Results for 'Experimental Phenomenology'
959 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- ExperimentalPhenomenology: An Introduction.Don Ihde -1977 - State University of New York Press.ExperimentalPhenomenology has already been lauded for the ease with which its author explains and demonstrates the kinds of consciousness by which we come to know the structure of objects and the structure of consciousness itself. The format of the book follows the progression of a number of thought experiments which mark out the procedures and directions of phenomenological inquiry. Making use of examples of familiar optical illusions and multi-stable drawings, Professor Ihde illustrates by way of careful and (...) disciplined step-by-step analyses, how some of the main methodological procedures and epistemological concepts ofphenomenology assume concrete relevance. Such formidable fare as epoche, noetic and noematic analysis, apodicticity, adequacy, sedimentation, imaginative variation, field, and fringe are rendered into the currency of familiar examples from the everyday world. (shrink)
- Experimentalphenomenology: What it is and what it is not.Liliana Albertazzi -2019 -Synthese 198 (Suppl 9):2191-2212.Experimentalphenomenology is the study of appearances in subjective awareness. Its methods and results challenge quite a few aspects of the current debate on consciousness. A robust theoretical framework for understanding consciousness is pending: current empirical research waves on what a phenomenon of consciousness properly is, not least because the question is still open on the observables to be measured and how to measure them. I shall present the basics ofexperimentalphenomenology and discuss the current (...) development ofexperimentalphenomenology, its main features, and the many misunderstandings that have obstructed a fair understanding and evaluation of its otherwise enlightening outcomes. (shrink)
- ExperimentalPhenomenology as an Approach to the Study of Contemplative Practices.Lars-Gunnar Lundh -2022 -Frontiers in Psychology 12.During history humans have developed a large variety of contemplative practices, in many different areas of life, and as part of many different traditions and contexts. Although some contemplative practices are very old, the research field of Contemplation Studies is young, and there are no agreed-upon definitions of central concepts such as contemplative practices and contemplative experiences. The present paper focuses on contemplative practices, defined as practices that are engaged in for the sake of the contemplative experiences they afford. The (...) purpose of the present paper is to discuss the potential ofexperimentalphenomenology to contribute to the development of the research field of Contemplation Studies.Experimentalphenomenology is defined as the investigation of phenomenological practices and their effects on experience. Phenomenological practices involve intentional variations of experiencing by means of changes in the direction of attention and the choice of attitude, typically as guided by verbal instructions or self-instructions. It is suggested that contemplative practices represent a subcategory of phenomenological practices. Two different varieties ofexperimentalphenomenology are described and illustrated in the present paper: an informal variety which involves the development of new phenomenological practices by creative variation of procedures and observation of effects; and a more rigorously scientific variety, which involves the systematic variation of phenomenological practices in accordance withexperimental designs to study their experiential effects. It is suggested that the development of contemplative practices during the ages is the result of an informal experimenting of the first kind; this variety ofexperimentalphenomenology can also be used to develop personalized health interventions in a clinical setting. As to the more rigorously scientificexperimentalphenomenology, it is possible that it may lead not only to an improved understanding of general principles underlying contemplative practices, but also to a more systematic development of new contemplative practices. Theexperimental-phenomenological approach to contemplative practices is illustrated by various examples involving mindfulness, gratitude, receiving and giving. (shrink)
- ExperimentalPhenomenology. [REVIEW]O. S. C. -1978 -Review of Metaphysics 31 (3):483-484.ExperimentalPhenomenology is a book on learningphenomenology by doing it. The format follows the progression of a number of thought-experiments which mark out the procedures and directions of phenomenological inquiry. Making use of examples of familiar optical illusions and multi-stable drawings, such as the well-known Necker cube, Professor Ihde illustrates by way of careful and disciplined step-by-step analyses how some of the main methodological procedures and epistemological concepts ofphenomenology assume concrete relevance in the project (...) of doingphenomenology. Such formidable phenomenological fare as epoche, noetic and noematic analysis, apodicticity, adequacy, sedimentation, imaginative variation, field, and fringe are rendered into the currency of a quotidian commerce with the perceptual world. (shrink)No categories
- ExperimentalPhenomenology, Second Edition: Multistabilities.Don Ihde -2012 - State University of New York Press.Expanded new edition of the landmark book demonstrating the practice ofphenomenology through visual illusions and ambiguous drawings.No categories
- TheExperimentalPhenomenology of Perception. A Collective Reflection on the Present and Future of this Approach.Roberto Burro &Ivana Bianchi -2022 -Gestalt Theory 44 (3):279-288.Summary The paper presents the result of a collective reflection inspired by the individual suggestions of 30 researchers working in different research areas. They are all familiar with theExperimentalPhenomenology of Perception, and are aware of the importance that this approach might represent nowadays in their specific research field. The picture that emerges from this ‘mosaic’ stimulates us to consider the potential future developments of this approach if we accept that we need to push its borders beyond (...) the traditional aims of the study of perception (as masterfully developed by the historic Italian Maestri of this approach). If we take this broader view, theExperimentalPhenomenology of Perception can extend its perimeters from an analysis of strictly perceptual aspects to an analysis of cognitive and metacognitive aspects (such as aesthetic evaluations, the perception of risk, the experience of certainty/uncertainty in a reasoning process, the perception of proximity to/distance from the solution to a problem and meaning-making in language). The cognitive and metacognitive aspects referred to are grounded in and modelled on the perceiver’s experience of a given situation. (shrink)
- Paolo Bozzi’sExperimentalPhenomenology.Ivana Bianchi &Richard Davies (eds.) -2018 - New York: Routledge.This anthology translates eighteen papers by Italian philosopher andexperimental psychologist Paolo Bozzi, bringing his distinctive and influential ideas to an English-speaking audience for the first time. The papers cover a range of methodological andexperimental questions concerning thephenomenology of perception and their theoretical implications, with each one followed by commentary from leading international experts. In his laboratory work, Bozzi investigated visual and auditory perception, such as our responses to pendular motion and bodies in freefall, afterimages, (...) transparency effects, and grouping effects in dot lattices and among sounds. Reflecting on the results of his enquiries against the background of traditional approaches to experimentation in these fields, Bozzi took a unique realist stance that challenges accepted approaches to perception, arguing thatexperimentalphenomenology is neither a science of the perceptual process nor a science of the appearances; it is a science of how things are. The writings collected here offer an important resource for psychologists of perception and philosophers, as well as for researchers in cognitive science. (shrink)
- Integratingexperimental-phenomenological methods and neuroscience to study neural mechanisms of pain and consciousness.D. Barrell Price &Rainville J. -2002 -Consciousness and Cognition 11 (4):593-608.Understanding the nature of pain at least partly depends on recognizing its inherent first person epistemology and on using a first person experiential and third personexperimental approach to study it. This approach may help to understand some of the neural mechanisms of pain and consciousness by integrating experiential–phenomenological methods with those of neuroscience. Examples that approximate this strategy include studies of second pain summation and its relationship to neural activities and brain imaging-psychophysical studies wherein sensory and affective qualities (...) of pain are correlated with cerebral cortical activity. The experiential paradigm of Price and Barrell offers the possibility of improved designs and methods for investigating neural mechanisms underlying pain and consciousness. (shrink)
- ExperimentalPhenomenology in contemporary perception science.Carmelo Calì -2008 -Teorie E Modelli 13 (1/2).Some issues heavily debated in perception sciences are presented: the explanatory gap and the experience measurement problem. Theexperimentalphenomenology is said to provide substantive contribution to settle controversy over the phenome- nological adequacy of perception theory and models. An interpretation of experi- mentalphenomenology as explanation of the perceptual manifold, and definition of relation varieties to eventually map onto other perception sciences’ domains is sketched.
- AnExperimental Phenomenological Approach to the Study of Inner Speech in Empathy: Bodily Sensations, Emotions, and Felt Knowledge as the Experiential Context of Inner Spoken Voices.Ignacio Cea,Mayte Vergara,Jorge Calderón,Alejandro Troncoso &David Martínez-Pernía -2022 - In Ignacio Cea, Mayte Vergara, Jorge Calderón, Alejandro Troncoso & David Martínez-Pernía,New Perspectives on Inner Speech. pp. 65–80.The relevance of inner speech for human psychology, especially for higher-order cognitive functions, is widely recognized. However, the study of thephenomenology of inner speech, that is, what it is like for a subject to experience internally speaking his/her voice, has received much less attention. This study explores the subjective experience of inner speech through empathy for pain paradigm. To this end, anexperimental phenomenological method was implemented. Sixteen healthy subjects were exposed to videos of sportswomen/sportsmen having physical (...) accidents practicing extreme sports. Immediately after the exposure to the stimuli, a phenomenological interview was conducted to gather data about bodily sensations, emotions, motivations, and inner speech of watching other people’s accidents. Participant’s inner speech expresses concern about the consequences the accident could generate to the sportswomen/sportsmen or about the participants themselves. Simultaneously, participants’ inner speech happened with negative emotional feelings, many sensations distributed throughout their bodies, and a felt knowledge coming from a meaningful but pre-reflective and pre-verbal bodily dimension. Our findings show that inner speech in empathy is not merely a psycholinguistic process or high-order cognitive function, but rather it is a complex experience that occurs deeply related to meaningful emotions, bodily sensations, and an implicit, somatically felt knowledge. (shrink)
- Experimentalphenomenology (?) – A rejoinder to Bianchi & Burro (2022).Riccardo Luccio -2023 -Gestalt Theory 45 (1-2):17-19.In recent years, the termexperimentalphenomenology has come to refer to the work of various researchers, mainly Italian, of whom Gaetano Kanizsa and Paolo Bozzi are the most representative. Their work is well presented in this article by Bianchi and Burro (2022). My objection is to what I consider to be the misnomer and misleading name “experimentalphenomenology,” which gives the impression that we are dealing with a homogeneous group following a unified approach. However, this (...) is not the case. The phenomenological view is not the same for everyone, ranging from borrowings from Gestalt theory, as in Kanizsa, to Gibsonian ecologism, as in Bozzi. And, most importantly, the research designs of these researchers are only sometimesexperimental, sometimes quasi-experimental, but more often non-experimental. (shrink)No categories
- The relationship between visual illusion and aesthetic preference – an attempt to unifyexperimentalphenomenology and empirical aesthetics.Kaoru Noguchi -2003 -Axiomathes 13 (3):261-281.Experimentalphenomenology has demonstrated that perception is much richer than stimulus. As is seen in color perception, one and the same stimulus provides more than several modes of appearance or perceptual dimensions. Similarly, there are various perceptual dimensions in form perception. Even a simple geometrical figure inducing visual illusion gives not only perceptual impressions of size, shape, slant, depth, and orientation, but also affective or aesthetic impressions. The present study reviews ourexperimental phenomenological work on visual illusion (...) andexperimental aesthetics, and examines how aesthetic preference is influenced by stimulus factors determining visual illusions including anomalous surface and transparency as well as geometrical illusion. Along with line figures producing geometrical illusions, illusory surface figures inducing neon color spreading and transparency effects were used as test patterns. Participants made both of psychophysical judgments and of aesthetic judgments for the same test pattern. Both of geometrical illusions and aesthetic preferences were found to change similarly as a function of stimulus variables such as the number of filling lines and the size ratio of the inner and outer figural components. Also, following specific stimulus variables such as lightness contrast ratio and spatial interval between inducing figural elements (so called ``packmen''), strong effects of color spreading and transparency were accompanied with strong preferences. It seems that the paradigm to investigate aesthetic phenomena along with perceptual dimensions is useful to bridge the gap betweenexperimentalphenomenology andexperimental aesthetics. (shrink)
- A newexperimental phenomenological method to explore the subjective features of psychological phenomena: its application to binocular rivalry.Takuya Niikawa,Katsunori Miyahara,Nishida Satoshi &Hamada Hiro Taiyo -2020 -Neuroscience of Consciousness 2020 (1).The subjective features of psychological phenomena have been studied intensively inexperimental science in recent years. Although various methods have been proposed to identify subjective features of psychological phenomena, there are elusive subjective features such as the spatiotemporal structure of experience, which are difficult to capture without some additional methodological tools. We propose a newexperimental method to address this challenge, which we call the contrast-basedexperimental phenomenological method (CEP). CEP proceeds in four steps: (i) front-loading
- Vittorio Benussi’s Genetic-ExperimentalPhenomenology of Perception and its Place in the History of Gestalt Psychology.Mauro Antonelli -2019 - In Arnaud Dewalque & Venanzio Raspa,Psychological Themes in the School of Alexius Meinong. De Gruyter. pp. 169-198.No categories
- Handbook ofExperimentalPhenomenology. Visual Peception of Shape, Space and Appearance.Liliana Albertazzi (ed.) -2013 - Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley.Visual Perception of Shape, Space and Appearance Liliana Albertazzi. the sort I have in mind. What I am speaking of is the mandatory correlations between attributes of visual space (those of, e.g., surfaces, shape, distance, direction) and ...
- ExperimentalPhenomenology: An Introduction.Sang-Ki Kim -1980 -Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 40 (4):597-598.No categories
- Michotte'sExperimentalPhenomenology of Perception.Georges Thinès,Alan Costall &George Butterworth (eds.) -1991 - Hillsdale, N.J.: Routledge.This volume of collected papers, with the accompanying essays by the editors, is the definitive source book for the work of this importantexperimental psychologist. Originally published in 1991, it offered previously inaccessible essays by Albert Michotte on phenomenal causality, phenomenal permanence, phenomenal reality, and perception and cognition. Within these four sections are the most significant and representative of the Belgian psychologist's research in the area ofexperimentalphenomenology. Extremely insightful introductions by the editors are included that (...) place the essays in context. Michotte's ideas have played an important role in much research on the development of perception, and his work on social perception continues to be influential in social psychology. The book also includes some lesser-known aspects of his work that are equally important; for example, a remarkable set of articles on pictorial analysis. (shrink)
- First steps inexperimentalphenomenology.Roberto Poli -2006 - In Angelo Loula, Ricardo Gudwin & Jo?O. Queiroz,Artificial Cognition Systems. Idea Group Publishers.
- Reality monitoring: Anexperimental phenomenological approach.M. K. NJohnson -1988 -Journal of Experimental Psychology 117:390-94.
- Michotte'sexperimentalphenomenology of perception.Albert Michotte -1991 - Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates. Edited by Georges Thinès, Alan Costall & George Butterworth.Thin, Costall, Butterworth...should be applauded for offering a collection of previously inaccessible essays by Albert Michotte on phenomenal causality, phenomenal permanence, phenomenal reality, and perception and cognition. Within these sections they have made wise selections and done a wonderful job of translating hitherto untranslated works. Most importantly, they have written extremely insightful section introductions that place the essays in historical and contemporary context. a Contemporary Psychology Albert Michotte's ideas have played an important role in recent research on the development of (...) perception, and his work on social perception continues to be influential in social psychology. This book presents the most significant and representative of the Belgian psychologist's research in the area ofexperimentalphenomenology -- only a small portion of which has been published in English translation. It also includes some lesser-known aspects of his work that are equally important; for example, a remarkable set of articles on pictorial analysis (including film) virtually unknown to most contemporary researchers. The editors/translators of this text offer an enlightening introduction to Michotte's career that establishes historical context and highlights some of the links between his efforts and current research. For the most part, however, Thin s, Costall, and Butterworth allow Michotte to speak for himself. What he has to say is of considerable import in terms of contemporary psychological inquiry and debate. (shrink)No categories
- TheExperimentalPhenomenology of Paolo Bozzi.Roberta Lanfredini -2019 - In Federica Buongiorno, Vincenzo Costa & Roberta Lanfredini,Phenomenology in Italy. Authors, Schools, Traditions. Springer.No categories
- ExperimentalPhenomenology: An Introduction, by Don Ihde.B. J. Jones -1978 -Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 9 (2):138-139.
- Depersonalization, the experience of prosthesis, and our cosmic insignificance: Theexperimentalphenomenology of an altered state.Andrew Apter -1992 -Philosophical Psychology 5 (3):257-285.Psychogenic depersonalization is an altered mental state consisting of an unusual discontinuity in the phenomenological perception of personal being; the individual is engulfed by feelings of unreality, self-detachment and unfamiliarity in which the self is felt to lack subjective perspective and the intuitive feeling of personal embodiment. A new sub-feature of depersonalization is delineated. 'Prosthesis' consists in the thought that the thinker is a 'mere thing'. It is a subjectively realized sense of the specific and objective 'thingness' of the particular (...) object thought about. I show that prosthesis is an important cognitive feature of depersonalization, and may be psychologically connected with the tendency of depersonalized individuals to report 'philosophical' types of thinking. Indeed, several philosophical issues concerning the identity of the self appear to have been enhanced by prosthesis experiences. Thus, far more efficient than William James'sexperimental attempts to uncover philosophical truths under the influence of nitrous oxide intoxication, prosthesis may be a safe and recommended experience for philosophers. The history of depersonalization theories is presented from Krishaber to Freud, and the main approaches to prosthesis criticized. Finally, a fresh approach to psychogenic depersonalization is outlined on the basis of certain cognitive similarities with visual agnosia. This paper may be understood as continuing the Jamesian tradition 'experimental abnormal psychology', that is, of examining extraordinary mental states with an eye to their philosophical implications. (shrink)
- "I am feeling tension in my whole body": Anexperimental phenomenological study of empathy for pain.David Martínez-Pernía,Ignacio Cea,Alejandro Troncoso,Kevin Blanco,Jorge Calderón,Constanza Baquedano,Claudio Araya-Veliz,Ana Useros,David Huepe,Valentina Carrera,Victoria Mack-Silva &Mayte Vergara -2023 -Frontiers in Psychology 13.Introduction: Traditionally, empathy has been studied from two main perspectives: the theory-theory approach and the simulation theory approach. These theories claim that social emotions are fundamentally constituted by mind states in the brain. In contrast, classicalphenomenology and recent research based on enactive theories consider empathy as the basic process of contacting others’ emotional experiences through direct bodily perception and sensation. Objective: This study aims to enrich knowledge of the empathic experience of pain by using anexperimental phenomenological (...) method. Method: Implementing anexperimental paradigm used in affective neuroscience, we exposed 28 healthy adults to a video of sportspersons suffering physical accidents while practicing extreme sports. Immediately after watching the video, each participant underwent a phenomenological interview to gather data on embodied, multi-layered dimensions (bodily sensations, emotions, and motivations) and temporal aspects of empathic experience. We also performed quantitative analyses of the phenomenological categories. Results: Experiential access to the other person’s painful experience involves four main-themes. Bodily resonance: participants felt a multiplicity of bodily, affective, and kinesthetic sensations. Attentional focus: some participants centered their attention more on their own personal discomfort and sensations of rejection, while others on the pain and suffering experienced by the sportspersons. Kinesthetic motivation: some participants experienced the feeling in their bodies to avoid or escape from watching the video, while others experienced the need to help the sportspersons avoid suffering any injury while practicing extreme sports. Temporality of experience: participants witnessed temporal fluctuations in their experiences, bringing intensity changes in their bodily resonance, attentional focus, and kinesthetic motivation. Finally, two experiential structures were found: one structure is self-centered empathic experience, characterized by bodily resonance, attentional focus centered on the participant’s own experience of seeing the sportsperson suffering, and self-protective kinesthetic motivation; the other structure is other-centered empathic experience, characterized by bodily resonance, attentional focus centered on the sportsperson, and prosocial kinesthetic motivation to help them. Discussion: We show how phenomenological data may contribute to comprehending empathy for pain in social neuroscience. In addition, we address the phenomenological aspect of the enactive approach to the three dimensions of embodiment of human consciousness, especially the intersubjective dimension. Also, based on our results, we suggest an extension of the enactive theory for non-interactive social experience. (shrink)
- ExperimentalPhenomenology. [REVIEW]Robert E. Innis -1978 -Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 53 (4):453-454.
- ExperimentalPhenomenology. [REVIEW]Randolph M. Feezell -1981 -New Scholasticism 55 (4):508-511.
- The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook ofExperimentalPhenomenology; Visual Perception of Shape, Space and Appearance.Liliana Albertazzi (ed.) -2013 - Wiley-Blackwell.
- (1 other version)The Phenomenological Foundations for Methodology Ii:Experimental Phenomenological Psychology.Wayne K. Andrew -1986 -Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 17 (1):77-97.
- Book Review: Don Ihde,ExperimentalPhenomenology. An introduction, Paragon Books, The Putnam Publishing Group, USA, Second Impression, 1979, 155 pp., 20x13 cm, (aproxi.) 12 USD. [REVIEW]Joaquim Carlos Araújo -2002 -Phainomenon 4 (1):177-196.The scientific phenornenology of Bachelard is constituted as an original reflection about the production of the scientific work, in their subjective (the scientist’s Psychology/Psychoanalysis) and objective (the phenomenon while measure) slopes. Inspired for a softer or a soft-headedphenomenology, the French author wanted to reformulate. some concepts and manners of seeing of the German classicphenomenology. Critical of the husserlianphenomenology of the concept of Meinung, Bachelard enrolled his epistemological labor inside of the history of the applied (...)phenomenology to the sciences. In spite. of, he defends the lost «husserlian purity», independently of the denial of the idealism of the absolute conscience. The main theory is the one of the “Applied Rationalism” to the science and the consequent passing of thc psychologism but, and at the same time, of the mathesis universalis. The “discursive idealism of Bachelard didn’t ignore the specific disparity of the several scientific practices, on the contrary, he examined them the light of what called «phenomenontechnique». (shrink)No categories
- Paolo Bozzi’sExperimentalPhenomenology. [REVIEW]Giulia Parovel -2018 -Gestalt Theory 41 (1):79-84.No categories
- Phenomenology of Perception: Theories andExperimental Evidence.Carmelo Calì -2017 - Boston: Brill | Rodopi._Phenomenology of Perception: Theories andExperimental Evidence_ presents an interpretation ofphenomenology as a set of commitments to discover the immanent grammar of perception by reviewing arguments andexperimental results that are still important today for psychology and the cognitive sciences.
- NaturalizingPhenomenology: A Must Have?Liliana Albertazzi -2018 -Frontiers in Psychology 9:397576.Quite a few cognitive scientists are working toward a naturalization ofphenomenology. Looking more closely at the relevant literature, however, the ‘naturalizingphenomenology’ proposals show the presence of different conceptions, assumptions, and formalisms, further differentiated by different philosophical and/or scientific concerns. This paper shows that the original Husserlian stance is deeper, clearer and more advanced than most supposed contemporary improvements. The recent achievements ofexperimentalphenomenology show how to ‘naturalize’phenomenology without destroying the guiding assumptions (...) ofphenomenology. The requirements grounding the scientific explanation of subjective experience are discussed, such as the nature of the stimuli, their variables, and their manipulation by properly phenomenological methods. (shrink)
- Phenomenology andExperimental Psychology: On the Prospects and Limitations ofExperimental Research for a Phenomenological Epistemology.Philipp Berghofer -2020 -Journal of Transcendental Philosophy 1 (1):85-108.Husserl’s transcendentalphenomenology is first and foremost a science of the structures of consciousness. Since it is intended to yield eidetic, i. e., a priori insights, it is often assumed that transcendentalphenomenology and the natural sciences are totally detached from each other such that phenomenological investigations cannot possibly benefit from empirical evidence. The aim of this paper is to show that a beneficial relationship is possible. To be more precise, I will show how Husserl’s a priori investigations (...) on consciousness can be supplemented by research inexperimental psychology in order to tackle fundamental questions in epistemology. Our result will be a phenomenological conception of experiential justification that is in accordance with and supported by empirical phenomena such as perceptual learning and the phenomenon of blindsight. Finally, I shall shed light on the systematic limits of empirical research. (shrink)
- Phenomenology andexperimental design: Toward a phenomenologically enlightenedexperimental science.Shaun Gallagher -2003 -Journal of Consciousness Studies 10 (9-10):85-99.I review three answers to the question: How canphenomenology contribute to theexperimental cognitive neurosciences? The first approach, neurophenomenology, employs phenomenological method and training, and uses first-person reports not just as more data for analysis, but to generate descriptive categories that are intersubjectively and scientifically validated, and are then used to interpret results that correlate with objective measurements of behaviour and brain activity. A second approach, indirectphenomenology, is shown to be problematic in a number of (...) ways. Indirectphenomenology is generally put to work after the experiment, in critical or creative interpretations of the scientific evidence. Ultimately, however, proposals for the indirect use ofphenomenology lead back to methodological questions about the direct use ofphenomenology inexperimental design. The third approach, 'front-loaded'phenomenology, suggests that the results of phenomenological investigations can be used in the design of empirical ones. Concepts or clarifications that have been worked out phenomenologically may operate as a partial framework for experimentation. (shrink)
- (1 other version)Theexperimental use of introspection in the scientific study of pain and its integration with third-person methodologies: The experiential-phenomenological approach.Murat Aydede &Donald D. Price -2005 - InPain: New Essays on its Nature and the Methodology of its Study. MIT Press. pp. 243--273.Understanding the nature of pain depends, at least partly, on recognizing its subjectivity (thus, its first-person epistemology). This in turn requires using a first-person experiential method in addition to third-personexperimental approaches to study it. This paper is an attempt to spell out what the former approach is and how it can be integrated with the latter. We start our discussion by examining some foundational issues raised by the use of introspection. We argue that such a first-person method in (...) the scientific study of pain (as in the study of any experience) is in fact indispensable by demonstrating that it has in fact been consistently used in conjunction with conventional third-person methodologies, and this for good reasons. We show that, contrary to what appears to be a widespread opinion, there is absolutely no reason to think that the use of such a first-person approach is scientifically and methodologically suspect. We distinguish between two uses of introspective methods in scientific experiments: one draws on the subjects’ introspective reports where any investigator has equal and objective access. The other is where the investigator becomes a subject of his own study and draws on the introspection of his own experiences. We give examples using and/or approximating both strategies that include studies of second pain summation and its relationship to neural activities, and brain imaging- psychophysical studies wherein sensory and affective qualities of pain are correlated with cerebral cortical activity. We explain what we call the experiential or phenomenological approach that has its origins in the work of Price and Barrell (1980). This approach capitalizes on the scientific prospects and benefits of using the introspection of the investigator. We distinguish between its vertical and horizontal applications. Finally, we conclude that integrating such an approach to standard third-person methodologies can only help us in having a fuller understanding of pain and of conscious experience in general. (shrink)
- Phenomenology: a challenge toexperimental psychology.Robert Brodie MacLeod -1974 - New York,: J. Norton Publishers.
- Phenomenological andexperimental research on embodied experience.Shaun Gallagher -2000 -Atelier Phenomenologie Et Cognition: Theorie de la Cognition Et Necessité d'Une Investigation Phenomenologique.In recent years there has been some hard-won but still limited agreement thatphenomenology may be of central importance to the cognitive sciences. This realization comes in the wake of dismissive gestures made by philosophers of mind like Dennett (1991), who mistakenly associates phenomenological method with the worst forms of introspection. For very different reasons, resistance can also be found on the phenomenological side of this issue. There are many thinkers well versed in the Husserlian tradition who do not (...) even want to consider the usefulness ofphenomenology for enlightening the sciences of the mind. For them cognitive science is simply too computational or too reductionistic to be seriously considered as capable of explaining experience or consciousness. [1] This is surprising in light of the fact that a highly respected phenomenologist like Merleau-Ponty was integrating phenomenological analyses with considerations drawn from the empirical sciences of psychology and neurology long before cognitive science was constructed as a framework to include just those aspects of psychology and neurology that focus on cognitive experience. Merleau-Ponty aside, philosophers on both sides of this issue have only gradually come to acknowledge the possibility thatphenomenology may be directly relevant for a scientific understanding of cognition. Sometimes the empirical scientists themselves have arrived at this conclusion even before, and in spite of the philosophers. Francisco Varela's work on neurophenomenology provides an important example (Varela, 1996). Even the hardest of hard scientists have made peace offerings tophenomenology. Recently, for example, the neuroscientist Jean-Pierre Changeux declares that his purpose "is not to go to war againstphenomenology; to the contrary, [he wants] to see what constructive contribution it can make to our knowledge of the psyche, acting in concert with the neurosciences" (Changeux and Ricoeur, 2000, p. 85). (shrink)
- Philosophical,Experimental and SyntheticPhenomenology: The Study of Perception for Biological, Artificial Agents and Environments.Carmelo Calì -2023 -Foundations of Science 28 (4):1111-1124.In this paper the relationship betweenphenomenology of perception and syntheticphenomenology is discussed. Syntheticphenomenology is presented on the basis of the issues in A.I. and Robotics that required to address the question of what enables artificial agents to have phenomenal access to the environment.Phenomenology of perception is construed as a theory with autonomous structure and domain, which can be embedded in a philosophical as well as a scientific theory. Two attempts at specifying the (...) phenomenal content of artificial agents are discussed. Concepts andexperimental evidence on the independence of perception and the coordination of motion and appearances are set out to submit thatphenomenology of perception makes a contribution to syntheticphenomenology. (shrink)
- Phenomenological analysis andexperimental method in psychology – the problem of their compatibility.Carl F. Graumann -1988 -Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 18 (1):33–50.
- Stuck in between.Phenomenology’s Explanatory Dilemma and its Role inExperimental Practice.Mark-Oliver Casper &Philipp Haueis -2023 -Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 22 (3):575-598.Questions aboutphenomenology’s role in non-philosophical disciplines gained renewed attention. While we claim thatphenomenology makes indispensable, unique contributions to different domains of scientific practice such as concept formation,experimental design, and data collection, we also contend that when it comes to explanation, phenomenological approaches face a dilemma. Either phenomenological attempts to explain conscious phenomena do not satisfy a central constraint on explanations, i.e. the asymmetry between explanans and explanandum, or they satisfy this explanatory asymmetry only by (...) largely merging with non-phenomenological explanation types. The consequence of this dilemma is that insofar as phenomenological approaches are explanatory, they do not provide an own type of explanation. We substantiate our two claims by offering three case studies of phenomenologically inspired experiments in cognitive science. Each case study points out a specific phenomenological contribution toexperimental practice while also illustrating how phenomenological approaches face the explanatory dilemma we outline. (shrink)
- Phenomenology andExperimental Psychology.Amedeo Giorgi -1971 -Duquesne Studies in Phenomenological Psychology 1:6-16.
- Gesture following deafferentation: a phenomenologically informedexperimental study.Jonathan Cole,Shaun Gallagher &David McNeill -2002 -Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1 (1):49-67.Empirical studies of gesture in a subject who has lost proprioception and the sense of touch from the neck down show that specific aspects of gesture remain normal despite abnormal motor processes for instrumental movement. The experiments suggest that gesture, as a linguistic phenomenon, is not reducible to instrumental movement. They also support and extend claims made by Merleau-Ponty concerning the relationship between language and cognition. Gesture, as language, contributes to the accomplishment of thought.
- Attention betweenphenomenology andexperimental psychology.Pierre Vermersch -2004 -Continental Philosophy Review 37 (1):45-81.It is possible to consider attention as the modulating dimension of consciousness. Understood in this sense, attention can be a privileged theme for relating the first person point of view (conceived as a psycho-phenomenology inspired by the work of Husserl) to theexperimental sciences (e.g. psychology, neuropsychology, etc.), which have done a great deal of work on attention. This article will take up in succession some different points of view regarding the status of attention and its structure (e.g. (...) static aspects). It will also consider the dynamic of attention from a micro-genetic point of view as well as a functional point of view. The final section will seek to show not only the unique and original contributions of each perspective, but also each perspective''s limitations and biases. (shrink)
- Experimental Study of Ostensibly Shamanic Journeying Imagery in Naïve Participants II: Phenomenological Mapping and Modified Affect Bridge.Adam J. Rock,Paul J. Casey Rock &Peter B. Baynes -2006 -Anthropology of Consciousness 17 (1):65-83.
- Phenomenology and temporality in the composition ofexperimental minimal music.Richard Glover &Bryn Harrison -2013 -University of Huddersfield Repository.The paper’s authors are composers operating within the field ofexperimental music. Their music is created from the use of limited materials placed into repetitive structures involving cyclic pitch patterns and sustained tone textures. This reductive approach to composition provides a fertile area for discussions of temporality, as the music functions outside of standard teleological narrative structures thereby prompting more varied subjective temporal experiences for listeners. The paper will take as its starting point the experience of the listener, rather (...) than the musical score, enhancing discussions from Thomas Clifton’s Music as Heard.1 This angle is particularly relevant when discussing minimal works, as the score does not (and is not intended to) give an indication to what the auditory experience will be, it simply acts as what pianist Philip Thomas describes as a ‘prescription for action’ for the performers.2 Drawing particularly upon work on the temporal experience by Merleau-Ponty (after Husserl), the paper discusses how phenomenological approaches can provide effective insight into the experience of sustained tone and repetitive music. By discussing notions of retention and protention, the two composers will explore how this permeates their compositional approach, particularly in relation to the use of repetition, examining the different types of musical materials used by the composers and how this affects the temporalities experienced upon performance. Points of similarity and variance between the two outlooks are explored in detail, providing an in-depth discussion as to how attitudes towards temporality can result in nuanced differences in output. Fundamental essences are clarified and discussed in relation to other composers’ work, and in particular American composer James Tenney’s work in applying a phenomenological model upon the listening experience is considered alongside the central discussion. The results of this investigation provide both clear artistic statements on the role of phenomenological thought in the creative process, and also tentative starting points for further discussion on experiential temporalities in minimal andexperimental musics. (shrink)
- ThePhenomenology of Agency andExperimental Philosophy.Part Eleven -2013 - In Paul Russell & Oisin Deery,The Philosophy of Free Will: Essential Readings From the Contemporary Debates. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 471.
- Ethnomethodology as an Experimentation with the Natural Attitude: George Psathas on Phenomenological Sociology.Carlos Belvedere -2020 -Human Studies 43 (3):353-360.My aim is to depict Psathas’s position on ethnomethodology as a way of doing phenomenological sociology. On this, he contested with others who argued that ethnomethodology is not a phenomenological sociology at all. His claim was that ethnomethodology is a part of the phenomenological movement. In this dispute, he offered two kinds of arguments. On the one hand, he documented the strong phenomenological background of Garfinkel’s ideas. On the other hand, he found in Garfinkel’s own words expressions of gratitude to (...) Husserl, Gurwitsch, and Schutz, among other phenomenologists. However, having proved that there was a close relation of Garfinkel with ethnomethodology, Psathas went on to show that Garfinkel turned phenomenological ideas into something new; in particular, he turnedphenomenology into anexperimental science dealing with the natural attitude. This is a groundbreaking contribution that Psathas appreciated and comprehended as no one else. (shrink)No categories
- The Phenomenological Background of Michotte'sExperimental Investigations.Georges Thinès -1988 -Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 19 (1):19-58.
- AlienPhenomenology, or, What It's Like to Be a Thing.Ian Bogost -2012 - Univ of Minnesota Press.Humanity has sat at the center of philosophical thinking for too long. The recent advent of environmental philosophy and posthuman studies has widened our scope of inquiry to include ecosystems, animals, and artificial intelligence. Yet the vast majority of the stuff in our universe, and even in our lives, remains beyond serious philosophical concern. In _AlienPhenomenology, or What It’s Like to Be a Thing_, Ian Bogost develops an object-oriented ontology that puts things at the center of being—a philosophy (...) in which nothing exists any more or less than anything else, in which humans are elements but not the sole or even primary elements of philosophical interest. And unlikeexperimentalphenomenology or the philosophy of technology, Bogost’s alienphenomenology takes for granted that _all_ beings interact with and perceive one another. This experience, however, withdraws from human comprehension and becomes accessible only through a speculative philosophy based on metaphor. Providing a new approach for understanding the experience of things _as_ things, Bogost also calls on philosophers to rethink their craft. Drawing on his own background as a videogame designer, Bogost encourages professional thinkers to become makers as well, engineers who construct things as much as they think and write about them. (shrink)
- :Split and Splice: APhenomenology of Experimentation.Elizabeth Cavicchi -2024 -Isis 115 (1):213-214.
| 1 — 50 / 959 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-786669fdf6-qr742 uwo