The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance.Ernst Mayr -1982 - Harvard University Press.detailsExplores the development of the ideas of evolutionary biology, particularly as affected by the increasing understanding of genetics and of the chemical basis of inheritance.
Animal Species and Evolution.Ernst Mayr -1963 - Belknap of Harvard University Press.detailsComprehensive evaluation and study of man's theories and knowledge of genetical characteristics and the evolutionary processes.
Toward a new philosophy of biology: observations of an evolutionist.Ernst Mayr -1988 - Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.detailsProvides a philosophical analysis of such biological concepts as natural selection, adaptation, speciation, and evolution.
Populations, species and evolution: An abridgment of Animal species and evolution.Ernst Mayr -1970 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.detailsIn the Preface of Animal Species and Evolution (1963), I wrote that it was "an attempt to summarize and review critically what we know about the biology and genetics of animal species and their role in evolution." The result was a volume of XIV ...
What Evolution Is.Ernst Mayr -2001 - Phoenix.detailsProvides a thorough overview of historical and contemporary theories of evolution, discusses key concepts and terms, and argues that our understanding of evolution has changed the beliefs and values of modern humankind. Reprint. 30,000 first printing.
What makes biology unique?: considerations on the autonomy of a scientific discipline.Ernst Mayr -2004 - New York: Cambridge University Press.detailsThis collection of revised and new essays argues that biology is an autonomous science rather than a branch of the physical sciences. Ernst Mayr, widely considered the most eminent evolutionary biologist of the 20th century, offers insights on the history of evolutionary thought, critiques the conditions of philosophy to the science of biology, and comments on several of the major developments in evolutionary theory. Notably, Mayr explains that Darwin's theory of evolution is actually five separate theories, each with its own (...) history, trajectory and impact. Ernst Mayr, commonly referred to as the "Darwin of the 20th century" and listed as one of the top 100 scientists of all-time, is Professor Emeritus at Harvard University. What Makes Biology Unique is the 25th book he has written during his long and prolific career. His recent books include This is Biology: The Science of the Living World (Belknap Press, 1997) and What Evolution Is (Basic Books, 2002). (shrink)
Systematics and the origin of species from the viewpoint of a zoologist.Ernst Mayr -1942 - Columbia University Press.detailsWE HAVE LEARNED in the preceding chapter that a revolutionary change of the species concept is in the making, a change which not only affects taxonomic procedure, but which also contributes considerably toward a better understanding of ...
One long argument: Charles Darwin and the genesis of modern evolutionary thought.Ernst Mayr -1991 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.detailsThis is an important book for students, biologists, and general readers interested in the history of ideas--especially ideas that have radically altered our ...
What is a species, and what is not?Ernst Mayr -1996 -Philosophy of Science 63 (2):262-277.detailsI analyze a number of widespread misconceptions concerning species. The species category, defined by a concept, denotes the rank of a species taxon in the Linnaean hierarchy. Biological species are reproducing isolated from each other, which protects the integrity of their genotypes. Degree of morphological difference is not an appropriate species definition. Unequal rates of evolution of different characters and lack of information on the mating potential of isolated populations are the major difficulties in the demarcation of species taxa.
Footnotes on the philosophy of biology.Ernst Mayr -1969 -Philosophy of Science 36 (2):197-202.detailsNo other branch of the philosophy of science is as backward as the philosophy of biology. When physicists or philosophers “explain biology,” they not only tend to use wrong terminologies but they usually throw away that which is typically biological. This error is second only to the even worse one of adopting vitalistic interpretations. Vitalism is now dead, as far as biologists are concerned, and a biologist can now talk about the differences between the philosophy of physics and the philosophy (...) of biology without being suspected of being a concealed vitalist. (shrink)
The why and how of species.Ernst Mayr -1988 -Biology and Philosophy 3 (4):431-441.detailsThe biological species concept deals both with the meaning of the sexual species as a harmonious gene pool and with its protection against deleterious outbreeding (effected by isolating mechanisms). According to the Darwin-Muller-Mayr theory isolating mechanisms are acquired by incipient species during alloparty. Isolating mechanisms are not the result of ad hoc selection, but of a change of function of properties acquired during the preceding isolation of the incipient species. The role of behavioral properties (recognition) among the isolating mechanisms has (...) long been recognized and described by naturalists but was rejected as basis of a species definition for a number of valid reasons. (shrink)
Comments on David Hull's Paper on Exemplars and Type Specimens.Ernst Mayr -1982 -PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:504 - 511.detailsThe type in taxonomy is not meant to be a particularly typical specimen, but simply a reference specimen suited to serve as a 'name bearer' whenever doubt arises concerning the identity of a species. The minimum requirement is that the specimen reflects some differentiating characteristics of the species. In analogy, only such individuals should be made the type of an ideological system as adhere to the principal ideologies of that system. Only such an evolutionist could serve as type for Darwinism (...) who on the whole accepts gradual evolution and, as the major moving force in evolution, natural selection. It is very questionable whether the type-method would be of any use where highly heterogeneous, open, or rapidly evolving systems are involved. When the meaning of a system is changing it is less confusing to redefine it than to coin a new term for each change. (shrink)
What is Darwinism Today?Ernst Mayr -1984 -PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:145 - 156.detailsModern Darwinism is an elaboration of Darwin's original theories. The misunderstandings of the synthetic theory, on which recent attacks are based, are analyzed in detail. Six areas are described in which current theory modifies or amplifies Darwin's thinking. The rejection of an inheritance of acquired characters, the greater role assigned to chance in the production of genetic variability, the knowledge of the total separation of genotype and phenotype, and the clearer recognition of the role of the individual as target of (...) selection, are among the modern amplifications of the Darwinian theory. Remaining gaps in our understanding of evolution are specified. (shrink)
Reasons for the failure of theories.Ernst Mayr -1994 -Philosophy of Science 61 (4):529-533.detailsA theory may be invalid, not owing to erroneous observations or the invocation of an inappropriate law, but because of the use of equivocal terms. This is demonstrated for Darwin's failed model of sympatric speciation through the principle of divergence.
Systems of ordering data.Ernst Mayr -1995 -Biology and Philosophy 10 (4):419-434.detailsFour ordering systems have been used most frequently in taxonomy: (1) special purpose classifications, (2) downward classifications (identification schemes), (3) upward or grouping classifications (traditional), and (4) Hennigian phylogenetic systems. The special properties of these four systems are critically evaluated. Grouping classifications and phylogenetic systems have very different objectives: the former the documentation of similarity and closeness of relationship, the latter of phylogeny. Both are legitimate ordering systems.