Results for 'Jennifer Lipton'
962 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- (1 other version)Preschool Children's Mapping of Number Words to Nonsymbolic Numerosities.Jennifer S.Lipton &Elizabeth S. Spelke -unknownFive-year-old children categorized as skilled versus unskilled counters were given verbal estimation and number word comprehension tasks with numerosities 20 – 120. Skilled counters showed a linear relation between number words and nonsymbolic numerosities. Unskilled counters showed the same linear relation for smaller numbers to which they could count, but not for larger number words. Further tasks indicated that unskilled counters failed even to correctly order large number words differing by a 2 : 1 ratio, whereas they performed well on (...) this task with smaller numbers, and performed well on a nonsymbolic ordering task with the same numerosities. These findings provide evidence that large, approximate numerosity representations become linked to number words around the time that children learn to count to those words reliably. (shrink)
- Preschool children master the logic of number word meanings.Jennifer S.Lipton &Elizabeth S. Spelke -2006 -Cognition 98 (3):57-66.No categories
- Non-symbolic arithmetic in adults and young children.Hilary Barth,Kristen La Mont,JenniferLipton,Stanislas Dehaene,Nancy Kanwisher &Elizabeth Spelke -2006 -Cognition 98 (3):199-222.
- The meta-ethical grounding of our moral beliefs: Evidence for meta-ethical pluralism.Jennifer C. Wright,Piper T. Grandjean &Cullen B. McWhite -2013 -Philosophical Psychology 26 (3):336-361.Recent scholarship (Goodwin & Darley, 2008) on the meta-ethical debate between objectivism and relativism has found people to be mixed: they are objectivists about some issues, but relativists about others. The studies discussed here sought to explore this further. Study 1 explored whether giving people the ability to identify moral issues for themselves would reveal them to be more globally objectivist. Study 2 explored people's meta-ethical commitments more deeply, asking them to provide verbal explanations for their judgments. This revealed that (...) while people think they are relativists, this may not always be the case. The explanations people gave were sometimes rated by outside (blind) coders as being objective, even when given a relativist response. Nonetheless, people remained meta-ethical pluralists. Why this might be is discussed. (shrink)
- (2 other versions)Variations in ethical intuitions.Jennifer L. Zamzow &Shaun Nichols -2009 -Philosophical Issues 19 (1):368-388.
- Accessing the Inaccessible: Redefining Play as a Spectrum.Jennifer M. Zosh,Kathy Hirsh-Pasek,Emily J. Hopkins,Hanne Jensen,Claire Liu,Dave Neale,S. Lynneth Solis &David Whitebread -2018 -Frontiers in Psychology 9.
- Tracking instability in our philosophical judgments: Is it intuitive?Jennifer Wright -2013 -Philosophical Psychology 26 (4):485-501.Skepticism about the epistemic value of intuition in theoretical and philosophical inquiry fueled by the empirical discovery of irrational bias (e.g., the order effect) in people's judgments has recently been challenged by research suggesting that people can introspectively track intuitional instability. The two studies reported here build upon this, the first by demonstrating that people are able to introspectively track instability that was experimentally induced by introducing conflicting expert opinion about certain cases, and the second by demonstrating that it was (...) the presence of instability?not merely the presence of conflicting information?that resulted in changes in the relevant attitudinal states (i.e., confidence and belief strength). The paper closes with the suggestion that perhaps the best explanation for these (and other) findings may be that intuitional instability is not actually ?intuitional.? (shrink)
- Defining disease: Much ado about nothing?Jennifer Worrall &John Worrall -2001 - In Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka & Evandro Agazzi,Life interpretation and the sense of illness within the human condition. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 33--55.
- Profiles of appraisal, motivation, and coping for positive emotions.Jennifer Yih,Leslie D. Kirby &Craig A. Smith -2019 -Cognition and Emotion 34 (3):481-497.We used a retrospective survey to model the patterns of appraisal, motivation, and coping that uniquely correspond with 12 positive emotions (affection/love, amusement, awe, challenge/det...
- The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Pain.Jennifer Corns (ed.) -2017 - New York: Routledge.The phenomenon of pain presents problems and puzzles for philosophers who want to understand its nature. Though pain might seem simple, there has been disagreement since Aristotle about whether pain is an emotion, sensation, perception, or disturbed state of the body. Despite advances in psychology, neuroscience, and medicine, pain is still poorly understood and multiple theories of pain abound. The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Pain is an outstanding reference source to the key topics, problems and debates in this exciting (...) and interdisciplinary subject and is the first collection of its kind. Comprising over thirty chapters by a team of international contributors the Handbook is divided into nine clear parts: Modelling pain in philosophy Modelling pain in neuroscience Modelling pain in psychology Pain in philosophy of mind Pain in epistemology Pain in philosophy of religion Pain in ethics Pain in medicine Pain in law. As well as fundamental topics in the philosophy of pain such as the nature, role, and value of pain, many other important topics are covered including the neurological pathways involved in pain processing, biopsychosocial and cognitive behavioural models of pain; chronic pain; pain and non-human animals; pain and knowledge; controlled substances for pain; pain and placebo effects; and pain and physician assisted suicide. The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Pain is essential reading for students and researchers in philosophy of mind, philosophy of psychology and ethics. It will also be very useful to researchers of pain from any field, especially those in psychology, medicine, and health studies. (shrink)
- Array heterogeneity prevents catastrophic forgetting in infants.Jennifer M. Zosh &Lisa Feigenson -2015 -Cognition 136 (C):365-380.No categories
- Corporate Social Performance: Research Directions for the 21st Century.Jennifer J. Griffin -2000 -Business and Society 39 (4):479-491.Rowley and Berman (2000) are tackling the right questions in their article. Three critical questions, in essence, are asked: What is corporate social performance (CSP)? What does it mean (i.e., CSP measures)? And, where does the future lie with CSP? In answering these questions, they are creating a CSP research agenda for the 21st Century. While agreeing, to a large extent, with their new set of questions, this paper questions their rationale for what is currently wrong with CSP and focuses (...) on extending future research directions. Specifically, this paper suggests that existing research in related disciplines can help accelerate our understanding of CSP. Marketing (i.e., customer-organization relations) and human relations (i.e., employee-organization relations) literatures, for example, already critically examine the conditions under which various organizational practices, policies, and procedures flourish. These boundary spanning functions provide newinsights that can lead to a broader, richer, and more systematic understanding of the complex CSP construct. (shrink)
- Meaning matters in children’s plural productions.Jennifer A. Zapf &Linda B. Smith -2008 -Cognition 108 (2):466-476.
- Creating the World’s Deadliest Catch: The Process of Enrolling Stakeholders in an Uncertain Endeavor.Jennifer L. Woolley,Susan L. Young &Sharon A. Alvarez -2020 -Business and Society 59 (2):287-321.There is growing interest in the processes by which entrepreneurial opportunities are cocreated between entrepreneurs and their stakeholders. The longitudinal case study of de novo firm Wakefield Seafoods seeks to understand the underlying dynamics of phenomena that play out over time as stakeholders emerge and their contributions become essential to the opportunity formation process. The king crab data show that under conditions of uncertainty, characterized by incomplete or missing knowledge, entrepreneurial processes of experimentation, failure, and learning were effective in forming (...) and exploiting an opportunity. Moreover, contrary to existing literature that either emphasizes heroic entrepreneurs or downplays their value, this article shows that both the vision of the entrepreneur and the stakeholder contributions are critical. This detailed examination of process data shows that the cumulative actions made by entrepreneurs in concert with their stakeholders formed an opportunity that coalesced into a new market. (shrink)No categories
- Understanding the role of dispositional and situational threat sensitivity in our moral judgments.Jennifer Cole Wright &Galen L. Baril -2013 -Journal of Moral Education 42 (3):383-397.Previous research has identified different moral judgments in liberals and conservatives. While both care about harm/fairness (‘individualizing’ foundations), conservatives emphasize in-group/authority/purity (‘binding’ foundations) more than liberals. Thus, some argue that conservatives have a more complex morality. We suggest an alternative view—that consistent with conservatism as ‘motivated social cognition’, binding foundation activation satisfies psychological needs for social structure/security/certainty. Accordingly, we found that students who were dispositionally threat-sensitive showed stronger binding foundation activation, and that conservatives are more dispositionally threat-sensitive than liberals. We (...) also found that in a heightened threat situation liberals (especially social liberals) showed increased binding foundation activation. These results support the view that the binding foundations function differently in our moral cognition than the individualizing foundations. (shrink)
- Tracing stakeholder terminology then and now: Convergence and new pathways.Jennifer J. Griffin -2017 -Business Ethics: A European Review 26 (4):326-346.Over the past four decades, stakeholder research has united a chorus of voices from different disciplines using different terminology for different audiences all related to a seemingly similar topic: those that affect and are affected by business. By juxtaposing a comprehensive review of the early years of stakeholder research against more recent stakeholder research, we identify areas of common convergence as well as emergent scholarship. We develop an organizing framework consisting of three stakeholder-related themes: who or what is a stakeholder; (...) mechanisms underlying stakeholder relationships; and outcomes-oriented stakeholder research. Future research opportunities include: simultaneously examining multiple stakeholders at multiple levels; multiplier effects along the value chain and across geographies; and net impacts. We conclude by identifying how stakeholder research can “move the needle” on important business issues such as: income inequality and CEO pay; human rights and building community inclusion; disease alleviation; and food security in firms’ continuous quest to create value. (shrink)No categories
- The Linguistic Formulation of Fallacies Matters: The Case of Causal Connectives.Jennifer Schumann,Sandrine Zufferey &Steve Oswald -2020 -Argumentation 35 (3):361-388.While the role of discourse connectives has long been acknowledged in argumentative frameworks, these approaches often take a coarse-grained approach to connectives, treating them as a unified group having similar effects on argumentation. Based on an empirical study of the straw man fallacy, we argue that a more fine-grained approach is needed to explain the role of each connective and illustrate their specificities. We first present an original corpus study detailing the main features of four causal connectives in French that (...) speakers routinely use to attribute meaning to another speaker, which is a key element of straw man fallacies. We then assess the influence of each of these connectives in a series of controlled experiments. Our results indicate each connective has different effects for the persuasiveness of straw man fallacies, and that these effects can be explained by differences in their semantic profile, as evidenced in our corpus study. Taken together, our results demonstrate that connectives are important for argumentation but should be analyzed individually, and that the study of fallacies should include a fine-grained analysis of the linguistic elements typically used in their formulation. (shrink)No categories
- Meta-ethical pluralism: A cautionary tale about cohesive moral communities.Jennifer Cole Wright -2015 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 38:e163.Meta-ethical pluralism gives us additional insight into how moral communities become cohesive and why this can be problematic (even dangerous) – and in this way provides support for the worries raised by the target article. At the same time, it offers several reasons to be concerned about the proposed initiative, the most important of which is that it could seriously backfire.No categories
- The Social Cost of Atheism: How Perceived Religiosity Influences Moral Appraisal.Jennifer Wright &Ryan Nichols -2014 -Journal of Cognition and Culture 14 (1-2):93-115.Social psychologists have found that stereotypes correlate with moral judgments about agents and actions. The most commonly studied stereotypes are race/ethnicity and gender. But atheists compose another stereotype, one with its own ignominious history in the Western world, and yet, one about which very little is known. This project endeavored to further our understanding of atheism as a social stereotype. Specifically, we tested whether people with non-religious commitments were stereotypically viewed as less moral than people with religious commitments. We found (...) that participants’ moral appraisals of atheists were more negative than those of Christians who performed the same moral and immoral actions. They also reported immoral behavior as more consistent for atheists, and moral behavior more consistent for Christians. The results contribute to research at the intersection of moral theory, moral psychology, and psychology of religion. (shrink)No categories
- Plotinus on the Soul: A Study in the Metaphysics of Knowledge.Jennifer Yhap -2003 - Susquehanna University Press.This work offers a study on the problematic of a scientific knowledge of the sensible reality in the Enneads.
- We don't need a microscope to explore the chimpanzee's mind.Daniel Povinelli & Vonk &Jennifer -2006 - In Susan Hurley & Matthew Nudds,Rational Animals? Oxford University Press.Export citation
Bookmark - Where guesses come from: Evolutionary epistemology and the anomaly of guided variation.Edward Stein &PeterLipton -1989 -Biology and Philosophy 4 (1):33-56.This paper considers a central objection to evolutionary epistemology. The objection is that biological and epistemic development are not analogous, since while biological variation is blind, epistemic variation is not. The generation of hypotheses, unlike the generation of genotypes, is not random. We argue that this objection is misguided and show how the central analogy of evolutionary epistemology can be preserved. The core of our reply is that much epistemic variation is indeed directed by heuristics, but these heuristics are analogous (...) to biological preadaptations which account for the evolution of complex organs. We also argue that many of these heuristics or epistemic preadaptations are not innate but were themselves generatedby a process of blind variation and selective retention. (shrink)
- Rethinking the Negativity Bias.Jennifer Corns -2018 -Review of Philosophy and Psychology 9 (3):607-625.The negativity bias is a broad psychological principle according to which the negative is more causally efficacious than the positive. Bad, as it is often put, is stronger than good. The principle is widely accepted and often serves as a constraint in affective science. If true, it has significant implications for everyday life and philosophical inquiry. In this article, I submit the negativity bias to its first dose of philosophical scrutiny and argue that it should be rejected. I conclude by (...) offering some alternative hedonic hypotheses that survive the offered arguments and may prove fruitful. (shrink)
- Firm Engagement and Social Issue Salience, Consensus, and Contestation.Jennifer J. Griffin,Andrew P. Bryant &Cynthia E. Clark -2017 -Business and Society 56 (8):1136-1168.Facing an increasing number and variety of issues with social salience, firms must determine how to engage with issues that likely have a significant impact on them. Integrating issues management and salience theories, the authors find that firms engage with socially contested issues—where there is a high degree of societal disagreement—in a different manner from issues that have social consensus, or high agreement. Examining social issue resolutions filed by shareholders from 1997 to 2009, the study finds that socially contested issues, (...) as well as those issues with social consensus, are both likely to result in engagement by the firm. For social issues with consensus, a firm is more likely to opt for a low level of shareholder engagement whereas resolutions regarding contested issues lead to engaging shareholders at a higher level. These findings shed new light on the IM and issue salience literature streams that have suggested firms will react differently to these types of issues, even while they remain largely untested. Finally, firms become less engaged with perennial issues over time. rather than more, providing new guidance to researchers, shareholder activists, and firms alike. To the authors’ knowledge, such fined-grained insight into expected levels of firm engagement with social issue salience has not been put forth previously. (shrink)
- Corporate Public Affairs: Commitment, Resources, and Structure.Jennifer J. Griffin &Paul Dunn -2004 -Business and Society 43 (2):196-220.Using resource dependency and institutional theories, we create and test a model examining the relationships among senior management commitment, resource allocations, and the structure of public affairs departments. Using a large sample of U.S.-based firms, we find a positive relationship between senior management commitment to the public affairs function and the level of human and monetary resources allocated to the public affairs department. Furthermore, firms structure their public affairs responsibilities into three common activity sets: communications, collaborations, and local activities. These (...) common activities are, in turn, positively associated with senior management commitment and resources allocated to the public affairs department. (shrink)
- Pain Research: Where We Are and Why it Matters.Jennifer Corns -2017 - InThe Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Pain. New York: Routledge.
- Berthoff, Ann E., 197, 275.Don Paul Abbott,Jennifer Ahern,Louis Althusser,Anderson Margaret,Jean Anyon,Arthur Applebee,Roger Ascham,Mark H. Ashcraft,M. M. Bakhtin &Jennifer Mae Barizo -2003 -Intertexts: Reading Pedagogy in College Writing Classrooms 76 (83):231.Export citation Bookmark
- Industry Social Analysis.Jennifer J. Griffin &James Weber -2006 -Business and Society 45 (4):413-440.Scholars and practitioners have wondered and debated over the participation of business organizations in the corporate social environment as well as argued over the successes or limitations of such participation. The authors examined six firms' corporate social responsibility activities within the beer industry in an effort to identify and compare these firms' stakeholder relations. The results have implications in our understanding and assessment of corporate social responsibility practices both within and across business industry groups.
- The Federal Trade Commission and Consumer Protections for Mobile Health Apps.Jennifer K. Wagner -2020 -Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 48 (S1):103-114.The Federal Trade Commission has an important role to play in the governmental oversight of mobile health apps, ensuring consumer protections from unfair and deceptive trade practices and curtailing anti-competitive methods. The FTC’s consumer protection structure and authority is outlined before reviewing the recent FTC enforcement activities taken on behalf of consumers and against developers of mhealth apps. The article concludes with identification of some challenges for the FTC and modest recommendations for strengthening the consumer protections it provides.
- Ethics and the political activities of US business.Jennifer Grimaldi -1998 -Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 7 (4):245–249.
- Commentary on Furth.Jennifer Whiting -1986 -Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 2 (1):268-273.No categories
- One is not Born but Becomes a Person: The Importance of Philosophical Mothering.Jennifer Whiting -2006 -Philosophic Exchange 36 (1).Annette Baier is my philosophical foremother. This paper examines Baier’s views on such topics as personal identity and philosophical methodology. It also examines the idea of motherhood, and the various forms that it takes.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Domenico Losurdo, Hegel und das Deutsche Erbe, Köln: Pahl-Rugenstein Verlag, 1989.Jennifer Williams -1992 -Hegel Bulletin 13 (1):70-71.No categories
- Feeling an emotion.Jennifer Wilkinson -1998 -South African Journal of Philosophy 17 (1):62-74.Export citation Bookmark
- 4 Students and Their Social Networks for Literacy.Jennifer Shade Wilson -2012 - In Alister H. Cumming,Adolescent Literacies in a Multicultural Context. Routledge. pp. 56.No categories
- Dreaming, Imagining, and First-person Methods in Philosophy: Commentary on Evan Thompson's Waking, Dreaming, Being.Jennifer M. Windt -2016 -Philosophy East and West 66 (3):959-981.Evan’s book is in many ways an exercise in remapping. The first is suggested by the book’s title. Waking, Dreaming, Being challenges existing ways of mapping the conceptual relationship between conscious states across the sleep-wake cycle. The idea that waking and dreaming are not discrete states but can interpenetrate each other—that, to use Evan’s words, they “aren’t opposed but flow into and out of [one] an other” —is a central theme running through the book. If Evan is correct, then the (...) taxonomy of conscious states that underlies large parts of contemporary philosophy of mind and cognitive neuroscience has to be redrawn. As Evan tells us in the introduction, the book’s organizing principle... (shrink)
- Are There Real Rules for Adding?Jennifer L. Woodrow -2010 -Dialogue 49 (3):455-477.RÉSUMÉ : J’affirme que les normes sémantiques, y compris les normes mathématiques pour l’addition, sont réelles. Ces normes sont régies par des pratiques sociales d’attribuer aux autres et d’entreprendre soi-même la signification, et cet aspect sociale obscurci l’objectivité des normes. L’attribution par Kripke d’un paradoxe sceptique, quant à la possibilité de suivre une règle, relève d’une conception de la normativité selon laquelle les pratiques sociales sont insuffisantes pour autoriser les normes sémantiques. Or, une conception de la normativité qui prend comme (...) point de départ que les êtres humains font partie du monde, détrône cette idée fausse ainsi que le scepticisme sémantique qu’elle soutien. (shrink)No categories
- The Problem with Attitudes.Jennifer Mather Saul -1996 - Dissertation, Princeton UniversityIn this dissertation, I argue that no account of propositional attitude reporting which does not include a significant degree of context-sensitivity can succeed in accommodating our intuitions about the truth conditions of such reports. Next, I argue that there are two general problems to be faced by any context-sensitive theory of attitude ascription, whether semantic or pragmatic. First, any theory which preserves our intuitions about which inference schemas are valid will violate our intuitions about truth conditions of particular attitude reports. (...) Second, all theories which depend upon speaker intentions and audience interests to supply the contextually-determined element will yield incorrect truth conditions for what attitude reports convey . I propose an alternative source for contextually-supplied elements: speaker dispositions. Speaker dispositions, I argue, succeed in securing the right truth conditions for the cases that speaker intentions could not handle. However, I suggest, they also point to a very different way of thinking about the way that communication takes place. (shrink)
- Experimental moral psychology: An introduction.Hagop Sarkissian &Jennifer Wright -2014 - In Hagop Sarkissian & Jennifer Cole Wright,Advances in Experimental Moral Psychology. New York: Bloomsbury Academic. pp. 1-17.An introduction to the volume bearing the same name, tracing the recent history of experimental moral psychology and summarizing the contributions to the volume.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- The evolution of molecular genetic pathways and networks.Jennifer M. Cork &Michael D. Purugganan -2004 -Bioessays 26 (5):479-484.There is growing interest in the evolutionary dynamics of molecular genetic pathways and networks, and the extent to which the molecular evolution of a gene depends on its position within a pathway or network, as well as over‐all network topology. Investigations on the relationships between network organization, topological architecture and evolutionary dynamics provide intriguing hints as to how networks evolve. Recent studies also suggest that genetic pathway and network structures may influence the action of evolutionary forces, and may play a (...) role in maintaining phenotypic robustness in organisms. BioEssays 26:479–484, 2004. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. (shrink)
- Guilt and shame: essays in French literature, thought and visual culture.Jenny Chamarette &Jennifer Higgins (eds.) -2010 - New York: Peter Lang.This collection of essays, on French and francophone prose, poetry, drama, visual art, cinema and thought, assesses guilt and shame in relation to structures of ...
- The Hornsby Discussion.Donald Davidson &Jennifer Hornsby -1997 - Philosophy International.Export citation Bookmark
- 2 Tutoring Adolescents in Literacy.Robert Kohls &Jennifer Shade Wilson -2012 - In Alister H. Cumming,Adolescent Literacies in a Multicultural Context. Routledge. pp. 23.
- Introduction.Jennifer Radden &Kelso Cratsley -2019 - In Kelso Cratsley & Jennifer Radden,Mental Health as Public Health: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Ethics of Prevention. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.In this introduction to the edited volume, we briefly describe some of the current challenges faced by public mental health initiatives, at both the national and global level. We also include several general remarks on interdisciplinary methodology in public mental health ethics, followed by short descriptions of the chapters included in the volume.
- The road to hell: Intentions and propositional attitude ascription.Jennifer M. Saul -1999 -Mind and Language 14 (3):356–375.Accounts of propositional attitude reporting which invoke contextual variation in semantic content have become increasingly popular, with good reason: our intuitions about the truth conditions of such reports vary with context. This paper poses a problem for such accounts, arguing that any reasonable candidate source for this contextual variation will yield very counterintuitive results. The accounts, then, cannot achieve their goal of accommodating our truth conditional intuitions. This leaves us with a serious puzzle. Theorists must either give up on the (...) goal of agreement with our truth conditional intuitions, or find a different source for contextual variation. (shrink)
- The nexus of Yanomamo growth, health and demography.R. Hames &Jennifer Kuzara -2004 - In Francisco M. Salzano & A. Magdalena Hurtado,Lost paradises and the ethics of research and publication. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 110--145.No categories
- Transcendental Inquiry and the Belief in Body: Comments on Rocknak's Imagined Causes.Jennifer S. Marušić -2019 -Hume Studies 45 (1):69-75.
- Commentary on Jonathan A. Newman, Gary Varner, and Stefan Linquist: Defending Biodiversity: Environmental Science and Ethics, chapter 11: should biodiversity be conserved for its aesthetic value?Jennifer Welchman -2020 -Biology and Philosophy 35 (1):13.
- Beyond antagonism : rethinking intersectionality, transnationalism, and the women's studies academic job market.Jennifer C. Nash -2021 - In Ashwini Tambe & Millie Thayer,Transnational feminist itineraries: situating theory and activist practice. Durham: Duke University Press.Export citation Bookmark
- Black sexualities.Jennifer C. Nash -2018 -Feminist Theory 19 (1):3-5.No categories
| 1 — 50 / 962 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5b9ff6f457-pc6d8 uwo