Works by E. H. Gombrich
52 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- The Story of Art.E. H. Gombrich -1951 -Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 9 (4):339-340.
- Illusion in Nature and Art.R. L. Gregory &E. H. Gombrich -1975 -Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 34 (2):213-215.
- Art, perception and reality.E. H. Gombrich,J. Hochberg & Black -1975 -Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 165 (4):487-488.
- Moment and movement in art.E. H. Gombrich -1964 -Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 27 (1):293-306.
- The Sense of Order.E. H. Gombrich -1980 -Journal of Philosophy 77 (3):179-181.
- Concerning 'The Science of Art': Commentary on Ramachandran and Hirstein.E. H. Gombrich -2000 -Journal of Consciousness Studies 7 (8-9):8-9.To the historian of art, it is evident that the two authors’ notion of ‘art’ is of very recent date, and not shared by everybody. They claim: ‘The purpose of art, surely, is not merely to depict or represent reality -- for that can be accomplished very easily with a camera -- but to enhance, transcend, or even to distort reality’ . They do not explain how one could photograph Paradise or Hell, the Creation of the World, the Passion of (...) Christ, or the escapades of the ancient gods -- all subjects that can be found represented in our museums. Nor is it more legitimate to generalize from certain Indian conventions of representing the female nude than it is for the academic tradition to take the Venus de Medici for the same purpose. Even a fleeting visit to one of the great museums might serve to convince the authors that few of the exhibits conform to the laws of art they postulate. [followed by response from V.S. Ramachandran]. (shrink)
- Icones symbolicae: The visual image in neo-platonic thought.E. H. Gombrich -1948 -Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 11 (1):163-192.
- The Preference for the Primitive: Episodes in the History of Western Taste and Art.E. H. Gombrich -2002 - Phaidon.Professor Gombrich's last book and first narrative work in over 20 years.
- Shadows and EnlightenmentShadows: The Depiction of Cast Shadows in Western Art.David Carrier,Michael Baxandall &E. H. Gombrich -1996 -Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 54 (2):200.
- Representation and Misrepresentation.E. H. Gombrich -1984 -Critical Inquiry 11 (2):195.It is a thankless task to have to reply to Professor Murray Krieger’s “Retrospective.” Qui s’excuse, s’accuse, and since I cannot ask my readers to embark on their own retrospective of my writings and test them for consistency, I have little chance of restoring my reputation in their eyes. Hence I would have been happier to leave Professor Krieger to his agonizing, if he did not present himself the “spokesman” for a significant body of theorists who appear to have acclaimed (...) my book on Art and Illusion without ever having read it. The followers of this school of criticism—of which Professor Krieger is a prominent member—had apparently convinced themselves that the book lent support to an aesthetics in which the notions of reality and of nature had no place. They thought that I had subverted the old idea of mimesis and that all that remained were different systems of conventional signs which were made to stand for an unknowable reality. True, professor Krieger admits that I never endorsed such an interpretation of my views, and he even concedes that there are passages in Art and Illusion which contradict such an out-and-out relativism, but he wants to convince his readers that these contradictions lead precisely to the ambiguities he now proposes to analyse.If he were right that the book encourages such a misreading, all I could do would be to express my regrets for having failed to make myself sufficiently clear. Luckily I can draw comfort from the fact that unlike these literary critics, the leading archaeologist of this country, Professor Stuart Piggott, had no difficulty at all in discerning my meaning and profiting from my arguments. In his Walter Neurath Memorial Lecture of 1978, entitled Antiquity Depicted: Aspects of Archaeological Illustration, the author did me the honour of taking a statement from my book as his starting point. It is the passage at the end of part I in which I recapitulate the content of the first two chapters:What matters to us is that the correct portrait, like the useful map, is an end product on a long road through schema and correction. It is not a faithful record of a visual experience but the faithful construction of a relational mode.Neither the subjectivity of vision nor the sway of conventions need lead us to deny that such a model can be constructed to any required degree of accuracy. What is decisive here is clearly the word “required.” The form of a representation cannot be divorced from its purpose and the requirements of the society in which the given visual language gains currency.1 1. E. H. Gombrich, Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation, A. W. Mellon Lectures in the Fine Arts, 1956 , p. 90. E. H. Gombrich was director of the Warburg Institute and Professor of the History of the Classical Tradition at the University of London from 1959 to 1976. His many influential works include The Story of Art, Art and Illusion, Meditations on a Hobby Horse, The Sense of Order, Ideals and Idols, The Image and the Eye, and, most recently, Tributes. His previous contributions to Critical Inquiry include “The Museum: Past, Present and Future and “Standards of Truth: The Arrested Image and the Moving Eye”. (shrink)
- "They Were All Human Beings: So Much Is Plain": Reflections on Cultural Relativism in the Humanities.E. H. Gombrich -1987 -Critical Inquiry 13 (4):686-699.In the fourth section of Goethe’s Zahme Xenien we find the quatrain from which I have taken the theme of such an old and new controversy, which, as I hope, concerns both Germanic studies and the other humanities: “What was it that kept you from us so apart?” I always read Plutarch again and again. “And what was the lesson he did impart?” “They were all human beings—so much is plain.”1 In the very years when Goethe wrote these lines, that (...) is in the 1820s, Hegel repeatedly gave his lectures on the philosophy of history. Right at the beginning he formulated the opposite view which I should like briefly to characterize as “cultural relativism.”Every age has such peculiar circumstances, such individual conditions that it must be interpreted, and can only be interpreted, by reference to itself…. Nothing is shallower in this respect than the frequent appeal to Greek and Roman example which so often occurred among the French at the time of their Revolution. Nothing could be more different than the nature of these peoples and the nature of our own times.2 What is at issue here is not, of course, Hegel’s assertion that ages and peoples differ from each other. We all know that, and Goethe, the attentive reader and traveler, also knew, for instance, that the Roman carnival differed in its character from the celebrations of the Feast of Saint Rochus at Bingen, both of which he had described so lovingly. What makes the cultural historian into a cultural relativist is only the conclusion which we saw Hegel draw, that cultures and styles of life are not only different but wholly incommensurable, in other words that it is absurd to compare the peoples of a region or an age with human beings of other zones because there is no common denominator that would justify us in doing so. 1. ‘Was hat dich nun von uns entfernt?’ Hab immer den Plutarch gelesen. ‘Was has du den dabei gelernt?’ Sind eben alles Menschen gewesen.’ Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Sämtlich Werke. Jubiläums-ausgabe in 40 Bänden 4:73; with commentary.2. See Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Vorselungen über die Philosophie der Geschichte, Werke, 20 vols. , 12:17. E. H. Gombrich was director of the Warburg Institute and Professor of the History of the Classical Tradition at the University of London from 1959 to 1976. His many influential works include The Story of Art, Art and Illusion, Meditations on a Hobby Horse, The Sense of Order, Ideals and Idols, The Image and the Eye, Tributes, Aby Warburg, and New Light on Old Masters. His previous contributions to Critical Inquiry include “The Museum: Past, Present and Future” , “Standards of Truth: The Arrested Image and the Moving Eye” , and “Representation and Misrepresentation”. (shrink)
- Botticelli's mythologies: A study in the neoplatonic symbolism of his circle.E. H. Gombrich -1945 -Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 8 (1):7-60.
- Standards of Truth: The Arrested Image and the Moving Eye.E. H. Gombrich -1980 -Critical Inquiry 7 (2):237-273.I have stressed here and elsewhere that perspective cannot and need not claim to represent the world "as we see it." The perceptual constancies which make us underrate the degree of objective diminutions with distance, it turns out, constitute only one of the factors refuting this claim. The selectivity of vision can now be seen to be another. There are many ways of "seeing the world," but obviously the claim would have to relate to the "snapshot vision" of the stationary (...) single eye. To ask, as it has so often been asked, whether this eye sees the world in the form of a hollow sphere or of a projection plane makes little sense, for it sees neither. The one point in focus can hardly be said to be either curved or flat, and the remainder of the field of vision is too indistinct to permit a decision. True, we can shift the point of focus at will, but in doing so we lose the previous perception, and all that remains is its memory. Can we, and do we, compare the exact extension of these changing percepts in scanning a row of columns extended at right angles from the central line of vision—to mention the most recalcitrant of the posers of perspectival theory?1 I very much doubt it. The question refers to the convenient choice of projection planes, not to the experience of vision.· 1. I now prefer this formulation to my somewhat laboured discussion in Art and Illusion, chap. 8, sec. 4.E.H. Gombrich was director of the Warburg Institute and Professor of the History of the Classical Tradition at the University of London from 1959 to 1976. His many influential works include The Story of Art, Art and Illusion, Meditations on a Hobby Horse, The Sense of Order, and Ideals and Idols. An early version of "Standards of Truth" was presented at Swarthmore College in October 1976 at a symposium to mark the retirement of Professor Hans Wallach. His contributions to Critical Inquiry include "The Museum: Past, Present, and Future" , "Notes and Exchanges" , and, with Quentin Bell, "Canons and Values in the Visual Arts: A Correspondence". (shrink)
- The Museum: Past, Present and Future.E. H. Gombrich -1977 -Critical Inquiry 3 (3):449-470.I hope you will agree, however, that the purpose of the museum should ultimately be to teach the difference between pencils and works of art. What I have called the shrine was set up and visited by people who thought that they knew this difference. You approached the exhibits with an almost religious awe, an awe which certainly was sometimes misplaced but which secured concentration. Our egalitarian age wants to take the awe out of the museum. It should be a (...) friendly place, welcoming to everyone. Of course it should be. Nobody should feel afraid to enter it or for that matter be kept away by his inability to pay. But as far as I can see the real psychological problem here is how to lift the burden of fear, which is the fear of the outsider who feels he does not belong, without also killing what for want of a better word I must still call respect. Such respect seems to me inseparable from the thrill of genuine admiration which belongs to our enjoyment of art. This admiration is a precious heritage which is in danger of being killed with kindness. E. H. Gombrich was director of the Warburg Institute and Professor of the History of the Classical Tradition at the University of London from 1959 to 1976. His books include The Story of Art, Art and Illusion, Meditations on a Hobby Horse, Norm and Form, Symbolic Images, The Heritage of Apelles, and In Search of Cultural History. He became a Fellow of the British Academy in 1960, a Commander of the British Empire in 1966, and was knighted in 1972. He is also a trustee of the British Museum and a foreign member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and of the American Philosophical Society. His contributions to Critical Inquiry include "Notes and Exchanges", "Standards of Truth: The Arrested Image and the Moving Eye", and, with Quentin Bell, "Canons and Values in the Visual Arts: A Correspondence". (shrink)
- Archaeologists or pharisees? Reflections on a painting by Maarten Van heemskerck.E. H. Gombrich -1991 -Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 54 (1):253-256.
- Additional thoughts on perspective.E. H. Gombrich -1993 -Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 51 (1):69.
- An early seventeenth-century canon of artistic excellence: Pierleone Casella's elogia illustrium artificum of 1606.E. H. Gombrich -1987 -Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 50 (1):224-232.
- Truth and Stereotype: An Illusion Theory of Representation.E. H. Gombrich -1992 - In Philip Alperson,The Philosophy of the visual arts. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 72--87.Export citation
Bookmark - Bosch's "garden of earthly delights": A progress report.E. H. Gombrich -1969 -Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 32 (1):162-170.
- Beroaldus on Francia.Michael Baxandall &E. H. Gombrich -1962 -Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 25 (1/2):113-115.
- Notes and Exchanges.Quentin Bell,E. H. Gombrich &James S. Ackerman -1979 -Critical Inquiry 5 (4):793-799.
- Art and Scholarship.E. H. Gombrich -1957
- A classical 'rake's progress'.E. H. Gombrich -1952 -Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 15 (3/4):254-256.
- A classical topos in the introduction to Alberti's Della pittura.E. H. Gombrich -1957 -Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 20 (1/2):173.
- Apollonio di Giovanni: A florentine cassone workshop seen through the eyes of a humanist poet.E. H. Gombrich -1955 -Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 18 (1/2):16-34.
- An interpretation of mantegna's 'parnassus'.E. H. Gombrich -1963 -Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 26 (1/2):196-198.
- A Little History of the World.E. H. Gombrich &Clifford Harper -2008 - Yale University Press.E. H. Gombrich’s bestselling history of the world for young readers tells the story of mankind from the Stone Age to the atomic bomb, focusing not on small detail but on the sweep of human experience, the extent of human achievement, and the depth of its frailty. The product of a generous and humane sensibility, this timeless account makes intelligible the full span of human history. In forty concise chapters, Gombrich tells the story of man from the stone age to (...) the atomic bomb. In between emerges a colorful picture of wars and conquests, grand works of art, and the spread and limitations of science. This is a text dominated not by dates and facts, but by the sweep of mankind’s experience across the centuries, a guide to humanity’s achievements and an acute witness to its frailties. (shrink)
- Aby warburg: His aims and methods: An anniversary lecture.E. H. Gombrich -1999 -Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 62 (1):268-282.
- Blurred images and the unvarnished truth.E. H. Gombrich -1962 -British Journal of Aesthetics 2 (2):170-179.
- Caricature.E. H. Gombrich &E. Kris -1942 -Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 2 (6):76-77.
- Canons and Values in the Visual Arts: A Correspondence.E. H. Gombrich &Quentin Bell -1976 -Critical Inquiry 2 (3):395-410.[E.H. Gombrich wrote on May 13, 1975:] . . . I recently was invited to talk about "Art" at the Institution for Education of our University. There was a well-intentioned teacher there who put forward the view that we had no right whatever to influence the likes and dislikes of our pupils because every generation had a different outlook and we could not possibly tell what theirs would be. It is the same extreme relativism, which has invaded our art schools (...) and resulted in the doctrine that art could not possibly be taught because only what has been done already can be taught, and since art is creativity it is not possible to teach it. Q.E.D.—I recently asked my history finalists what "Quod erat demonstrandum" means and they did not know. . . . [Quentin Bell responded on May 15, 1975:] . . . Your teacher at the Institute, is he really a relativist? Isn't he a kind of religious zealot? I used to teach school children. With me there was a much better teacher . One day she came into the room where I had been teaching and found a series of the most surprising and beautiful water colours. "What are these?" said she. I explained that they were copies of Raphael made by eleven and twelve year old children. I would have gone on to explain how interested I was by their resemblance, not to Raphael but rather to Simone Martini, for they had all the shapes beautifully right but none of the internal drawing or the sentiment, but I was checked by her look of horror. "You've made them copy from Raphael?" she said. Her expression was exactly that of someone who had been casually informed that that I had committed a series of indecent assaults upon the brats. And in fact in subsequent conversation it appeared that this was very nearly what she did feel. For her, what she called "self expression" was as precious as virginity. E.H. Gombrich was director of the Warburg Institute and Professor of the History of the Classical Tradition at the University of London from 1959 to 1976. His books include The Story of Art, Art and Illusion, Meditations on a Hobby Horse, Norm and Form, Symbolic Images, The Heritage of Apelles, and In Search of Cultural History. He became a Fellow of the British Academy in 1960, a Commander of the British Empire in 1966, and was knighted in 1972. He is also a trustee of the British Museum and a foreign member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and of the American Philosophical Society. His contributions to Critical Inquiry include "Notes and Exchanges" ,"Standards of Truth: The Arrested Image and the Moving Eye" , and, with Quentin Bell, "Canons and Values in the Visual Arts: A Correspondence" . Quentin Bell is professor of the history and theory of art, Sussex University. He has written Virginia Woolf: A Biography, Of Human Finery, Ruskin, Victorian Artists and Bloomsbury. Other contributions to Critical Inquiry are "The Art Critic and the Art Historian" , "Notes and Exchanges" , and "Bloomsbury and 'the Vulgar Passions'". (shrink)
- Così Fan tutte (procris included).E. H. Gombrich -1954 -Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 17 (3/4):372-374.
- Evolution in the arts.E. H. Gombrich -1964 -British Journal of Aesthetics 4 (3):263-270.
- In Memory of George Boas.E. H. Gombrich -1981 -Journal of the History of Ideas 42 (2):335.Export citation Bookmark
- Kunsthistorie og samfundsvidenskab.E. H. Gombrich,Else Mogensen &Lars Aagaard-Mogensen -1979 -Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 37 (3):360-360.
- Norma e forma.E. H. Gombrich -1963 - Torino,: Edizioni di "Filosofia".Neste livro Gombrich discute as idéias e as posturas específicas que tiveram influência decisiva na prática da arte renascentista. Todos os estudos aqui reunidos tratam de algo a que se pode chamar clima renascentista de opiniões sobre a arte, além da influência desse clima sobre a prática e a crítica da arte.
- (1 other version)Personal recollections of the publication of the Open society'.E. H. Gombrich -1994 - In Karl R. Popper,The open society and its enemies: one-volume edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Renaissance and golden age.E. H. Gombrich -1961 -Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 24 (3/4):306-309.
- Symposium: Art and the Language of the Emotions.E. H. Gombrich &Ruth Saw -1962 -Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 36 (1):215 - 246.
- The debate on primitivism in ancient rhetoric.E. H. Gombrich -1966 -Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 29 (1):24-38.
- The earliest description of Bosch's garden of delight.E. H. Gombrich -1967 -Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 30 (1):403-406.
- The Essential Gombrich.E. H. Gombrich &Richard Woodfield -1996 - Phaidon Press.An accessible selection of Professor Gombrich's best and most characteristic writing.
- The Heritage of Apelles.E. H. Gombrich -1977 -Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 35 (3):378-379.
- Topics of Our Time: Comments on Twentieth-Century Issues in Learning and in Art.E. H. Gombrich -1994 -Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 52 (2):247-249.
- The repentance of judas in Piero Della Francesca's 'flagellation of Christ'.E. H. Gombrich -1959 -Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 22 (1/2):172.
- The Sala Dei venti in the Palazzo Del te.E. H. Gombrich -1950 -Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 13 (3/4):189-201.
- Vasari's lives and cicero's brutus.E. H. Gombrich -1960 -Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 23 (3/4):309-311.
- Art as Image and IdeaThe Story of Art.Ernest Mundt,Edmund Burke Feldman &E. H. Gombrich -1968 -Journal of Aesthetic Education 2 (4):142.
- Sight and Insight: Essays On Art and Culture in Honour of E.H. Gombrich At 85.John Onians &E. H. Gombrich -1994 - Phaidon Press.A collection of essays written in affectionate tribute to Gombrich.No categories
- Art, Perception, and Reality. [REVIEW]A. F. W.,J. Hochberg &E. H. Gombrich -1973 -Review of Metaphysics 26 (3):525-526.This book contains three essays: "The Mask and the Face: The Perception of Physiognomic Likeness in Life and Art" by Gombrich, the renowned art historian and critic; "The Representation of Things and People" by psychologist, Julian Hochberg; and "How Do Pictures Represent" by philosopher, Max Black. The book is based upon lectures delivered in the Johns Hopkins 1970 Thalheimer Lectures, where, taking off from the question "how there can be an underlying identity in the manifold and changing facial expression of (...) a single individual," there is an interdisciplinary attempt at clarifying the problem of representation. Gombrich’s central thesis is that the key to artistic representation is empathy and projection, which is guided by the interlocking display of the permanent and mobile features of the object represented. Perceptual activity and empathy rely more on the muscular imitation than on passive visual reception. He holds that what is singled out as the likeness-factor uniting the permanent and mobile features in, for example, the photograph of the four-year old Lord Russell and such factors in the ninety-year old Russell is the "general tonus, the melody of transition from given ranges of relaxations to forms of tenseness." Hochberg’s essay spells out the position that perception is purposive behavior, wherein the purpose is the information sought and behavior is the "succession of glances in different directions." Holding that perceptual activity is grounded in expectations, he lays aside Gombrich’s muscularity-thesis in favor of a learned expectation of feature characteristics. Black’s essay is a conceptual analysis of "depiction," or more precisely, of "P displays a subject S if and only if R, where R ‘will constitute the necessary and sufficient condition for P displaying S'." The essay, which proceeds in a Wittgensteinian Investigations-type fashion ends where the reader would hope it begin. He concludes that the problem can only be adequately answered by moving from logical investigation to the world of the artisan and art lover. To arrive at this conclusion he debunks six candidates that claim to meet the depiction conditions: causal history, selective information, intention, mimesis, resemblance, and "looking-like." At best, depiction may be considered a "cluster" concept of all six. Further determination, he holds, requires knowledge of the purpose of a particular depiction, and this takes us out of logic and into art; and so Black stops, unfortunately.—W. A. F. (shrink)
| 1 — 50 / 52 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-bbztg uwo