Results for 'Indexicals'
904 found
Order:
1 filter applied
See alsoSee also:
Bibliography:Indexicals and DemonstrativesinPhilosophy of Language Bibliography:Direct Reference Theories of IndexicalsinPhilosophy of Language Bibliography:Indexicals, MiscinPhilosophy of Language Bibliography:Pure and Impure IndexicalsinPhilosophy of Language Bibliography:Frege: Indexicals and Demonstratives, Miscin20th Century Philosophy |
- İndex.* İndex * -2015 -Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 17 (31).No categories
- Current periodical articles 475.Indexical Predicates -1997 -Mind 106 (424).No categories
- BELLIOTTI, Raymond A. Blood is Thicker than Water: Don't Forsake the Family Jewels COOPER, David E. LESLIE, John Demons, Vats and the Cosmos MACDONALD, Ian Group Rights.Index to Volume Xviii -1989 -Philosophical Papers 265 (53):169-177.Export citation
Bookmark - Enquêter sur les violences policières en France. Index,Allan Deneuville &Gala Hernández López -2022 -Multitudes 4 (4):76-80.L’agence d’expertise indépendante INDEX, constituée d’architectes, d’artistes et de chercheurs, enquête sur les violences d’État en France et depuis la France. Dans cet entretien, iels expliquent comment iels réinvestissent politiquement la notion d’expertise dans les enquêtes policières, racontent leurs liens avec le collectif Forensic Architecture, explicitent ce qu’iels entendent par « vérité » dans les enquêtes en sources ouvertes et ce qu’iels mettent en place pour permettre une plus grande dissémination des outils de l’OSINT.No categories
- ANDERSON, Erik Dispositional Essentialism: Alive and well ARONSON, Jerrold L. Kinds.Index to Volume Xxvi -1997 -Philosophical Papers 179 (26):1.Export citation Bookmark
- First page preview.Index to Volume Xxiii -1994 -Philosophical Papers 23 (3).No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- First page preview.Index to Volume Xx -1991 -Philosophical Papers 20 (3).No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Paper taps chart storage.Chart Index,Punched Tape,Pressure Index,Punched Tap,Punched Cards &Charts Key -1968 - In Peter Koestenbaum,Proceedings. [San Jose? Calif.,: [San Jose? Calif.. pp. 391.Export citation Bookmark
- First page preview.Index to Volume Xvi -1987 -Philosophical Papers 16 (3).No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- A Note on EssentialIndexicals of Direction.Rogério Passos Severo -2012 -Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):10-15.Some authors claim that ‘I’ and ‘now’ are essentialindexicals, in the sense that they cannot be eliminated in favor of otherindexicals or nonindexical expressions. This article argues that threeindexicals of direction—one for each spatial dimension (e.g., ‘up’, ‘front’, and ‘left’)—must also be regarded essential, insofar as they are used as pureindexicals and not as demonstratives.
- Centner, D., 72.Author Index -2006 - In Riccardo Viale, Daniel Andler & Lawrence A. Hirschfeld,Biological and cultural bases of human inference. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawerence Erlbaum. pp. 241.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Indexicals and 'de se'attitudes.Wayne Davis -2013 - In Neil Feit & Alessandro Capone,Attitudes De Se: Linguistics, Epistemology, Metaphysics. CSLI Publications. pp. 29--58.
- Proper names andindexicals trigger rigid presuppositions.Emar Maier -2009 -Journal of Semantics 26 (3):253-315.I provide a novel semantic analysis of proper names andindexicals, combining insights from the competing traditions of referentialism, championed by Kripke and Kaplan, and descriptivism, introduced by Frege and Russell, and more recently resurrected by Geurts and Elbourne, among others. From the referentialist tradition, I borrow the proof that names andindexicals are not synonymous to any definite description but pick their referent from the context directly. From the descriptivist tradition, I take the observation that names, and (...) to some extentindexicals, have uses that are best understood by analogy with anaphora and definite descriptions, that is, following Geurts, in terms of presupposition projection. The hybrid analysis that I propose is couched in Layered Discourse Representation Theory. Proper names andindexicals trigger presuppositions in a dedicated layer, which is semantically interpreted as providing a contextual anchor for the interpretation of the other layers. For the proper resolution of DRSs with layered presuppositions, I add two constraints to van der Sandt's algorithm. The resulting proposal accounts for both the classic philosophical examples and the new linguistic data, preserving a unified account of the preferred rigid interpretation of both names andindexicals, while leaving room for non-referential readings under contextual pressure. (shrink)
- (1 other version)On the meaning ofindexicals.Marian Przełęcki -1982 -Bulletin of the Section of Logic 11 (1-2):65-67.The approach to the meaning ofindexicals adopted in this paper is based on the theory known as Montague grammar. Accepting, in general, that kind of theory { especially in its modied version, which is due to Thomason and Kaplan 1 { I point out certain inadequacy in its treatment of the meaning of some indexical expressions and suggest some modication of its theoretical framework in order to avoid that shortcoming.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- The Singapore and Melaka Straits: Violence, security and diplomacy in the 17th century.Peter Borschberg &Index Illustrations -2013 -Philosophy East and West 63 (2).
- Indexicals and the theory of reference.Stephen Schiffer -1981 -Synthese 49 (1):43--100.
- The logic ofindexicals.Alexandru Radulescu -2015 -Synthese 192 (6):1839-1860.Since Kaplan : 81–98, 1979) first provided a logic for context-sensitive expressions, it has been thought that the only way to construct a logic forindexicals is to restrict it to arguments which take place in a single context— that is, instantaneous arguments, uttered by a single speaker, in a single place, etc. In this paper, I propose a logic which does away with these restrictions, and thus places arguments where they belong, in real world conversations. The central innovation (...) is that validity depends not just on the sentences in the argument, but also on certain abstract relations between contexts. This enrichment of the notion of logical form leads to some seemingly counter-intuitive results: a sequence of sentences may make up a valid argument in one sequence of contexts, and an invalid one in another such sequence. I argue that this is an unavoidable result of context sensitivity in general, and of the nature ofindexicals in particular, and that reflection on such examples will lead us to a better understanding of the idea of applying logic to context sensitive expressions, and thus to natural language in general. (shrink)
- Descriptions,indexicals, and belief reports: Some dilemmas (but not the ones you expect).Stephen Schiffer -1995 -Mind 104 (413):107-131.
- Temporalindexicals and the passage of time.Michelle Beer -1988 -Philosophical Quarterly 38 (151):158-164.
- Indexicals and demonstratives.Eros Corazza -2011 - In Marina Sbisà, Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren,Philosophical Perspectives for Pragmatics. John Benjamins. pp. 10--131.
- Acknowledgements 1. Introduction 1.1 Attention, Economy, Power 1.2 Post-Phenomenology and New Materialism 1.3 Media, Software and Game Studies 1.4 Chapter outlines 2. Interface 2.1 Interface theory 2.3 Interfaces as Environments 2.4 Interface, Object, Transduction 3. Resolution 3.1 Resolution 3.2 Neuropower 3.3 High and low Resolution 3.4 Phasing between resolutions 3.5 Resolution, Habit, Power 4. Technicity 4.1 Technicity 4.2 Psychopower 4.3 Homogenization 4.4 Irreversibility 4.5 Technicity, Time, Power 5. Envelopes 5.1 Homeomorphic Modulation 5.2 Envelope Power 5.3 Shifting Logics of the Envelope in Games Design 5.4 The Contingency of Envelopes 6. Ecotechnics 6.1 The Ecotechnics of Care 6.2 Ecotechnics of Care: two sites of transduction 6.3 From suspended to immanent ecotechnical systems of care 6.4 The Temporal Deferral of Negative Affect 7. Envelope Life 7.1 Gamification 7.2 Non-gaming interface envelopes 7.3 Questioning Envelope Life 7.4 Pharmacology 8. Conclusions 8.1 Games / Dig. [REVIEW]Capitalism Bibliography Index -2015 - In James Ash,The interface envelope: gaming, technology, power. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- (2 other versions)Machine generated contents note: Introduction1. The pre-socratic philosophers: Sixth and fifth centuries B.c.E. Thales / anaximander / anaximenes / Pythagoras / xenophanes / Heraclitus / parmenides / Zeno / empedocles / anaxagoras / leucippus and democritus 2. the athenian period: Fifth and fourth centuries B.c.E. The sophists: Protagoras, gorgias, thrasymachus, callicles and critias / socrates / Plato / Aristotle 3. the hellenistic and Roman periods: Fourth century B.c.E through fourth century C.e. Epicureanism / stoicism / skepticism / neoPlatonism 4. medieval and renaissance philosophy: Fifth through fifteenth centuries saint Augustine / the encyclopediasts / John scotus eriugena / saint Anselm / muslim and jewish philosophies: Averroës, Maimonides / the problem of faith and reason / the problem of the universals / saint Thomas Aquinas / William of ockham / renaissance philosophers 5. continental rationalism and british empiricism: The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries Descartes. [REVIEW]Farewell to the Twentieth Century: Nussbaum Glossary of Philosophical Terms Selected Bibliography Index -2009 - In Donald Palmer,Looking at philosophy: the unbearable heaviness of philosophy made lighter. New York: McGraw-Hill.Export citation Bookmark
- (1 other version)The use ofindexicals to co-construct common ground on the continuum of intra- and intercultural communicative contexts.Hanh Dinh -2019 -Pragmatics Cognition 26 (1):135-165.This paper examines the roles ofindexicals in explicating speakers’ intentions and constructing common ground in the context of a continuum with two extreme endpoints, the intracultural at one end, and the intercultural at the other, within the framework of the socio-cognitive approach proposed and developed by Kecskes and Kecskes and Zhang. Thirteen participants from different linguistic and cultural backgrounds were recruited to represent varying degrees on the intra- and intercultural continuum. They were divided into three groups: American English (...) speakers, speakers from Asian countries, and a group of speakers, each of whom represents linguistically and culturally different countries. Eight extracts were drawn from the data of up to three hours of recordings, including discussions on one topic, and retrospective interviews retrieving the speakers’ intentions for using deixis. The results reveal that the closer the interlocutors were towards the intercultural communicative context endpoint on the continuum, the more they employed four types ofindexicals as common ground construction strategies. Those strategies included the explicit manifestation of intentions, clarification, and confirmation of referent identification in actual situational context, elicitation of information, disambiguation and explanation of similar salient specifics in their home culture in an effort to sustain cooperative communication. This study enhances our understanding of different functions ofindexicals in interactions on the intra- and intercultural continuum, which resulted from different levels of context interpretation and common ground. (shrink)No categories
- Lessons from DescriptiveIndexicals.Kjell Johan Sæbø -2015 -Mind 124 (496):1111-1161.Two main methods for analysing de re readings of definite descriptions in intensional contexts coexist: that of evaluating the description in the actual world, whether by means of scope, actuality operators, or non-local world binding, and that of substituting another description, usually one expressing a salient or ‘vivid’ acquaintance relation to an attitude holder, prior to evaluation. Recent work on so-called descriptiveindexicals suggests that contrary to common assumptions, both methods are needed, for different ends. This paper aims to (...) show that there is indeed a division of labour between the two methods of analysis and to identify criteria for choosing among alternative ways to model the second, substitutional method. (shrink)
- Smith onIndexicals.Daniel Asher Krasner -2006 -Synthese 153 (1):49-67.In this paper, I advance a new view of the semantics ofindexicals, using a paper by Quentin Smith as my starting point. I make use of Smith’s examples, refined and expanded upon by myself to argue, as Smith does, that the standard view, thatindexicals refer to some prominent features of the context according to an invariant rule called the character, does not agree with a wide range of phenomena. I depart from Smith, however, in denying that (...) we need more complex rules, which he does not give, called metacharacters to account for all the deviations, and instead argue for a view ofindexicals as just being special cases of demonstratives. I show how demonstratives can be substituted forindexicals to support this view, and I adduce recent work in the semantics of demonstratives to explain how it can work. (shrink)
- Intentions,indexicals and communication.Stefano Predelli -2002 -Analysis 62 (4):310-316.
- Making Sense ofIndexicals.Michael Anderson -1992 -Lyceum 4 (1):39-82.Export citation Bookmark
- 6 Understanding TemporalIndexicals.Peter Ludlow -2005 - In Michael O'Rourke & Corey Washington,Situating Semantics: Essays on the Philosophy of John Perry. MIT Press. pp. 155.
- A Different Story aboutIndexicals.Isidora Stojanovic -unknownThe received view aboutindexicals holds that they are directly referential expressions, and that the semantic contribution of an indexical consists of that thing or individual to which the indexical refers in the context of its utterance. The aim of this paper is to put forward a different picture. I argue that direct reference and indexicality are distinct and separate phenomena, even if they cooccur often. Still, it is the speaker who directly refers to the things that she is (...) talking about, and those things matter for the truth of her utterance.Indexicals, on the other hand, merely help the interpreter identify the speaker's intended reference. Typically,indexicals encode descriptive conditions that the context must meet to make the utterance true. For example, the demonstrative 'this' encodes the condition that the subject matter, ie that about which one is talking, should be salient and proximal to the speaker. The semantic contribution of an indexical, I suggest, consists precisely of such descriptive conditions. I will offer a formal account, dubbed contextual update semantics, and show how it captures the main conceptual motivation and how it handles embeddedindexicals, which may seem problematic at a first glance. (shrink)
- DescriptiveIndexicals and Indexical Descriptions.Geoffrey Nunberg -2004 - In Marga Reimer & Anne Bezuidenhout,Descriptions and beyond. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 261--279.
- Indexicals and Reported Speech.Sainsbury R. Mark -1969 - In J. W. Davis,Philosophical logic. Dordrecht,: D. Reidel. pp. 45-69.
- Indexicals and Reported Speech.R. M. Sainsbury -2004 - In Thomas Baldwin & Timothy Smiley,Studies in the Philosophy of Logic and Knowledge. New York: Oup/British Academy. pp. 209.
- Names,indexicals, and identity statements.Ernesto Napoli -1997 - In M. Anduschus, Albert Newen & Wolfgang Kunne,Direct Reference, Indexicality, and Propositional Attitudes. CSLI Press. pp. 185--211.
- Machine generated contents note: Introduction1. The pre-socratic philosophers: Sixth and fifth centuries B.c.E. Thales / anaximander / anaximenes / Pythagoras / xenophanes / Heraclitus / parmenides / Zeno / empedocles / anaxagoras / leucippus and democritus 2. the athenian period: Fifth and fourth centuries B.c.E. The sophists: Protagoras, gorgias, thrasymachus, callicles and critias / socrates / Plato / Aristotle 3. the hellenistic and Roman periods: Fourth century B.c.E through fourth century C.e. Epicureanism / stoicism / skepticism / neoPlatonism 4. medieval and renaissance philosophy: Fifth through fifteenth centuries saint Augustine / the encyclopediasts / John scotus eriugena / saint Anselm / muslim and jewish philosophies: Averroës, Maimonides / the problem of faith and reason / the problem of the universals / saint Thomas Aquinas / William of ockham / renaissance philosophers 5. continental rationalism and british empiricism: The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries Descartes. [REVIEW]Farewell to the Twentieth Century: Nussbaum Glossary of Philosophical Terms Selected Bibliography Index -2009 - In Donald Palmer,Looking at philosophy: the unbearable heaviness of philosophy made lighter. New York: McGraw-Hill.Export citation Bookmark
- Cognitive dynamics andindexicals.Simon Prosser -2005 -Mind and Language 20 (4):369–391.Frege held that indexical thoughts could be retained through changes of context that required a change of indexical term. I argue that Frege was partially right in that a singular mode of presentation can be retained through changes of indexical. There must, however, be a further mode of presentation that changes when the indexical term changes. This suggests thatindexicals should be regarded as complex demonstratives; a change of indexical term is like a change between 'that φ' and 'that (...) ψ', where 'φ' and 'ψ' pick out relational properties that may nonetheless be conceived of by the thinker as intrinsic. (shrink)
- (1 other version)Temporalindexicals.Quentin Smith -1990 -Erkenntnis 32 (1):5--25.
- What makesindexicals different?C. J. F. Williams -1995 -Ratio 8 (2):192-193.
- When Shapes and Sounds become Words:Indexicals and the Metaphysics of Semantic Tokens.Cathal O'Madagain -2021 -Thought: A Journal of Philosophy.To avoid difficulties that arise when we appeal to speaker intentions or multiple rules to determine the meaning ofindexicals, Cohen (2013) recently defends a conventionalist account of these terms that focuses on their context of tokening. Apart from some tricky cases already discussed in the literature, however, such an account faces a serious difficulty: in many speech acts, multiple apparent tokens are produced – for example when a speaker speaks on a telephone, and her utterance is heard both (...) where she speaks, and at the location of the receiver of the call. The ‘token-contextual’ account seems to imply that in such cases a speaker will simultaneously produce multiple contradictory utterances. Here I argue that to resolve such problems we cannot help but to invoke speaker intentions. However, by appealing to intentions at the level of the metaphysics of semantic tokens, rather than to decide their meaning, the token-contextualist can make this appeal without reintroducing the difficulties associated with intentionalist accounts that she hopes to avoid. The resulting metaphysics of semantic tokens is, interestingly, more complex than we might have expected. -/- . (shrink)
- Assessment-contextualindexicals.Josh Parsons -2011 -Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (1):1 - 17.In this paper, I consider whether tenses, temporalindexicals, and otherindexicals are contextually dependent on the context of assessment (or a-contextual), rather than, as is usually thought, contextually dependent on the context of utterance (u-contextual). I begin by contrasting two possible linguistic norms, governing our use of context sensitive expressions, especially tenses and temporalindexicals (??2 and 3), and argue that one of these norms would make those expressions u-contextual, while the other would make them a-contextual (...) (?4). I then ask which of these two norms are followed by English speakers (?5). Finally, I argue that the existence of a-contextuality does not in any sense entail ?relativism? about truth (?6). (shrink)
- The difference betweenindexicals and demonstratives.Alexandru Radulescu -2018 -Synthese 195 (7):3173-3196.In this paper, I propose a new way to distinguish betweenindexicals, like “I” and “today”, and demonstratives, like “she” and “this”. The main test case is the second person singular pronoun “you”. The tradition would generally count it as a demonstrative, because the speaker’s intentions play a role in providing it with a semantic value. I present cross-linguistic data and explanations offered of the data in typology and semantics to show that “you” belongs on the indexical side, and (...) argue that they can be generalized to a novel criterion for distinguishing betweenindexicals and demonstratives. The central theoretical claim is that the semantic values ofindexicals are objects which play certain utterance-related roles, which are fixed independently of the words being used in the utterance. For instance, the speaker plays the speaker role whether or not she uses the word “I”, and the addressee plays that role whether or not the speaker uses the word “you”. Demonstratives, on the other hand, pick out objects that play no such role, and are instead helped by the speaker’s word-specific intentions. (shrink)
- Free enrichment or hiddenindexicals?Alison Hall -2008 -Mind and Language 23 (4):426-456.Abstract: A current debate in semantics and pragmatics is whether all contextual effects on truth-conditional content can be traced to logical form, or 'unarticulated constituents' can be supplied by the pragmatic process of free enrichment. In this paper, I defend the latter position. The main objection to this view is that free enrichment appears to overgenerate, not predicting where context cannot affect truth conditions, so that a systematic account is unlikely (Stanley, 2002a). I first examine the semantic alternative proposed by (...) Stanley and others, which assumes extensive hidden structure acting as a linguistic trigger for pragmatic processes, so that all truth-conditional effects of context turn out to be instances of saturation. I show that there are cases of optional pragmatic contributions to the proposition expressed that cannot plausibly be accounted for in this way, and that advocates of this approach will therefore also have to appeal to free enrichment. The final section starts to address the question of how free enrichment is constrained: I argue that it involves only local development or adjustment of parts of logical form, any global developments being excluded by the requirement for the proposition expressed to provide an inferential warrant for the intended implications of the utterance. (shrink)
- Are 'here' and 'now'indexicals?Francois Recanati -2001 -Texte 27:115-127.It is argued there is nothing special or deviant about the use of 'now' to refer to a time in the past (or about the use of 'here' to refer to a distant place) — no need to appeal to pragmatic mechanisms such as context-shifting to account for such uses. Such uses are puzzling only if one (mistakenly) maintains that 'here' and 'now' are pureindexicals. In the paper it is claimed that they are more similar to demonstratives than (...) to pureindexicals. Updated material on this can be found in *Truth-Conditional Pragmatics*, Chapter 6, 2010. (shrink)
- Global Domains versus HiddenIndexicals.Christopher Gauker -2010 -Journal of Semantics 27 (2):243-270.Jason Stanley has argued that in order to obtain the desired readings of certain sentences, such as “In most of John’s classes, he fails exactly three Frenchmen”, we must suppose that each common noun is associated with a hidden indexical that may be either bound by a higher quantifier phrase or interpreted by the context. This paper shows that the desired readings can be obtained as well by interpreting nouns as expressing relations and without supposing that nouns are associated with (...) hiddenindexicals. Stanley’s theory and the present alternative are not equivalent, however. They differ over the status of sentences such as “Every student is happy and some student is not happy”. On Stanley’s theory, this sentence will be true in some contexts, while on the present alternative it will be true in no context. Considerations in favor of the present theory’s verdict on such sentences are presented. The broader question at issue is the correct way to incorporate context-relativity into formal semantics. (shrink)
- Spinoza andindexicals.T. L. S. Sprigge -1997 -Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 40 (1):3 – 22.Spinoza distinguishes between three grades of knowledge, (i) sense perception and hearsay; (ii) abstract scientific knowledge; (iii) intuitive reason. It is implied that our intellectual ideal should be to pass from the first to the second, and then from the second to the third. It is problematic, however, how such supersession of the first kind of knowledge is an intelligible ideal. For, on the face of it, it is this alone which can direct our attention on to those particulars (single (...) individuals) a better understanding of which is the main value of the second and third types of knowledge. But perhaps the third (if not, the second) kind of knowledge targets particulars from its own resources. However, it is doubtful that this is quite Spinoza's position. So there is something of a problem as to how he conceives the clearest knowledge of particulars which it makes sense to strive for. There is even a related problem as to how God can possess such knowledge, at least of particulars qua extended. An attempt is made to find a Spinozistic answer to these problems including a Spinozistic account ofindexicals such as 'this'. (shrink)
- Demonstratives andIndexicals.Geoff Georgi -2015 -Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Demonstratives andIndexicals In the philosophy of language, an indexical is any expression whose content varies from one context of use to another. The standard list ofindexicals includes pronouns such as “I”, “you”, “he”, “she”, “it”, “this”, “that”, plus adverbs such as “now”, “then”, “today”, “yesterday”, “here”, and “actually”. Other candidates include the tenses … Continue reading Demonstratives andIndexicals →.
- (1 other version)Frege onIndexicals.Kazuyuki Nomoto -1985 -Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 6 (5):253-259.
- Are Proper NamesIndexicals? -A Defense of Recanati’s Indexical Theory of Proper Names-. 이풍실 -2020 -Cheolhak-Korean Journal of Philosophy 145:185-219.르카나티는 고유명이 지표사의 일종이라는 이론을 제안한다. 이 논문에서 나는 르카나티의 이론을 소개하고 고유명을 지표사의 일종으로 볼만한 이유가 무엇인지 논의할 것이다. 그 다음으로 나는 이 이론에 대하여 제기된 비판들을 다룰 것이다. 라미는 고유명이 지표사의 일종이라는 주장에는 동의하지만 르카나티의 이론은 고유명 유형의 개별화와 관련하여 문제가 있으며 우리의 언어적 직관과 상충하는 부적절한 귀결을 낳는다고 비판한다. 맥킨지는 고유명의 의미론적 지시체 결정에 대한 르카나티의 설명이 고유명의 언어적 의미에 대한 그의 설명과 충돌한다고 비판한다. 나는 이러한 비판들로부터 르카나티의 이론을 방어할 것이다. 그리고 그 과정에서 고유명의 언어적 의미와 (...) 지시체 결정에 관한 르카나티의 이론의 핵심적 주장들을 명료하게 드러내고 이러한 주장들이 일관적임을 보일 것이다. 르카나티는 크립키의 논의를 바탕으로 고유명을 지표사의 일종으로 보는 것이 불합리한 귀결을 낳는다는 논증을 구성해낸 후, 이 논증을 논박한다. 나는 르카나티의 논박이 충분하지 않음을 지적한 후 이를 보충하는 논증을 제안할 것이다. 본 논고에서 제시된 르카나티의 이론의 옹호 작업은 완전하지는 않지만, 르카나티의 이론이 고유명의 의미와 지칭에 관한 보다 구체적인 이론으로 발전될 수 있으며 이 때문에 앞으로도 연구될 가치가 있음을 보여준다는 점에서 그 의의가 있다고 하겠다. (shrink)No categories
- Minds, brains, andindexicals.Jane Heal -manuscript
- Indexicals and contextual involvement.Katarzyna Kijania-Placek -2021 - In Piotr Stalmaszczyk,The Cambridge Handbook of the Philosophy of Language. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Export citation Bookmark
- Reference through Mental Files :Indexicals and Definite Descriptions.François Recanati -2013 - In Carlo Penco & Filippo Domaneschi,What Is Said and What Is Not: The Semantics/pragmatics Interface. Chicago: Chicago University Press. pp. 159-173.Accounts for referential communication (and especially communication by means of definite descriptions andindexicals) in the mental file framework.
| 1 — 50 / 904 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-vb4rf uwo