Results for 'Frederick P. Rivara'
951 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- Parent Beliefs about Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy: Implications for Ethical Communication by Healthcare Providers.Emily Kroshus,Sara P. D. Chrisman &Frederick P.Rivara -2017 -Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 45 (3):421-430.The objective of this study was to assess the beliefs of parents of youth soccer players about Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy, concussion, and retirement from sport decisions and compare them to those of concussion-specialized clinicians. An electronic survey was completed by parents of youth club soccer players and concussion-specialized clinicians located in a large U.S. urban center. Parents believed more strongly in the causal relationship between concussions and CTE, and between CTE and harm than did clinicians. Parents who themselves had participated (...) in sport at a high level had more conservative beliefs than other parents about the number of concussions after which an athlete should retire from contact or collision sport. Results are discussed in the context of ethical risk communication between clinicians and parents. This includes the importance of communicating information about CTE to parents and youth athletes in an understandable way so that they can make informed choices about contact and collision sport participation. Further research is encouraged to evaluate approaches of communicating evidence about CTE to a diverse population of families of youth athletes. (shrink)No categories
- Predictive testing and oncogenes.Frederick P. Li -1995 -Ethics and Behavior 5 (2):194 – 196.
- The Chinese Short Story: Studies in Dating, Authorship, and Composition.Frederick P. Brandauer &Patrick Hanan -1977 -Journal of the American Oriental Society 97 (1):94.No categories
- The Teaching of Philosophy.Frederick P. Harris -1952 -Philosophical Review 61 (1):128-129.No categories
- The Chinese Vernacular Story.Frederick P. Brandauer &Patrick Hanan -1984 -Journal of the American Oriental Society 104 (2):350.
- Shan-ko von Feng Meng-lung: Eine Volksliedersammlung aus der Ming-Zeit.Frederick P. Brandauer,Cornelia Töpelmann &Cornelia Topelmann -1977 -Journal of the American Oriental Society 97 (2):224.No categories
- The Significance of a Dog's Tail: Comments on the Xu Xiyou ji.Frederick P. Brandauer -1993 -Journal of the American Oriental Society 113 (3):418-422.No categories
- Die Bedeutung Des Weltalls Für Gott Nach Ibn Gabirols Philosophischem Gedichte.Frederick P. Bargebuhr -1954 -Zeitschrift für Religions- Und Geistesgeschichte 6 (1):18-36.
- The historical dimensions of a rational faith.Frederick P. Van de Pitte -1980 -Journal of the History of Philosophy 18 (4):482-483.In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:482 HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY G. E. Michalson, Jr. TheHistoricalDimensions ofaRattonalFaith. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America, 1977. Pp. 222. $8.65. The primary intentionof this work is to argue that historical or ecclesiastical religion plays a vital role in Kant's religious thought, because it is necessary to provide a sensible content for the purely formal doctrine of Kant's "moral" religion. But Michalson resists that this strategy cannot succeed, because of (...) the technical requirements of Kant's eplstmology, and that we must ultimately encounter an "impasse" in Kant's thought on history and religion (pp. 77, 134, 169). This is an area of Kant's thought that has not until recently received the attention it deserves. A careful consideration of all the related issued helps one to recognize, from perhaps the most beneficial standpoint, how all the various parts of Kant's philosophical scheme fit together. Michalson quite rightly maintains that we must remain within the epistemological framework Kant has established for the Critical Philosophy. But unfortunately he recognizes only the negative aspects of this framework. What he chooses to call "Kant's principle of human limitations" (mentioned thirtynine times) is the essential element in his interpretation. Secondly, Michalson is unwilling to follow the lead of other commentators (e.g., Michel Despland and Ylrmiahu Yovel) in broadening the context still further in order to take into account the full scope of Kant's philosophical project. These two defects persist throughout Michalson's analysis, and ultimately they prevent any fruitful conclusions. The approach employed, in its most simple form, ~sto point out that historical religion belongs to the phenomenal order and that morality (as the basis for Kant's technical rehgious position) belongs to the noumenal order. Kant's recognition of the need to bridge this gap is dealt with in terms of the "schematism of analogy" (pp. 95, 112-13) mentioned in Religion withinthe Ltmits ofReasonAlone. Michalson provides an interpretation of the schematism m Chapter 3 and concludes that "Kant's Religion is not altogether consistent with certain basic teachings of the critical philosophy" (p. 132). His attempt to deal with this problem carries him into a discussion of teleology and the highest good (Chapter 4), and it is only in this concluding chapter that his various interpretive errors crystallze and produce their Inevitable consequences. Rather than emphasizing the negative aspects of Kant's conception of man, Despland offers Kant's positive perspective on man and his destiny----drawing, for example, on the Anthropologyfrom a PragmaticPoint of View. Employing equally good judgment, Yovel provides an interpretation of the highest good which shows it as the culmination (in the indefinite future) of the concrete process through which man's social, political, educational, and religious development takes place. These perspectives permit the historical dimension (both religious and secular) to be gradually transformed by the imposition of moral designs--as men ~lowly and painfully assume responsibility for directing the blind laws of nature into patterns that serve moral ends. Such commentators help us to see more clearly what Kant was attempting to achieve and how the elements of his total philosophical scheme are to be understood as interconnected. Michalson, on the other hand, has only his impasse to offer us. Because history is phenomenal and religion (as morality) is noumenal, he maintainsthat no bridge is possible between the two realms. But this is simply a failure to recognize Kant's strategy. For Kant is very careful to restrict knowledge (in the strict sense) to the phenomenal order. But he is equally clear in asserting that it is legitimate (indeed, necessary) to postulate those conditions which alone make it possible for us to act in conformity with the moral law. Therefore, we must postulate not only God and immortality but the possibility of a worldly order which conforms both to the laws of nature and to the moral law. And for Kant these postulates have the full strength of rational truths, m that--like the postulates of mathematics -reason cannot reject them. Interpreting Kant's phenomenon-noumenon distinction strictly (but misapplying it), Michalson insists that such a projected ideal state of the world is inconsistent with Kant's epistemological commitment. For such... (shrink)
- Antoine Arnauld, On True and False Ideas, New Objections to Descartes' Meditations and Descartes' Replies Reviewed by.Frederick P. Van De Pitte -1991 -Philosophy in Review 11 (2):83-85.Export citation
Bookmark - Some of Descartes’ Debts to Eustachius A Sancto Paulo.Frederick P. Van De Pitte -1988 -The Monist 71 (4):487-497.In various letters written to Mersenne in 1640 and 1641, Descartes mentions the Summa philosophiae quadrapartita of Eustachius a Sancto Paulo. But nothing that he says would lead us to believe the work an important influence on his thought. Nonetheless, when we turn to the Summa we are immediately struck by what seem to be “Cartesian” elements in its presentation. For example, a distinction is drawn between formal logic and “natural” logic. Formal logic is seen as a convenience in learning (...) the sciences, but natural logic alone is found to be the absolutely essential requirement. And this natural logic is basically a product of the natural light. It is not difficult to see in these passages a foreshadowing of Descartes’ new conception of method. Like Eustachius, he too maintains that the natural functions of the mind are all that we require in the pursuit of truth. But we shall find even more interesting similarities between the two men. (shrink)
- The Dating of Rule IV-B in Descartes's Regulae ad directionem ingenii.Frederick P. VandePitte -1991 -Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (3):375-395.
- The alhambra palace of the eleventh century.Frederick P. Bargebuhr -1956 -Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 19 (3/4):192-258.
- Kierkegaard's 'Approximation'.Frederick P. Van De Pitte -1971 -Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 52 (3):483.Export citation Bookmark
- Gary Steiner, Descartes as a Moral Thinker: Christianity, Technology, Nihilism Reviewed by.Frederick P. Van De Pitte -2006 -Philosophy in Review 26 (1):64-66.Export citation Bookmark
- Gottfried Martin, Arithmetic and Combinatorics: Kant and his Contemporaries Reviewed by.Frederick P. Van De Pitte -1987 -Philosophy in Review 7 (6):255-258.
- Tung YüehTung Yueh.Katherine Carlitz &Frederick P. Branduaer -1982 -Journal of the American Oriental Society 102 (1):141.No categories
- Descartes et Kant: empirisme et innéité.Frédérick P. Van de Pitte -1985 -Les Etudes Philosophiques:175.Export citation Bookmark
- Descartes' Epistemological Revolution: A Modern Realist Transformation of the Doctrine of Forms.Frederick P. Van De Pitte -1985 -Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 59:132.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Descartes's Strategy for the Grounding of Physics in the Meditations.Frederick P. Van De Pitte -1997 -Laval Théologique et Philosophique 53 (3):561-574.
- Descartes et Kant: Empirisme et innéité.Frédérick P. Van De Pitte &Vincent Carraud -forthcoming -Les Etudes Philosophiques.
- Eine europäische Renaissance- aus dokumentarischer Dichtung.Frederick P. Bargebuhr -1978 -Zeitschrift für Religions- Und Geistesgeschichte 30 (1):2-18.
- John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, Dugald Murdoch and Anthony Kenny, The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Volume III: The Correspondence Reviewed by.Frederick P. Van De Pitte -1992 -Philosophy in Review 12 (4):236-237.Export citation Bookmark
- Martial Gueroult, Descartes' Philosophy Interpreted According to the Order of Reasons Reviewed by.Frederick P. Van de Pitte -1985 -Philosophy in Review 5 (5):198-201.Export citation Bookmark
- The Role of Hölderlin in the Philosophy of Heidegger.Frederick P. Van De Pitte -1962 -Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 43 (2):168.Export citation Bookmark
- Descartes' Role in the Faith-Reason Controversy.Frederick P. Van De Pitte -1980 -Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 40 (3):344.No categories
- Nicholas Rescher, Kant's Theory of Knowledge and Reality: A Group of Essays Reviewed by.Frederick P. Van De Pitte -1985 -Philosophy in Review 5 (2):79-80.Export citation Bookmark
- Immanuel Kant, Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, with Selections from the Critique of Pure Reason Reviewed by.Frederick P. Van De Pitte -2005 -Philosophy in Review 25 (1):45-47.Export citation Bookmark
- Descartes' role in the faith-reason controversy.Frederick P. Van Pitte -1980 -Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 40 (3):344-353.
- From Metaphysics to Physics.Frederick P. van de Pitte &Geneviève Rodis-Lewis -1993 - In Stephen Voss,Essays on the philosophy and science of René Descartes. New York: Oxford University Press.This chapter explains the relationship between metaphysics and science as expounded by Descartes. The topic includes the effect of concepts of God and soul into the discovery of the scientific method. Metaphysical certainty grounds the rule of evidence in God, who is the source of all truth, and then extends from mathematics to everything so demonstrated in physics, and the knowledge that material things exist. The chapter examines in particular the stages of science's subordination to God, and some of its (...) consequences: What are the meaning and limits of the “fable” of The World? What is the difference between hypotheses, which move toward a conjunction with the real, and the “comparisons” employed in the Essays, which are not based on “principles”? Is the modern notion of a model ruled out, and with what legitimacy? (shrink)No categories
- (1 other version)La mathesis universalis de Descartes.Frederick P. Van de Pitte -1998 -Revista de filosofía (Chile) 51:7-26.No categories
- Moltke S. Gram., The Transcendental Turn: The Foundation of Kant's Idealism.Frederick P. Van De Pitte -1989 -International Studies in Philosophy 21 (1):88-88.
- The Role of Necessity in Descartes’ Metaphysics.Frederick P. Van De Pitte -1987 -Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 61:112-120.
- The Dating of Rule IV-B in Descartes's "Regulae ad directionem ingenii".Frederick P. Van De Pitte -1991 -Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (3):375.
- Intuition and judgment in Descartes' theory of truth.Frederick P. Van de Pitte -1988 -Journal of the History of Philosophy 26 (3):453-470.
- Descartes' revision of the renaissance conception of science. de Pitte &P.Frederick -1981 -Vivarium 19 (1):70-80.Export citation Bookmark
- Descartes’ Epistemological Revolution: A Modern Realist Transformation of the Doctrine of Forms.Frederick P. Van De Pitte -1985 -Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 59:132-148.
- Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers, eds., The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy Reviewed by.Frederick P. van de Pitte -1999 -Philosophy in Review 19 (3):175-181.Export citation Bookmark
- (1 other version)Descartes' Innate Ideas.Frederick P. Van De Pitte -1985 -Kant Studien 76 (1-4):363-384.A careful examination of descartes' works shows that innate ideas are not born with the mind, But are generated by (i.E., Born within) the mind. This is descartes' way of talking about empirical concept formation, As well as what the mind can infer from these concepts. Particular examples are examined to provide the material and formal conditions for identifying innate ideas. Descartes forces the transition from medieval to very modern epistemology.
- Reservations on a post- Wittgensteinian view of Descartes.Frederick P. Van De Pitte -1974 -Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 35 (1):107-112.
- Roger Ariew, Dennis Des Chene, Douglas M. Jesseph, Tad M. Schmaltz and Theo Verbeek, eds., Historical Dictionary of Descartes and Cartesian Philosophy Reviewed by. [REVIEW]Frederick P. Van De Pitte -2005 -Philosophy in Review 25 (5):313-314.Export citation Bookmark
- Descartes' Revision of the Renaissance Conception of Science.Frederick P. Van De Pitte -1981 -Vivarium 19 (1):70-80.
- Descartes' Mathesis Universalis.Frederick P. Van de Pitte -1979 -Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 61 (2):154-174.
- Descartes on Analogy and Other Minds.Frederick P. Van De Pitte -1975 -International Studies in Philosophy 7:89-110.
- Insights & Perspectives.Adnan Derti &Frederick P. Roth -unknown -Bioessays 34:576 - 577.Export citation Bookmark
- Imperial Rulership and Cultural Change in Traditional China.Charles Holcombe,Frederick P. Brandauer,Chün-Chieh Huang &Chun-Chieh Huang -1996 -Journal of the American Oriental Society 116 (4):759.
- Descartes’s Criterion of Divine Deception.Frederick P. Van de Pitte -1988 -Philosophie Et Culture: Actes du XVIIe Congrès Mondial de Philosophie 4:84-88.
- Joëlle Proust, Questions of Form: Logic and the Analytic Proposition from Kant to Carnap, trans. Anastasios Albert Brenner. [REVIEW]Frederick P. Van De Pitte -1991 -Philosophy in Review 11 (1):60-62.Export citation Bookmark
- Thomas M. Lennon, The Battle of the Gods and Giants: The Legacies of Descartes and Gassendi, 1655-1715. [REVIEW]Frederick P. Van de Pitte -1994 -Philosophy in Review 14 (3):180-183.Export citation Bookmark
- Charles H. Kahn.Frederick P. van de Pitte -1988 -The Monist 71 (4).
| 1 — 50 / 951 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6dc498764b-l54s5 uwo