Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs
Order:

1 filter applied
Disambiguations
Lisa M. Mitchell [3]Lisa Meryn Mitchell [1]
  1.  121
    Risk and the Pregnant Body.Anne Drapkin Lyerly,Lisa M. Mitchell,Elizabeth Mitchell Armstrong,Lisa H. Harris,Rebecca Kukla,Miriam Kuppermann &Margaret Olivia Little -2009 -Hastings Center Report 39 (6):34-42.
    Reasoning well about risk is most challenging when a woman is pregnant, for patient and doctor alike. During pregnancy, we tend to note the risks of medical interventions without adequately noting those of failing to intervene, yet when it's time to give birth, interventions are seldom questioned, even when they don't work. Meanwhile, outside the clinic, advice given to pregnant women on how to stay healthy in everyday life can seem capricious and overly cautious. This kind of reasoning reflects fear, (...) not evidence. (shrink)
    Direct download(4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  2.  88
    Finding autonomy in birth.Rebecca Kukla,Miriam Kuppermann,Margaret Little,Anne Drapkin Lyerly,Lisa M. Mitchell,Elizabeth M. Armstrong &Lisa Harris -2008 -Bioethics 23 (1):1-8.
    Over the last several years, as cesarean deliveries have grown increasingly common, there has been a great deal of public and professional interest in the phenomenon of women 'choosing' to deliver by cesarean section in the absence of any specific medical indication. The issue has sparked intense conversation, as it raises questions about the nature of autonomy in birth. Whereas mainstream bioethical discourse is used to associating autonomy with having a large array of choices, this conception of autonomy does not (...) seem adequate to capture concerns and intuitions that have a strong grip outside this discourse. An empirical and conceptual exploration of how delivery decisions ought to be negotiated must be guided by a rich understanding of women's agency and its placement within a complicated set of cultural meanings and pressures surrounding birth. It is too early to be 'for' or 'against' women's access to cesarean delivery in the absence of traditional medical indications – and indeed, a simple pro- or con- position is never going to do justice to the subtlety of the issue. The right question is not whether women ought to be allowed to choose their delivery approach but, rather, taking the value of women's autonomy in decision-making around birth as a given, what sorts of guidelines, practices, and social conditions will best promote and protect women's full inclusion in a safe and positive birth process. (shrink)
    Direct download(4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  3.  45
    Cross-Cultural Cyborgs: Greek and Canadian Women's Discourses on Fetal Ultrasound.Lisa M. Mitchell &Eugenia Georges -1997 -Feminist Studies 23 (2):373.
  4. Women As Political Actors: A Reappraisal.Lisa Meryn Mitchell -1985 -Nexus 4 (1):3.
Export
Limit to items.
Filters





Configure languageshere.Sign in to use this feature.

Viewing options


Open Category Editor
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?

Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp