Results for 'Lawrence Deyton'
950 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- War, Its Aftermath, and U.S. Health Policy: Toward a Comprehensive Health Program for America's Military Personnel, Veterans, and Their Families.Michael J. Jackonis,LawrenceDeyton &William J. Hess -2008 -Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (4):677-689.Extensive media coverage of the nation’s response to its obligation to furnish health care for service members wounded in current overseas conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan has elevated public consciousness of the importance of the U.S. military and veteran’s health care systems to a level not seen since the end of the Vietnam War. The number of casualties of U.S. military engagements has varied in each specific conflict and is a direct result of both the type of battle and the (...) military’s ability to handle battlefield injuries. (shrink)
- The Philosophy of Moral Development: Moral Stages and the Idea of Justice.Lawrence Kohlberg -1981 - San Francisco : Harper & Row.Examines the theories of Socrates, Kant, Dewey, Piaget, and others to explore the implications of Socrates' question "what is a virtuous man, and what is a virtuous school and society which educates virtuous men.".
- Reciprocity.Lawrence C. Becker -1986 - Boston: Routledge.The tendency to reciprocate – to return good for good and evil for evil – is a potent force in human life, and the concept of reciprocity is closely connected to fundamental notions of ‘justice’, ‘obligation’ or ‘duty’, ‘gratitude’ and ‘equality’. In _Reciprocity_, first published in 1986,_ _Lawrence Becker presents a sustained argument about reciprocity, beginning with the strategy for developing a moral theory of the virtues. He considers the concept of reciprocity in detail, contending that it is a basic (...) virtue that provides the basis for parental authority, obligations to future generations, and obedience to law. Throughout the first two parts of the book, Becker intersperses short pieces of his own narrative fiction to enrich reflection on the philosophical arguments. The final part is devoted to extensive bibliographical essays, ranging over anthropology, psychology, political theory and law, as well as the relevant ethics and political philosophy. (shrink)
- Self-consciousness in chimps and pigeons.Lawrence H. Davis -1989 -Philosophical Psychology 2 (3):249-59.Chimpanzee behaviour with mirrors makes it plausible that they can recognise themselves as themselves in mirrors, and so have a 'self-concept'. I defend this claim, and argue that roughly similar behaviour in pigeons, as reported, does not in fact make it equally plausible that they also have this mental capacity. But for all that it is genuine, chimpanzee self-consciousness may differ significantly from ours. I describe one possibility I believe consistent with the data, even if not very plausible: that the (...) chimpanzee is aware of itself only as a material being, and not as a subject of any psychological states. As I try to make clear, this possibility exists even if the chimpanzee has psychological states, and is aware of some of them. (shrink)
- What Makes Wrongful Discrimination Wrong?: Biases, Preferences, Sterotypes [sic], and Proxies.Lawrence A. Alexander -1989 - Faculty of Law, University of Toronto.
- Mead and the Emergence of the Joint Intentional Self.Lawrence Cahoone -2019 -European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 11 (2).What is the core of the distinctiveness of Homo sapiens? Some of the most famous hypotheses include tool use and tool making, language, free will and moral agency, self-consciousness, mind itself, and reason or rational problem-solving. All these answers are partly true. But recent work in comparative psychology, primatology, and cognitive science have converged on a conception of human distinctiveness that underlies these. Remarkably, it was explored a century ago by George Herbert Mead. The American pragmatists played a special role (...) in the development of non-reductive naturalism. But among them, Mead uniquely endorsed the notion of “emergence” developed by the British Emergentists. This led him to an analysis of the emergence of the human self and mind out of social processes, most famously employing his concept of “significant gesture.” In recent decades both notions have been buttressed by philosophical and scientific work. Emergence has returned in the sciences of nonlinear dynamics and complexity, and has been re-conceptualized by philosophers like Wiliiam Wimsatt. Mead’s social conception of the human mind and self have been repurposed by a host of scientists, as in Michael Tomasello’s conception of “joint intentionality” and Antonio Damasio’s analysis of self-consciousness. These developments show that Mead was remarkably prescient in his core insights. (shrink)
- Gunther Von hagens' body worlds: Selling beautiful education.Lawrence Burns -2007 -American Journal of Bioethics 7 (4):12 – 23.In the BODY WORLDS exhibitions currently touring the United States, Gunther von Hagens displays human cadavers preserved through plastination. Whole bodies are playfully posed and exposed to educate the public. However, the educational aims are ambiguous, and some aspects of the exhibit violate human dignity. In particular, the signature cards attached to the whole-body plastinates that bear the title, the signature of Gunther von Hagens, and the date of creation mark the plastinates as artwork and von Hagens as the artist (...) in a gesture that strips the personal dignity from the donors. I conclude that the educational use of cadavers is compatible with respect for dignity if: 1) the utility of such use is great enough; 2) there are no other ways of achieving these ends; and 3) every effort is made to honor the dignity of the donors. (shrink)
- Virtue as the end of law: an aretaic theory of legislation.Lawrence B. Solum -2018 -Jurisprudence 9 (1):6-18.ABSTRACTThis article investigates a virtue-centered approach to normative legal theory in the context of legislation. The core idea of such a theory is that the fundamental aim of law should be the promotion of human flourishing, where a flourishing human life is understood as a life of rational and social activities that express the human excellences. Law can promote flourishing in several ways. Because peace and prosperity are conducive to human flourishing, legislation should aim at the establishment and maintenance of (...) these conditions. The human excellences are developed in childhood and young adulthood by stable and nurturing families and by educational institutions: therefore, the law should support and foster families and schools. Although some critics have argued that an aretaic theory of legislation must support so-called “vice laws,” this is not the case. A virtue-centered approach must take into account the effects produced by criminalization of alcohol, drugs, gambling, and prosti... (shrink)No categories
- Max Stirner as Hegelian.Lawrence S. Stepelevich -1985 -Journal of the History of Ideas 46 (4):597.From its first appearance in 1844, Max Stirner’s major work, Der Einzige und sein Eigentum ,[1] has produced little agreement among its many interpreters. The very first of these interpreters was Friedrich Engels, who suggested that Stirner’s doctrines would be quite compatible with Benthamite utilitarianism, which he then admired, and even saw in these doctrines the potential of benefiting communism.[2] Marx, in short order, corrected this optimistic deviation, and then—with a surely repentant Engels—set forth the orthodox gospel for all future (...) generations of communists: Stirner, or “Sankt Max,” was but the speculative spokesman for the petty bourgeois, a decadent Hegelian boasting over the unrestraint of his self inflated ego.[3] Sidney Hook echoed Marx when he condemned Stirner’s work as but the “social defense mechanism of a petty bourgeois soul.”[4] Others, unsatisfied with this “petty” status, elevate him to that of the Grand Bourgeois, or Fascist.[5] Still others, taking an opposite stance, see in Stirner the most articulate defender of individual liberty.[6] In between, he has been called a nihilist, an anarchist, an existentialist, a solipsist, an anti Benthamite, an intemperate capitalist, or—as we might now suspect—an anti capitalist.[7] At least two commentators, lost in the confusion, have managed to escape the need to classify Stirner within the ongoing political and ethical categories and simply declare him to be insane.[8] In short, the list of radically diverse interpretations.. (shrink)
- Saint Thomas, Alvin Plantinga, and the Divine Simplicity.Lawrence Dewan -1989 -Modern Schoolman 66 (2):141-151.
- Ad Hominem Arguments.Lawrence H. Powers -unknownAd hominem arguments argue that some opponent should not be heard and no argument of that opponent should be heard or considered. The opponent has generally pernicious views, false and harmful. Moreover he is diabolically clever at arguing for his views. Thus, the ad hominem argument is essentially a device by which non-intellectuals try to wrest control of a dialectical situation from intellectuals. Stifling intellectuals, disrupting the dialectical situation, is an unpleasant conclusion, but no fallacy has been shown in what (...) leads up to that conclusion. (shrink)
- Max Stirner and Ludwig Feuerbach.Lawrence S. Stepelevich -1978 -Journal of the History of Ideas 39 (3):451.
- A Few Words from the Editor and the Treasurer.Lawrence S. Stepelevich -1990 -The Owl of Minerva 22 (1):3-4.The Editor of The Owl and the Treasurer of the Hegel Society of America share the same residence, i.e., the body ofLawrence S. Stepelevich. The Treasurer insists upon having a few words to say. These will be followed by a few from the Editor.
- Mead, Joint Attention, and the Human Difference.Lawrence Cahoone -2013 -The Pluralist 8 (2):1-25.The struggle between the parties bent on inflating humanity's self-conception and those bent on deflating it continues. Mind, consciousness, soul, reason, free will, language, culture, tool-use—all have been invoked as the unique character of the human, some deriving from Judeo-Christian religion, others from classical philosophy and modern anthropology. Opponents, sometimes motivated by ethical concerns about the treatment of animals, and buoyed by scientific advances in animal and especially primate studies, have either deconstructed these traits or ascribed them to nonhumans. Seeking (...) to block human exploitation of nonhuman species, they argue that humans are not "exceptional" and possess no "cognitive module" .. (shrink)
- The Influenza Controversy: Should Limits Be Placed on Science?Lawrence O. Gostin -2012 -Hastings Center Report 42 (3):12-13.Should government have the power to place limits on a scientific pursuit that holds the potential for both good and harm—on what is called “dual‐use research”? That is the highly charged question surrounding research to genetically modify influenza A (H5N1) to render it more easily transmissible from human to human. There is seldom a “right” answer to dual‐use research, but a fair, inclusive, and transparent process—building on the NSABB model—should improve decision‐making. A local institutional panel should evaluate dual‐use research based (...) on the following structured ethical framework. (shrink)
- John Dewey as educator.JohnLawrence Childs -1940 - [New York,: Progressive Education Association. Edited by William Heard Kilpatrick.
- Christian Ideas and Ideals: An Outline of Christian Ethical Theory.RobertLawrence Ottley -2013 - New York [etc.]: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform.Published in 1909, this title contains a series of lectures on "The Outlines of Christian Ethics" addressed to candidates for the ministry.
- Developing the Theology of Priesthood: Celibate, Married, or Both?Basilio Petra &Lawrence Cross -2010 -The Australasian Catholic Record 87 (2):187.Export citation
Bookmark - Nietzsche’s Will to Power and Politics.Lawrence J. Hatab -2014 - In Manuel Knoll & Barry Stocker,Nietzsche as Political Philosopher. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 113-134.
- Intersubjectivity and the conceptualization of communication.Lawrence Grossberg -1982 -Human Studies 5 (1):213 - 235.
- La politique par le détour de l'art, de l'éthique et de la philosophie.Lucille Beaudry &Lawrence Olivier (eds.) -2001 - Sainte-Foy: Sainte-Foy : Presses de l'Université du Québec.
- Tackling Obesity and Disease: The Culprit Is Sugar; the Response Is Legal Regulation.Lawrence O. Gostin -2018 -Hastings Center Report 48 (1):5-7.It is staggering to observe the new normal in America: 37.9 percent of adults are obese, and 70.7 percent are either obese or overweight. One out of every five minors is obese. The real tragedy, of course, is the disability, suffering, and early death that devastates families and communities. But all of society pays, with the annual medical cost estimated at $147 billion. The causal pathways are complex, but if we drill down, sugar is a deeply consequential pathway to obesity, (...) and the single greatest dietary source is sugar-sweetened beverages. The copious amount of sugar in the American diet is no accident. Industry practices and regulatory failures have fueled this explosion. Yet there are sensible, effective interventions that would create the conditions for healthier behaviors. What are the key interventions, and how can we overcome the social, political, and constitutional roadblocks? Tobacco control offers a powerful model, suggesting that success requires a suite of interventions working in concert: labeling, warnings, taxation, portion sizes, product formulation, marketing restrictions, and bans in high-risk settings such as schools and hospitals. Each intervention deserves detailed analysis, but I'm kick-starting scholarly and policy conversation by systematically laying out the major legal tools. (shrink)
- Intending.Lawrence H. Davis &John F. M. Hunter -1979 -Philosophical Review 88 (4):652.
- XML Update and Query-Structural Recursion on Ordered Trees and List-Based Complex Objects--Expressiveness and PTIME Restrictions.Edward L. Robertson,Lawrence V. Saxton,Dirk Van Gucht &Stijn Vansummeren -2006 - In O. Stock & M. Schaerf,Lecture Notes In Computer Science. Springer Verlag. pp. 344-358.Export citation Bookmark
- Revisiting Aquinas's "fifth way".Lawrence Dewan -2004 -Philosophy and Culture 31 (3):47-67.Thomas Aquinas based on things "management" for the existence of God made two different arguments, one found in the philosophy of Guinness, the other found in the Summa Theologica, which is the so-called "fifth way." First, the metaphysics, the fifth way is considered more important, so it is selected into the Summa Theologica. Secondly, I deal with this issue of the validity of the argument, stressing that this argument is based on absolute basis of experience. Thomas Aquinas presents two different (...) argument for the existence of a God based on the "government" of things, one in the Summer contra Gentiles and one in the Summa Theologiae, the latter the so-called "Fifth way". First, I argue that the Fifth way is metaphysically more fundmental, for which reason it is selected for use in the later Summa. Secondly, I address the question of the argument's validity, alling attention to its foundation in absolutely fundamental experience. (shrink)Export citation Bookmark
- Acts Amid Precepts: The Aristotelian Logical Structure of Thomas Aquinas’s Moral Theory by Kevin Flannery, S.J.Lawrence Dewan -2007 -Nova et Vetera 5:431-444.Export citation Bookmark
- Concerning the Person and the Common Good.Lawrence Dewan -1989 -Maritain Studies/Etudes Maritainiennes 5:7-21.
- Death in the Setting of Divine Wisdom.Lawrence Dewan -1988 - Pontificia Università San Tommaso.Export citation Bookmark
- Jacques Maritain, St. Thomas, and the Birth of Metaphysics.Lawrence Dewan -1997 -Maritain Studies/Etudes Maritainiennes 13:3-18.
- Maritain on Religion in a Democratic Society: Man and the State Revisited.Lawrence Dewan -2005 -Maritain Studies/Etudes Maritainiennes 21:32-60.
- Some Notes on St. Thomas's Use of "dignitas".Lawrence Dewan -2013 -Nova et Vetera 11 (3).No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- St. Thomas, Natural Law, and Universal Ethics.Lawrence Dewan -2011 -Nova et Vetera 9:737-762.Export citation Bookmark
- St. Thomas, our Natural Lights, and the Moral Order.Lawrence Dewan -1986 -Maritain Studies/Etudes Maritainiennes 2:59-92.
- St. Thomas, St. Bonaventure, and the Need to Prove the Existence of God.Lawrence Dewan -1988 -Philosophie Et Culture: Actes du XVIIe Congrès Mondial de Philosophie 3:841-844.No categories
- Norms and values in the study of law.Lawrence M. Friedman -2015 - In Aristides N. Hatzis & Nicholas Mercuro,Law and economics: philosophical issues and fundamental questions. New York, NY: Routledge.Export citation Bookmark
- Effects of hypothermia on Pavlovian conditioning in the rabbit: II. Heart rate response.Lawrence G. Stava &Ralph B. Hupka -1976 -Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 7 (3):246-248.
- (6 other versions)A Few Words from the Editor.Lawrence S. Stepelevich -1983 -The Owl of Minerva 15 (1):3-4.No categories
- A Union of Egoists: Max Stirner and Moses Hess.Lawrence S. Stepelevich -2014 -Philosophical Forum 45 (4):335-353.
- Errol E Harris, The Spirit of Hegel, Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press, 1993, pp xii + 272, Hb $45.00.Lawrence S. Stepelevich -1993 -Hegel Bulletin 14 (1-2):53-56.No categories
- Hegel and Stirner.Lawrence S. Stepelevich -1976 -Idealistic Studies 6 (3):263-278.The recent profusion of studies directed to uncovering the “Young Marx” has also provoked some renewed interest in his contemporary, Johann Caspar Schmidt, better known as Max Stirner. With a few exceptions, the most important being William Brazill’s The Young Hegelians, Stirner has been retained in his traditional role as Marx’s first critic, the harried “Sankt Max” of The German Ideology. This perspective, established firmly by Sidney Hook and continued by David McLellen, does cast light upon Marx’s development, but it (...) cannot be expected to do justice to Stirner, who is more than a mere anti-Marxist. (shrink)
- Hartvig Nissen's impressions of the Scottish educational system in the mid‐nineteenth century.Lawrence Stenhouse -1961 -British Journal of Educational Studies 9 (2):143-154.
- Max Stirner: The ego and his own.Lawrence S. Stepelevich -1972 -Journal of the History of Philosophy 10 (2):230-232.
- Neurological ballistic movements: Sampled data or intermittent open-loop control.Lawrence Stark -1982 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (4):564-566.
- Towards a reassessment of early Victorian aesthetics: The metaphysical foundations.Lawrence J. Starzyk -1971 -British Journal of Aesthetics 11 (2):167-177.
- The non-poietic foundations of Victorian aesthetics.Lawrence J. Starzyk -1986 -British Journal of Aesthetics 26 (3):218-227.
- A Few More Words from the Editor.Lawrence S. Stepelevich -1984 -The Owl of Minerva 16 (1):3-4.In August of 1978, the XVI World Congress of Philosophy convened in Düsseldorf. As the European Hegel societies were then unable to prepare a common program, it first appeared as if Hegel would be left unrepresented in this most important of philosophical gatherings. As this seemed not right, the Hegel Society of America took the initiative, at the last moment, to prepare a special section. The result proved, not unexpectedly, to be a great success. The special program featured two of (...) the finest Hegel scholars, Professors John N. Findlay and Errol E. Harris. The papers they delivered at that time, before a large and appreciative audience, were subsequently published in the Owl. (shrink)
- August von Cieszkowski: From Theory to Praxis.Lawrence S. Stepelevich -1974 -History and Theory 13 (1):39-52.A neglected Young Hegelian, Cieszkowski published prolifically in economics and philosophy, but the work most influential on the Hegelians was his Prolegomena Zur Historiosophie . Rejecting the conservative interpretation of Hegel, it denied that the end of history had been reached, celebrated the will as transcending thought, and anticipated a future in which being and thinking would find their syntheses in praxis. At once a critique of Hegel and a development of Hegelianism, his work is most notable for its millennial (...) optimism. (shrink)
- Feuerbach and the Young Hegelians.Lawrence S. Stepelevich -1998 - In Simon Critchley & William Ralph Schroeder,A Companion to Continental Philosophy. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 107–117.In defining the Wise Man, the Man of absolute Knowledge, as perfectly self‐conscious – i. e., omniscient, at least potentially – Hegel nevertheless had the unheard‐of audacity to assert that he realized Wisdom in his own person.No categories
- Hegel's Ladder, Volume I: The Pilgrimage of Reason, and: Volume II: The Odyssey of Spirit (review).Lawrence S. Stepelevich -1998 -Journal of the History of Philosophy 36 (3):473-475.In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:Reviewed by:Hegel’s Ladder, Volume I: The Pilgrimage of Reason by Henry Silton HarrisLawrence S. StepelevichHenry Silton Harris. Hegel’s Ladder, Volume I: The Pilgrimage of Reason. Pp. xvi+ 658. Volume II: The Odyssey of Spirit. Pp. xiii + 909. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1997. Cloth, $150.00, the set.This commentary upon Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit is the concentrated result of over three decades of sustained study by one of the most (...) renowned of contemporary Hegelian scholars.The Phenomenology stands in the course of philosophic history as (depending upon one’s point of view) either an opportunity or an obstacle—an unavoidable Sphinx. Both admirers and detractors of this famous work will often assign themselves or, more readily, their students, the task of reading it as a introduction to Hegel’s philosophy. However, what occurs is not usually what is intended. After a short perusal, the reader finds that the Phenomenology itself needs an introduction. This need has not been lost on scholars, and their various introductory observations, when expanded and duly annotated, are entered into the ever-growing list of commentaries upon the Phenomenology. Needless to say, given the hundreds of studies which, either in whole or in part, are devoted to commenting upon this work, there are some grand failures, as Lowenberg’s elegantly vapid Dialogues on the Phenomenology, or Heidegger’s inconclusive “critical debate with Hegel.” There are also a few successes, such as Jean Hyppolite’s Genesis and Structure. Without doubt, Harris’s commentary is a success, and surely the most successful of all Anglophone commentaries upon the Phenomenology. [End Page 473]Hegel’s Ladder, which assumes a learned readership, embarks upon the same long and tortured path facing any reader of the Phenomenology. It is no small thing to follow where one thinks Hegel leads, as he had a somewhat perverse tendency to avoid both clarifying examples and a tendency to, as J. N. Findlay described it, “wanton obscurity.” To make matters worse, there is also the complex ordering of the text itself, a palimpsest character which has led more than a few commentators to take the work as a disorderly juvenalia, best left ignored in favor of the more lucid Encyclopaedia. And finally, there is also the extratextual matter of whether or not one “buys into” Hegel’s thought—which Harris does. In any case, a superficial reading will not do, and readers will be reminded of Hegel’s own “path of despair” when they follow the course of Harris’s 1,500-page commentary. It is not an “easy read,” nor could it be.Professor Harris is well aware of the problems confronting any commentator, but addresses them in an way which would assure the reader that the commentary is directly linked to the text, and does not simply follow “paths of one’s own, offering variations, elaborations, and applications instead of faithful analysis” (xii). To this end, a “logical commentary” is developed, one which follows a serial paragraph-by-paragraph analysis of the text. Each paragraph-analysis is referenced to the Phenomenology, which allows the reader a direct reference to Hegel’s own words. These “safe” and constrained analytic paragraphs are each followed by an extensive and free-ranging commentary. The intention of this procedure is not only to assure the reader that Harris’s commentary is textually grounded, but to convince the reader that Harris’s contention regarding the nature of the Phenomenology is correct—that it is a profoundly cohesive and extended logical argument. In short, for Harris, the Phenomenology is exactly what what Hegel claimed it to be: a science of experience. Most commentators have not accepted this claim of either the unity or the logical course of the text, but this “received view” is, for Harris, the “view that I want to challenge and, if possible, to overthrow. If I am right, an acceptably continuous chain of argument, paragraph by paragraph, ought to be discoverable in the text” (xii).In the total context of Hegel’s philosophy, Harris understands the Phenomenology to be the “necessary preamble to speculative logic.” Once this is accepted, then “we ought to know at once, by the simplest of... (shrink)
- Obituary.Lawrence S. Stepelevich -1995 -The Owl of Minerva 27 (1):112-113.
| 1 — 50 / 950 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5b9ff6f457-db555 uwo