Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs
Order:

1 filter applied
Disambiguations
Marta Kutas [10]M. Kutas [5]Michal Kutáš [1]
  1.  36
    Learning to use words: Event-related potentials index single-shot contextual word learning.Arielle Borovsky,Marta Kutas &Jeff Elman -2010 -Cognition 116 (2):289-296.
  2.  45
    Online expectations for verbal arguments conditional on event knowledge.Klinton Bicknell,Jeffrey L. Elman,Mary Hare,Ken McRae &Marta Kutas -2008 - In B. C. Love, K. McRae & V. M. Sloutsky,Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  3. Monitoring conscious recollection via the electrical activity of the brain.K. A. Paller,M. Kutas &H. K. McIsaac -1995 -Psychological Science 6:107-11.
  4.  51
    Electrical and magnetic readings of mental functions.Marta Kutas &Anders Dale -1997 - In Michael D. Rugg,Cognitive Neuroscience. MIT Press. pp. 1974242.
  5. Generalized event knowledge activated during online language comprehension.R. Metusalem,M. Kutas,M. Hare,K. McRae &J. L. Elman -2010 - In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone,Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  6.  14
    Flexible Conceptual Representations.Alyssa Truman &Marta Kutas -2024 -Cognitive Science 48 (6):e13475.
    A view that has been gaining prevalence over the past decade is that the human conceptual system is malleable, dynamic, context‐dependent, and task‐dependent, that is, flexible. Within the flexible conceptual representation framework, conceptual representations are constructed ad hoc, forming a different, idiosyncratic instantiation upon each occurrence. In this review, we scrutinize the neurocognitive literature to better understand the nature of this flexibility. First, we identify some key characteristics of these representations. Next, we consider how these flexible representations are constructed by (...) addressing some of the open questions in this framework: We review the age‐old question of how to reconcile flexibility with the apparent need for shareable stable definitions to anchor meaning and come to mutual understanding, as well as some newer questions we find critical, namely, the nature of relations among flexible representations, the role of feature saliency in activation, and the viability of all‐or‐none feature activations. We suggest replacing the debate about the existence of a definitional stable core that is obligatorily activated with a question of the degree and probability of activation of the information constituting a conceptual representation. We rely on published works to suggest that (1) prior featural salience matters, (2) feature activation may be graded, and (3) Bayesian updating of prior information according to current demands offers a viable account of how flexible representations are constructed. This proposal provides a theoretical mechanism for incorporating a changing momentary context into a constructed representation, while still preserving some of the concept's constituent meaning. (shrink)
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  15
    One Lesson Learned: Frame Language Processing—Literal and Figurative—as a Human Brain Function.Marta Kutas -2006 -Metaphor and Symbol 21 (4):285-325.
    No categories
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  8. Event-related brain potentials in the study of consciousness.E. Donchin,G. McCarthy,M. Kutas &W. Ritter -1983 - In Richard J. Davidson, Gary E. Schwartz & D. H. Shapiro,Consciousness and Self-Regulation. Plenum.
  9.  41
    Semantic integration of novel word meanings after a single exposure in context.Arielle Borovsky,Jeff Elman &Marta Kutas -2010 - In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone,Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Box 1. ERPs and other neuroimaging techniques.M. Kutas &K. D. Federmeier -2000 -Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (12):463-470.
  11.  58
    In-line measures of syntactic processing using event-related brain potentials.Marta Kutas &Jonathan W. King -1999 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):104-105.
    Scalp-recorded event-related potential (ERP) measures of reading and listening have been proved more sensitive to the time course of syntactic processing than the chronometric and behavioral data described by Caplan & Waters. ERP studies using sentences containing relative clauses indicate that there are individual differences in syntactic processing that appear at the earliest theoretically relevant time points and are attributable to working memory operations.
    Direct download(5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. Online measures of word comprehension.M. Kutas -1988 -Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 26 (6):493-493.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  21
    One, two, or many mechanisms? The brain's processing of complex words.Thomas F. M.ü,Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells nte &Marta Kutas -1999 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1031-1032.
    The heated debate over whether there is only a single mechanism or two mechanisms for morphology has diverted valuable research energy away from the more critical questions about the neural computations involved in the comprehension and production of morphologically complex forms. Cognitive neuroscience data implicate many brain areas. All extant models, whether they rely on a connectionist network or espouse two mechanisms, are too underspecified to explain why more than a few brain areas differ in their activity during the processing (...) of regular and irregular forms. No one doubts that the brain treats regular and irregular words differently, but brain data indicate that a simplistic account will not do. It is time for us to search for the critical factors free from theoretical blinders. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  29
    An electrophysiological measure of priming of visual word-form.Ken A. Paller,Marta Kutas &Heather K. McIsaac -1998 -Consciousness and Cognition 7 (1):54-66.
    Priming and recollection are expressions of human memory mediated by different brain events. These brain events were monitored while people discriminated words from nonwords. Mean response latencies were shorter for words that appeared in an earlier study phase than for new words. This priming effect was reduced when the letters of words in study-phase presentations were presented individually in succession as opposed to together as complete words. Based on this outcome, visual word-form priming was linked to a brain potential recorded (...) from the scalp over the occipital lobe about 450 ms after word onset. This potential differed from another potential previously associated with recollection, suggesting that distinct operations associated with these two types of memory can be monitored at the precise time that they occur in the human brain. (shrink)
    Direct download(4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  39
    Elaboration over a Discourse Facilitates Retrieval in Sentence Processing.Melissa Troyer,Philip Hofmeister &Marta Kutas -2016 -Frontiers in Psychology 7.
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16. Dennett, D. C.: The Mystery of Consciousness. [REVIEW]Michal Kutáš -2011 -Filozofia 66 (2):201-204.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
Export
Limit to items.
Filters





Configure languageshere.Sign in to use this feature.

Viewing options


Open Category Editor
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?

Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp