Revisiting Renewable Energies: Liberating, Pacifying, and Democratizing.Stefan Schaltegger,Martina K. Linnenluecke,Samanthi Dijkstra-Silva &Katherine L. Christ -2024 -Business and Society 63 (6):1295-1301.detailsWe all know that renewable energies are important for environmental reasons. However, recent developments should open our eyes to the fact that they are even more critical for sustainable development. In this commentary, we argue that societal benefits should be included in renewable energy decisions. Specifically, we discuss their contributions to freedom, peace, and democracy.
Beyond adaptation: Resilience for business in light of climate change and weather extremes.Martina Linnenluecke &Andrew Griffiths -2010 -Business and Society 49 (3):477-511.detailsScientific findings forecast that one of the major consequences of human-induced climate change and global warming is a greater occurrence of extreme weather events with potentially catastrophic effects for organizations, industries, and society. Current management and adaptation approaches typically focus on economic factors of competition, such as technology and innovation. Although offering useful insights, these approaches are potentially ill equipped to deal with any increases in drastic changes in the natural environment. This article argues that discussions on organizational adaptation need (...) to be broadened and that new conceptual and practical approaches are needed to incorporate the effects of climate change and a greater occurrence of weather extremes into corporate strategy and decision making. The authors advance the notion that a resilience framework might provide insights into dealing with new types of environmental change. They contend that by developing resilience, organizations can develop resources and capabilities to avoid or minimize organizational collapse and to reorganize in light of discontinuities associated with climate change and weather extremes. Implications for organizational practice and research are discussed. © 2010 SAGE Publications. (shrink)
Patterns of Firm Responses to Different Types of Natural Disasters.Martina K. Linnenluecke &Brent McKnight -2019 -Business and Society 58 (4):813-840.detailsThis article examines the relationships between disaster type and firms’ disaster responses. We draw on a unique dataset of 2,164 press releases related to the occurrence of 206 natural disasters over a 10-year period to analyze how firm responses are shaped by the type of disaster it faces. Firms play an increasingly important role in disaster response. We find that firms engage in more anticipatory responses when the type of disaster a firm faces exhibits even impact dispersion and high expected (...) recurrence, and provides substantial warning. Our study draws a relationship between physical geography, disaster type, and more anticipatory firm responses which can improve how firms and communities respond to the risks posed by different types of natural disasters. The article concludes by outlining an agenda for future research on firm responses to natural disasters. (shrink)
No categories
The paradigm shift: Business associations shaping the discourse on system change.Sandra Waddock,Irene Henriques,Martina Linnenluecke,Nicholas Poggioli &Steffen Böhm -2024 -Business and Society Review 129 (2):155-167.detailsThis Agenda 2050 piece is a call to action for management scholars to follow the lead of business associations, foundations, and businesses in studying and understanding the transformative change needed to bring about a more equitable and flourishing world for all living beings—including humans and other‐than‐humans. These entities advocate for a significant paradigm shift in how business is practiced as a way of responding to ‘polycrisis’—the interrelated set of civilization‐threatening crises that includes climate change, social inequality, and biodiversity loss. Yet (...) management scholars lag behind business discourse with issues of sustainability and ecological flourishing, adapting to the type of leadership needed for the future, and understanding the need for system change. We provide four keystone pathways to help scholars shape future discourse in business scholarship, practice, and curricula: 1) structural changes to management education, 2) piloting social impact, 3) development of regenerative business models, and 4) moral, legal, and financial cases for action. (shrink)
No categories
Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility: Taking stock and looking forward.Ralf Barkemeyer,Martina Linnenluecke,Stefan Markovic &Georges Samara -2023 -Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 32 (4):1123-1125.detailsBusiness Ethics, the Environment &Responsibility, Volume 32, Issue 4, Page 1123-1125, October 2023.
Mission Accomplished? Reflecting on 60 Years of Business & Society.Martina Linnenluecke,Layla Branicki &Stephen Brammer -2022 -Business and Society 61 (5):980-1041.detailsBusiness & Society’s 60th anniversary affords an opportunity to reflect on the journal’s achievements in the context of the wider field. We analyze editorial commentaries to map the evolving mission of the journal, assess the achievement of the journal’s mission through a thematic analysis of published articles, and examine Business & Society’s distinctiveness relative to peer journals using a machine learning approach. Our analysis highlights subtle shifts in Business & Society’s mission and content over time, reflecting variation in the relative (...) emphasis on scholarly quality versus policy/practice relevance, and building the journal and its academic community versus addressing issues of concern to wider society. While Business & Society’s intended missions have been substantially and sequentially achieved, an increased emphasis on the society-business nexus and a critical approach to interdisciplinarity could further enhance Business & Society’s leading role within business and society research and attract new generations of contributors and readers. (shrink)
No categories