Results for 'Marvin R. Natowicz'
956 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- The Use of Medical Records in Research: What Do Patients Want?Nancy E. Kass,Marvin R.Natowicz,Sara Chandros Hull,Ruth R. Faden,Laura Plantinga,Lawrence O. Gostin &Julia Slutsman -2003 -Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (3):429-433.In the past ten years, there has been growing interest in and concern about protecting the privacy of personal medical information. Insofar as medical records increasingly are stored electronically, and electronic information can be shared easily and widely, there have been legislative efforts as well as scholarly analyses calling for greater privacy protections to ensure that patients can feel safe disclosing personal information to their health-care providers. At the same time, the volume of biomedical research conducted in this country continues (...) to grow. The budget of the National Institutes of Health, for example, was $20,298 million in 2001, having more than doubled from a budget of $9,218 million 10 years before. This growing body of research includes increased efforts to use stored medical records as a source of data for health services, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. (shrink)
- Individual, family, and societal dimensions of genetic discrimination: A case study analysis. [REVIEW]Lisa N. Geller,Joseph S. Alper,Paul R. Billings,Carol I. Barash,Jonathan Beckwith &Marvin R.Natowicz -1996 -Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (1):71-88.Background. As the development and use of genetic tests have increased, so have concerns regarding the uses of genetic information. Genetic discrimination, the differential treatment of individuals based on real or perceived differences in their genomes, is a recently described form of discrimination. The range and significance of experiences associated with this form of discrimination are not yet well known and are investigated in this study. Methods. Individuals at-risk to develop a genetic condition and parents of children with specific genetic (...) conditions were surveyed by questionnaire for reports of genetic discrimination. A total of 27,790 questionnaires were sent out by mail. Of 917 responses received, 206 were followed up with telephone interviews. The responses were analyzed regarding circumstances of the alleged discrimination, the institutions involved, issues relating to the redress of grievances, and strategies to avoid discrimination. (shrink)
- ‘Real Estate’ Theology: Zionism and Biblical Claims.Marvin R. Wilson -1985 -Transformation: An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies 2 (4):12-18.No categories
- One-tailed tests and "unexpected" results.Marvin R. Goldfried -1959 -Psychological Review 66 (1):79-80.No categories
- Amount of uncertainty associated with decoding in free recall.Marvin R. Mueller,Ed M. Edmonds &Selby H. Evans -1967 -Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (4):437.No categories
- Is attentional selection to different levels of hierarchical structure based on spatial frequency?Marvin R. Lamb,E. William Yund &Heather M. Pond -1999 -Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 128 (1):88.
- Granularity Analysis for Mathematical Proofs.Marvin R. G. Schiller -2013 -Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (2):251-269.Mathematical proofs generally allow for various levels of detail and conciseness, such that they can be adapted for a particular audience or purpose. Using automated reasoning approaches for teaching proof construction in mathematics presupposes that the step size of proofs in such a system is appropriate within the teaching context. This work proposes a framework that supports the granularity analysis of mathematical proofs, to be used in the automated assessment of students' proof attempts and for the presentation of hints and (...) solutions at a suitable pace. Models for granularity are represented by classifiers, which can be generated by hand or inferred from a corpus of sample judgments via machine-learning techniques. This latter procedure is studied by modeling granularity judgments from four experts. The results provide support for the granularity of assertion-level proofs but also illustrate a degree of subjectivity in assessing step size. (shrink)
- Antecedent Probability and A Grammar of Assent.Marvin R. O’Connell -1987 -New Scholasticism 61 (2):218-229.
- The Oxford Conspirators: A History of the Oxford Movement 1833-1845.Marvin R. O'Connell -1991 - Upa.A narrative history of Oxford Movement, whereby a group of Anglican intellectuals, notably Newman, Pusey, Keble and Froude, attempted to restore to the Victorian Church of England the character of primitive Christianity. Many of the inherent principles, such as Apostolic Succession, were seen to be exemplified by the Catholic Church.No categories
- (1 other version)Newman and the Irish Bishops.Marvin R. O’Connell -2004 -Newman Studies Journal 1 (1):49-61.What was the background to Newman’s rectorship of the Catholic University in Dublin? In 1845 the British government proposed to establish three non-denominational colleges in Ireland; some of the Irish bishops felt that it would be possible to work out a modus vivendi with the government. A slight majority of the bishops, however, opposed these so-called “godless” colleges and voted at the Synod of Thurles in 1850, to found a Catholic University in Ireland—a country that had been repeatedly decimated by (...) poverty and oppression, and a few years earlier the potato famine (1845-48). (shrink)
- Dawson and the Oxford Movement.Marvin R. O'Connell -1983 -The Chesterton Review 9 (2):149-160.
- Coptic Future Tenses: Syntactical Studies in Sahidic.Virginia Davis &Marvin R. Wilson -1972 -Journal of the American Oriental Society 92 (1):192.
- Effect of word frequency restriction on anagram solution.Ed M. Edmonds &Marvin R. Mueller -1969 -Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (3p1):545.
- Colloquium of the Seven about Secrets of the Sublime. [REVIEW]Marvin R. O’Connell -1979 -New Scholasticism 53 (2):254-255.
- The Exclusion and Distortion of African American Perspectives in Peace Education.Marvin J. Berlowitz,Nathan A. Long &Eric R. Jackson -2006 -Educational Studies 39 (1):5-15.
- The Jewish Temple: A Non-Biblical Sourcebook.Marvin A. Sweeney &C. T. R. Hayward -1999 -Journal of the American Oriental Society 119 (1):147.
- Spectacular Nature: Corporate Culture and the Sea World Experience.G. R.Marvin -1999 -Environmental Values 8 (4):521-522.
- Essays in the Science of Culture.Marvin K. Opler,G. E. Dole &R. L. Carneiro -1961 -Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 21 (3):426.No categories
- Umma in the Sargonic Period.Marvin A. Powell &Benjamin R. Foster -1985 -Journal of the American Oriental Society 105 (1):144.No categories
- Borderline Hypertension: How and When to Treat.Marvin Moser,Lawrence R. Krakoff &Michael H. Alderman -1981 -Hastings Center Report 11 (6):45-46.
- The soul.Frederic R.Marvin -1875 -Journal of Speculative Philosophy 9 (4):421 - 422.
- The song of the spirit over the waters.Frederic R.Marvin -1876 -Journal of Speculative Philosophy 10 (2):215 - 216.
- Visual memorability in the absence of semantic content.Qi Lin,Sami R. Yousif,Marvin M. Chun &Brian J. Scholl -2021 -Cognition 212 (C):104714.
- Balancing Ethical Considerations for Assisted Outpatient Treatment.Michael R. MacIntyre,Jeffrey W. Swanson,Jon E. Sherin &Marvin Swartz -2025 - In William Connor Darby & Robert Weinstock,Forensic neuropsychiatric ethics: balancing competing duties in and out of court. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Publishing.Export citation
Bookmark - Notes and Correspondence.George Sarton,W. Burke-Gaffney,M. Nierenstein,Henry E. Sigerist,R. J. Forbes &F. S.Marvin -1938 -Isis 28 (2):461-466.
- Notes on Relation R.Marvin Belzer -1996 -Analysis 56 (1):56-62.No categories
- Hypothesis theory and nonlearning despite ideal S-R-reinforcement contingencies.Marvin Levine -1971 -Psychological Review 78 (2):130-140.No categories
- Book Reviews Section 3.James L. Jarrett,Walter P. Krolikowski,Charles R. Estes,Hugh C. Black,Charles S. Benson,John Lipkin,Gerald T. Kowitz,Anthony Scarangello,Langston C. Bannister,David N. Campbell,Christine C. Swarm,Steven I. Miller,David H. Ford,William J. Mathis,Don Kauchak,Paul R. Klohr,George W. Bright,Joyce Ann Rich,Edward F. Dash &Marvin Willerman -1973 -Educational Studies 4 (3):155-168.No categories
- James R. Flynn, Race, I.Q. and Jensen. [REVIEW]Marvin Glass -1982 -Philosophy in Review 2:274-276.Export citation Bookmark
- Book Review Section 5. [REVIEW]John T. Abrahamson,David R. Kniefel,Edward J. Nussel,Thomas G. James,Harry Wagschal,Marvin Willerman,Jerome J. Salamone,Conrad Katzenmeyer,Robert B. Grant &Alan H. Jones -unknown
- A Tribute to Fr.Marvin R. O'Connel.M. Katherine Tillman -2016 -Newman Studies Journal 13 (2):8-9.No categories
- The cognitive theory of emotions.Marvin C. Sterling -1979 -Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 10 (2):165-176.
- What is Science? edited by J.R. Newman. [REVIEW]Marvin K. Opler -1956 -Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 17:268.No categories
- Marvin Farber's Contribution to the Phenomenological Movement: An International Perspective.Helmut R. Wagner -1984 - In Kah Kyung Cho,Philosophy and science in phenomenological perspective. Hingham, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 209--236.No categories
- Marvin Farber.R. D'Amico,S. -K. Kim &P. Piccone -1980 -Télos 1980 (46):165-169.
- Sciences of man and social ethics.Marvin Charles Katz -1969 - Boston,: Branden Press.Ethical self-management; an introduction to systematic personality psychology, by M. C. Katz.--Four axiological proofs of the infinite value of man, by R. S. Hartman.--Some thoughts regarding the current philosophy of the behavioral sciences, by C. R. Rogers.--Autonomy and community, by D. Lee.--Synergy in the society and in the individual, by A. H. Maslow.--Human nature: its cause and effect; a theoretical framework for understanding human motivation, by M. C. Katz.--Mental health; a generic attitude, by G. W. Allport.--Love feelings in courtship couples; (...) an analysis, by R. P. Hattis.--Economic policies and human well-being, by W. A. Weisskopf.--The great transformation, by H. F. W. Perk.--Contingencies of reinforcement in the design of a culture, by B. F. Skinner.--For further reading. (shrink)
- The Beginning of Broadcast Regulation in the Twentieth Century.Marvin R. Bensman.Hugh Slotten -2001 -Isis 92 (4):809-809.
- Applied Ontology: AMarvin Farber Conference on Law and Institutions in Society.Barry Smith &David R. Koepsell (eds.) -1998 - Buffalo: University at Buffalo.The application of ontology has thus far [in 1998] been confined almost exclusively to the field of knowledge representation. Ontology has been applied, for example, in the design of medical databases and in the construction of geographical information systems. One area which is naturally suited to ontological analysis is that of the law and of social institutions in general. -/- Legal systems are composed of legal entities, such as laws, contracts, obligations, and rights. Their application yields new categories of entities (...) such as: corporations, trademarks, marriages, and parcels of real estate. The categorization of these entities by different legal systems has not, by-and-large, been conducted in ways which exploit the tools of modern ontology. Consequently, contradictions and inconsistencies often arise in the law when, for instance, one type of entity is forced into two mutually exclusive categories (e.g., when software is considered both patentable and copyrightable). Papers are invited which consider these and related issues from a philosophical point of view. (shrink)Export citation Bookmark
- “She Who Shouts Gets Heard!”: Counting and Accounting for Women Writers in Literary Grants and Norton Anthologies.Julie R. Enszer -2016 -Feminist Studies 42 (3):720.In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:720 Feminist Studies 42, no. 3. © 2016 by Feminist Studies, Inc. Julie R. Enszer “She Who Shouts Gets Heard!”: Counting and Accounting for Women Writers in Literary Grants and Norton Anthologies In 1979, the Coordinating Council of Literary Magazines (CCLM), a New York-based nonprofit that supported literary magazines through technical assistance and grant-making, announced a new program: CCLM editor fellowships.1 Editor fellowships came with a $5,000 grant. Members (...) of the literary community nominated editors to CCLM for the award. Adrienne Rich nominated Ellen Marie Bissert, editor of the feminist journal 13th Moon, and Mab Segrest, editor of Feminary: A Feminist Journal for the South Emphasizing the Lesbian Vision, for the editor fellowships. In 1979, the inaugural year of the prize, among the ten winners, not one was a woman. Bissert was one of three honorable mentions. Bissert rejected the distinction with a public letter to Maureen Owen, the only woman on the CCLM board of directors. Bissert deplored “the sexism inherent in the panelists’ decisions.”2 Several feminist publications reprinted Bissert’s letter while “the male small press gave it scant 1. The work of CCLM continues today, although now the organization is called the Council for Literary Magazines and Presses (CLMP). Under the leadership of Jeffrey Lependorf, the nonprofit organization continues to be a vital advocate for small magazines and publishers. 2. Open letter from Ellen Marie Bissert to Maureen Owen, June 28, 1980, CCLM Editors’ Grant 1980 folder, box 6, 13th Moon records, New York Public Library, Rare Books and Manuscripts Division (hereafter, CCLM folder). Julie R. Enszer 721 coverage.”3 As a result of Bissert’s objections, CCLM released the application statistics: 225 people were nominated, forty (18%) were women, and fifteen (7%) were non-white men. Of the 124 people who completed the applications, twenty-three (19%) were women and eleven (9%) were nonwhite men. There were thirty-three semifinalists, five (15%) women and four (12%) non-white men. These numbers shocked and outraged Bissert and other feminists. Adrienne Rich wrote to Maureen Owen, “I am appalled by the blatant sexism evidenced in the Council’s decision to fund ten male editors.”4 The attention that Bissert brought to the grant process resulted in a special meeting of the CCLM board to “discuss the controversy” and the awards.5 The next year, the CCLM editor fellowships went to five journals run by women and five run by men; one of the winners of the $5,000 award in 1980 was the editorial collective of Conditions, a magazine of writing by women with an emphasis on writing by lesbians.6 In a letter to readers of Conditions, the three editors, Elly Bulkin, Jan Clausen, and Rima Shore, noted that the “feminist protest following the announcement of the 1979 awards no doubt had an impact on the decision-making process” and that the award “represents the only substantial payment we have received, or seem likely to receive, for our editorial work, and we were greatly encouraged by it.”7 Maureen Owen acknowledged the importance of Bissert’s protests saying it “strengthened my position on the board at CCLM and the position of women editors and writers in general. She who shouts, get heard!”8 In 1979, Bissert, Rich, and other feminists demonstrated the importance of shouting about the inclusion of women in systems of literary appraisal; they recognized the important economic consequences of grants for feminist publishers and feminist authors. Thirty years later, in 2009, CateMarvin and Erin Belieu founded VIDA: Women in Literary Arts to promote “conversations regarding the critical reception 3. Open letter from Bissert to Owen. 4. Rich to Owen, August 7, 1979, CCLM folder. 5. Open letter from Bissert to Owen. 6. Press release, June 11, 1980, CCLM folder. 7. Elly Bulkin, Jan Clausen, and Rima Shore, Conditions 7, unnumbered front matter. 8. Postcard from Owen to Bissert, undated, CCLM folder. 722 Julie R. Enszer of women’s creative writing in our current culture.”9 Each February or March since 2010, VIDA releases “the count”: a compilation of the gender breakdown of prizes, reviews, and literary journals in the United States. VIDA’s numbers demonstrate bias toward men in... (shrink)No categories
- "Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Criticism," byMarvin Levich. [REVIEW]Maurice R. Holloway -1965 -Modern Schoolman 42 (3):321-322.
- (1 other version)Importing phenomenology: the early editorial life of Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.Gabriel R. Ricci -2016 -History of European Ideas 42 (3):399-411.SUMMARYThis paper examines the reception of Edmund Husserl's phenomenology in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, a philosophy quarterly which was founded in conjunction with the International Society of Phenomenology and for whichMarvin Farber served as editor until his death in 1980. From its founding in 1940, Farber relied on the editorial support of many of Husserl's enthusiastic students who found themselves intellectual exiles, including Husserl's son. Farber's professional and personal interaction with Husserl's ardent followers reveals a dramatic story of (...) former students who were ever vigilant about maintaining the core values of the Master's unique philosophy, and Farber's personal philosophical transformation from a publicist of Husserl's work to a guarded critic intent on avoiding the promotion of sectarianism. (shrink)
- (1 other version)Mind Design: Philosophy, Psychology, and Artificial Intelligence.John Haugeland (ed.) -1981 - MIT Press.Semantic Engines: An Introduction to Mind Design, John C. Haugeland; Computer Science as Empirical Inquiry: Symbols and Search, Alan Newell and Herbert A. Simon; Complexity and the Study of Artificial and Human Intelligence, Zenon Pylyshyn; A Framework for Representing Knowledge,Marvin Minsky; Artificial Intelligence---A Personal View, David Marr; Artificial Intelligence Meets Natural Stupidity, Drew McDermott; From Micro-Worlds to Knowledge Representation: AI at an Impasse, Hubert L. Dreyfus; Reductionism and the Nature of Psychology, Hilary Putnam; Intentional Systems, Daniel C. Dennett; (...) The Nature and Plausibility of Cognitivism, John C. Haugeland; Minds, Brains, and Programs, John R. Searle; MethodologicalSolipsism Considered as a Research Strategy in Cognitive Psychology, Jerry A. Fodor; The Material Mind, Donald Davidson. (shrink)
- An Examination of Plato's Doctrines. I. Plato on Man and Society.R. E. Allen &I. M. Crombie -1963 -Philosophical Review 72 (4):528.
- Fiat flux: the writings of Wilson R. Bachelor, nineteenth-century country doctor and philosopher.Wilson R. Bachelor -2013 - Fayetteville, Ark.: University of Arkansas Press. Edited by William D. Lindsey, Thomas Allen Bruce & Jonathan James Wolfe.Wilson R. Bachelor was a Tennessee native who moved with his family to Franklin County, Arkansas, in 1870. A country doctor and natural philosopher, Bachelor was impelled to chronicle his life from 1870 to 1902, documenting the family's move to Arkansas, their settling a farm in Franklin County, and Bachelor's medical practice. Bachelor was an avid reader with wide-ranging interests in literature, science, nature, politics, and religion, and he became a self-professed freethinker in the 1870s. He was driven by a (...) concept he called "fiat flux," an awareness of the "rapid flight of time" that motivated him to treat the people around him and the world itself as precious and fleeting. (shrink)
- Hypothetical Promising and John R. Searle.Donald R. Barker -1972 -Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 3 (3):21-34.
- In Which Religion Do I Have the Right to Believe? An Analysis of the Will-to-Believe Argument.Betül Akdemi̇r-süleyman -2022 -Cumhuriyet İlahiyat Dergisi 26 (3):1197-1213.The ethics of belief involves an inquiry into what beliefs are legitimate to hold, including religious beliefs. Whatever the criteria determined in such an investigation, adopting a belief that does not meet this criterion is seen as illegitimate and it is considered an ethical violation. English mathematician W. K. Clifford (d. 1879) defines “sufficient evidence” as a criterion in his famous essay, “The Ethics of Belief”. Clifford’s evidence-centered argument becomes one of the most frequent references in the evidentialist objection against (...) theism. It turns out that this argument is not functional in the face of the diversity of beliefs. In this context, different suggestions are presented about what the ethics of belief could be. American philosopher William James (d. 1810), one of the founding names of pragmatism, offers a new proposal. In his classic work, “The Will to Believe”, James claims that Clifford is wrong in seeking the requirement of evidence for all beliefs. Because it is not possible to prove beliefs from the passionate nature of human beings, especially religious beliefs. Following this distinction, James proposes a new criterion for religious beliefs: a religious belief can be vivid or dead, forced or avoidable; and momentous or trivial. If a religious belief is vivid, forced, and momentous, it is necessary to have the courage to believe in it instead of suspending it. James' proposal is often valued as a strong counter-challenge or defense of religious beliefs. However, this argument also has aspects that are open to criticism. One of them is that the will to believe argument concurrently accepts conflicting religious beliefs or, in other words, confronts the issue of religious diversity. According to J. Hick, for example, this argument inevitably results in religious pluralism, even though James does not want to. Contrary to Hick, S. F. Aikin claims that the will to believe does not result in religious pluralism. According to Aikin, who draws attention to the relationship of argument with pragmatism, James obscures religious beliefs and removes them from being claims about truth. Therefore, there is no contradiction in the classical sense. So, which of the objections is valid? Does the will-to-believe argument result in religious pluralism by legitimizing more than one religious belief at the same time, or does it make a purely pragmatic proposition by devaluing religious beliefs? Which religion do I have the right to believe in according to the will to believe? The aim of this article is to provide an answer to the mentioned question. In the article, unlike the current evaluations, it is argued that the argument is closely related to James's theory of knowledge, radical empiricism, not pragmatism as it is usually made. For this purpose, after showing the relationship between the arguments of Clifford and James, the argument will be re-examined in this context and it will be revealed that James has two steps regarding religious beliefs: to make religious beliefs independent from factual beliefs; leaving theism to accept a monistic vision of God and basing religion on mystical experience, which is an emotional experience. As details emerge, it will become clear that James defends a natural religion that excludes traditional religions in his philosophical system and that he defends the beliefs of a humanized religion. With an individual definition of religion based on emotion, James on the one hand ensures the commonality of religious feeling, on the other hand, he makes religion independent from the field of facts. Therefore, with this study, it will be seen that the argument of the will to believe does not aim to legitimize believing in traditional religions, and diversity is not a fundamental problem. (shrink)No categories
- Principii di logica reale: lezioni fatte nel secondo corso del R. liceo "Umberto I" di Roma.Nicolò R. D' Alfonso -1894 - Torino: G. B. Paravia e c..Export citation Bookmark
- The reality of responses to fiction.R. T. Allen -1986 -British Journal of Aesthetics 26 (1):64-68.
- Mȯnkhȯȯr savlasan mȯnkhbus.Daramyn Batbai︠a︡r -2004 - Ulaanbaatar Khot: Nomos.Export citation Bookmark
- VIII*—Substance Un-Locked.R. J. Butler -1974 -Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 74 (1):131-160.R. J. Butler; VIII*—Substance Un-Locked, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume 74, Issue 1, 1 June 1974, Pages 131–160, https://doi.org/10.1093/aristo.
| 1 — 50 / 956 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-g6h22 uwo