Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

PhilPapersPhilPeoplePhilArchivePhilEventsPhilJobs

Works by Frank G. Verges

(view other items matching `Frank G. Verges`,view all matches )
5 found
Order:

1 filter applied
Disambiguations
Frank G. Verges [5]Frank Gust Verges [1]
  1.  70
    Rorty and the New Hermeneutics.Frank G. Verges -1987 -Philosophy 62 (241):307 - 323.
    Wittgenstein's genius, John Wisdom has suggested, was uniquely revealed in his ability to formulate such questions as ‘Could one play chess without the queen? Would it still be chess?’ The central questions raised by Richard Rorty's work may be cast in a parallel form: ‘Could one do philosophy without the notion of truth as “correspondence with the Real”? Would it still be philosophy?’ Both pairs of questions, Wittgenstein' and Rorty's, are quintessentially anti-essentialist. The scope and ingenuity of Rorty's ‘philosophy without (...) mirrors’ has challenged philosophers to reconf ront basic questions about the nature and purposes of philosophical inquiry. (shrink)
    Direct download(5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  57
    The Unbearable Lightness of Deconstruction.Frank G. Verges -1992 -Philosophy 67 (261):386 - 393.
  3.  56
    Jackson on incorrigibility.Frank G. Verges -1974 -Australasian Journal of Philosophy 52 (3):243-50.
  4.  77
    On Having Your Marx and Deconstructing Him Too.Frank G. Verges -1985 -Philosophy Research Archives 11:589-610.
    In this paper I examine some logical features of Marxist/Christian compatibilist projects. I use Arthur McGovern’s Marxism: An American Christian Perspective as my chief stalking horse. As an heuristic device, I distinguish the views in Marx’s early writings (Marxist humanism--M-I)from the more mature theory of historical materialism (M-2), where the latter is construed primarily as a social scientific method for the explanation of historical change. I also distinguish C-1, the moral teachings of Jesus, from C-2, Christian theology. I argue that (...) the logic of Christian compatibilism requires the acceptance of C-1, C-2, and M-2, while it must reject or downplay M-l, Marxist humanism. Similarly, the logic of a Marxist compatibilism requires the acceptance of M-1, M-2, end C-1, while it must reject C-2, Christian theology. I conclude that, while Christian and Marxist compatibilists can work together in seeking to overcome capitalism and imperialism, it is more difficult to see how thedisagreements over Marxist humanism vs. Christian theology could ever be transcended. (shrink)
    Direct download(3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  40
    Pragmatism Without Foundations: Reconciling Realism and Relativism By Joseph Margolis Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986, xix + 320 pp., £42.75. [REVIEW]Frank G. Verges -1988 -Philosophy 63 (243):125-.
Export
Limit to items.
Filters





Configure languageshere.Sign in to use this feature.

Viewing options


Open Category Editor
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?

Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.

Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:

Email RSS feed
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct

CDPPhiosophy Documentation Center
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).

Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation

Server: philpapers-web-5b9ff6f457-pc6d8 uwo
[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp