Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs
Order:

1 filter applied
Disambiguations
He Cui [3]Hengmei Cui [1]
  1.  295
    Development of a Novel Methodology for Ascertaining Scientific Opinion and Extent of Agreement.Vickers Peter,Ludovica Adamo,Mark Alfano,Cory J. Clark,Eleonora Cresto,He Cui,Haixin Dang,Finnur Dellsén,Nathalie Dupin,Laura Gradowski,Simon Graf,Aline Guevara,Mark Hallap,Jesse Hamilton,Mariann Hardey,Paula Helm,Asheley Landrum,Neil Levy,Edouard Machery,Sarah Mills,Sean Muller,Joanne Sheppard,Shinod N. K.,Matthew Slater,Jacob Stegenga,Henning Strandin,Mike Stuart,David Sweet,Ufuk Tasdan,Henry Taylor,Owen Towler,Dana Tulodziecki,Heidi Tworek,Rebecca Wallbank,Harald Wiltsche &Samantha Mitchell Finnigan -2024 -PLoS ONE 19 (12):1-24.
    We take up the challenge of developing an international network with capacity to survey the world's scientists on an ongoing basis, providing rich datasets regarding the opinions of scientists and scientific sub-communities, both at a time and also over time. The novel methodology employed sees local coordinators, at each institution in the network, sending survey invitation emails internally to scientists at their home institution. The emails link to a ‘10 second survey’, where the participant is presented with a single statement (...) to consider, and a standard five point Likert scale. In June 2023, a group of 30 philosophers and social scientists invited 20,085 scientists across 30 institutions in 12 countries to participate, gathering 6,807 responses to the statement 'Science has put it beyond reasonable doubt that COVID-19 is caused by a virus'. The study demonstrates that it is possible to establish a global network to quickly ascertain scientific opinion on a large international scale, with high response rate, low opt-out rate, and in a way that allows for significant (perhaps indefinite) repeatability. Measuring scientific opinion in this new way would be a valuable complement to currently available approaches, potentially informing policy decisions and public understanding across diverse fields. (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  21
    Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement.Peter Vickers,Ludovica Adamo,Mark Alfano,Cory Clark,Eleonora Cresto,He Cui,Haixin Dang,Finnur Dellsén,Nathalie Dupin,Laura Gradowski,Simon Graf,Aline Guevara,Mark Hallap,Jesse Hamilton,Mariann Hardey,Paula Helm,Asheley Landrum,Neil Levy,Edouard Machery,Sarah Mills,Seán Muller,Joanne Sheppard,Shinod N. K.,Matthew Slater,Jacob Stegenga,Henning Strandin,Michael T. Stuart,David Sweet,Ufuk Tasdan,Henry Taylor,Owen Towler,Dana Tulodziecki,Heidi Tworek,Rebecca Wallbank,Harald Wiltsche &Samantha Mitchell Finnigan -unknown
    We take up the challenge of developing an international network with capacity to survey the world’s scientists on an ongoing basis, providing rich datasets regarding the opinions of scientists and scientific sub-communities, both at a time and also over time. The novel methodology employed sees local coordinators, at each institution in the network, sending survey invitation emails internally to scientists at their home institution. The emails link to a ‘10 second survey’, where the participant is presented with a single statement (...) to consider, and a standard five-point Likert scale. In June 2023, a group of 30 philosophers and social scientists invited 20,085 scientists across 30 institutions in 12 countries to participate, gathering 6,807 responses to the statement Science has put it beyond reasonable doubt that COVID-19 is caused by a virus. The study demonstrates that it is possible to establish a global network to quickly ascertain scientific opinion on a large international scale, with high response rate, low opt-out rate, and in a way that allows for significant (perhaps indefinite) repeatability. Measuring scientific opinion in this new way would be a valuable complement to currently available approaches, potentially informing policy decisions and public understanding across diverse fields. (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3. Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement.Peter Vickers,Ludovica Adamo,Mark Alfano,Cory J. Clark,Eleonora Cresto,He Cui,Haixin Dang,Finnur Dellsen,Nathalie Dupin,Laura Gradowski,Simon Graf,Aline Guevara,Mark Hallap,Jesse Hamilton,Mariann Hardey,Paula Helm,Asheley Landrum,Neil Levy,Edouard Machery,Sarah Mills,Sean Muller,Joanne Sheppard,Shinod N. K.,Matthew Slater,Jacob Stegenga,Henning Strandin,Michael T. Stuart,David Sweet,Tasdan Ufuk,Henry Taylor,Towler Owen,Dana Tulodziecki,Heidi Tworek,Rebecca Wallbank,Harald Wiltsche &Samantha Mitchell Finnigan -2024 -PLoS ONE 19 ((12)).
    We take up the challenge of developing an international network with capacity to survey the world’s scientists on an ongoing basis, providing rich datasets regarding the opinions of scientists and scientific sub-communities, both at a time and also over time. The novel methodology employed sees local coordinators, at each institution in the network, sending survey invitation emails internally to scientists at their home institution. The emails link to a ‘10 second survey’, where the participant is presented with a single statement (...) to consider, and a standard five-point Likert scale. In June 2023, a group of 30 philosophers and social scientists invited 20,085 scientists across 30 institutions in 12 countries to participate, gathering 6,807 responses to the statement Science has put it beyond reasonable doubt that COVID-19 is caused by a virus. The study demonstrates that it is possible to establish a global network to quickly ascertain scientific opinion on a large international scale, with high response rate, low opt-out rate, and in a way that allows for significant (perhaps indefinite) repeatability. Measuring scientific opinion in this new way would be a valuable complement to currently available approaches, potentially informing policy decisions and public understanding across diverse fields. (shrink)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4.  16
    Development of a nomogram prediction model for depression in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.Haoyang Chen,Hengmei Cui,Yaqin Geng,Tiantian Jin,Songsong Shi,Yunyun Li,Xin Chen &Biyu Shen -2022 -Frontiers in Psychology 13.
    Systemic lupus erythematosus is an inflammatory autoimmune disease with depression as one of its most common symptoms. The aim of this study is to establish a nomogram prediction model to assess the occurrence of depression in patients with SLE. Based on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale cutoff of 8, 341 patients with SLE, recruited between June 2017 and December 2019, were divided into depressive and non-depressive groups. Data on socio-demographic characteristics, medical history, sociopsychological factors, and other risk factors were (...) collected. Between-group differences in clinical characteristics were assessed with depression as the dependent variable and the variables selected by logistic multiple regression as predictors. The model was established using R language. Marital status, education, social support, coping, and anxiety predicted depression. The nomogram prediction model showed that the risk rate was from 0.01 to 0.80, and the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the area under the curve was 0.891. The calibration curve can intuitively show that the probability of depression predicted by the nomogram model is consistent with the actual comparison. The designed nomogram provides a highly predictive assessment of depression in patients with SLE, facilitating more comprehensive depression evaluation in usual clinical care. (shrink)
    Direct download(2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
Export
Limit to items.
Filters





Configure languageshere.Sign in to use this feature.

Viewing options


Open Category Editor
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?

Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp