Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs
Order:

1 filter applied
  1.  24
    The Birth of Tragedy? Extremely Premature Births and Shared Decision-Making.Joseph W. Kaempf &Kevin M. Dirksen -2022 -American Journal of Bioethics 22 (11):59-66.
    British philosopher Philippa Foot devoted her life explicating the utility of virtue ethics, aptly summed up as “my attempt to connect good reasoning to goodness.” Shared decision-making is one suc...
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  40
    Decision Zone at the Margins of Life and Good Health: The Role of Medical Staff Guidelines for the Care of Extremely Early Gestation Pregnancies and Premature Infants.Kevin M. Dirksen,Joseph W. Kaempf,Mark W. Tomlinson &Nicole M. Schmidt -2017 -American Journal of Bioethics 17 (1):89-91.
  3.  30
    Extremely premature birth bioethical decision-making supported by dialogics and pragmatism.Gregory P. Moore &Joseph W. Kaempf -2023 -BMC Medical Ethics 24 (1):1-9.
    Moral values in healthcare range widely between interest groups and are principally subjective. Disagreements diminish dialogue and marginalize alternative viewpoints. Extremely premature births exemplify how discord becomes unproductive when conflicts of interest, cultural misunderstanding, constrained evidence review, and peculiar hierarchy compete without the balance of objective standards of reason. Accepting uncertainty, distributing risk fairly, and humbly acknowledging therapeutic limits are honorable traits, not relativism, and especially crucial in our world of constrained resources. We think dialogics engender a mutual understanding that: (...) i) transitions beliefs beyond bias, ii) moves conflict toward pragmatism (i.e., the truth of any position is verified by subsequent experience), and iii) recognizes value pluralism (i.e., human values are irreducibly diverse, conflicting, and ultimately incommensurable). This article provides a clear and useful Point-Counterpoint of extreme prematurity controversies, an objective neurodevelopmental outcomes table, and a dialogics exemplar to cultivate shared empathetic comprehension, not to create sides from which to choose. It is our goal to bridge the understanding gap within and between physicians and bioethicists. Dialogics accept competing relational interests as human nature, recognizing that ultimate solutions satisfactory to all are illusory, because every choice has downside. Nurturing a collective consciousness via dialogics and pragmatism is congenial to integrating objective evidence review and subjective moral-cultural sentiments, and is that rarest of ethical constructs, a means and an end. (shrink)
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  22
    Periviability in a Pandemic: Good Ethics Still Considered Essential.Kevin M. Dirksen,Joseph W. Kaempf &Nicholas J. Kockler -2020 -American Journal of Bioethics 20 (7):177-180.
    Volume 20, Issue 7, July 2020, Page 177-180.
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
Export
Limit to items.
Filters





Configure languageshere.Sign in to use this feature.

Viewing options


Open Category Editor
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?

Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp