Works by Georgia Warnke
50 found
Order:
1 filter applied
DisambiguationsDisambiguations:
| Georgia Warnke [51] | Georgia Culliton Warnke [1] |
- Gadamer: Hermeneutics, Tradition and Reason.Georgia Warnke -1987 - Oxford: Polity.Hans-Georg Gadamer is one of the leading philosophers in the world today. His philosophical hermeneutics has had a major impact in a wide range of disciplines, including the social sciences, literary criticism, theology and jurisprudence. Truth and Method, his major work, is widely recognised to be one of the great classics of twentieth-century thought. In this book Georgia Warnke provides a clear and systematic exposition of Gadamer's work, as well as a balanced and thoughtful assessment of his views. Warnke gives (...) particular attention to the ways in which Gadamer's work has been taken up and criticised by literary critics, social theorists and philosophers, such as Hirsch, Habermas and Rorty. She thus provides an introduction to Gadamer which demonstrates the relevance of his work to current debates in a variety of disciplines. This book will be invaluable to students and specialists throughout the humanities and social sciences, as well as to anyone who is interested in the most important developments in contemporary thought. (shrink)
- Introduction to Philosophical Hermeneutics.Georgia Warnke,Jean Grondin &Joel Weinsheimer -1996 -Philosophical Review 105 (3):408.Jean Grondin’s starting point in his impressive book is what Hans-Georg Gadamer refers to as the universal claim of hermeneutics. Gadamer is better known for the limits his hermeneutics seems to place on universal claims. Against the reliance the Enlightenment placed on the insights of a reason common to humanity, Gadamer stresses the prejudiced and partial character of attempts to understand meaning. And against more contemporary attempts to ground Enlightenment conceptions in universal human competencies, he stresses the historicity and finitude (...) of human knowledge. Our attempts to understand the meaning of texts, conversations, historical events, and social actions and practices are conditioned by the horizon of our language, our own historical experiences, and our assumptions and expectations. Still, Gadamer ends his Truth and Method by stressing not only the linguistic character of understanding but the infinite capacity of all languages to find and express new dimensions of meaning. “Language,” he writes, “forestalls any objection to its jurisdiction. Its universality keeps pace with the universality of reason.”. (shrink)No categories
- Legitimate Differences: Interpretation in the Abortion Controversy and Other Public Debates.Georgia Warnke -1999 - University of California Press._Legitimate Differences_ challenges the usual portrayal of current debates over thorny social issues including abortion, pornography, affirmative action, and surrogate mothering as _moral_ debates. How can it be said that our debates oppose principles of life to those of liberty, principles of liberty to those of equality, principles of equality to those of fairness, and principles of fairness to those of integrity, when we as Americans share all these principles? Debates over such issues are not, Georgia Warnke argues, moral debates (...) over which principles we should adopt. Rather, they are interpretive debates over the meanings of principles we already possess. Warnke traces the structure of these debates with reference to the work of Jane Austen, Hans-Georg Gadamer, Jürgen Habermas, and Bernard Williams. In separate chapters on surrogate mothering, affirmative action, abortion, and pornography she articulates new understandings of the meanings of some of our principles and shows the equal legitimacy of some different interpretations of the meanings of others. Finally, she suggests that the orientation of American public policy ought to be directed less at finding single canonical interpretations of our principles than at accommodating different legitimate understandings of them. The perspective offered by _Legitimate Differences_ should have a significantly beneficial effect on public discussions. (shrink)
- Justice and interpretation.Georgia Warnke (ed.) -1992 - Cambridge: MIT Press.The presumption behind this book is that recent developments in political philosophy can be productively assessed under the idea of a hermeneutic or ...
- Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics.Georgia Warnke -1996 -Philosophical Quarterly 46 (183):273-276.No categories
- After Identity: Rethinking Race, Sex, and Gender.Georgia Warnke -2009 -Political Theory 37 (4):585-590.
- Solidarity and tradition in Gadamer's hermeneutics.Georgia Warnke -2012 -History and Theory 51 (4):6-22.Commentators have compared Hans-Georg Gadamer’s focus on tradition in Truth and Method to his focus on solidarity in his later work in order to suggest that the latter signals a move away from ontological toward ethical and political concerns. This paper, however, is guided by Gadamer’s own view that his work, both early, late, and in Truth and Method, was always concerned with ethical and political issues. I therefore want to challenge the idea that his so-called politics of solidarity marks (...) a new direction in his work. His politics of solidarity does mark a new direction in discussions of solidarity insofar as he disconnects it from any necessary grounding in preexisting affinities such as religion and nationality. Gadamer’s later work may also be more explicitly concerned with the question of differences and the other than is Truth and Method. Nevertheless, I want to argue that rather than signaling a new direction for Gadamer, both his politics of solidarity and his concern with otherness highlight important features already present in his earlier account of tradition. Indeed, I think attention to this earlier account discloses a political dimension to Gadamer’s thought that is more sophisticated than his remarks on solidarity. Attention to this dimension of his earlier account allows us to challenge the now standard objection that it undermines possibilities for critical reflection. (shrink)
- Inheriting Gadamer: New Directions inPhilosophical Hermeneutics.Georgia Warnke (ed.) -2016 - University of Edinburgh.Hans-Georg Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics - one of the seminal philosophies of the 20th century - has had a profound influence on a wide array of fields, including classical philology, theology, the philosophy of the social sciences, literary theory, philosophy of law, critical social theory and the philosophy of art. This collection expands on some of these areas and takes his hermeneutics into yet new fields including narrative medicine, biotechnology, the politics of memory, the philosophy of place and the non-verbal language (...) of the body. And, building on Gadamer's well-known discussions with Heidegger, Habermas and Derrida, Inheriting Gadamer sets him in dialogue with Mahatma Gandhi, Christine Korsgaard, Charles Mills and others. In these ways, the volume holds fast to a Gadamerian virtue: cultivating our important philosophical traditions while embracing the constant need to re-think their meaning in new circumstances and in relation to new knowledge. (shrink)
- Hermeneneutics and the social sciences: A Gadamerian critique of Rorty.Georgia Warnke -1985 -Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):339 – 357.Richard Rorty challenges the traditional use of hermeneutic understanding to defend the methodological autonomy of the social sciences, claiming that hermeneutics is part of both social and natural science and, moreover, that it exposes the limits of ?epistemologically centered philosophy?. Hermeneutics is interested in edification rather than truth, in finding new ways of speaking rather than adjudicating knowledge claims or securing the grounds of rational consensus. Although Rorty refers to Gadamer's ?philosophical hermeneutics? as support for this position, Gadamer's own analysis (...) points in a different direction. First, it distinguishes the social from the natural sciences as forms of practical, not theoretical, knowledge. As hermeneutic analyses, the social sciences participate in an on?going dialogue about values and forms of life. Second, the goal of this dialogue is cognitive and normative agreement. Indeed, hermeneutics is an act of integration which tries to expand consensus between different cultures and historical perspectives by mediating their claims to truth. (shrink)
- Rawls, Habermas, and real talk-a reply to Walzer.Georgia Warnke -1989 -Philosophical Forum 21 (1-2):197-203.
- 11. Ocularcentrism and Social Criticism.Georgia Warnke -1993 - In David Michael Levin,Modernity and the Hegemony of Vision. University of California Press. pp. 287-308.No categories
- 4 Hermeneutics, Ethics, and Politics.Georgia Warnke -2002 - In Robert J. Dostal,The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 79.No categories
- Hermeneutics, tradition, and the standpoint of women.Georgia Warnke -1994 - In Brice R. Wachterhauser,Hermeneutics and truth. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press. pp. 206--26.
- Experiencing Tradition versus Belonging to It: Gadamer’s Dilemma.Georgia Warnke -2014 -Review of Metaphysics 68 (2):347-369.
- Intersexuality and the Categories of Sex.Georgia Warnke -2001 -Hypatia 16 (3):126-137.Operations on intersexuals indicate that the sex of a person is based on more than biology. Expectations about proper gender activities furnish the frameworks through which certain features and combinations of features are understood to be fundamental to bodies and to comprise their sex. Yet, we can ask whether this interpretation is either coherent or consistent with our fuller conceptions of ourselves. Is there a point to interpreting a person as a sex?
- Feminism and Hermeneutics.Georgia Warnke -1993 -Hypatia 8 (1):81 - 98.Feminists often look to postmodern philosophy for a framework within which to treat difference. We might more productively look to a hermeneutic philosophy that emphasizes the interpretive dimensions of difference and allows us to acknowledge the partiality of our understanding. Hence, we might also recognize the importance of a hermeneutic conversation unconstrained by relations of power or ideology in which all nonexclusionary interpretive voices can be educated by one another.
- Debating Sex and Gender.Georgia Warnke -2010 - Oup Usa.The fifth volume in the Fundamentals of Philosophy Series, Debating Sex and Gender by Georgia Warnke is a concise yet in-depth introduction to contemporary feminist thought on sex and gender.
- THE AFTER OF IDENTITY: RESPONSE TO ALCOFF, BARTHOLD, SHRAGE, AND ZACK.Georgia Warnke -2012 -Review Journal of Political Philosophy 10:65-84.
- After Identity: Rethinking Race, Sex, and Gender.Georgia Warnke -2008 - Cambridge University Press.Social and political theorists have traced in detail how individuals come to possess gender, sex and racial identities. This book examines the nature of these identities. Georgia Warnke argues that identities, in general, are interpretations and, as such, have more in common with textual understanding than we commonly acknowledge. A racial, sexed or gendered understanding of who we and others are is neither exhaustive of the 'meanings' we can be said to have nor uniquely correct. We are neither always, or (...) only, black or white, men or women or males or females. Rather, all identities have a restricted scope and can lead to injustices and contradictions when they are employed beyond that scope. In concluding her argument, Warnke considers the legal and policy implications that follow for affirmative action, childbearing leave, the position of gays in the military and marriage between same-sex partners. (shrink)
- Historical Understanding and “The Blemish of Extraordinary Moral Legacies”.Georgia Warnke -2017 -Philosophy of Education 73:33-56.No categories
- Virginia’s Slavery Deliberations.Georgia Warnke -2017 -Philosophy of the Social Sciences 48 (2):218-236.For many deliberative theorists, the importance of a public exchange of reasons lies in its capacity to improve the quality of democratic decision making. The 1831-1832 debate over abolishing slavery in Virginia in the state’s House of Delegates raises the question of whether it can do so on its own. The bigotry of those opposing the abolition of Virginian slavery was matched only by the prejudice of those advocating for its end. This paper examines James Bohman’s sophisticated defense of deliberative (...) democracy but argues for the value of negative and disclosive experience. (shrink)
- European and American Philosophers.John Marenbon,Douglas Kellner,Richard D. Parry,Gregory Schufreider,Ralph McInerny,Andrea Nye,R. M. Dancy,Vernon J. Bourke,A. A. Long,James F. Harris,Thomas Oberdan,Paul S. MacDonald,Véronique M. Fóti,F. Rosen,James Dye,Pete A. Y. Gunter,Lisa J. Downing,W. J. Mander,Peter Simons,Maurice Friedman,Robert C. Solomon,Nigel Love,Mary Pickering,Andrew Reck,Simon J. Evnine,Iakovos Vasiliou,John C. Coker,Georges Dicker,James Gouinlock,Paul J. Welty,Gianluigi Oliveri,Jack Zupko,Tom Rockmore,Wayne M. Martin,Ladelle McWhorter,Hans-Johann Glock,Georgia Warnke,John Haldane,Joseph S. Ullian,Steven Rieber,David Ingram,Nick Fotion,George Rainbolt,Thomas Sheehan,Gerald J. Massey,Barbara D. Massey,David E. Cooper,David Gauthier,James M. Humber,J. N. Mohanty,Michael H. Dearmey,Oswald O. Schrag,Ralf Meerbote,George J. Stack,John P. Burgess,Paul Hoyningen-Huene,Nicholas Jolley,Adriaan T. Peperzak,E. J. Lowe,William D. Richardson,Stephen Mulhall & C. -1991 - In Robert L. Arrington,A Companion to the Philosophers. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 109–557.Peter Abelard (1079–1142 ce) was the most wide‐ranging philosopher of the twelfth century. He quickly established himself as a leading teacher of logic in and near Paris shortly after 1100. After his affair with Heloise, and his subsequent castration, Abelard became a monk, but he returned to teaching in the Paris schools until 1140, when his work was condemned by a Church Council at Sens. His logical writings were based around discussion of the “Old Logic”: Porphyry's Isagoge, aristotle'S Categories and (...) On Interpretation and boethius'S textbook on topical inference. They comprise a freestanding Dialectica (“Logic”; probably c.1116), a set of commentaries (known as the Logica [Ingredientibus], c. 1119) and a later (c. 1125) commentary on the Isagoge (Logica Nostrorum Petititoni Sociorum or Glossulae). In a work Abelard called his Theologia, issued in three main versions (between 1120 and c.1134), he attempted a logical analysis of trinitarian relations and explored the philosophical problems surrounding God's claims to omnipotence and omniscience. The Collationes (“Debates,” also known as “Dialogue between a Christian, a Philosopher and a Jew”; probably c.1130) present a rational investigation into the nature of the highest good, in which the Christian and the Philosopher (who seems to be modeled on a philosopher of pagan antiquity) are remarkably in agreement. The unfinished Scito teipsum (“Know thyself,” also known as the “Ethics”; c.1138) analyses moral action. (shrink)No categories
- Affirmative Action, Neutrality, and Integration.Georgia Warnke -1998 -Journal of Social Philosophy 29 (3):87-103.
- Legitimate Prejudices.Georgia Warnke -1997 -Laval Théologique et Philosophique 53 (1):89-102.
- Social interpretation and political-theory, Walzer and his critics.Georgia Warnke -1989 -Philosophical Forum 21 (1-2):204-226.
- Book ReviewsRaymond Geuss,. Outside Ethics.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005. Pp. 320. $59.50 ; $24.95.Georgia Warnke -2007 -Ethics 117 (2):352-356.
- Richard Arneson University of California, San Diego Alison Leigh Brown Northern Arizona University.John Carriero,Michael Ferejohn,Michael Jubien,Philip Kain,Kwong-Loi Shun,David W. Smith,Michael Tye,Julie Van Camp &Georgia Warnke -2000 -Philosophical Studies 99 (1).No categoriesExport citation
Bookmark - Hermeneutics Ancient and Modern.Georgia Warnke -1995 -Metaphilosophy 26 (1‐2):161-165.
- Democracy and interpretation.Georgia Warnke -2010 - In Marianne Janack,Feminist Interpretations of Richard Rorty. Pennsylvania State University Press.Export citation Bookmark
- Deliberation and interpretation.Georgia Warnke -2013 -Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (8):755-770.Because citizens of diverse and pluralistic democracies possess different values and interests, deliberative democratic theory founds legitimate decision-making in non-coercive deliberations among free and equal citizens who appeal to public reasons or, in other words, to reasons that can be accepted by ‘all who are possibly affected’. Yet it is not clear that what stymies democratic justification is the failure to offer or accept public reasons. Can we not agree on them while understanding them in different but equally compelling ways? (...) Indeed, might it not be that what stymies justification is our failure to acknowledge this possibility? The first part of this paper explores these questions as they relate both to the original formulations of deliberative theory and to certain revisions. The second part of the paper investigates a hermeneutic alternative that not only acknowledges but also value differences in the ways we can plausibly understand the public reasons to which we agree. (shrink)
- Feminism and democratic deliberation.Georgia Warnke -2000 -Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (3):61-74.rgen Habermas's response to struggles for recognition on the part of women and minority groups. Although this response expands the focus of liberal political theory from the achievement and constitutional protection of individual rights to the public deliberations and discussions of democratic citizens, the article argues that Habermas pays insufficient attention to the interpretive aspects of democratic deliberation. For Habermas the role of interpretation in feminist struggles for recognition is restricted to the clarification and self-clarification of needs. Where different groups (...) of women understand their needs differently, these differences must be procedurally resolved. In contrast, the article argues that conflicting interpretations are the source of reciprocal processes of education necessary to legitimate policy conclusions. Moreover, it argues that social identities are in general products of interpretation and that conceiving of them in this way allows for fluidity and flexibility in who we take ourselves to be. Key Words: deliberation • democratic discourse • feminism • Habermas • interpretation • Rhode. (shrink)
- Gadamer. Herméneutique, tradition et raison.Georgia Warnke &Jacques Colson -1993 -Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 183 (2):489-489.Export citation Bookmark
- Hermeneutics and Democracy.Georgia Warnke -2018 -Research in Phenomenology 48 (3):447-455.
- Intersections between analytic and continental feminism.Georgia Warnke -2008 -Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
- Interpretive Democracy.Georgia Warnke -2005 -Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 26 (1):47-64.The ideal of deliberative democracy grounds the legitimate use of state power in free public reasoning among equals. It does not conceive of democratic decision-making as a mere aggregate of individual preferences. Instead, in public debates over proposed policies and programs, citizens advance considerations they think can be compelling to others who may possess values and commitments different from their own. Decisions are collective, then, in the sense that they reflect a process of reasoning to which all citizens can agree. (...) At the same time, decisions respect pluralism insofar as they acknowledge the differences in the values and commitments of a diverse body of citizens. As Joshua Cohen writes. (shrink)
- Jan Morris begins her 1974 memoir with the words,“I was three or perhaps four when I realized that I had been born into the wrong body and should really be a girl.”.Georgia Warnke -2009 - In Laurie Shrage,You’Ve Changed: Sex Reassignment and Personal Identity. Oup Usa. pp. 28.
- Legitimacy and consensus: Comments on part of the work of Thomas McCarthy.Georgia Warnke -1996 -Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (2):67-81.
- Marxism and expressivism: Comments on Benhabib's critique, Norm and utopia.Georgia Warnke -1987 -Philosophy and Social Criticism 12 (4):374-386.
- Politics and literary criticism: A hermeneutic view.Georgia Warnke -2000 -Revue Internationale de Philosophie 54 (213):423-446.Export citation Bookmark
- Sex, Gender, and Hermeneutics.Georgia Warnke -2010 - In Jeff Malpas & Santiago Zabala,Consequences of hermeneutics: fifty years after Gadamer's Truth and method. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press. pp. 324.
- The Hermeneutic Circle versus Dialogue.Georgia Warnke -2011 -Review of Metaphysics 65 (1):91-112.At the start of his account of hermeneutic experience, Gadamer quotes Heidegger: “Our first, last and constant task is never to allow our fore-having, fore-sight and fore-conception to be presented to us by fancies and popular conceptions, but rather to make the scientific theme secure by working out these fore-structures in terms of the things themselves.” Heidegger’s “fore-structures” reflect our practical pre-understanding and ongoing engagement with our world or “the things themselves.” Yet, if so, how can we work these fore-structures (...) out in terms of them? Gadamer claims to take his answer to this question from Heidegger and to appeal, like him, to the hermeneutic circle. However, I argue that Gadamer takes the question more seriously than Heidegger does by supplementing recourse to the hermeneutic circle with an appeal to dialogue. I also explore concerns about this supplement. Gadamer conceives of understanding as a dialogue in which we test our fore-meanings against those of others and come to a consensus with others about a subject matter (Sache). Yet, dialogue can just as easily reinforce or even exaggerate our fore-meanings as test them For its part, consensus is as easily to be feared as sought. (shrink)
- The Right to Choose: A Hermeneutic Inquiry.Georgia Warnke -2015 -Journal of Social Philosophy 46 (2):161-177.
- Understanding and Explanation: A Transcendental-Pragmatic Perspective.Georgia Warnke (ed.) -1984 - MIT Press.The explanation versus understanding debate was important to the philosophy of the social sciences from the time of Dilthey and Weber through the work of Popper and Hempel. In recent years, with the development of interpretive approaches in hermeneutics, phenomenology, and language analysis, the problematic has become absolutely central. The broad literature to which it has given rise, while still split along "analytic" versus "continental" lines, shows increasing signs of a reunification in philosophy. G. H. von Wright's important book, Explanation (...) and Understanding, originally published in 1971, is a good example of this trend.In Understanding and Explanation, Karl-Otto Apel takes von Wright's work as a point of departure for a rigorous, penetrating analysis of the issues involved. After reviewing the failure of earlier discussions to resolve these issues, Apel develops his own approach in light of the turn from logico-semantic to pragmatic analysis of language in post-Wittgensteinian philosophy. In doing so, he constructs bridges that reach back to themes and positions of the German tradition of the Geisteswissenschaften, but from strikingly new angles.Karl-Otto Apel holds the chair for social philosophy at the University of Frankfurt. His book is included in the series Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought, edited by Thomas McCarthy. (shrink)
- The Lies that Bind: Rethinking Identity. [REVIEW]Georgia Warnke -2019 -The Philosophers' Magazine 84:106-108.No categories
- Being and Idea. [REVIEW]Georgia Warnke -1994 -Review of Metaphysics 48 (2):389-390.Armour's Being and Idea begins with the felt need for unity, the need at the base of the philosophies of both Spinoza and Hegel and a need increasingly felt by us who inhabit a modern or postmodern world. "Sometimes," Armour writes, "we are looking for a unity of knowledge which will enable us to 'make sense of' the various things that we know. Sometimes we are looking for a thread that will link together the seemingly meaningless events of our lives. (...) Sometimes we are looking for a unity between the source of 'explanation' of the world and the world of appearances. Sometimes we are looking for a unity of principle either in our moral affairs or in our scientific explanations". (shrink)
- Book reviews. [REVIEW]Georgia Warnke -1993 -Mind 102 (405):197-199.No categories
- Book ReviewPaul Ricoeur,. The Just. Translated by David Pellauer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000. Pp. xxiv+155. $20.00. [REVIEW]Georgia Warnke -2002 -Ethics 112 (2):406-408.
- Heidegger: Thought and historicity : Christopher Fynsk , 229 pp., S27.45 cloth. [REVIEW]Georgia Warnke -1988 -History of European Ideas 9 (5):616-617.
- Insight and Solidarity. [REVIEW]Georgia Warnke -1996 -International Studies in Philosophy 28 (4):142-143.
- Puzzling Identities. [REVIEW]Georgia Warnke -2016 -The Philosophers' Magazine 74:110-111.No categories
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-k24bk uwo