Works by Edwin Curley
81 found
Order:
1 filter applied
DisambiguationsDisambiguations:
| Edwin Curley [49] | Edwin M. Curley [38] | Edwin Munson Curley [1] |
- Behind the Geometrical Method: A Reading of Spinoza's Ethics.Edwin Curley -1988 - Princeton University Press.This book is the fruit of twenty-five years of study of Spinoza by the editor and translator of a new and widely acclaimed edition of Spinoza's collected works.
- Spinoza's Metaphysics: An Essay in Interpretation.Edwin M. Curley -1969 - Cambridge,: Harvard University Press.
- Descartes Against the Skeptics.Edwin M. Curley -1978 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- The Collected Works of Spinoza.The Ethics and Selected Letters.Edwin Curley,Baruch Spinoza,Samuel Shirley &Seymour Feldman -1987 -Philosophical Review 96 (2):306-311.
- (1 other version)Spinoza's Metaphysics: An Essay in Interpretation.Edwin M. Curley -1969 -Philosophy 45 (174):342-343.
- Experience in Spinoza's Theory of Knowledge.Edwin Curley -1978 - In Marjorie Grene,Spinoza: a collection of critical essays. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press. pp. 25-59.
- (1 other version)Behind the Geometrical Method. A Reading of Spinoza's „Ethics”.Edwin Curley -1989 -Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 51 (4):710-711.
- (1 other version)Spinoza's necessitarianism reconsidered.Edwin Curley &Gregory Walski -1999 - In Gennaro Rocco & Huenemann Charles,New Essays on the Rationalists. Oxford University Press. pp. 241--62.
- Descartes, Spinoza, and the Ethics of Belief.Edwin Curley -1975 - In Eugene Freeman,Spinoza: essays in interpretation. La Salle, Ill.,: Open Court. pp. 159-189.
- Spinoza: Issues and Directions.Edwin M. Curley &Pierre-François Moreau (eds.) -1990 - New York: Brill.The proceedings of the first major international conference on the philosophy of Spinoza to be held in the United States are published here. Contained are papers on all aspects of Spinoza's thought by 31 distinguished scholars from the United States, Europe, Israel and Australia including Jonathan Bennett, Alan Donagan, Margaret Wilson, Amélie Rorty, Richard Popkin, Jean-Marie Beyssade, Alexandre Matheron, Étienne Balibar, Pierre Macherey, Emilia Giancotti, Hubertus Hubbeling, and Yirmiyahu Yovel.Topics discussed are Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Mind, Psychology, Moral, Political (...) and Social Philosophy, and Spinoza's influence. (shrink)No categories
- Hobbes and the cause of religious toleration.Edwin Curley -unknown
- On Bennett's Spinoza: The Issue of Teleology.Edwin Curley -1990 - In Edwin M. Curley & Pierre-François Moreau,Spinoza: Issues and Directions. New York: Brill. pp. 39-52.
- Calvin and Hobbes, or Hobbes as an orthodox Christian.Edwin Curley -1996 -Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (2):257-271.Notes and Discussions Calvin and Hobbes, or, Hobbes as an Orthodox Christian Three years ago, in the proceedings of an Italian conference on Hobbes and Spinoza, I published an article arguing that Hobbes was at best a deist, and most likely an atheist? In a recent book on Hobbes, A. P. Martinich devoted an appendix to criticizing that article, as part of his case that Hobbes is not merely a theist, but an orthodox Christian, and specifically, that he had "a (...) strong commitment" to the Calvinist branch of the Church of England.' It has been suggested that I respond to Martinich's rebuttal, and I think I should. Martinich's work is arguably the best available book of its kind.3 Pursuing the issues this book raises may help us to see why it is worth our while to be curious about the differences between the English text of Leviathan, first published in 165 x, and the Latin text of that work, first published in 1668. This is a topic generally ignored in English-language discussions of Hobbes and one in which I have a special interest.4 The great virtue of Martinich's book is that he is very precise about what his thesis See '"I Durst Not Write So Boldly' or, How to Read Hobbes' Theological-Political Treatise," in Hobbes e Spinoza, Atti del Convegno Internazionale, Urbino, i4-~ 7 ottobre, 1988 , ed. by Daniela Bostrenghi, intro, by Emilia Giancotti . By 'deist' I understand someone who believes in a personal God, but rejects divine.. (shrink)
- (2 other versions)Descartes Against the Skeptics.Edwin Curley -1978 -Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 171 (3):350-351.
- (1 other version)The State of Nature and Its Law in Hobbes and Spinoza.Edwin Curley -1991 -Philosophical Topics 19 (1):97-117.
- Dialogues with the dead.Edwin Curley -1986 -Synthese 67 (1):33 - 49.Serious work in history of philosophy requires doing something very difficult: conducting a hypothetical dialogue with dead philosophers. Is it worth devoting to it the time and energy required to do it well? Yes. Quite apart from the intrinsic interest of understanding the past, making progress toward solving philosophical problems requires a good grasp of the range of possible solutions to those problems and of the arguments which motivate alternative positions, a grasp we can only have if we understand well (...) philosophy's past. Philosophers who concentrate too much on the present are apt to assume too simple a view of alternative theories and of important philosophical arguments. Ryle and Austin offer instructive examples of how it is possible to go wrong by ignoring or misrepresenting historical figures. (shrink)No categories
- Hobbes versus Descartes.Edwin Curley -1995 - In Roger Ariew & Marjorie Grene,Descartes and His Contemporaries: Meditations, Objections, and Replies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- The Cogito and the Foundations of Knowledge.Edwin Curley -2006 - In Stephen Gaukroger,The Blackwell Guide to Descartes' Meditations. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 30–47.
- 'I Durst Not Write So Boldly,' or How to Read Hobbes' Theological-Political Treatise.Edwin Curley -unknown
- (1 other version)Certainty: Psychological, Moral, and Metaphysical.Edwin Curley -1993 - In Stephen Voss,Essays on the philosophy and science of René Descartes. New York: Oxford University Press.This chapter examines Peter Markie's book, “Descartes Gambit,” Edwin Curley's work titled “Descartes Against the Skeptics” and the exchange of criticisms between the two works. The “gambit” Markie refers to in his title is Descartes' attempt to deduce a metaphysical theory of the self from premises about his knowledge of himself. The epistemological premises are that “I am certain that I think”, that “I am certain that I exist”, and that “I am uncertain that I have a body.” The metaphysical (...) theory of the self derived from these premises is, roughly, that I am a thinking, nonextended substance capable of existing apart from its body. Markie maintains that Descartes himself held that these metaphysical conclusions could be deduced from these epistemological premises without establishing God's existence and veracity. The point of contention between the two works is on the definition and relationship of three species of Cartesian certainty— psychological, moral, and metaphysical. (shrink)No categories
- Spinoza and the Science of Hermeneutics.Edwin Curley -unknownNo categories
- Reflections on Hobbes: Recent Work on his Moral and Political Philosophy.Edwin Curley -1990 -Journal of Philosophical Research 15:169-226.In this article I attempt to survey work on Hobbes within the period from 1975 to 1989. The text is restricted almost exclusively to work in English on topics in moral and political philosophy. The bibliography is more comprehensive, including work on other aspects of Hobbes’ philosophy and work written in a variety of other languages.The central questions on which the text focuses are these: what psychological assumptions underlie Hobbes’ moral and political conclusions? in particular, what roles do egoism, the (...) striving for self-preservation, and the desire for glory play in his system? to what extent is Hobbes committcd to the claim that the state of nature is a war or all against all? does that war stem from human rationality or from human irrationality? does Hobbes view morality as entirely a human invention, a creation of the state? if people had the psychology Hobbes assumes in justifying the institution of a sovereign, would they be able to institute one? to what extent does Hobbes regard rebellion as justifiable?I devote an attention some people may find excessive to recent works by Greg Kavka and Jean Hampton. I share Gautier’s view that they will prove landmarks in Hobbes scholarship. But I do try also to pay attention to other interesting work by authors like Richard Tuck, Tom Sorell, and David Johnston, and I have many criticisms to make of Kavka and Hampton. (shrink)
- Spinoza on truth.Edwin Curley -1994 -Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72 (1):1 – 16.
- Leviathan: With Selected Variants From the Latin Edition of 1668.Edwin Curley (ed.) -1994 - Hackett Publishing Company.Designed to meet the needs of both student and scholar, this edition of _Leviathan_ offers a brilliant introduction by Edwin Curley, modernized spelling and punctuation of the text, and the inclusion, along with historical and interpretive notes, of the most significant variants between the English version of 1651 and the Latin version of 1668. A glossary of seventeenth-century English terms, and indexes of persons, subjects, and scriptural passages help make this the most thoughtfully conceived edition of _Leviathan_ available.No categories
- Spinoza's Geometric Method.Edwin M. Curley -1986 -Studia Spinozana: An International and Interdisciplinary Series 2:151.
- Descartes on the Mind-Body Union: A Different Kind of Dualism.Minna Koivuniemi &Edwin Curley -2016 -Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 7:83-122.https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/156056/1/Mind-Body Union.pdf.
- Homo audax. Leibniz, Oldenburg and the TTP.Edwin Curley -1990 -Studia Leibnitiana 27:277-312.No categories
- Resurrecting Leo Strauss.Edwin Curley -2015 - In Winfried Schröder,Reading Between the Lines - Leo Strauss and the History of Early Modern Philosophy. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 129-170.
- Spinoza's metaphysics revisited.Edwin Curley -2019 - In Jack Stetter & Charles Ramond,Spinoza in Twenty-First-Century American and French Philosophy: Metaphysics, Philosophy of Mind, Moral and Political Philosophy. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
- Bibliographical Note.Edwin M. Curley -1978 - InDescartes Against the Skeptics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Recent Work on 17th Century Continental Philosophy.Edwin Curley -1974 -American Philosophical Quarterly 11 (4):235 - 255.This article surveys work on descartes, Spinoza, Malebranche, And leibniz, Between 1960 and 1972, With particular attention to hintikka, Frankfurt, Kenny, Gueroult, Robinet, Rescher, Parkinson, Ishiguro, And mates. It is accompanied by an extensive bibliography.
- The Immortality of the Soul in Descartes and Spinoza.Edwin M. Curley -2001 -Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75 (27-41):27-41.In this paper, I examine the thought of Descartes and Spinoza regarding the immortality of the soul. I conclude that Descartes’s argument(s) for the immortality of the soul—or at least the argument(s) that one can construct based on Descartes’s texts—are disappointing, and that Spinoza’s thought on the soul and its relation to the body leaves little room for the traditional doctrine of personal immortality.
- Le corps et l'esprit : du "Court Traité" à l'"Éthique".Edwin Curley -1988 -Archives de Philosophie 51 (1):5.
- Religion and morality in Hobbes.Edwin Curley -1998 - In Jules L. Coleman & Christopher W. Morris,Rational Commitment and Social Justice: Essays for Gregory Kavka. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 90--111.
- Castellio vs. Spinoza on Religious Toleration.Edwin Curley -2000 -The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 7:89-110.The central thesis of Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise is that the state not only can permit freedom of philosophizing without endangering piety or the public peace, but that it must do so if it is not to destroy piety and the public peace. Spinoza’s argument is not limited to religious toleration, but is an argument for freedom of philosophizing generally. Nevertheless, freedom of philosophizing in religion is the central case. In making such an argument, he contributed greatly toward the transformation of (...) Western culture with respect to toleration and religious liberty. As an historian, I want to understand how this transformation came about and what role Spinoza played in it. As a philosopher, I also want to know whether any of the arguments philosophers made in favor of religious toleration deserved to be effective in bringing about this transformation. (shrink)
- From Locke's letter to Montesquieu's lettres.Edwin Curley -2002 -Midwest Studies in Philosophy 26 (1):280–306.
- Notes.Edwin M. Curley -1969 - InSpinoza's Metaphysics: An Essay in Interpretation. Cambridge,: Harvard University Press. pp. 161-172.No categories
- The Covenant with God in Hobbes's Leviathan.Edwin Curley -2004 - In Tom Sorell & Luc Foisneau,Leviathan after 350 years. New York: Oxford University Press.
- The Incoherence of Christian Theism.Edwin Curley -2003 -The Harvard Review of Philosophy 11 (1):74-100.InThe God of the Philosophers Anthony Kenny argues that the concept of God which has dominated Christian philosophical theology is incoherent. I don’t think he shows that it is incoherent, but he certainly raises a question worthy of our curiosity: is it in fact possible to demonstrate that this concept involves a contradiction?
- Locke on Religious Toleration.Edwin Curley -2022 -Roczniki Filozoficzne 70 (4):167-191.The paper analyses and criticizes Locke’s arguments for religious toleration presented in his Letter concerning Toleration. The author argues that the epistemology Locke developed in his Essay concerning Human Understanding made a more constructive contribution to the case for toleration.
- Cavell and the Comedy of Remarriage.Edwin Curley -1988 -Philosophy Research Archives 14:581-603.This paper deals critically with Stanley Cavell’s Pursuits of Happiness, a study of seven film comedies from the 30’s and 40’s, among them The Philadelphia Story, His Girl Friday, Adam’s Rib, and It Happened One Night. Negatively, I argue that Cavell’s interpretations of the films he deals with are often extravagant, if held to any objective standard; that his conception of the genre of the comedy of remarriage is highly arbitrary, both in its inclusions and exclusions, and in its contention (...) that the genre does not have a history; and that the philosophy of marriage implicit in Cavell’s criticism is unsatisfactory in implying the illegitimacy of most existing marriages. Positively, I support his contentions that the genre has its roots in Shakespearean comedy and that the films often (sometimes quite consciously) raise the very difficult philosophical questions Cavell takes them to raise. Though I find much to disagree with, I contend that Cavell is writing criticism of the highest order. (shrink)
- 6. Spinoza’s Biblical Scholarship.Edwin Curley -2014 - In Otfried Höffe,Spinoza: Theologisch-Politischer Traktat. [Berlin]: De Gruyter. pp. 109-126.
- A correspondência entre Lambert van Velthuysen e Espinosa.Edwin M. Curley -2000 -Discurso 31:11-44.A análise da correspondência entre Espinosa e L. van Velthuysen pode ser bastante útil para aperfeiçoar nossa compreensão do Tractatus theologico-politicus e da filosofia de Espinosa em geral. Em sua correspondência, Espinosa é freqüentemente evasivo e lento para ver (ou, ao menos, para reconhecer) um ponto. É uma questão interessante como deveríamos dar conta destas deficiências em suas respostas, e sua correspondência com Velthuysen seria uma boa oportunidade para provar a perspectiva de Bennett. O artigo está dividido em três partes: (...) 1) Velthuysen antes de Espinosa e o contexto de suas críticas; 2) um exame das Cartas 42 e 43; e 3) o debate em torno do deísmo e do ateísmo. (shrink)
- A Good Man Is Hard to Find.Edwin Curley -1991 -Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 65 (3):29 - 45.
- Analysis in the Meditations: The quest for clear and distinct ideas.Edwin M. Curley -1986 - In[no title]. pp. 153-76.No categories
- 8. Body.Edwin M. Curley -1978 - InDescartes Against the Skeptics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. pp. 207-234.
- Bibliography.Edwin Curley -1990 -Journal of Philosophical Research 15:227-250.No categories
- Contents.Edwin M. Curley -1978 - InDescartes Against the Skeptics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- 3. Dreaming.Edwin M. Curley -1978 - InDescartes Against the Skeptics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. pp. 46-69.
- Descartes.Edwin Curley -2010 - Routledge.René Descartes (1596-1650) is well-known for his introspective turn away from sensible bodies and toward non-sensory ideas of mind, body, and God. Such a turn is appropriate, Descartes supposes, but only once in the course of life, and only to arrive at a more accurate picture of reality that we then incorporate in everyday embodied life. In this clear and engaging book David Cunning introduces and examines the full range of Descartes' philosophy. A central focus of the book is Descartes' (...) view that embodied human beings become more perfect to the degree that they move in the direction of finite approximations of independence, activity, immutability, and increased knowledge. Beginning with an introduction and a chapter on Descartes' life and works, Cunning also addresses the following key topics: Descartes on the wonders of the material universe skepticism as epistemic garbage, and the easy dissolution of hyperbolic doubt Descartes' three arguments for the existence of God the ontology of possibility and necessity freedom and embodiment arguments for the immateriality of mind sensible bodies and the pragmatic certainty by which to navigate them Descartes' stoic view on how best to live. Descartes is an outstanding introduction to one of the greatest of Western philosophers. Including a chronology, suggestions for further reading, and a glossary of key terms, it is essential reading for anyone studying Descartes and the history of modern philosophy. (shrink)
| 1 — 50 / 81 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5b9ff6f457-db4gm uwo