepts that are expressed with linguistically different constructions. However, the frequency of expression may be influenced by the manner in which generics are expressed in the language. (shrink)
- Nouns andnounphrases.Emmon Bach -1968 - In Emmon W. Bach & Robert Thomas Harms,Universals in Linguistic Theory. (Edited by Emmon Bach, Robert T. Harms ... Contributing Authors, Charles J. Fillmore ... Paul Kiparsky ... James D. McCawley.). New York, NY, USA: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. pp. 90--122.
- Efficiency of pregroups and the Frenchnoun phrase.Sylvain Degeilh &Anne Preller -2005 -Journal of Logic, Language and Information 14 (4):423-444.We study mathematical and algorithmic properties of Lambek's pregroups and illustrate them by the Frenchnoun phrase. An algorithm of complexity n3 to solve the reduction problem in an arbitrary free pregroup as well as recognition by a pregroup grammar is presented. This algorithm is then specified to run in linear time. A sufficient condition for a language fragment that makes the linear algorithm complete is given.
- Focus and weaknounphrases.Elena Herburger -1997 -Natural Language Semantics 5 (1):53-78.
- Tracking the time course of multi-wordnoun phrase production with ERPs or on when (and why) cat is faster than the big cat.Audrey Bürki &Marina Laganaro -2014 -Frontiers in Psychology 5:79843.Words are rarely produced in isolation. Yet, our understanding of multi-word production, and especially its time course, is still rather poor. In this research, we use event-related potentials to examine the production of multi-wordnounphrases in the context of overt picture naming. We track the processing costs associated with the production of thesenounphrases as compared with the production of bare nouns, from picture onset to articulation. Behavioral results revealed longer naming latencies for French (...)nounphrases with determiners and pre-nominal adjectives (D-A-N, the big cat ) than fornounphrases with a determiner (D-N, the cat ), or bare nouns (N, cat ). The spatio-temporal analysis of the ERPs revealed differences in the duration of stable global electrophysiological patterns as a function of utterance format in two time windows, from ~190 to 300 ms after picture onset, and from ~530 ms after picture onset to 100 ms before articulation. These findings can be accommodated in the following model. During grammatical encoding (here from ~190 to 300 ms), thenoun and adjective lemmas are accessed in parallel, followed by the selection of the gender-agreeing determiner. Phonological encoding (after ~530 ms) operates sequentially. As a consequence, the phonological encoding process is longer for longer utterances. In addition, when determiners are repeated across trials, their phonological encoding can be anticipated or primed, resulting in a shortened encoding process. (shrink)
- A Neural Dynamic Model Perceptually Grounds NestedNounPhrases.Daniel Sabinasz &Gregor Schöner -2023 -Topics in Cognitive Science 15 (2):274-289.We present a neural dynamic model that perceptually grounds nestednounphrases, that is,nounphrases that contain further (possibly also nested)nounphrases as parts. The model receives input from the visual array and a representation of anoun phrase from language processing. It organizes a search for the denoted object in the visual scene. The model is a neural dynamic architecture of interacting neural populations which has clear interfaces with perceptual processes. (...) It solves a set of theoretical challenges, including the problem of keeping a nested structure in short-term memory in a way that solves the problem of 2 and massive binding problem emphasized by Jackendoff. The model organizes a search for the objects that are referenced in that structure. We motivate the model, demonstrate simulation results, and discuss how it differs from related models. (shrink)
- The Role of Dimensions in the Syntax ofNounPhrases.Roger Schwarzschild -unknownIn the formation of extendednounphrases, expressions are used that describe some dimension. Weight is described by each of the prenominal expressions in heavy rock, too much ballast, 2 lb rock, 2 lbs of rocks. The central claim of this paper is that the position of these types of expressions within thenoun phrase limits the kinds of dimensions they may describe. The limitations have to do with whether or not the dimension tracks relevant part-whole relations. (...) An analogy is made between these constraints and the well-known constraints on thematic relations that are incurred by the position of anoun phrase in a clause. A proposal is made about the meanings of expressions like too much and 2 pounds which explains their common cross-categorial distribution and this informs the analysis of their use innounphrases. A position is taken on the meaning of the count mass distinction which, in conjunction with the hypothesis about dimensions, explains asymmetries in the distribution of prenominal adjectives with count and mass nouns. (shrink)
- The role of focus, semantic overlap and discourse function innoun-phrase anaphor resolution.H. W. Cowles &A. Garnham -2011 - In Edward Gibson & Neal J. Pearlmutter,The Processing and Acquisition of Reference. MIT Press.One area of language research that has received a great deal of attention, both theoretical and empirical, is the use of anaphoric expressions. Such expressions can be thought of as serving two functions: the primary function is to refer back to a referent from previous discourse, and the secondary, but no less important, function is to help provide discourse coherence and structure. Third person pronouns such as he or she are anaphoric expressions par excellence, but fuller anaphoric expressions, including demonstrative (...) and definitenounphrases (NPs) such as that woman and the woman are also used in natural discourse. In this chapter we shall focus primarily on issues concerning definite NP anaphor resolution, and in particular we shall examine the interaction of two factors that are related to the identification of antecedents: the focus status of the antecedent and the semantic relationship between the antecedent and the anaphor (including semantic overlap). After presenting these factors, we will discuss one particular approach to anaphor resolution, Almor's (1999) Informational Load Hypothesis (ILH), and present three experiments that examined the findings presented in Almor (1999). The results of these experiments will lead us to consider in more detail the secondary, discourse-structuring function of anaphoric expressions. (shrink)
- Sequential processing duringnoun phrase production.Audrey Bürki,Jasmin Sadat,Anne-Sophie Dubarry &F. -Xavier Alario -2016 -Cognition 146 (C):90-99.
- On the Readings of pluralnounphrases.Peter Lasersohn -1989 -Linguistic Inquiry 20 (1):130-134.Argues against a Gillon-style covers-based analysis of pluralnounphrases.
- On the Base Referential Structure of the EnglishNoun Phrase.J. Gough &L. Chiaraviglio -1970 -Foundations of Language 6 (4):447-462.
- Non-syntactic constraints on Lisunoun phrase order.Edward R. Hope -1973 -Foundations of Language 10 (1):79-109.
- Looking both ways: The JANUS model ofnoun phrase anaphor processing.Alan Garnham &H. Wind Cowles -2008 - In Jeanette K. Gundel & Nancy Ann Hedberg,Reference: interdisciplinary perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 246--272.This chapter presents a new model of coreferential NP anaphora processing, JANUS, within the mental models framework. It summarises previous research on NP anaphora that is most pertinent to JANUS, and outlines two previous attempts to provide an integrated theory of NP anaphora: Centering Theory and Almor’s Informational Load Hypothesis. Each has it problems, but the Informational Load Hypothesis is more firmly rooted in psychology, and closer to our own approach. JANUS incorporates many ideas from the Informational Load Hypothesis, but (...) attempts to address its problems. JANUS assumes that the semantic content of an anaphor should be justified by two types of role that the anaphoric expression plays. Backward-looking roles are primarily concerned with identifying the antecedent (and referent) of the anaphor. Forward-looking roles relate to what is to be said about the referent in upcoming discourse. These two types of roles give JANUS its name. (shrink)
- The modifier effect: Default inheritance in complexnounphrases.James A. Hampton,M. C. Jönsson &Alessia Passanisi -2009 - In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn,Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. pp. 303--308.Export citation Bookmark
- Experimental investigations of weak definite and weak indefinitenounphrases.Natalie M. Klein,Whitney M. Gegg-Harrison,Greg N. Carlson &Michael K. Tanenhaus -2013 -Cognition 128 (2):187-213.
- Scope and partitivity of plural indefinitenounphrases in Spanish.Juan J. Colomina-Almiñana -2017 -Latest Issue of Pragmatics and Society 8 (1):107-128.No categories
- On syntactic binding into adjuncts in the Russiannoun phrase.Gilbert C. Rappaport -1987 -Linguistics and Philosophy 10 (4):475 - 501.
- Viewing and naming objects: eye movements duringnoun phrase production.Antje S. Meyer,Astrid M. Sleiderink &Willem J. M. Levelt -1998 -Cognition 66 (2):B25-B33.
- The Bacon not the Bacon: How children and adults understand accented and unaccentednounphrases.Jennifer E. Arnold -2008 -Cognition 108 (1):69-99.
- The modifier effect in within-category induction: Default inheritance in complexnounphrases.Martin Jönsson &James Hampton -2012 -Language and Cognitive Processes 27:90-116.Within-category induction is the projection of a generic property from a class to a subtype of that class. The modifier effect refers to the discovery reported by Connolly et al., that the subtype statement tends to be judged less likely to be true than the original unmodified sentence. The effect was replicated and shown to be moderated by the typicality of the modifier. Likelihood judgements were also found to correlate between modified and unmodified versions of sentences. Experiment 2 elicited justifications, (...) which suggested three types of reason for the effect-pragmatics, knowledge-based reasoning, and uncertainty about attribute inheritance. It is argued that the results provide clear evidence for the default inheritance of prototypical attributes in modified concepts, although a full account of the effect remains to be given. (shrink)
- Assignment of reference to reflexives and pronouns in picturenounphrases: evidence from eye movements.Jeffrey T. Runner,Rachel S. Sussman &Michael K. Tanenhaus -2003 -Cognition 89 (1):B1-B13.
| 1 — 50 / 975 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-72j75 uwo