Results for 'Michel M. Denuit'
959 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- Risk aversion, prudence, and asset allocation: a review and some new developments.Michel M.Denuit &Louis Eeckhoudt -2016 -Theory and Decision 80 (2):227-243.In this paper, we consider the composition of an optimal portfolio made of two dependent risky assets. The investor is first assumed to be a risk-averse expected utility maximizer, and we recover the existing conditions under which all these investors hold at least some percentage of their portfolio in one of the assets. Then, we assume that the decision maker is not only risk-averse, but also prudent and we obtain new minimum demand conditions as well as intuitively appealing interpretations for (...) them. Finally, we consider the general case of investor’s preferences exhibiting risk apportionment of any order and we derive the corresponding minimum demand conditions. As a byproduct, we obtain conditions such that an investor holds either a positive quantity of one of the assets or a proportion greater than 50 %. (shrink)
- Almost expectation and excess dependence notions.Michel M.Denuit,Rachel J. Huang &Larry Y. Tzeng -2015 -Theory and Decision 79 (3):375-401.This paper weakens the expectation dependence concept due to Wright and its higher-order extensions proposed by Li to conform with the preferences generating the almost stochastic dominance rules introduced in Leshno and Levy. A new dependence concept, called excess dependence is introduced and studied in addition to expectation dependence. This new concept coincides with expectation dependence at first-degree but provides distinct higher-order extensions. Three applications, to portfolio diversification, to the determination of the sign of the equity premium in the consumption-based (...) CAPM, and to optimal investment in the presence of a background risk, illustrate the usefulness of the approach proposed in the present paper. (shrink)No categories
- Michele M. Moody-Adams: Fieldwork in Familiar Places. Morality, Culture, & Philosophy.Michele M. Moody-Adams -1999 -Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (4):427-432.
- Episodic memory processes modulate how schema knowledge is used in spatial memory decisions.Michelle M. Ramey,John M. Henderson &Andrew P. Yonelinas -2022 -Cognition 225 (C):105111.
- The Prophetic Vocation of Women and the Order of Love.Michele M. Schumacher -1999 -Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture 2 (2):146-192.
- Ecclesial existence: Person and community in the trinitarian anthropology of Adrienne Von speyr.Michele M. Schumacher -2008 -Modern Theology 24 (3):359-385.
- Vers une approche spirituelle de la pauvreté.Michele M. Schumacher -2002 -Nova et Vetera 77 (1):51-63.No categoriesExport citation
Bookmark - Gender Ideology and the “Artistic” Fabrication of Human Sex: Nature as Norm or the Remaking of the Human?Michele M. Schumacher -2016 -The Thomist 80 (3):363-423.In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:Gender Ideology and the “Artistic” Fabrication of Human Sex: Nature as Norm or the Remaking of the Human?Michele M. SchumacherUntil quite recently,” the famous English novelist C. S. Lewis remarked in 1959, “it was taken for granted that the business of the artist was to delight and instruct his public”: that is to say, to address simultaneously their passions and their intellects. “There were, of course, different publics.... And (...) an artist might lead his public on to appreciate finer things than they had wanted at first; but he could do this only by being; from the first, if not merely entertaining, yet entertaining, and if not completely intelligible, yet very largely intelligible.” This constraint—let us call it intelligent (or purposeful) design, in keeping with a basic analogy that we will draw upon in these pages—had however been lost, Lewis observed. Hence, even “in the highest aesthetic circles one now hears nothing about the artist’s duty to us. It is all about our duty to him. He owes us nothing; we owe him ‘recognition,’ even though he has never paid the slightest attention to our tastes, interests, or habits.”1 In short, the artist of modernity need not pay the slightest attention to an intention, not even his own. Modern art need not be an expression of intelligence or [End Page 363] understanding; it is expression as such (tout court): personal and autonomous.2Lewis’s remarks do not point merely to the increasingly relativist tendencies of art in the Western world, to the lack of objective criteria or norms governing the artistic disciplines. They also point to the growing disregard among artists for the sociocultural expectations of their publicum. Mediating between the two is, without a doubt, the basis upon which both artistic and social norms were traditionally founded: nature, which served as a classic analogy for both art (understood in the broad sense, so as to include not only the fine arts, but also technology and practical sciences) and ethics in virtue of nature’s intrinsic inclination towards its defining end and perfection.With regard to the first of these analogies (that of art and nature), Mark Schiefsky explains that although art does bring about “results that nature itself cannot,” it does so in the classic understanding “by acting in a natural way—the way nature would act if it could generate the products of art.”3 As for the difference between the two, nature is moved to its specifying end by way of intrinsic inclinations that are implicit to it, whereas a work of art is moved to its end extrinsically, and thus with more or less violence.4 A sculptor, for example, who introduces a form into a piece of marble, does so by chiseling [End Page 364] and hammering away at the fine stone.5 “Art is,” Aristotle explains, “the principle and form of the thing that comes to be [let us say, a sculpture]; but it is located elsewhere [in, for example, the artist’s mind or in a sketch that he has made] than in that thing, whereas the movement of nature is located in the thing itself that comes to be [a tree, for example, or a baby], and is derived from another natural organism [a tree or human parents] which possessed the form in actuality.”6This classic distinction between art and nature parallels the distinction between art and ethics. Ethics “does not affect human action in the same way as do art and technique,” Servais Pinckaers explains. Unlike art and technique, which are concerned with “the external work produced by human action”—this painting or that machine, for example—ethics is concerned with an immanent principle, qualifying the actor as such: the stable dispositions (or habitus: virtues or vices) at the origin of “the active willing that is the principle source of the action.”7 This immanent principle at the source of ethical action is—to complete our analogy—creative in only a limited sense. The human person is indeed free to choose, but he or she is not free to decide “what is good or evil” as such, nor what is “good or bad for... (shrink)No categories
- Postmodernism: No Longer Useful?Michelle M. Tokarczyk -1997 -Theory and Event 1 (4).
- What aspects of self do self-monitors monitor?Michele M. Tomarelli &David R. Shaffer -1985 -Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 23 (2):135-138.No categories
- Performing the ‘lifeworld’ in public education campaigns.Michelle M. Lazar -2010 -Pragmatics and Society 1 (2):284-310.In Singapore, top down public education campaigns have long been a mode of governance by which the conduct of citizens is constantly regulated. This article examines how in two fairly recent campaigns, a new approach to campaign communication is used that involves media interdiscursivity, viz., the mixing of discourses and genres in which the media constitute a significant element. The present approach involves the appropriation of a popular local television character, ‘Phua Chu Kang’, in order to address the public through (...) educational rap music videos. Media interdiscursivity is based on an attempt to engage the public via a discourse of the ‘lifeworld’. The present article analyzes the ‘lifeworld’ discourse in terms of a combination of two processes, ‘informalization’ and ‘communitization’. The dual processes are examined and discussed in relation to the choice of Phua Chu Kang as an ‘ordinary’ and almost ‘real’ person, including his informal register and speech style; his use of Singlish; and his construction of ‘community.’ The presence of Singlish, in particular, is interesting because it is included as part of PCK’s public performance of the lifeworld. The article concludes by considering this form of media interdiscursivity as the government’s shrewd way of achieving its social governance goals. (shrink)
- Le Conflit entre «la femme» et «la mère» selon Élisabeth Badinter. Une confrontation entre Mère Nature et Dieu le Père, Créateur.Michele M. Schumacher -2012 -Nova et Vetera 87 (2):193-223.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- The Nasirean Ethics by Naṣīr Ad-Dīn ṬūsīThe Nasirean Ethics by Nasir Ad-Din Tusi.Michel M. Mazzaoui,G. M. Wickens,Naṣīr Ad-Dīn Ṭūsī &Nasir Ad-Din Tusi -1967 -Journal of the American Oriental Society 87 (4):616.
- Semi-Recluses (tonseisha) and Impermanence (mu $): Kamo no Chomei and Urabe Kenko.M. A. R. Michele -1984 -Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 11:313.No categories
- History of Shāh ʿAbbās the Great (Tārīḵ-e ʿĀlamārā-ye)History of Shah Abbas the Great.Michel M. Mazzaoui,Eskandar Beg Monshi &Roger M. Savory -1982 -Journal of the American Oriental Society 102 (2):382.No categories
- Original sin, hermeneutical question.M.Michel -1974 -Revue des Sciences Religieuses 48 (2):113-125.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- The return of eschatology in contemporary theology.M.Michel -1984 -Revue des Sciences Religieuses 58 (1-2-3):180-195.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Eskandar Beg Monshi: History of Shāh ʿAbbās the Great (Tārīḵ-e ʿĀlamārā-ye ʿAbbāsī)Eskandar Beg Monshi: History of Shah Abbas the Great.Michel M. Mazzaoui,Roger M. Savory,Renée Bernhard &Renee Bernhard -1989 -Journal of the American Oriental Society 109 (1):164.No categories
- Nicodemus or the dismissal of the truth.M.Michel -1981 -Revue des Sciences Religieuses 55 (4):227-236.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Cognitive Reengineering.Michele M. Young -1994 -Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 14 (1):37-47.
- How schema knowledge influences memory in older adults: Filling in the gaps, or leading memory astray?Michelle M. Ramey,Andrew P. Yonelinas &John M. Henderson -2024 -Cognition 250 (C):105826.
- Could our epistemic reasons be collective practical reasons?Michelle M. Dyke -2021 -Noûs 55 (4):842-862.Are epistemic reasons merely a species of instrumental practical reasons, making epistemic rationality a specialized form of instrumental practical rationality? Or are epistemic reasons importantly different in kind? Despite the attractions of the former view, Kelly (2003) argues quite compellingly that epistemic rationality cannot be merely a matter of taking effective means to one’s epistemic ends. I argue here that Kelly’s objections can be sidestepped if we understand epistemic reasons as instrumental reasons that arise in light of the aims held (...) by social collectives of which we are members, rather than being fixed by our own individual goals. This social version of epistemic instrumentalism would not be subject to counterexamples that point to the failure of individual people to possess desires or goals that would account for all of the epistemic reasons we find it natural to attribute to them. I conclude by comparing the proposed view to the alternative version of instrumentalism defended by Kornblith (1993). I argue that the social view I sketch here has one noteworthy advantage. It better accounts for the intuitive distinctness of our practical and epistemic reasons for belief in cases where flouting epistemic norms would better help us to achieve our own individual goals. (shrink)
- La biopedagogia: dottrina e practica di una nuova scienza dell'educazione.Michele M. Tumminelli -1954 - Milano,: Editrice "La Scuola do oggi".
- Bad bootstrapping: the problem with third-factor replies to the Darwinian Dilemma for moral realism.Michelle M. Dyke -2020 -Philosophical Studies 177 (8):2115-2128.Street’s “Darwinian Dilemma” is a well-known epistemological objection to moral realism. In this paper, I argue that “third-factor” replies to this argument on behalf of the moral realist, as popularized by Enoch :413–438, 2010, Taking morality seriously: a defense of robust realism, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2011), Skarsaune :229–243, 2011) and Wielenberg :441–464, 2010, Robust ethics: the metaphysics and epistemology of godless normative realism, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014), cannot succeed. This is because they are instances of the illegitimate form (...) of reasoning known as “bootstrapping.” The phenomenon of bootstrapping has been discussed in detail, most notably by Vogel :602–623, 2000) and Cohen :309–329, 2002), in a different context as an objection to reliabilism and related theories of knowledge. I introduce four different characterizations of the error of bootstrapping from the epistemic literature in order to argue that the form of reasoning exemplified by third-factor replies would be deemed illegitimate by every one of them. I conclude that the moral realist should abandon third-factor replies, or else suggest a novel diagnosis for what goes wrong in bootstrapping cases that does not apply equally to the realist’s form of argument. However, I am not optimistic about the prospects for this latter strategy. (shrink)
- La théologie du corps de Jean-Paul II confrontée au féminisme.Michele M. Schumacher -2011 -Nova et Vetera 86 (3):297-322.Export citation Bookmark
- Transnational Black feminisms, womanisms and queer of color critiques.Michelle M. Wright -2014 - In Mary Evans, Clare Hemmings, Marsha Henry, Hazel Johnstone, Sumi Madhok, Ania Plomien & Sadie Wearing,The SAGE handbook of feminist theory. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE reference.Export citation Bookmark
- Between yesterday and tomorrow.M.Michel -1969 -Revue des Sciences Religieuses 43 (3-4):303-308.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Conscious and unconscious memory differentially impact attention: Eye movements, visual search, and recognition processes.Michelle M. Ramey,Andrew P. Yonelinas &John M. Henderson -2019 -Cognition 185:71-82.No categories
- Feminist critical discourse analysis: gender, power, and ideology in discourse.Michelle M. Lazar (ed.) -2005 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.This is the first collection to bring together well-known scholars writing from feminist perspectives within critical discourse analysis. The theoretical structure of CDA is illustrated with empirical research in Eastern and Western Europe, New Zealand, Asia, South America and the US, demonstrating the complex workings of power and ideology in discourse in sustaining particular gender(ed) orders. These studies deal with texts and talk in domains ranging from parliamentary settings, news and advertising media, the classroom, community literacy programs and the workplace.
- Group Agency Meets Metaethics: How to Craft a More Compelling Form of Normative Relativism.Michelle M. Dyke -2020 - In Russ Shafer-Landau,Oxford Studies in Metaethics Volume 15. Oxford University Press. pp. 219-240.The author argues that well-known forms of relativism are unable to accommodate, at once, a set of three highly intuitive theses about the distinctive character of moral reasons. Yet the author argues it is possible to formulate a novel form of normative relativism that has the power to accommodate these claims. The proposed view combines the relativist idea that the normative facts are attitude-dependent with the insight that there are non-human agents to which it makes sense to attribute the kinds (...) of attitudes that give rise to normative reasons. Societies, too, can possess reasons to pursue their aims. What distinguishes moral reasons from reasons of practical rationality is that the former apply directly to societies in virtue of aims held by each society as a group, while the latter apply directly to persons in light of their own individual interests. (shrink)
- Respecting Disability Rights — Toward Improved Crisis Standards of Care.Michelle M. Mello,Govind Persad &Douglas B. White -2020 -New England Journal of Medicine (5):DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp2011997.We propose six guideposts that states and hospitals should follow to respect disability rights when designing policies for the allocation of scarce, lifesaving medical treatments. Four relate to criteria for decisions. First, do not use categorical exclusions, especially ones based on disability or diagnosis. Second, do not use perceived quality of life. Third, use hospital survival and near-term prognosis (e.g., death expected within a few years despite treatment) but not long-term life expectancy. Fourth, when patients who use ventilators in their (...) daily lives (e.g., home ventilation) present to acute care hospitals, their personal ventilators should not be reallocated to other patients. Fifth, designate triage officers to assess patients individually on the basis of objective medical evidence, not stereotypes or assumptions. Sixth, include disability rights advocates in policy development and dissemination. (shrink)
- Griffin's Modest Proposal: Michele M. Moody-Adams.Michele M. Moody-Adams -1999 -Utilitas 11 (1):112-121.
- Race, class, and the social construction of self-respect.Michele M. Moodyadams -1993 -Philosophical Forum 24 (1-3):251-266.
- Epistemic instrumentalism and the problem of epistemic blame.Michelle M. Dyke -2024 -Synthese 204 (110):1-18.In this paper, I draw attention to the phenomenon of warranted epistemic blame in order to pose a challenge for most forms of epistemic instrumentalism, which is the view that all of the demands of epistemic normativity are requirements of instrumental rationality. Because of the way in which the instrumentalist takes the force of one’s epistemic reasons to derive from one’s own individually held ends, the instrumentalist faces unique difficulties in explaining our standing to blame one another for violations of (...) epistemic norms. In many cases, it is unclear why, according to the instrumentalist, we might be entitled to others’ adherence to epistemic norms at all. This is a serious problem. The upshot is that theorists of epistemic normativity should be prepared reject most forms of epistemic instrumentalism. (shrink)
- Entitled to consume: postfeminist femininity and a culture of post-critique.Michelle M. Lazar -2009 -Discourse and Communication 3 (4):371-400.The article provides a critical analysis of a postfeminist identity that is emergent in a set of beauty advertisements, called ‘entitled femininity’. Three major discursive themes are identified, which are constitutive of this postfeminist feminine identity: 1) ‘It’s about me!’ focuses on pampering and pleasuring the self; 2) ‘Celebrating femininity’ reclaims and rejoices in feminine stereotypes; and 3) ‘Girling women’ encourages a youthful disposition in women of all ages. The article shows that entitled femininity occupies an ambivalent discursive space, which (...) celebrates as well as repudiates feminism, and re-installs normative gendered stereotypes. The ambivalence, it is argued, contributes to fostering a culture of post-critique, which numbs resistance and deflects criticism. For all its appearances to be pro-women, feminine entitlement based squarely on an entitlement to consume offers a rather limited and problematic vision of femininity and gender equality. (shrink)No categories
- Demystifying Eukaryote Lateral Gene Transfer.Michelle M. Leger,Laura Eme,Courtney W. Stairs &Andrew J. Roger -2018 -Bioessays 40 (5):1700242.In a recent BioEssays paper [W. F. Martin, BioEssays 2017, 39, 1700115], William Martin sharply criticizes evolutionary interpretations that involve lateral gene transfer into eukaryotic genomes. Most published examples of LGTs in eukaryotes, he suggests, are in fact contaminants, ancestral genes that have been lost from other extant lineages, or the result of artefactual phylogenetic inferences. Martin argues that, except for transfers that occurred from endosymbiotic organelles, eukaryote LGT is insignificant. Here, in reviewing this field, we seek to correct some (...) of the misconceptions presented therein with regard to the evidence for LGT in eukaryotes. A recent paper dismisses claims of lateral gene transfer into eukaryotic genomes. We counter the arguments made in that paper and discuss the extensive evidence for LGT in eukaryotes. (shrink)
- Democratic conflict and the political morality of compromise.Michelle M. Moody-Adams -2018 - In Jack Knight,Compromise: NOMOS LIX. New York: Nyu Press.
- XIII—Reclaiming the Idea of ‘the Human’.Michele M. Moody-Adams -2024 -Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 124 (3):277-298.Progressive social movements correctly presume that justice demands treating people with humane regard: combining respect for human agency with concern for human vulnerability to suffering. Promoting humane regard is a critical means of acknowledging the moral claims of humanity. Some critics reject the underlying concept of a universal humanity, in virtue of which human beings form a distinct community of reciprocal moral obligation. Critics charge that the concept presumes indefensible dualisms (of mind and body, and humanity and nature); that it (...) wrongly assigns a privileged status to reason; and that it involves an unsupportable belief in human exceptionalism. I argue that we can assert the moral claims of humanity without privileging reason, repudiating nature, or denying that there are many valuable ways to be human. I also defend an account of human moral exceptionalism that does not imply human moral superiority, to show that we can meet morally weighty obligations to humans while affirming morally substantive connections to non-human communities and domains. (shrink)No categories
- A little bias goes a long way: The effects of feedback on the strategic regulation of accuracy on formula-scored tests.Michelle M. Arnold,Philip A. Higham &Beatriz Martín-Luengo -2013 -Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 19 (4):383-402.
- Psychics, aliens, or experience? Using the Anomalistic Belief Scale to examine the relationship between type of belief and probabilistic reasoning.Toby Prike,Michelle M. Arnold &Paul Williamson -2017 -Consciousness and Cognition 53:151-164.
- Profiles of Social-Emotional Readiness for 4-Year-Old Kindergarten.Michele M. Miller &H. Hill Goldsmith -2017 -Frontiers in Psychology 8.
- Societies as group agents.Michelle M. Dyke -2025 -Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 68 (3):958-978.Could an entire society count as an agent in its own right? I argue here that it could. While previous defenders of group agency have focused primarily on groups such as states and corporations that exhibit a great deal of formalized internal structure, less attention has been devoted to more loosely structured social groups. I focus on defending the claims that societies can have ends or goals and that they engage in end-directed behavior. I defend this view by responding to (...) three potential objections. The first is the allegation that the attribution of ends to societies would be redundant, given that the properties of any group will supervene upon the properties of the group’s individual human members. The second is the charge that societies are not genuine agents engaged in end-directed actions because their behavior is not under their own direct control. The third is the concern that while it may be useful to speak of societies ‘as if’ they were agents, this does not indicate that societies really act in pursuit of ends. I draw upon a functionalist approach from the philosophy of mind to argue that all three objections can be addressed by the defender of social agency. (shrink)
- Teachers' articulation of beliefs about teaching knowledge: conceptualizing a belief framework.Helenrose Fives &Michelle M. Buehl -2010 - In Lisa D. Bendixen & Florian C. Feucht,Personal epistemology in the classroom: theory, research, and implications for practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- The functions of beliefs: teachers' personal epistemology on the pinning block.Helenrose Fives &Michelle M. Buehl -2017 - In Gregory J. Schraw, Jo Brownlee & Lori Olafson,Teachers' personal epistemologies: evolving models for informing practice. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc,..Export citation Bookmark
- Intersectionalisation as meta-discursive practice: complicated power dynamics in Pink Dot’s movement-building.Michelle M. Lazar -2024 -Critical Discourse Studies 21 (5):573-590.This article adopts the combined perspectives of critical discourse studies and (critical) intersectionality studies to examine efforts at movement-building by Pink Dot SG, an LGBTQ group, which has developed within the illiberal geopolitical space of Singapore. The term ‘intersectionalisation’ is introduced to refer to a reflexive meta-discursive strategy which mobilizes the intersectionality of social identities (such as gender, sexuality, race, class, generation, and nationality) to advance particular sociopolitical objectives. The article illustrates three ways intersectionalisation operates in Pink Dot’s official videos: (...) (i) to create solidarities within the LGBTQ community; (ii) to advocate for the LGBTQ community by straight allies, and (iii) to forge alliances dialogically between queer and straight communities in Singapore. The analysis of the videos shows that interactions between various assemblages of intersectional identities of privilege and marginality are brought to the fore in building the social movement, and how its discourse navigates a terrain of complicated power dynamics. (shrink)No categories
- Confidentiality: More than a Linkage File and a Locked Drawer.Michele M. Easter,Arlene M. Davis &Gail E. Henderson -2004 -IRB: Ethics & Human Research 26 (2):13.
- Rereading the Widow: A Possible Judeo-Iberian Model for the Pseudo-Ovidian De Vetula and the Libro de buen amor.Michelle M. Hamilton -2007 -Speculum 82 (1):97-119.No categories
- Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis–Gender.Michelle M. Lazar -2005 - In Alan F. Blackwell & David MacKay,Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.Export citation Bookmark
- Communicating (post)feminisms in discourse.Michelle M. Lazar -2009 -Discourse and Communication 3 (4):339-344.No categories
- (1 other version)Rationalizing vaccine injury compensation.Michelle M. Mello -2007 -Bioethics 22 (1):32–42.ABSTRACT Legislation recently adopted by the United States Congress provides producers of pandemic vaccines with near‐total immunity from civil lawsuits without making individuals injured by those vaccines eligible for compensation through the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. The unusual decision not to provide an alternative mechanism for compensation is indicative of a broader problem of inconsistency in the American approach to vaccine‐injury compensation policy. Compensation policies have tended to reflect political pressures and economic considerations more than any cognizable set of principles. (...) This article identifies a set of ethical principles bearing on the circumstances in which vaccine injuries should be compensated, both inside and outside public health emergencies. A series of possible bases for compensation rules, some grounded in utilitarianism and some nonconsequentialist, are discussed and evaluated. Principles of fairness and reasonableness are found to constitute the strongest bases. An ethically defensible compensation policy grounded in these principles would make a compensation fund available to all individuals with severe injuries and to individuals with less‐severe injuries whenever the vaccination was required by law or professional duty. (shrink)
| 1 — 50 / 959 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-cj6sj uwo