Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs
Order:

1 filter applied
  1. Optimally interacting minds.Bahador Bahrami,Karsten Olsen,Peter Latham,Andreas Roepstorff,Geraint Rees &Chris Frith -2010 -Science 329 (5995):1081–5.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   54 citations  
  2. Coming to terms: Quantifying the benefits of linguistic coordination.Riccardo Fusaroli,Bahador Bahrami,Karsten Olsen,Andreas Roepstorff,Geraint Rees,Chris Frith &Kristian Tylén -2012 -Psychological Science 23 (8):931-939.
    Sharing a public language facilitates particularly efficient forms of joint perception and action by giving interlocutors refined tools for directing attention and aligning conceptual models and action. We hypothesized that interlocutors who flexibly align their linguistic practices and converge on a shared language will improve their cooperative performance on joint tasks. To test this prediction, we employed a novel experimental design, in which pairs of participants cooperated linguistically to solve a perceptual task. We found that dyad members generally showed a (...) high propensity to adapt to each other’s linguistic practices. However, although general linguistic alignment did not have a positive effect on performance, the alignment of particular task-relevant vocabularies strongly correlated with collective performance. In other words, the more dyad members selectively aligned linguistic tools fit for the task, the better they performed. Our work thus uncovers the interplay between social dynamics and sensitivity to task affordances in successful cooperation. (shrink)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   46 citations  
  3.  58
    Does interaction matter? Testing whether a confidence heuristic can replace interaction in collective decision-making.Dan Bang,Riccardo Fusaroli,Kristian Tylén,Karsten Olsen,Peter Latham,Jennifer Lau,Andreas Roepstorff,Geraint Rees,Chris Frith &Bahador Bahrami -2014 -Consciousness and Cognition 26:13-23.
    In a range of contexts, individuals arrive at collective decisions by sharing confidence in their judgements. This tendency to evaluate the reliability of information by the confidence with which it is expressed has been termed the ‘confidence heuristic’. We tested two ways of implementing the confidence heuristic in the context of a collective perceptual decision-making task: either directly, by opting for the judgement made with higher confidence, or indirectly, by opting for the faster judgement, exploiting an inverse correlation between confidence (...) and reaction time. We found that the success of these heuristics depends on how similar individuals are in terms of the reliability of their judgements and, more importantly, that for dissimilar individuals such heuristics are dramatically inferior to interaction. Interaction allows individuals to alleviate, but not fully resolve, differences in the reliability of their judgements. We discuss the implications of these findings for models of confidence and collective decision-making. (shrink)
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  4. What failure in collective decision-making tells us about metacognition.Bahador Bahrami,Karsten Olsen,Dan Bang,Andreas Roepstorff,Geraint Rees &Chris Frith -2012 -Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367 (1594):1350–65.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  5. Equality bias impairs collective decision-making across cultures.Ali Mahmoodi,Dan Bang,Karsten Olsen,Yuanyuan Zhao,Zhenhao Shi,Kristina Broberg,Shervin Safavi,Shihui Han,Majid Ahmadabadi,Chris Frith & Others -2015 -Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (12):3835–40.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  6.  19
    Social learning and the adaptiveness of expressing and perceiving fearfulness.Karsten Olsen &Ida Selbing -2023 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46:e74.
    The fearful ape hypothesis revolves around our ability to express and perceive fearfulness. Here, we address these abilities from a social learning perspective which casts fearfulness in a slightly different light. Our commentary argues that any theory that characterizes a (human) social signal as being adaptive, needs to address the role of social learning as an alternative candidate explanation.
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
Export
Limit to items.
Filters





Configure languageshere.Sign in to use this feature.

Viewing options


Open Category Editor
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?

Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp