Works by Graham Nerlich
50 found
Order:
1 filter applied
DisambiguationsDisambiguations:
| Graham Nerlich [52] | Graham Charles Nerlich [1] |
- The Shape of Space.Graham Nerlich -1994 - Cambridge University Press.This is a revised and updated edition of Graham Nerlich's classic book The Shape of Space. It develops a metaphysical account of space which treats it as a real and concrete entity. In particular, it shows that the shape of space plays a key explanatory role in space and spacetime theories. Arguing that geometrical explanation is very like causal explanation, Professor Nerlich prepares the ground for philosophical argument, and, using a number of novel examples, investigates how different spaces would affect (...) perception differently. This leads naturally to conventionalism as a non-realist metaphysics of space, an account which Professor Nerlich criticises, rejecting its Kantian and positivistic roots along with Reichenbach's famous claim that even the topology of space is conventional. He concludes that there is, in fact, no problem of underdetermination for this aspect of spacetime theories, and offers an extensive discussion of the relativity of motion. (shrink)
- What can geometry explain?Graham Nerlich -1979 -British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (1):69-83.
- What Spacetime Explains: Metaphysical Essays on Space and Time.Graham Nerlich -1994 - Cambridge University Press.Graham Nerlich is one of the most distinguished of contemporary philosophers of space and time. Eleven of his essays are here brought together in a carefully structured volume, which deal with ontology and methodology in relativity, variable curvature and general relativity, and time and causation. The author has provided a new general introduction and also introductions to each part to bring the discussion more up to date and draw out the general themes. The book will be welcomed by all philosophers (...) of physics, and of science in general. (shrink)
- How euclidean geometry has misled metaphysics.Graham Nerlich -1991 -Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):169-189.
- What Spacetime Explains.Graham Nerlich -1995 -British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (3):425-435.
- (1 other version)Hands, knees, and absolute space.Graham Nerlich -1973 -Journal of Philosophy 70 (12):337-351.
- Special relativity is not based on causality.Graham Nerlich -1982 -British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33 (4):361-388.
- Space-time substantivalism.Graham Nerlich -2003 - In Michael J. Loux & Dean W. Zimmerman,The Oxford handbook of metaphysics. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Falling branches and the flow of time.Graham Nerlich -1998 -Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (2):309 – 316.
- How to Make Things Have Happened.Graham Nerlich -1979 -Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9 (1):1 - 22.Might something I do now make something have happened earlier? This paper is about an argument which concludes that I might. Some arguments about “backward causation” conclude that the world could have been the kind of place in which actions make things have happened earlier. The present argument says that it is that kind of place: that we actually are continually doing things that really make earlier things have happened. The argument is not new. It sees temporal direction as logically (...) independent of any direction which necessary and sufficient conditions may have and it sees causal direction as properly deriving from the latter. Thus the directions of time and of making things happen need not coincide and, as it turns out, do not actually coincide in fact. There are examples of events which are sufficient, in a suitably rich sense, for the occurrence of earlier events; hence they make the earlier events happen. My purpose in this paper is to lend support to the argument by filling in some details which ‘backward sufficient conditions’ may lay claim to. (shrink)No categories
- Physical topology.Chris Mortensen &Graham Nerlich -1978 -Journal of Philosophical Logic 7 (1):209 - 223.
- Incongruent counterparts and the reality of space.Graham Nerlich -2009 -Philosophy Compass 4 (3):598-613.Left and right hands are incongruent counterparts. Yet each replicates the intrinsic properties of the other. This suggests that differing relations to space make the difference. Kant's and Weyl's discussions of the problem are critically discussed. It emerges that spatial relationism fails to explain how its relations may be interpreted. An excursion into visual geometry explains the basis of handedness in the orientable structure of space.
- Why spacetime is not a hidden cause: a realist story.Graham Nerlich -unknown
- Is curvature intrinsic to physical space?Graham Nerlich -1979 -Philosophy of Science 46 (3):439-458.Wesley C. Salmon (1977) has written a characteristically elegant and ingenious paper 'The Curvature of Physical Space'. He argues in it that the curvature of a space cannot be intrinsic to it. Salmon relates his view that space is affinely amorphous to Grunbaum's view (Grunbaum 1973, esp. Ch. 16 & 22) that it is metrically amorphous and acknowledges parallels between the arguments which have been offered for each opinion. I wish to dispute these conclusions on philosophical grounds quite as much (...) as on geometrical ones. Although I concentrate most on arguing for a well defined, intrinsic affinity for physical space the arguments extend easily to support a well defined, intrinsic metric. (shrink)
- Time and the direction of conditionship.Graham Nerlich -1979 -Australasian Journal of Philosophy 57 (1):3-14.
- On the one hand: Reflections on enantiomorphy.Graham Nerlich -1995 -Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73 (3):432 – 443.No categories
- The Structure of Time.Graham Nerlich -1982 -Philosophical Quarterly 32 (128):283-285.No categories
- Time as Spacetime.Graham Nerlich -1998 - In Robin Le Poidevin,Questions of time and tense. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 119--34.
- Can Time Be Finite?Graham Nerlich -1981 -Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62 (3):227-239.No categories
- Can Parts of Space Move? On Paragraph Six of Newton’s Scholium.Graham Nerlich -2005 -Erkenntnis 62 (1):119-135.Paragraph 6 of Newton's Scholium argues that the parts of space cannot move. A premise of the argument -- that parts have individuality only through an "order of position" -- has drawn distinguished modern support yet little agreement among interpretations of the paragraph. I argue that the paragraph offers an a priori, metaphysical argument for absolute motion, an argument which is invalid. That "order of position" is powerless to distinguish one part of Euclidean space from any other has gone virtually (...) unremarked. It remains uncertain what the import of the paragraph is but it is not close to apparently similar arguments of Leibniz. (shrink)
- Values and valuing: speculations on the ethical life of persons.Graham Nerlich -1989 - New York: Clarendon Press.This provocative book argues that people are naturally endowed with the ability to speak an articulate language and to form a culture. Language and cultural life require self-appraisal, and hence an evolution--through self-conflict--of desires into values. Nerlich demonstrates that this valuing is a natural process, one that underlies the morals of duty and obligation. He concludes that such valuing will be good only if it results in objective values that are authentic to the individual's nature and surrounding culture.
- A problem about sufficient conditions.Graham Nerlich -1971 -British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 22 (2):161-170.
- Values and Valuing.Graham Nerlich -1990 -Philosophy 65 (254):524-525.
- What ontology can be about: A spacetime example.Graham Nerlich &Andrew Westwell-Roper -1985 -Australasian Journal of Philosophy 63 (2):127 – 142.
- Pragmatically necessary statements.Graham Nerlich -1973 -Noûs 7 (3):247-268.No categories
- A Scrutiny of Reference.Graham Nerlich -1972 -Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1 (3):315 - 326.In many of his writings, Quine has argued that language is indeterminate in various ways. He has pursued, at length and often, an ingenious conclusion about one such way, which he sometimes calls the inscrutability of reference and, sometimes, the inscrutability of terms. It is the conclusion that one dimension of indeterminacy leaves the references of general terms unfixed among a number of alternatives; further, that no sort of scrutiny of the terms or of the occasions of their utterance could, (...) in principle, provide a means for settling objectively which referent to assign to a term. This single doctrine assumes various guises: there is a firm claim about incompatible but equally acceptable translations of certain Japanese classifiers; there is a somewhat less clear commitment to the inscrutability of a choice between expressions and their Godel numbers as referents for quoted expressions; further, there is a yet more tentative endorsement of Harman's example of the various referents of numerical expressions given by competing set theoretic reductions of number. (shrink)
- Bell's 'Lorentzian Pedagogy': A Bad Education.Graham Nerlich -unknownBell’s 'Lorentzian Pedagogy' has been extolled as a constructive account of the relativistic contraction of moving rods. Bell claimed advantages for teaching relativity through the older approach of Lorentz, Fitzgerald and Larmor. However, he describes the differences between their absolutist approach and the relativistic one as philosophical, and claims that the facts of physics do not force us to choose between them. Bell’s interpretation of the physics of motion contraction, and therefore of constructivist as opposed to principle approaches, is indeterminate. (...) His flawed pedagogy never directly addresses the difference between Fitzgerald and Lorentz contractions. (shrink)
- First page preview.Graham Nerlich -2007 -Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (2).No categories
- Games with Toy Spaces.Graham Nerlich -1992 -Cogito 6 (2):61-67.No categories
- Holes in the Role Argument.Graham Nerlich -1994 - In Dag Prawitz & Dag Westerståhl,Logic and Philosophy of Science in Uppsala: Papers From the 9th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht, Netherland: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 465--482.
- J.J.C. Smart, 1920-2012.Graham Nerlich -2013 -Philosophy Now 94:41-41.
- Lost Opportunity: how Einstein 1916 ingored Minkowski 1908.Graham Nerlich -unknownEinstein’s first survey of General Relativity is deeply flawed in its informal introductory section, Part A. He presents the salient feature of the new theory as the mere lifting of coordinate restrictions on Special Relativity rather than its being a spacetime theory of gravity. Minkowski developed a different conception of Special Relativity, independent of light and signalling, with spacetime as its immediate and principal consequence. If Einstein had begun general relativity from that basis he would have avoided the many errors (...) into which Part A fell. (shrink)
- Moral Reflections on Unilaterally Disarming.Graham Nerlich -1986 -Critical Philosophy 3 (1/2):37.Export citation
Bookmark - On Learning from the Mistakes of Positivists.Graham Nerlich -1989 - In Jens Erik Fenstad, Ivan Timofeevich Frolov & Risto Hilpinen,Logic, methodology, and philosophy of science VIII: proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, Moscow, 1987. New York, NY, U.S.A.: Sole distributors for the U.S.A. and Canada, Elsevier Science.
- On the sovereign independence of spacetime.Graham Nerlich -unknownABSTRACT: Special Relativity is not a branch of electromagnetism: it does not depend on light’s having a constant, limiting speed. If the theory is true, it depends on no matter theory. Rather, very general and familiar symmetries of space and time impose the form of the Lorentz transformation on every matter theory, independently of any that obeys it. I explore this and its metaphysical consequences.
- Physical relativity: Space-time structure from a dynamical perspective.Graham Charles Nerlich -2006 -Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (4):634-636.
- Quine's 'Real Ground'.Graham Nerlich -1976 -Analysis 37 (1):15 - 19.
- Replies to Sklar and Earman.Graham Nerlich -1991 - In James Van~Cleve & Robert E. Frederick,The Philosophy of Right and Left: Incongruent Counterparts and the Nature of Space. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 257--262.
- The Metaphysics of Hyperspace.Graham Nerlich -2008 -Philosophical Review 117 (3):462-464.
- The Nature of Space and Time.Graham Nerlich -2001 -International Studies in Philosophy 33 (4):126-127.
- Universals: Escaping Armstrong's regresses.Graham Nerlich -1976 -Australasian Journal of Philosophy 54 (1):58 – 64.
- The Disappearance of Time: Kurt Gödel and the Idealistic Tradition in Philosophy.Graham Nerlich -1996 -Philosophical Quarterly 46 (183):258-260.No categories
- Review: Natural Reasons. [REVIEW]Graham Nerlich -1991 -Philosophical Quarterly 41 (162):86 - 93.
- EARMAN, J., GLYMOUR, C. & STACHEL, J. "Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science", Vol. VIII: "Foundations of Space-Time Theories". [REVIEW]Graham Nerlich -1979 -Australasian Journal of Philosophy 57:186.Export citation Bookmark
- FRANKLIN, R. L. Freewill and Determinism. [REVIEW]Graham Nerlich -1972 -Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50:76.
- Reviews. [REVIEW]Graham Nerlich -1978 -British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (3):295-298.
- Review: The Present State of Realism. [REVIEW]Graham Nerlich -1982 -Philosophical Quarterly 32 (128):272 - 279.
- The Present State of Realism. Reduction, Time and Reality, ed. Richard Healby. [REVIEW]Graham Nerlich -1982 -Philosophical Quarterly 32 (28):272-279.
- van FRAASSEN, BAS C.: "An Introduction to the Philosophy of Time and Space". [REVIEW]Graham Nerlich -1973 -Australasian Journal of Philosophy 51:82.
- W. H. Newton-Smith, "The Structure of Time". [REVIEW]Graham Nerlich -1982 -Philosophical Quarterly 32 (28):283.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5b9ff6f457-pc6d8 uwo