Results for 'Ken Nishi'
971 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- Jitsuzon kara no bōken.KenNishi -1989 - Tōkyō: Mainichi Shinbunsha.
- On images from correlations.Sarah Norgate &Ken Richardson -2007 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (2):162-163.The difficulty of making reliable interpretation from a dense cloud of unreliable correlations means that the grounds for making a testable or brain-based, theory of intelligence remain very shaky. We briefly discuss the conceptual and methodological problems that arise and suggest one possible alternative interpretation of the data.
- A/ew Zealand Bioethics Journal.Neil Pickering,Ken Daniels,Andrew Moore,Warren Brookbanks,John Adams,Shayne Grice,David B. Menkes,Alan A. Woodall &David Woolner -2000 -New Zealand Bioethics Journal 1:1.Export citation
Bookmark - How hedonic and perceived community benefits from employee CSR involvement drive CSR advocacy behavior to co-workers.Rojanasak Chomvilailuk &Ken Butcher -2021 -Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 31 (1):224-238.Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, EarlyView.No categories
- Türkiye'de felsefenin yüzyılı.Betül Çotuksöken (ed.) -2017 - Konya: Çizgi Kitabevi.
- Keihō to kindaihō chitsujo.Naohira Takeda &Ken®Ichi Nakayama -1988 - Tōkyō: Seibundō. Edited by Ken'ichi Nakayama.
- Gone Tomorrow; Zen Inspired Poetry.E. H. S. &Ken Noyle -1967 -Journal of the American Oriental Society 87 (2):212.
- (2 other versions)Experiencing contingency and agency.Jacqueline Nadel,Ken Prepin &Mako Okanda -2005 -Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 6 (3):447-462.Precursors of inferential capacities concerning self- and other- understanding may be found in the basic experience of social contingency and emotional sharing. The emergence of a sense of self- and other-agency receives special attention here, as a foundation for self-understanding. We propose that synchrony, an amodal parameter of contingent self-other relationships, should be especially involved in the development of a sense of agency. To explore this framework, we have manipulated synchrony in various ways, either by delaying mother’s response to infant’s (...) behaviour, disorganizing mother’s internal synchrony between face and voice, freezing the partner in a still attitude, or on the contrary maximizing synchrony through imitation. We report results obtained with healthy and clinical populations that are supposed to be at the beginning of basic experiences concerning the ownership of their actions: infants of 2 months and 6 months, low-functioning children with autism and MA matched young children with Down Syndrome. Our results support the idea of a two-step process linking understanding of self to understanding of other and leading on to form the concept of human beings as universally contingent entities. (shrink)No categories
- Toward a comprehensive integration of science and religion: a postmetaphysical approach.Sean Esbjörn-Hargens &Ken Wilber -2006 - In Philip Clayton & Zachory Simpson,The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 523--546.Accession Number: ATLA0001712251; Hosting Book Page Citation: p 523-546.; Physical Description: diag ; Language(s): English; General Note: Bibliography: p 544-546.; Issued by ATLA: 20130825; Publication Type: Essay.
- New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence.Takashi Washio,Ken Satoh,Hideaki Takeda &Akihiro Inokuchi (eds.) -2008 - Springer.This book constitutes the thoroughly refereed joint post-proceedings of three international workshops organized by the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, held in Tokyo, Japan in June 2006 during the 20th Annual Conference JSAI 2006. The volume starts with eight award winning papers of the JSAI 2006 main conference that are presented along with the 21 revised full workshop papers, carefully reviewed and selected for inclusion in the volume.
- Abraham Geiger's Liberal Judaism: Personal Meaning and Religious Authority.Ken Koltun-Fromm -2006 - Indiana University Press.German rabbi, scholar, and theologian Abraham Geiger is recognized as the principal leader of the Reform movement in German Judaism. In his new work, Ken Koltun-Fromm argues that for Geiger personal meaning in religion—rather than rote ritual practice or acceptance of dogma—was the key to religion’s moral authority. In five chapters, the book explores issues central to Geiger’s work that speak to contemporary Jewish practice—historical memory, biblical interpretation, ritual and gender practices, rabbinic authority, and Jewish education. This is essential reading (...) for scholars, rabbis, rabbinical students, and informed Jewish readers interested in Conservative and Reform Judaism. Published with the generous support of the Lucius N. Littauer Foundation. (shrink)
- Technology transfer in Africa: A global imperative.G. I. Ken Akaninwor -2002 -Dialogue and Universalism 12.
- ‘Ducking and Diving’: How Political Issues Affect Equivocation in Japanese Political Interviews.Ofer Feldman,Ken Kinoshita &Peter Bull -2016 -Japanese Journal of Political Science 17 (2):141-167.This paper examines how Japanese leading politicians cope with the communication problems posed during televised political interviews. Based on data gathered during the year 2012 equivocation, thereby to also assess the significance of these talk shows in the broader context of political communication in Japan.
- Chūgoku kodai no shūkyō to shisō.Jōken Kato -1954 - Kyōto-shi: Hābādo Enkei Dōshisha Tōhō Bunka Kōza Iinkai.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Integrating Conceptual Knowledge Within and Across Representational Modalities.Ken McRae Chris McNorgan, Jackie Reid -2011 -Cognition 118 (2):211.
- Tetsugaku oyobi shūkyō to sono rekishi: Hatano Seiichi Sensei kentei ronbunshū.Seiichi Hatano &Ken Ishihara (eds.) -1938 - Tōkyō: Iwanami Shoten.Export citation Bookmark
- Not additive, not defined: mutual constitution in feminist intersectional studies.Allison Suppan Helmuth &Ivy Ken -2021 -Feminist Theory 22 (4):575-604.The term ‘mutual constitution’ appears with regularity in scholarship on intersectionality, but what does it mean? We could not easily answer this question in the usual way – by reading books and articles about it – because the term has not received direct, widespread or sustained engagement in feminist theory. This led us to analyse a wide range of feminist scholarship – the entire set of 379 articles in women’s studies journals that consider both intersectionality and mutual constitution – to (...) determine whether there are patterns and commonalities in the ways this important theoretical term is used. Our analysis reveals that while there is widespread agreement that mutual constitution does not allow for an additive or binary approach, this is the only major point of shared understanding of this term. Scholars disagree over whether mutual constitution is, in fact, the same thing as intersectionality, and in practice, clusters of disciplines use the term with different norms and levels of precision. Because of the explanatory potential of this term in intersectional theory, we recommend on the basis of our analysis that social scientists reconsider the convention of asserting that entities such as race, class and gender are mutually constituted and borrow the methodological tools from feminist historians, literary critics and other humanists that would allow for a genuine determination and demonstration of when entities are mutually constituted. (shrink)No categories
- Ronkō jirui sakuln.Jōken Katō &Katsumi Yamada (eds.) -1960Export citation Bookmark
- Gendai supōtsu ron josetsu.Tomohisa Kawaguchi &Ken Kageyama (eds.) -1977No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- The First Christian Historian: Writing the “Acts of the Apostles”.Daniel Marguerat,Ken McKinney,Gregory J. Laughery &Richard Bauckham -2002No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Eastern Christianity and late antique philosophy.Evangelia Anagnostou-Laoutides &Ken Parry (eds.) -2020 - Boston: Brill.Readers of Eastern Christianity and Late Antique Philosophy will find a collection of authoritative papers from across the Neoplatonic and Eastern Christian traditions. It is only recently that scholars have started to take notice of the Eastern Christian engagement with late antique philosophical texts. This volume builds upon this new interest in order to show the dynamic nature of Neoplatonism and Eastern Christianity at a time when both faced a variety of challenges. The legacy of Greek philosophy in the Christian (...) East fills the gap between the schools of Alexandria and Baghdad and brings into focus the intellectual history of the period. The aim of the volume is to stimulate interest in late antique philosophy and its reception in the Christian East. (shrink)
- Nishi Amane, Katō Hiroyuki.AmaneNishi -1972 - Edited by Michiari Uete.
- Nishi Amane zenshū.AmaneNishi &Toshiaki Okubo -1960 - Munetaka Shobo. Edited by Toshiaki Ōkubo.Export citation Bookmark
- Ōnishi Hajime Ikuko shokanshū: tsuketari Ōnishi Hajime ate shokan.Hajime Ōnishi -1993 - Tōkyō: Kyōbunkan. Edited by Ikuko Ōnishi, Keizō Ishizeki & Toshirō Kōno.Export citation Bookmark
- Wakamatsu Ken shisō ronshū.Ken Wakamatsu -1990 - Ōsaka-shi: Sōgensha.
- Doxastic deliberation.Nishi Shah &J. David Velleman -2005 -Philosophical Review 114 (4):497-534.Believing that p, assuming that p, and imagining that p involve regarding p as true—or, as we shall call it, accepting p. What distinguishes belief from the other modes of acceptance? We claim that conceiving of an attitude as a belief, rather than an assumption or an instance of imagining, entails conceiving of it as an acceptance that is regulated for truth, while also applying to it the standard of being correct if and only if it is true. We argue (...) that the second half of this claim, according to which the concept of belief includes a standard of correctness, is required to explain the fact that the deliberative question whether to believe that p is transparent to the question whether p. This argument raises various questions. Is there such a thing as deliberating whether to believe? Is the transparency of the deliberative question whether to believe that p the same as the transparency of the factual question whether I do believe that p? We will begin by answering these questions and then turn to a series of possible objections to our argument. (shrink)
- Picture Taker: Photographs by Ken Elkins.Ken Elkins &Rick Bragg -2005 - University Alabama Press.Ken Elkins retired as chief photographer of the Anniston Star in 2000, and this selection of his work demonstrates his brilliant eye for finding and capturing images of rural southern lives and landscapes in all their difficulty, candor, and humor. These are unadorned images of a timeless landscape and proud resourceful people, who know well their neighbors, honor their past, and face the tests of daily life with wit and a stoic sense of endurance.
- How truth governs belief.Nishi Shah -2003 -Philosophical Review 112 (4):447-482.Why, when asking oneself whether to believe that p, must one immediately recognize that this question is settled by, and only by, answering the question whether p is true? Truth is not an optional end for first-personal doxastic deliberation, providing an instrumental or extrinsic reason that an agent may take or leave at will. Otherwise there would be an inferential step between discovering the truth with respect to p and determining whether to believe that p, involving a bridge premise that (...) it is good (in whichever sense of good one likes, moral, prudential, aesthetic, allthings-considered, etc.) to believe the truth with respect to p. But there is no such gap between the two questions within the first-personal deliberative perspective; the question whether to believe that p seems to collapse into the question whether p is true. (shrink)
- Seiyō tetsugakushi: Ōnishi Hajime ikō.Hajime Ōnishi -1900 - [Tokyo]: Tōkyō Senmon Gakkō Shuppanbu.Export citation Bookmark
- I—Ken Gemes.Ken Gemes -2006 -Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 80 (1):321-338.No categories
- Clearing Space For Doxastic Voluntarism.Nishi Shah -2002 -The Monist 85 (3):436-445.It is common for philosophers to claim that doxastic voluntarism, the view that an agent can form beliefs voluntarily, is false, and therefore that agents do not have the kind of control over their beliefs required for a straightforward application of deontological concepts such as obligation or duty in the domain of epistemology. The role that the denial of doxastic voluntarism plays in an argument to the effect that agents do not have obligations with respect to belief is simply this.
- A new argument for evidentialism.Nishi Shah -2006 -Philosophical Quarterly 56 (225):481–498.When we deliberate whether to believe some proposition, we feel immediately compelled to look for evidence of its truth. Philosophers have labelled this feature of doxastic deliberation 'transparency'. I argue that resolving the disagreement in the ethics of belief between evidentialists and pragmatists turns on the correct explanation of transparency. My hypothesis is that it reflects a conceptual truth about belief: a belief that p is correct if and only if p. This normative truth entails that only evidence can be (...) a reason for belief. Although evidentialism does not follow directly from the mere psychological truth that we cannot believe for non-evidential reasons, it does follow directly from the normative conceptual truth about belief which explains why we cannot do so. (shrink)
- How Action Governs Intention.Nishi Shah -2008 -Philosophers' Imprint 8:1-19.Why can't deliberation conclude in an intention except by considering whether to perform the intended action? I argue that the answer to this question entails that reasons for intention are determined by reasons for action. Understanding this feature of practical deliberation thus allows us to solve the toxin puzzle.
- Tetsugaku nyūmon.ShinʼichirōNishi -1948No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Reasoning in Stages.Nishi Shah &Matthew Silverstein -2013 -Ethics 124 (1):101-113.Mark Schroeder has recently presented apparent counterexamples to the standard account of the distinction between the right and the wrong kinds of reasons. We argue that these examples appear to refute the standard account only because they blur the distinction between two kinds of reasoning: reasoning about whether to intend or believe that p and reasoning about whether to take up the question of whether to intend or believe that p.
- Can reasons for belief be debunked?Nishi Shah -2011 - In Andrew Reisner & Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen,Reasons for Belief. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- 21-seiki no hō fukushi iryō: sono kadai to tenbō: Yamagami Kenʾichi Hakushi koki kinen ronbunshū.Kenʾichi Yamagami (ed.) -2002 - Tōkyō: Chūō Keizaisha.
- (1 other version)Rational Decisions.Ken Binmore -2009 - Princeton University Press.It is widely held that Bayesian decision theory is the final word on how a rational person should make decisions. However, Leonard Savage--the inventor of Bayesian decision theory--argued that it would be ridiculous to use his theory outside the kind of small world in which it is always possible to "look before you leap." If taken seriously, this view makes Bayesian decision theory inappropriate for the large worlds of scientific discovery and macroeconomic enterprise. When is it correct to use Bayesian (...) decision theory--and when does it need to be modified? Using a minimum of mathematics, Rational Decisions clearly explains the foundations of Bayesian decision theory and shows why Savage restricted the theory's application to small worlds. The book is a wide-ranging exploration of standard theories of choice and belief under risk and uncertainty. Ken Binmore discusses the various philosophical attitudes related to the nature of probability and offers resolutions to paradoxes believed to hinder further progress. In arguing that the Bayesian approach to knowledge is inadequate in a large world, Binmore proposes an extension to Bayesian decision theory--allowing the idea of a mixed strategy in game theory to be expanded to a larger set of what Binmore refers to as "muddled" strategies. Written by one of the world's leading game theorists, Rational Decisions is the touchstone for anyone needing a concise, accessible, and expert view on Bayesian decision making. (shrink)
- Impact of COVID-19 on the Income of Entrepreneurs Who Borrowed from SHG.Nishi Malhotra &Pankaj Kumar Baag -2023 -Journal of Human Values 29 (2):153-167.The COVID-19 pandemic has shaken the world. After liberalization in 1991, microfinance became a panacea for poor people without collateral and information asymmetry. The higher cost of microfinance and debt traps highlighted the need for the state to intervene in resource redistribution. In addition, national lockdowns and COVID-19 restrictions have made it difficult for emerging economies like India to achieve this sustainable development goal. The Reserve Bank of India introduced self-help group (SHG) bank linkage to ensure the financial inclusion of (...) the poor. The difference-in-difference method examined how SHGs affect entrepreneur households’ income. CMIE Consumer Pyramid dx data were used for analysis. The data establish that SHGs have increased the income of the households, and demographic factors such as education, income level and gender also impact the financial inclusion of the poor. (shrink)No categories
- Welfare and Rational Care.Nishi Shah -2004 -Philosophical Review 113 (4):577-582.George, feeling stressed and anxious about the criminal investigation into his firm’s accounting practices, decides that it would do him good to get away and take a long, relaxing vacation in Bermuda. According to popular informed-desire accounts of a person’s good, if George would desire to take a vacation to Bermuda upon being made fully aware of what his experience of the vacation would be like and of all the consequences therein, then this course of action would benefit him. This (...) does not mean that George must actually be privy to whether his fully informed self would desire to travel to Bermuda, but whether he would, according to such an account, determines whether going to Bermuda would benefit George, whether he or anyone else is capable of knowing it. (shrink)
- The essential Ken Wilber: an introductory reader.Ken Wilber -1998 - Boston: Shambhala.Ever since the publication of his first book, The Spectrum of Consciousness, written when he was twenty-three, Ken Wilber has been identified as the most comprehensive philosophical thinker of our times. This introductory sampler, designed to acquaint newcomers with his work, contains brief passages from his most popular books, ranging over a variety of topics, including levels of consciousness, mystical experience, meditation practice, death, the perennial philosophy, and Wilber's integral approach to reality, integrating matter, body, mind, soul, and spirit. Here (...) is Wilber's writing at its most reader-friendly, discussing essential ideas of the world's great psychological, philosophical, and spiritual traditions in language that is lucid, engaging, and inspirational. (shrink)
- Scientific Composition and Metaphysical Ground.Ken Aizawa &Carl Gillett (eds.) -2016 - London: Palgrave-Macmillan.Part I -- Scientific Composition and the New Mechanism. - 1. Laura Franklin-Hall: New Mechanistic Explanation and the Need for Explanatory Constraints. - 2. Kenneth Aizawa: Compositional Explanation: Dimensioned Realization, New Mechanism, and Ground. - 3. Jens Harbecke: Is Mechanistic Constitution a Version of Material Constitution?. - 4. Derk Pereboom: Anti-Reductionism, Anti-Rationalism, and the Material Constitution of the Mental. Part II -- Grounding, Science, and Verticality in Nature. - 5. Jonathan Schaffer: Ground Rules: Lessons from Wilson. - 6. Jessica Wilson: (...) The Unity and Priority Arguments for Grounding. - 7. Carl Gillett: The Metaphysics of Nature, Science, and the Rules of Engagement. - 8. Andrew Melnyk: Grounding and the Formulation of Physicalism. - 9. Alyssa Ney: Grounding in the Philosophy of Mind: A Defense. (shrink)
- Basho as a Post-Pastoral Poet.KinyaNishi &欣也 西 -2017 -Culture and Dialogue 5 (1):7-30.No categories
- Tōyō dōtoku kenkyū.ShinʾichirōNishi -1940Export citation Bookmark
- Family-Supportive Supervisor Behavior, Felt Obligation, and Unethical Pro-family Behavior: The Moderating Role of Positive Reciprocity Beliefs.Ken Cheng,Qianlin Zhu &Yinghui Lin -2022 -Journal of Business Ethics 177 (2):261-273.Drawing on social exchange theory, we argue that family-supportive supervisor behavior (FSSB) inhibits employees’ unethical pro-family behavior (UPFB) via the mediation of felt obligation. We further propose that employees’ positive reciprocity beliefs strengthen the hypothesized relationships. Using a sample consisting of 345 full-time employees from an Internet service company located in China, we found that felt obligation partially mediated the negative relationship between FSSB and UPFB and that the FSSB-felt obligation relationship and the mediation relationship were stronger for employees with (...) higher positive reciprocity beliefs. Theoretical and practical implications, limitations, and future directions are discussed. (shrink)
- The collected works of Ken Wilber.Ken Wilber -1999 - Boston: Shambhala.v. 1. The spectrum of consciousness ; No boundary ; Selected essays -- v. 2. The Atman Project ; Up from Eden -- v. 3. A sociable god ; Eye to eye -- v. 4. Integral psychology ; Transformations of consciousness ; Selected essays -- v. 5. Grace and grit : spirituality and healing in the life and death of Treya Killam Wilber. 2nd ed. -- v. 6. Sex, ecology, spirituality : the spirit of evolution. 2nd, rev. ed. -- v. (...) 7. A brief history of everything ; The eye of spirit -- v. 8. The marriage of sense and soul ; One taste. (shrink)
- XV-The Limits of Normative Detachment.Nishi Shah -2010 -Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110 (3pt3):347-371.
- Playing for Real: A Text on Game Theory.Ken Binmore -2007 - Oxford University Press USA.Ken Binmore's previous game theory textbook, Fun and Games, carved out a significant niche in the advanced undergraduate market; it was intellectually serious and more up-to-date than its competitors, but also accessibly written. Its central thesis was that game theory allows us to understand many kinds of interactions between people, a point that Binmore amply demonstrated through a rich range of examples and applications. This replacement for the now out-of-date 1991 textbook retains the entertaining examples, but changes the organization to (...) match how game theory courses are actually taught, making Playing for Real a more versatile text that almost all possible course designs will find easier to use, with less jumping about than before. In addition, the problem sections, already used as a reference by many teachers, have become even more clever and varied, without becoming too technical. Playing for Real will sell into advanced undergraduate courses in game theory, primarily those in economics, but also courses in the social sciences, and serve as a reference for economists. (shrink)
- Game Theory and the Social Contract.Ken Binmore -1994 - MIT Press.Binmore argues that game theory provides a systematic tool for investigating ethical matters.
- Why we reason the way we do.Nishi Shah -2013 -Philosophical Issues 23 (1):311-325.No categories
| 1 — 50 / 971 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-vb4rf uwo