Works by John McCormick
79 found
Order:
1 filter applied
DisambiguationsDisambiguations:
| John P. McCormick [36] | John F. McCormick [32] | John McCormick [13] | John Francis McCormick [2] |
| John N. McCormick [1] |
- Machiavellian democracy.John P. McCormick (ed.) -2011 - New York: Cambridge University Press.Highlighting previously neglected democratic strains in Machiavelli's major writings, McCormick excavates institutions through which the common people of ancient, medieval, and Renaissance republics constrained the power of wealthy citizens and public magistrates, and he imagines how such institutions might be revived today.
- (1 other version)Machiavelli Against Republicanism.John P. McCormick -2003 -Political Theory 31 (5):615-643.Scholars loosely affiliated with the “Cambridge School” (e.g., Pocock, Skinner, Viroli, and Pettit) accentuate rule of law, common good, class equilibrium, and non-domination in Machiavelli's political thought and republicanism generally but underestimate the Florentine's preference for class conflict and ignore his insistence on elite accountability. The author argues that they obscure the extent to which Machiavelli is an anti-elitist critic of the republican tradition, which they fail to disclose was predominantly oligarchic. The prescriptive lessons these scholars draw from republicanism for (...) contemporary politics reinforce rather than reform the “senatorial,” electorally based, and socioeconomically agnostic republican model (devised by Machiavelli's aristocratic interlocutor, Guicciardini, and refined by Montesquieu and Madison) that permits common citizens to acclaim but not determine government policies. Cambridge School textual interpretations and practical proposals have little connection with Machiavelli's “tribunate,” class-specific model of popular government elaborated in The Discourses, one that relies on extra-electoral accountability techniques and embraces deliberative popular assemblies. (shrink)
- Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism: Against Politics as Technology.John P. McCormick -1997 - New York: Cambridge University Press.This is the first in-depth critical appraisal in English of the political, legal, and cultural writings of Carl Schmitt, perhaps this century's most brilliant critic of liberalism. It offers an assessment of this most sophisticated of fascist theorists without attempting either to apologise for or demonise him. Schmitt's Weimar writings confront the role of technology as it finds expression through the principles and practices of liberalism. Contemporary political conditions such as disaffection with liberalism and the rise of extremist political organizations (...) have rendered Schmitt's work both relevant and insightful. John McCormick examines why technology becomes a rallying cry for both right- and left-wing intellectuals at times when liberalism appears anachronistic, and shows the continuities between Weimar's ideological debates and those of our own age. (shrink)
- Fear, Technology, and the State.John P. Mccormick -1994 -Political Theory 22 (4):619-652.It is striking that one of the most consequential representatives of [the] abstract scientific orientation of the seventeenth century [Thomas Hobbes] became so personalistic. This is because as a juristic thinker he wanted to grasp the reality of societal life just as much as he, as a philosopher and a natural scientist, wanted to grasp the reality of nature.... [J]uristic thought in those days had not yet become so overpowered by the natural sciences that he, in the intensity of his (...) scientific approach, should unsuspectingly have overlooked the specific reality of legal life. Carl Schmitt, Political Theology (1922)In the light of Hobbes's natural science, man and his works become a mere phantasmagoria. Through Hobbes's natural science, “the native hue” of his political science “is sicklied o'er with the pale cast” of something which is reminiscent of death but utterly lacks the majesty of death—of something which foreshadows the positivism of our day. It seems then that if we want to do justice to the life which vibrates in Hobbes's political teaching, we must understand that teaching by itself, and not in the light of his natural science. Can this be done?² Leo Strauss, “On the Basis ofHobbes's Political Philosophy” (1959). (shrink)
- Derrida on Law; or, Poststructuralism gets Serious.John P. Mccormick -2001 -Political Theory 29 (3):395-423.
- Subdue the Senate.John P. McCormick -2012 -Political Theory 40 (6):714-735.This article analyzes Machiavelli's accounts of the historical figures Agathocles, Clearchus, Appius and Pacuvius to (1) accentuate the Florentine's distinction between tyranny and civic leadership, (2) identify the proper place of elite punishment and popular empowerment in his conception of democratic politics, and (3) criticize contemporary Straussian and "radical" interpreters of Machiavelli for profoundly underestimating the roles that popular judgment and popular rule play within his political thought.
- Post-Enlightenment sources of political authority: Biblical atheism, political theology and the Schmitt–Strauss exchange.John P. McCormick -2011 -History of European Ideas 37 (2):175-180.This essay reevaluates the Weimar writings of Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss, specifically, their intellectual efforts to replace the political authority of Kantian liberalism with, respectively, a ‘political theology’ and ‘Biblical atheism’ derived from the thought of early-modern state theorists like Hobbes and Spinoza. Schmitt and Strauss each insisted that post-Kantian Enlightenment rationality was unraveling into a way of thinking that violently rejected ‘form’ of any kind, fixated myopically on material things and lacked any conception of the external constraints that (...) invariably condition the possibilities of philosophy, morality and politics. They considered Kantian reason and liberal politics to pose serious threats to ‘genuine’ expressions of rationality and as dangerous obfuscations of the necessity of political order—of the brute fact that human beings stand in need of ‘being ruled,’ as such. (shrink)
- Republicanism and Democracy.John P. McCormick -2013 - In Andreas Niederberger & Philipp Schink,Republican democracy: liberty, law and politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.This chapter explores the notion of popular participation advocated by philosopher-statesmen of the past such as Marcus Tullius Cicero, Leonardo Bruni and Francesco Guicciardini, and its political outcomes in relation to the common good. It highlights the significant similarities between traditional republicanism and the ideas of Philip Pettit. Drawing on the writings of Niccolò Machiavelli, it argues that the people are much more likely than the few to make decisions that promote the common good within republics. It also suggests that (...) political democracy, owing to normative and empirical grounds, is more desirable than philosophical republicanism that empowers neutral or ‘depoliticised’ experts and representatives to act on behalf of the people. The chapter explains how popular marginalisation and elite empowerment resulted in the collapse of the regimes served by republican philosopher-statesmen. (shrink)
- Of Tribunes and Tyrants: Machiavelli's Legal and Extra‐Legal Modes for Controlling Elites.John P. McCormick -2015 -Ratio Juris 28 (2):252-266.This essay examines the two means by which Machiavelli thought republics could address the political problem of predatory socio-economic elites: Healthy republics, he proposes explicitly, should consistently check the “insolence of the nobles” by establishing constitutional offices like the Roman tribunes of the plebeians; corrupt republics, he suggests more subtly, should completely eliminate overweening oligarchs via the violent actions of a tyrannical individual. Roman-styled tribunes, wielding veto, legislative and accusatory authority, contain the oppressive behavior of socio-economic elites during normal republican (...) circumstances. By contrast, having overthrown a republic grown corrupt through oligarchic encroachment on the commonweal, Machiavelli suggests that Greek-styled tyrants lay the foundation for a more robust—that is, more egalitarian and martial—republic down the road by eliminating elites entirely and by instituting economic redistribution and military reforms. (shrink)
- Political Theory and Political Theology.John P. McCormick -1998 -Political Theory 26 (6):830-854.
- Introduction. Weimar Thought: Continuity and Crisis.John P. McCormick &Peter E. Gordon -2013 - In John P. McCormick & Peter E. Gordon,Weimar Thought: A Contested Legacy. Princeton University Press. pp. 1-12.No categories
- Machiavelli's Political Trials and “The Free Way of Life”.John P. McCormick -2007 -Political Theory 35 (4):385-411.This essay examines the political trials through which, according to Machiavelli's Discourses, republics should punish magistrates and prominent citizens who threaten or violate popular liberty. Unlike modern constitutions, which assign indictments and appeals to small numbers of government officials, Machiavelli's neo-Roman model encourages individual citizens to accuse corrupt or usurping elites and promotes the entire citizenry as political jury and court of appeal. Machiavellian political justice requires, on the one hand, equitable, legal procedures that serve all citizens by punishing guilty (...) parties and discouraging retaliatory reprisals, including foreign intervention. On the other hand, frankly acknowledging the power disparities that exist in every republic, Machiavelli outlines how political trials enable pro-plebeian magistrates and populist reformers to thwart patrician-generated smear campaigns and oligarchic conspiracies. (shrink)
- Weimar Thought: A Contested Legacy.John P. McCormick &Peter E. Gordon (eds.) -2013 - Princeton University Press.A comprehensive look at the intellectual and cultural innovations of the Weimar period During its short lifespan, the Weimar Republic witnessed an unprecedented flowering of achievements in many areas, including psychology, political theory, physics, philosophy, literary and cultural criticism, and the arts. Leading intellectuals, scholars, and critics—such as Hannah Arendt, Walter Benjamin, Ernst Bloch, Bertolt Brecht, and Martin Heidegger—emerged during this time to become the foremost thinkers of the twentieth century. Even today, the Weimar era remains a vital resource for (...) new intellectual movements. In this incomparable collection, Weimar Thought presents both the specialist and the general reader a comprehensive guide and unified portrait of the most important innovators, themes, and trends of this fascinating period. The book is divided into four thematic sections: law, politics, and society; philosophy, theology, and science; aesthetics, literature, and film; and general cultural and social themes of the Weimar period. The volume brings together established and emerging scholars from a remarkable array of fields, and each individual essay serves as an overview for a particular discipline while offering distinctive critical engagement with relevant problems and debates. Whether used as an introductory companion or advanced scholarly resource, Weimar Thought provides insight into the rich developments behind the intellectual foundations of modernity. (shrink)No categories
- Rousseau’s Rome and the Repudiation of Populist Republicanism.John P. McCormick -2007 -Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 10 (1):3-27.The chapters of Rousseau’s Social Contract devoted to republican Rome prescribe institutions that obstruct popular efforts at diminishing the excessive power and influence of wealthy citizens and political magistrates. I argue that Rousseau reconstructs ancient Rome’s constitution in direct opposition to the more populist and anti‐elitist model of the Roman Republic championed by Machiavelli in the Discourses: Rousseau eschews the establishment of magistracies, like the tribunes, reserved for common citizens exclusively, and endorses assemblies where the wealthy are empowered to outvote (...) the poor in lawmaking and elections. On the basis of sociologically anonymous principles like generality and popular sovereignty, and by confining elite accountability to general elections, Rousseau’s neo‐Roman institutional proposals aim to pacify the contestation of class hierarchies and inflate elite prerogative within republics – under the cover of more formal, seemingly more genuine, equality. (shrink)
- Gabriele Pedullà’sOn Niccolò Machiavelli: the bonds of politics(New York: Columbia University Press, 2023).John P. McCormick,Agneska Bloch,Sabrina Marasa,Marshall Pierce &Gabriele Pedullà -2025 -History of European Ideas 51 (3):585-602.1. At the end of February 2024, the University of Chicago invited Gabriele Pedullà to discuss his new book, On Niccolò Machiavelli: The Bonds of Politics.1 Anyone who encounters the book will immed...
- Pocock, Machiavelli and Political Contingency in Foreign Affairs: Republican Existentialism Outside (and Within) the City.John P. McCormick -2017 -History of European Ideas 43 (2):171-183.SUMMARYIn this essay, inspired by J.G.A. Pocock's appropriation of Machiavelli's theory of political contingency, and building upon my previous engagements with Pocock's ‘republican existentialism’, I focus on the role played by ‘accidents’ in Machiavelli's analysis of war and foreign affairs within The Prince and the Discourses. In so doing, I consider the following issues: the ways through which a potential imperial hegemon might consolidate control over nearby lesser powers—and, conversely, how such less powerful polities might resist imperial encroachments on their (...) autonomy; the contrasting military modes and orders characteristic of ancient and modern republics; and the extent to which Machiavelli actually thought that accidents in foreign affairs were ever truly ‘accidental’ in light of his determinations concerning well- versus badly ordered domestic institutions. (shrink)
- Teaching in Vain : Carl Schmitt, Thomas Hobbes, and the Theory of the Sovereign State.John P. McCormick -2016 - In Jens Meierhenrich & Oliver Simons,The Oxford Handbook of Carl Schmitt. New York, NY: Oxford University Press USA.This chapter traces Carl Schmitt’s attempt, in his 1932 book The Concept of the Political, to quell the near civil war circumstances of the late Weimar Republic and to reinvigorate the sovereignty of the German state through a reappropriation of Thomas Hobbes’s political philosophy. The chapter then examines Schmitt’s reconsideration of the Hobbesian state, and his own recent reformulation of it, in light of the rise of the “Third Reich,” with particular reference to Schmitt’s 1938 book The Leviathan in the (...) State Theory of Thomas Hobbes. (shrink)
- Dangers of mythologizing technology and politics.John P. McCormick -1995 -Philosophy and Social Criticism 21 (4):55-92.
- Confronting mass democracy and industrial technology: political and social theory from Nietzsche to Habermas.John P. McCormick (ed.) -2002 - Durham [N.C.]: Duke University Press.This rich volume is sure to attract scholarly attention in a variety of fields. There is nothing else like it in print.
- Justice, Interpretation, and Violence.John P. Mccormick -2001 -Political Theory 29 (6):876-881.
- Must There Be a Christian Philosophy?John F. McCormick -1936 -Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 12:30-37.No categories
- The Crisis of Constitutional-Social Democracy in the Weimar Republic.John P. McCormick -2002 -European Journal of Political Theory 1 (1):121-128.
- From Roman Catholicism to mechanized oppression: on political‐theological disjunctures in Schmitt’s Weimar thought.John P. McCormick -2010 -Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (2-3):391-398.
- SantayanaPersons and Places: Fragments of Autobiography.George Santayana: A Biography.Harry Levin,George Santayana,William G. Holzberger,Herman J. Saatkamp,Richard C. Lyon &John McCormick -1987 -Journal of the History of Ideas 48 (4):719.
- America.John F. McCormick -1933 -Modern Schoolman 10 (4):95-97.No categories
- A Fundamental in Scholastic Thought.John F. McCormick -1934 -Modern Schoolman 11 (2):31-32.No categories
- A Forerunner of the Scottish School.John F. McCormick -1941 -New Scholasticism 15 (4):299-317.
- Another Music: Polemics and Pleasures.John McCormick -2008 - Routledge.As the essays in this book attest, in a time of specialization John McCormick chose diversification, a choice determined by a life spent in many occupations and many countries. After his five years in the U. S. Navy in the Second World War, the academy beckoned by way of the G. I. Bill, graduate training, and a career in teaching. Prosperity in the American university at the time meant setting up as a "Wordsworth man," a "Keats man," or a "Dr. (...) Johnson man": all chilling to the author. He chose self-exile in which he disguised himself as an "Americanist" saleable in Europe, and lectured happily in comparative studies: literature, history, and philosophy. Thus the broad range of this volume, both in subject matter and in the span of time it covers. The essays are divided into three sections. First are general and personal essays on a variety of topics, followed by work on individual writers, and third, writings on criticism and theory. A section on Santayana reflects his eight years of research for Santayana's biography. The writings on Spain and toreo result from another long-held interest, together with the author's attempt to alter some of the romantic nonsense about the running of the bulls in Pamplona, too often the entire substance of what the general public knows about Spain. McCormick has long been convinced that without knowledge of bullfighting, the foreigner cannot comprehend arcane and wonderful aspects of the Spanish character. The coda, "Another Music," is an old man's attempt to solve the mysterious algebra of how the world turns now, and how the young appear to the aged. While the volume is diverse in its range of writers--from Whitman in America to Santayana in Europe, taken as a collectivity, these essays provide a sense of the grandeur as well as the decadent in twentieth century politics and aesthetics alike. Written with the literary taste and political non-conformity that still characterizes McCormick, the volume is a treat for the specialist and for the generalist. John McCormick was professor of American Studies in the Free University, Berlin, and is at present professor emeritus of comparative literature at Rutgers University. He is the author of Bullfighting, American and European Literary Imagination, Catastrophe and Imagination, Fiction as Knowledge, George Santayana and Seagoing. (shrink)No categories
- Against Politics as Technology: Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism.John P. Mccormick -1995 - Dissertation, The University of ChicagoOver the last decade there has been a veritable explosion of Anglo-American interest in the works of Weimar constitutional and political theorist, Carl Schmitt. There has been concurrently a revival in the treatment of technology as a subject worthy of social-philosophical inquiry. Yet the two scholarly movements have surprisingly passed each other by. Surprisingly because as I demonstrate the German critique of technology is crucial for understanding the works of Schmitt, especially his criticisms of liberalism, and vice versa, theoretical confrontations (...) with technology, often dismissed as excessively abstract, could benefit greatly by observing the way in which Schmitt incorporated theoretical engagements with technology into practical-political treatises. The conjuncture of the critiques of liberalism and technology in Schmitt's writings may shed fresh light on the perennial problem of "technocracy" in liberal democracies and the potential for authoritarianism latent within it. The context in which fascism first emerged in Europe was characterized by a structural transformation--a fusion--of the economy, society and politics as welfare state conditions eclipsed the nineteenth century's--supposedly separate--state/society configuration. As the perceived agent of this transformation technology consequently aroused exhilaration, awe and fear irrespective of whether it was perceived as beneficial or detrimental. The analyses on the part of the intellectuals who engaged technology in this context were sometimes hysterical but also sometimes quite perspicacious. Soviet Communism, fascism and liberal technocracy were all posed as solutions to this situation. Since the 1970s industrial societies have undergone another structural transformation as a Fordist welfare state configuration gives way to a globalized one. This process has brought down Soviet Communism, but fascism has reemerged and liberal technocracy transmutes itself in not necessarily progressive ways. The considerations on these political alternatives in the wake of this century's first technological transformation by fascism's most brilliant promoter and liberalism's most relentless critic may not provide facile answers in the midst of this century's second transformation. But we must properly understand the past to accurately assess the present and insure that the disastrous outcome that befell a fragile liberal democracy such as Weimar's does not occur again. (shrink)Export citation
Bookmark - Catastrophe & Imagination: English & American Writings From 1870 to 1950.John McCormick -1998 - Routledge.Catastrophe and Imagination explores fiction in America and England from 1870 to 1950, measuring the impact of the twentieth century's wars on the literary imagination. McCormick holds that the novel has a unique relationship to society, and defines this in relation to the many catastrophes of his era - wars, revolutions, and other outrages on the social order. After an initial survey of society in the novels of Jane Austen, Dickens, and Thackeray, to name only a few, he analyzes what (...) the novel is not, with reference to the work of Virginia Woolf, John Steinbeck, and D. H. Lawrence. (shrink)
- Essays in Modern Scholasticism.John F. Mccormick &A. C. Pegis -1945 -Philosophical Review 54 (4):426-428.No categories
- The Error of Aristotle.John F. McCormick -1942 -Modern Schoolman 19 (3):51-53.
- Fiction as Knowledge: The Modern Post-Romantic Novel.John McCormick -1999 - Routledge.In 'Fiction as Knowledge', John McCormick proposes that much of the vitality of modern fiction derives from romantic conceptions of history. He demonstrates the vitality of the romantic impulse in the work of seven major novelists.No categories
- (1 other version)George Santayana: a biography.John McCormick -1987 - New York: Paragon House.
- (1 other version)George Santayana's Marginalia, a Critical Selection: Book One, Abell--Lucretius.John McCormick (ed.) -1986 - MIT Press.In his essay "Imagination," George Santayana writes, "There are books in which the footnotes, or the comments scrawled by some reader's hand in the margins, may be more interesting than the text." Santayana himself was an inveterate maker of notes in the margins of his books, writing comments that illuminate, contest, or interestingly expand the author's thought. These volumes offer a selection of Santayana's marginalia, transcribed from books in his personal library. These notes give the reader an unusual perspective on (...) Santayana's life and work. He is by turns critical, approving, literary, slangy, frivolous, and even spiteful. The notes show his humor, his occasional outcry at a writer's folly, his concern for the niceties of English prose and the placing of Greek accent marks. These two volumes list alphabetically by author all the books extant that belonged to Santayana, reproducing a selection of his annotations intended to be of use to the reader or student of Santayana's thought, his art, and his life. Each entry includes a headnote with the author's name, the title of the work, brief publication information, and the library location of the book. Not all marginalia from a given text is included; the notes have been selected for content and style. [cut last sentence; cut entire paragraph if nec.] Santayana, often living in solitude, spent a great deal of his time talking to, and talking back to, a wonderful miscellany of writers, from Spinoza to Kant to J. S. Mill to Bertrand Russell. These notes document those conversations. (shrink)
- Introduction to Schmitt's "The Age of Neutralizations and Depoliticizations ".John P. Mccormick -1993 -Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 96:119.Export citation Bookmark
- Irracjonalny wybór i krwawa walka.John P. McCormick -2008 -Kronos - metafizyka, kultura, religia 3 (3):78-101.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- A Jesuit Contemporary of Descartes.John F. McCormick -1937 -Modern Schoolman 14 (4):79-82.
- Knowledge and the Species.John F. McCormick -1928 -Modern Schoolman 5 (1):13-13.
- 3. Legal Theory and the Weimar Crisis of Law and Social Change.John P. McCormick -2013 - In John P. McCormick & Peter E. Gordon,Weimar Thought: A Contested Legacy. Princeton University Press. pp. 55-72.
- Machiavelli and the Orders of Violence. Yves Winter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.John P. McCormick -2020 -Constellations 27 (2):313-316.
- Machiavelli's Greek tyrant as republican reformer.John P. McCormick -2015 - In Filippo Del Lucchese, Fabio Frosini & Vittorio Morfino,The radical Machiavelli: politics, philosophy and language. Boston: Brill.Export citation Bookmark
- Moral Principles and Practice: Papers Read at the Summer School of Catholic Studies Held at Cambridge, 1932.John F. McCormick -1934 -Modern Schoolman 11 (2):46-46.No categories
- Max Weber and the Legal-Historical Ramifications of Social Democracy.John Mccormick -2004 -Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 17 (1):143-184.Max Weber grappled with the rise of social democracy, the welfare state, or theSozialstaat, most explicitly in the “sociology of law” sections of his posthumously published Economy and Society. Through a close reading of Weber’s text, this essay argues that the historical and analytic categories Weber deployed in his investigation of the Sozialstaat, its rise and its legal dimensions, were inadequate for an appropriate understanding of the phenomena and for the attempt to offer progressive prescriptions for their further development. Instead, (...) by relying on a faulty historical logic, Weber obscured many realities of the Sozialstaat, and unwittingly laid the groundwork for the neo-conservative critique of the welfare state on both sides of the Atlantic. The essay concludes with some reflections on similar, “Weberian,” theoretical moves observable in literatures dealing with the most recent large-scale transformation of law and the state: the rise of the European Union. (shrink)
- On Josiah Ober’s Demopolis: Basic Democracy, Economic Inequality and Political Punishment.John P. McCormick -2019 -Polis 36 (3):535-542.No categories
- (2 other versions)Presidential Address.John F. Mccormick -1926 -Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 5:18-25.No categories
- Pain and sympathy..John N. McCormick -1907 - [n.p.]:Export citation Bookmark
- The Pragmatism of James.John F. McCormick -1942 -Modern Schoolman 20 (1):18-26.
- Philosophy of Religion.John F. Mccormick -1931 -Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 7:196.Export citation Bookmark
- (1 other version)Psycho-Physical Parallelism.John F. Mccormick -1926 -Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 2:51-66.
| 1 — 50 / 79 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5b9ff6f457-q9rxf uwo