Works by Georg Lohmann
22 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- Zur Philosophie der Gefühle.Hinrich Fink-Eitel &Georg Lohmann (eds.) -1993 - Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.No categories
- Philosophie der Menschenrechte [Philosophy of Human Rights].Stefan Gosepath &Georg Lohmann -1998 - Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland: Suhrkamp.Collection of original essays on human rights Content: Höffe, Otfried: Transzendentaler Tausch. Eine Legimitationsfigur für Menschenrechte? Tugendhat, Ernst: Die Kontroverse um die Menschenrechte. Lohmann, Georg: Menschenrechte zwischen Moral und Recht. Koller, Peter: Der Geltungsbereich der Menschenrechte. Wildt, Andreas: Menschenrechte und moralische Rechte. Gosepath, Stefan: Zu Begründungen sozialer Menschenrechte. O'Neill, Onora: Transnationale Gerechtigkeit. Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang: Ist Demokratie eine notwendige Forderung der Menschenrechte?. Alexy, Robert: Die Institutionalisierung der Menschenrechre im demokratischen Verfassungsstaat. Wellmer, Albrecht: Menschenrechte und Demokratie. Dworkin, Ronald: Freiheit, Selbstregierung und der (...) Wille des Volkes. Okin, Susan Moller: Konflikte zwischen Grundrechten. Shue, Henry: Menschenrechte und kulturelle Differenz. Pogge, Thomas: Menschenrechte als moralische Ansprüche an globale Institutionen. (shrink)
- Kant als Anreger. Menschenrechte und Menschenwürde nach Kant.Georg Lohmann -2018 - In Reza Mosayebi,Kant Und Menschenrechte. De Gruyter. pp. 153-174.No categories
- Normative und rechtsstaatliche Kapitalismuskritiken und ihre Verdrängung bei Marx.Georg Lohmann -2018 -Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 66 (4):429-465.The essay is a critical revision of various of Marx’s approaches in his analysis of capitalism in “Das Kapital”. One can distinguish immanent, normative critiques from transcendental and objectivistic ones. The review of the normative standards used in each case leads to the questions of how Marx determined and used the relationships of justice and law and the capitalist mode of production. Orthodox Marxist views (most recently C. Menke) claim that Marx did not criticise capital as unjust and understood the (...) law of capital only as private law that stabilised domination. Against this, it is shown that he certainly bases his “critical presentation” on an (almost Kantian) constitutional (“rechtsstaatliches”) concept of private law and public law. Thus the “popular prejudice” of “human equality”, defined by Marx as an epochal and systematic condition of the capitalist exchange of goods, becomes apparent as a covert reference to the historical (America, French Revolution),public-lawdeclarations of human rights. And in the chapter “Struggle for the length of the working day” Marx presents the decisions of this dispute between “equal rights” first and foremost in the systematic historical actions of the constitutional powers (legislature, executive and judiciary). At the same time, however, he attempts to ironise and defame this public-law and deliberative, democratic dispute and then to misinterpret it as a violent “civil war”. Because Marx in his further presentation ignores this legal-democratic dispute, including a potential human-rights critique and (possible!) future regulation of capitalism, focussing instead on objectivist concepts of history and development, he can only insufficiently grasp the still challenging relationship between democracy and capitalism. (shrink)No categories
- The Adaptation of Individual Life to the Inner Infinity of the Metropolis. Forms of Individualization in Simmel.Georg Lohmann -1996 -Thesis Eleven 44 (1):1-11.No categories
- Anfang und Grenzen des Sinns: für Emil Angehrn.Emil Angehrn,Brigitte Hilmer,Georg Lohmann &Tilo Wesche (eds.) -2006 - Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.
- Ethik und Marx: Moralkritik und normative Grundlagen der Marxschen Theorie.Emil Angehrn &Georg Lohmann -1986No categories
- (1 other version)A Confucian Farewell to Human Rights?Georg Lohmann -2020 -Yearbook for Eastern and Western Philosophy 2020 (5):257-271.No categories
- As definições teóricas de direitos humanos de Jürgen Habermas: o princípio legal e as correções morais[ign] [title language="en"]The theoretical definitions of human rights of Jürgen Habermas[ign]: [subtitle]legal principle and moral corrections.Georg Lohmann -2013 -Trans/Form/Ação 36 (s1):87-102.No entendimento de Habermas, "direito", na expressão "direitos humanos", é um conceito jurídico, donde direitos humanos, para ele, serem direitos jurídicos, normas legais declaradas em atos de fundações do Estado ou anunciadas em convenções do direito internacional e/ou constituições estatais. Ao conceber assim os direitos e tematizar os direitos humanos numa abordagem tríplice (focando-os entre moral, direito e política), ele fornece diferentes definições teóricas dos direitos humanos. O texto apresenta uma exposição sistemática dessas definições e focaliza os diferentes problemas que (...) motivaram Habermas a alterar e ampliar suas concepções de direitos humanos. In the understanding of Habermas, "right" in the phrase "human rights" is a legal concept, where human rights are legal rights, i.e., legal norms declared in acts of foundations of the State or announced conventions of international law and/or State constitutions. By conceiving of rights in this way and by treating human rights in a threefold approach (placing them between morals, law and politics), he presents different theoretical definitions of human rights. This paper presents a systematic exposition of these definitions, and focuses on the different problems that motivated Habermas to change and expand his conceptions of human rights. (shrink)
- As Definições Teóricas de Direitos Humanos de Jürgen Habermas – O Princípio Legal e as Correções Morais.Georg Lohmann -2013 -Trans/Form/Ação 36 (1).No entendimento de Habermas, "direito", na expressão "direitos humanos", é um conceito jurídico, donde direitos humanos, para ele, serem direitos jurídicos, normas legais declaradas em atos defundações do Estado ou anunciadas em convenções do direito internacional e/ou constituições estatais. Ao conceber assim os direitos e tematizar os direitos humanos numa abordagem tríplice (focando-os entre moral, direito e política), ele fornece diferentes definições teóricas dos direitos humanos. O texto apresenta uma exposição sistemática dessas definições e focaliza os diferentes problemas que motivaram (...) Habermas a alterar e ampliar suas concepções de direitos humanos. (shrink)Export citation
Bookmark - Die Ambivalenz der Indifferenz in der modernen Gesellschaft: Marx und Simmel.Georg Lohmann -2019 -Zeitschrift Für Ethik Und Moralphilosophie 2 (1):75-93.ZusammenfassungMarx und Simmel gehören zur Tradition der Moderne, die seit Rousseau und Hegel die moderne Gesellschaft für verschiedene Phänomene der „Entfremdung“ kritisiert. Während der junge Marx noch eindeutig „Entfremdung“ negativ bewertet, analysiert und bewertet der reife Marx des Kapitalbuches Entfremdungsphänomene als differente „Verdinglichungen“ und „Vergleichgültigungen“ und bewertet diese Indifferenzen kontextspezifisch positiv oder negativ. Ihm folgt Georg Simmel, der besonders in seiner „Philosophie des Geldes“ Indifferenz als Signatur der modernen Gesellschaft bestimmt und für ihre negativ bewerteten Auswirkungen positive Kompensationen aufzeigt und (...) verfolgt. Der Aufsatz skizziert Marxens Analyse und Kritik von Kapital-verursachten Indifferenzen und verfolgt dann Simmels mehr kulturphilosophische Diagnosen von gesellschaftlichen Indifferenzen an den Phänomenen „Lebensstil“, „Ästhetisierung des Lebens“, „Tragödie der Kultur“ u. a. mehr, die alle auf die Frage hinauslaufen: Warum gelingt der Übergang von modernen Befreiungsprozessen durch Indifferenzen zu neuen Bindungen nicht „vollständig“? (shrink)No categories
- Eine herausfordernde Geschichte der Menschenrechte.Georg Lohmann -2013 -Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 61 (2):317-321.No categories
- Faktzität und liberale Gemeinschaften.Georg Lohmann -1994 -Studia Philosophica 53:75-94.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- „Menschenrechte“ angesichts ihrer Geschichtlichkeit.Georg Lohmann -2016 -Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 64 (3):465-479.Name der Zeitschrift: Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie Jahrgang: 64 Heft: 3 Seiten: 465-479.No categories
- Marxens Kapitalismuskritik als Kritik an menschenunwürdigen Verhältnissen.Georg Lohmann -2013 - In Rahel Jaeggi & Daniel Loick,Karl Marx - Perspektiven der Gesellschaftskritik. De Gruyter. pp. 67-78.
- 17 National and International Public Spheres and the Protection of Human Rights.Georg Lohmann -2016 -Yearbook for Eastern and Western Philosophy 2016 (1):219-229.Since the founding of the UN, the protection of human rights has been a national and international challenge. In international human rights covenants, State Parties firstly commit themselves to respecting human rights in their respective constitutional area and to protecting and possibly incorporating them into the relevant constitution, but, secondly, they also submit to an international control. National protection is usually organized by different institutions, but also accompanied by critical NGOs and the national civil public. International protection is on the (...) one hand implemented by a number of international organizations and institutions, but on the other hand is accompanied by a critical, now regionally and internationally operating public. This includes a number of permanent NGOs, but also ad hoc groups, tribunals and the various media and anonymous campaigns on the Internet and the social networks. This paper examines the functions and tasks of such concomitant national and international public spheres and tries to assess their importance for the protection of human rights. (shrink)No categories
- On the Relation between Moral, Legal and Evaluative Justifications of Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD).Georg Lohmann -2003 -Ethical Perspectives 10 (3):196-203.In Germany the question whether to uphold or repeal the judicial prohibition on Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis is being debated from quite different standpoints. This paper differentiates the major arguments according to their reasons as a) moral, b) evaluative , and c) legal. The arguments for and against PGD can be divided by content into three groups: arguments relating to the status of the embryo, focusing on individual actions in the implementation of PGD, and relating to the foreseeable or probable consequences (...) of PGD.In Germany, from a legal perspective, the status of the embryo does not permit the intervention of PGD; from a purely moral perspective, a prohibition on PGD does not appear defensible. It remains an open question, however, whether the moral argument permitting PGD should be restricted for evaluative reasons. The paper discusses the species-ethical reasons, for which Jürgen Habermas sees worrisome consequences in the wake of PGD to the extent that we comprehend it as the forerunner of a ‘positive eugenics’. It would so disrupt the natural preconditions of our universal morality. The question of whether to prohibit or allow PGD is not merely a question of simple moral and/or legal arguments, but demands a choice between evaluative, moral and species-ethical arguments, and the question remains open. (shrink)
- (1 other version)Progress and Human Rights Justice as Evaluating Criteria for Global Developments.Georg Lohmann -2019 -Yearbook for Eastern and Western Philosophy 2019 (4):241-254.The paper clarifies first a critical understanding of “progress”. Progress implies a development for the better, the comprehensive definition of which must be a conception of justice if progress is to justify global developments and political rule. Therefore a somewhat minimal but complex definition of “human rights justice”, as formulated in the international human rights pacts since 1948, is explained. Through this, the different but systematically interrelated human rights (liberty rights, justice rights, political rights, economic, cultural and social rights) can (...) allow for reflected and more comprehensive assessments of progress in different areas of development. But it is also necessary to integrate the specific progress developments into a comprehensive conception of human rights justice, the precise definition of which requires not only the observance of social but ultimately of all human rights, and in particular political participation rights. In the final section some problems of this approach will be discussed. (shrink)No categories
- Probleme der „Werteerziehung" im Ethikunterricht.Georg Lohmann -1998 -Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 46 (2).No categories
- Uma filosofia da história tornada sóbria sobre o papel da filosofia da história na teoria crítica da sociedade de Jürgen Habermas.Georg Lohmann -2013 -Trans/Form/Ação 36 (3):203-224.
- Versuch über Versionen der Macht: Herrschaft, Gewalt, Zwang und Einfluss.Georg Lohmann -2018 - In Falk Bornmüller & Katrin Felgenhauer,Macht:Denken: Substantialistische Und Relationalistische Theorien - Eine Kontroverse. Transcript Verlag. pp. 31-46.No categories
- Allerlei „Würden“. [REVIEW]Georg Lohmann -2018 -Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 66 (4):558-572.Name der Zeitschrift: Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie Jahrgang: 66 Heft: 4 Seiten: 558-572.No categories
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5b9ff6f457-cbsf4 uwo