Results for 'Diane M. Korngiebel'
980 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- Digital Health Care Disparities.Diane M.Korngiebel -2021 -Hastings Center Report 51 (1):inside_front_cover-inside_front_.Digital health includes applications for smartphones and smart speakers as well as more traditional ways to access health information electronically, such as through your health care provider's online web‐based patient portal. As the number of digital health offerings—such as smartphone health trackers and web‐based patient portals—grows, what benefit do ethics, or bioethics, perspectives bring to digital health product development? For starters, the field of bioethics is concerned about issues of social justice, including equitable benefit and minimization and fair distribution of (...) the burden of harms. Researchers who employ user‐centered design methods should consider what digital health applications and products would look like if issues like equity and accessibility were foregrounded throughout design and development. One group whose needs are often neglected in the design of digital health products is older adults. Many people anticipate that the digital divide among older adults will close as the current generation of tech‐savvy consumers ages up. But since technology is constantly evolving, this divide may be constantly recreated. As bioethics moves ever further into the technology era, I want it to be mindful of the creation of digital health care disparities. (shrink)
- Reproductive Workers and the Market.Diane M. Tober -2002 - In Nancy Scheper-Hughes & Loïc J. D. Wacquant,Commodifying bodies. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
- >Editor's Note: Transitions.Diane M. Yeager -2001 -Journal of Religious Ethics 29 (2).
- (1 other version)Russell, Stopes and Birth Control.Diane M. Kerss -1977 -Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies:72.
- Self and Culture Revisited: Culture Acquisition Among Iranians in the United States.Diane M. Hoffman -1989 -Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 17 (1):32-49.
- Engaging Pediatric Health Professionals in Interactive Online Ethics Education.Diane M. Plantz,Jeremy R. Garrett,Brian Carter,Angela D. Knackstedt,Vanessa S. Watkins &John Lantos -2014 -Hastings Center Report 44 (6):15-20.Bioethical decision‐making in pediatrics diverges from similar decisions in other medical domains because the young child is not an autonomous decision‐maker, while the teen is developing—and should be encouraged to develop—autonomy and decisional capacity. Thus the balance between autonomy and beneficence is fundamentally different in pediatrics than in adult medicine. While ethical dilemmas that reflect these fundamental issues are common, many pediatric physician and nursing training programs do not delve into the issues or offer specific training about how to deal (...) with borderline cases.To meet this need, the Children's Mercy Bioethics Center in Kansas City, Missouri, created a program specifically dedicated to serving practicing, experienced pediatric health professionals. Our students come from various professional disciplines: they are doctors, nurses, social workers, chaplains, lawyers, psychologists, counselors, and hospital administrators practicing in pediatrics. (shrink)
- Approaches Responsive to Reproductive Technologies: A Need for Critical Assessment and Directions for Further Study.Diane M. Kondratowicz -1997 -Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (2):148.Since its inception decades ago, technological intervention in human reproduction has been the subject of considerable attention and controversy. After identifying two focal points of debate, I focus in this paper upon an emerging body of literature responsive to a host of problematic issues that, scholars claim, reproductive technologies pose. Maintaining that critical assessment of this literature is necessary, I identify two areas of inquiry which deserve attention and, correspondingly, sketch directions which might guide further study.
- Busy as a Bee or Unemployed?: Shifting Scientific Discourse on Work.Diane M. Rodgers -2012 -Minerva 50 (1):45-64.Changing images of work in discourse both portray and co-constitute the shift from an industrial to a postindustrial economy. Specifically, work metaphors appear in extra-scientific and intra-scientific discourse on workers and work structures in the natural and social world. An analysis of the entomological discourse from the late nineteenth century to the present shows changes in these metaphors that overlap with the discourse of change in human work and organizational structures. For instance, the metaphor of a busy bee within an (...) efficient hive had traditionally evoked a comparison to the modern industrial workplace. The discourse on the hive currently more closely resembles a postindustrial conception of work. Discourse analysis can illustrate the role of language in co-constructing shared changes in image of work. (shrink)
- Intergroup relations: Insights from a theoretically integrative approach.Diane M. Mackie &Eliot R. Smith -1998 -Psychological Review 105 (3):499-529.
- Kidneys and Controversies in the Islamic Republic of Iran: The Case of Organ Sale.Diane M. Tober -2007 -Body and Society 13 (3):151-170.
- The folly of boxology.Diane M. Beck &John Clevenger -2016 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39.No categories
- Insects, instincts and boundary work in early social psychology.Diane M. Rodgers -2013 -History of the Human Sciences 26 (1):68-89.Insects factored as ‘symbols of instinct’, necessary as a rhetorical device in the boundary work of early social psychology. They were symbolically used to draw a dividing line between humans and animals, clarifying views on instinct and consciousness. These debates were also waged to determine if social psychology was a subfield of sociology or psychology. The exchange between psychologist James Mark Baldwin and sociologist Charles Abram Ellwood exemplifies this particular aspect of boundary work. After providing a general background of the (...) debates, I turn specifically to the writings of Baldwin and Ellwood between 1890 and 1936, tracing the use of insects as ‘symbols of instinct’. (shrink)
- Power Struggles: The Paradoxes of Emotion and Control among Child‐Centered Mothers in the Privileged United States.Diane M. Hoffman -2013 -Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 41 (1):75-97.
- Scientific societies and whistleblowers: The relationship between the community and the individual.Diane M. McKnight -1998 -Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (1):97-113.Formalizing shared ethical standards is an activity of scientific societies designed to achieve a collective goal of promoting ethical conduct. A scientist who is faced with the choice of becoming a “whistleblower” by exposing misconduct does so in the context of these ethical standards. Examination of ethics policies of scientific societies which are members of the Council of Scientific Society Presidents (CSSP) shows a breadth of purpose and scope in these policies. Among the CSSP member societies, some ethics policies chiefly (...) present the ethical culture of the community in an educational context and do not have enforcement procedures. Other policies are more comprehensive and include standards for certification, procedures for addressing ethical issues, and established sanctions. Of the 36 member societies of CSSP that have developed a code or adopted a code of another professional society, 18 specifically identified a responsibility to expose ethical misconduct, demonstrating an acknowledgment of the possible critical role of the whistleblower in addressing ethical issues. Scientific societies may revise their ethics codes based upon experience gained in addressing cases of ethical misconduct. In most cases, the action of a whistleblower is the initial step in addressing an ethics violation; the whistleblower may either be in the position of an observer or a victim, such as in the case of someone who discovers that his or her own work has been plagiarized. The ethics committee of a scientific society is one of several possible outlets through which the whistleblower can voice a complaint or concern. Ethical violations can include falsification, fabrication, plagiarism and other authorship disputes, conflict of interest and other serious violations. Commonly, some of these violations may involve publication in the scientific literature. Thus addressing ethical issues may be intertwined with a scientific society’s role in the dissemination of new scientific results. For a journal published by a scientific society, the editor can refer at some point to the ethics committee of the society. Whereas, in the case of a journal published by a commercial publisher, the editor may be without direct support of the associated scientific community in handling the case. The association of a journal with a scientific society may thus direct a whistleblower towards addressing the issue within the scientific community rather than involving the press or talking to colleagues who may gossip. A formal procedure for handling ethics cases may also discourage false accusers. Another advantage of handling complaints through ethics committees is that decisions to contact home institutions or funding agencies can be made by the ethics committee and are not the responsibility of the whistleblower or the editor of the journal. The general assessment is that the establishment of ethics policies, especially policies covering publication in society journals, will promote a culture supportive of whistleblowers and discouraging to false accusers. (shrink)
- Quiet Riot: The Culture of Teaching and Learning in Schools.Diane M. Hoffman -2015 - Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Quiet Riot offers an anthropological critique of teaching and learning in two U.S. high schools over a twenty-seven year period. Based on the author's experiences shadowing two average students in 1983 and 2009, it presents detailed observations that powerfully capture the reality of student experiences in school.
- Semen as Gift, Semen as Goods: Reproductive Workers and the Market in Altruism.Diane M. Tober -2001 -Body and Society 7 (2-3):137-160.This article examines how perceptions of what semen is thought to contain affect its value as a marketable product. I explore how donor altruism, intelligence and ethnicity traits thought to be transmitted in sperm are perceived and transacted among representatives of the sperm banking industry, as well as among women who purchase semen for insemination and show how the linkages between the reproductive industry and the sex industry further heighten the commodity-quality of semen donation. I argue that the emphasis placed (...) on altruism, is an attempt to redefine the commodity quality of semen as gift, in order to imbue it with higher emotional and moral value. (shrink)
- From Prejudice to Intergroup Emotions: Differentiated Reactions to Social Groups.Diane M. Mackie &Eliot R. Smith (eds.) -2002 - Psychology Press.The theories or programs of research described in the chapters of this book move beyond the traditional evaluation model of prejudice, drawing on a broad range of theoretical ancestry to develop models of why, when, and how differentiated reactions to groups arise, and what their consequences might be. The chapters have in common a re-focusing of interest on emotion as a theoretical base for understanding differentiated reactions to, and differentiated behaviors toward, social groups. The contributions also share a focus on (...) specific interactional and structural relations among groups as a source of these differentiated emotional reactions. The chapters in the volume thus reflect a theoretical shift from an earlier emphasis on knowledge about ingroups and outgroups to a new perspective on prejudice in which socially-grounded emotional differentiation becomes a basis for social regulation. (shrink)
- Dynamics of Group-Based Emotions: Insights From Intergroup Emotions Theory.Eliot R. Smith &Diane M. Mackie -2015 -Emotion Review 7 (4):349-354.Over-time variability characterizes not only individual-level emotions, but also group-level emotions, those that occur when people identify with social groups and appraise events in terms of their implications for those groups. We discuss theory and research regarding the role of emotions in intergroup contexts, focusing on their dynamic nature. We then describe new insights into the causes and consequences of emotional dynamics that flow from conceptualizing emotions as based in group membership, and conclude with research recommendations.
- Cynicism, with Consequences.Diane M. Plantz -2011 -Hastings Center Report 41 (2):12-13.On a recent evening, while working in a children's hospital emergency department as a pediatric emergency medicine physician, I picked up the chart of yet another patient without a true emergency: a sixteen-year-old with vaginal discharge. After reviewing her chart, her nurse and I spoke with her in her room. Her story was all too familiar. She was sexually active. She did not use contraception. She had also been treated for pelvic inflammatory disease three times before, but luckily, she had (...) not yet been pregnant. And like many adolescents, she did not have a primary care physician, so the emergency department was her primary care clinic. I informed her that she would need a pelvic exam and a pregnancy test. I .. (shrink)
- Review essay / Reform and realism.Diane M. Hartmus -1991 -Criminal Justice Ethics 10 (2):47-54.Larry W. Yackle, Reform and Regret: The Story of Federal Judicial Involvement in the Alabama Prison System New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989, xii+322 pp.
- The Trouble With Thinking Like Arena: Learning to Use Simulation Software.Reinaldo J. Moraga &Diane M. Rodgers -2011 -Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 31 (2):144-152.Simulation software used for modeling has become as ubiquitous as computers themselves. Despite growing reliance on simulation in educational and workplace settings, users encounter frustration in using simulation software programs. The authors conducted a study with 26 engineering students and interviewed them about their experience learning the simulation software Arena for optimization modeling. These students experienced frustration with the process of learning to “think” like the simulation software. Students explained their difficulty with learning the software in a way that implied (...) human dialogue with a machine and negotiation with Arena in an attempt to overcome this frustration. Rather than being gender specific, frustrations were experienced by most male and female students equally, specifically those who held a perception of difference between human and machine “thinking.” The authors contend that communication difficulty with the embedded assumptions of the software is the source of frustration rather than deficiencies of users. (shrink)No categories
- Silos and First Movers in the Sharing Economy Debates.Diane M. Ring -2019 -The Law and Ethics of Human Rights 13 (1):61-96.Over the past few years, a significant global debate has developed over the classification of workers in the sharing economy either as independent contractors or as employees. While Uber and Lyft have dominated the spotlight lately, the worker classification debates extend beyond ridesharing companies and affect workers across a variety of sectors. Classification of a worker as an employee, rather than an independent contractor, can carry a range of implications for worker treatment and protections under labor law, anti-discrimination law, tort (...) law, and tax law, depending on the legal jurisdiction. The debates, at least in the United States, have been incomplete due to the failure of policy makers and advocates to consider the scope and interconnectedness of the worker classification issues across the full sweep of legal arenas. There is time, however, to remedy the incompleteness of these policy conversations before worker classification decisions ossify and path dependence takes hold. Two interacting forces create the most serious risk for inadequate policy formulation: (1) silos among legal experts, and (2) first-mover effects. Both of these factors, silo and first mover, emerge in sharing economy debates in the United States. Tax experts and other legal specialists operate in distinct silos leading to a misunderstanding by non-tax analysts of the tax ramifications of worker classification, and to an under appreciation on the part of tax experts of the potential influence of “modest” tax rule changes on worker classification generally. The risks of such misunderstandings can be amplified by first-mover efforts, such as: (1) platforms’ contractual designation of workers as independent contractors to bolster a claim of nonemployer/nonemployee status; (2) platforms’ support for proposed tax legislation that would “clarify” the status of sharing workers as independent contractors for tax purposes if they satisfy a multiple-prong (relatively easy) safe harbor test; and (3) sharing economy worker litigation to secure employee status. This Article identifies the incompleteness in the worker classification debates and argues for the active formulation of policy through a process that looks beyond individual fields. A more complete conversation requires analytical engagement across multiple fields and recognition of the de facto power of reform in one arena to influence others. Moreover, it is by no means clear that just because tax might arrive at the legislative drawing table first (due to first mover effects), that it should drive or shape the broader worker classification debate. (shrink)No categories
- Alternate health delivery systems and collaborative plans.Diane M. Howard -forthcoming -Scarce Medical Resources and Justice.Export citation
Bookmark - A Good Night.Laura Miller-Smith &Diane M. Plantz -2014 -Hastings Center Report 44 (2):6-7.As Josie's physicians, we developed trusting relationships with the family, relationships based on honesty. When their daughter passed away a week after the conversation described, at least we had not sheltered them from that possibility but prepared them for it. We continue to wonder, however, what words parents are hearing that we do not intend for them to hear. In addition, we wonder what words they are hearing that do not truly mean what they imply? How can health care providers (...) caring for patients and families recognize that simple words like “good,” “stable,” and “quiet” may be misinterpreted and may affect the trust families place in our communication? As for us, we choose our words more carefully now. (shrink)
- From Freire to Levinas: Toward a Post-Humanist Global Citizenship Education.Chenyu Wang &Diane M. Hoffman -2020 -Educational Studies 56 (5):435-455.No categories
- Introduction: Why Islam, Health and the Body?Debra Budiani &Diane M. Tober -2007 -Body and Society 13 (3):1-13.No categories
- Learner-Controlled Self-Observation is Advantageous for Motor Skill Acquisition.Diane M. Ste-Marie,Kelly A. Vertes,Barbi Law &Amanda M. Rymal -2012 -Frontiers in Psychology 3.
- Who Understands? A Survey of 25 Words or Phrases Commonly Used in Proposed Clinical Research Consent Forms.William C. Waggoner &Diane M. Mayo -1995 -IRB: Ethics & Human Research 17 (1):6.
- (1 other version)News from the president's council on bioethics.F. Daniel Davis &Diane M. Gianelli -2006 -Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (4):375-377.In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:News from the President’s Council on BioethicsF. Daniel Davis (bio) andDiane M. Gianelli (bio)As most readers of this column already know, the President's Council on Bioethics went through a major transition during the past year when Leon Kass—in October 2005—handed the chairman's gavel over to Georgetown University's Edmund Pellegrino. Dr. Kass has remained on the Council as a member.1When the gavel change took place, the Council's phone (...) started ringing. Everyone wanted to know the same thing: What topics would the Council take up this term? Dr. Pellegrino's answer was always the same: The Council's agenda would be established through a consultative process with the members themselves and with an eye to those problems and controversies in bioethics to which we, as a body, can make a contribution.Taking its cue from the list of potential topics suggested by members, the Council—over the course of the next several meetings—listened to experts on such topics as children and bioethics (with a focus on children in clinical research), organ transplantation, and that oft-cited-but-hard-to-define concept, "human dignity."The latter topic entered the arena of discussion because it is a concept that is cited frequently in the bioethics literature, and it is also one that has figured prominently in Council discussions and documents. Although the concept is widely invoked, there is no universal understanding of what it means, and it is not easy to encapsulate into a one-size-fits-all definition. Indeed, some critics maintain that appeals to human dignity are fig leaves used to camouflage unconvincing arguments. So between December 2005 and April 2006, the Council devoted several sessions to various perspectives on "human dignity: its meaning, its foundations, and its relevance to bioethics." After hearing from James Childress, Patricia Churchland, Daniel Sulmasy, and Paul Weithman2 on the topic, the Council decided to issue a volume of approximately 20 essays, some by Council members and others by scholars from a variety of relevant disciplines.3 The volume is expected to encompass a broad array of opinion on the topic of human dignity and is scheduled to be published next spring."Children" were also the focus of several sessions during the past year. The Council's last report addressed care giving for the elderly.4 After it was issued, several members suggested it was time to focus on the youngest members of [End Page 375] society. The challenge, of course, was to find a topic that was both timely and relevant—and one about which the Council was uniquely qualified to make a contribution. A number of experts in a variety of related fields testified before the Council about possible issues it could explore: newborn screening for genetic disorders; decision-making standards for those who lack capacity; ethical issues in neonatal and pediatric intensive care; pharmacology and psychiatric disorders in children; and children and clinical research. In addition, a number of groups and individuals involved in related topics met with staff to discuss their interests and concerns.This exploratory engagement with facets of the broad topic of children and bioethics led the Council to focus, more narrowly, on a cluster of issues concerning newborn screening for genetic disorders—a topic on which it is likely that the Council will issue a white paper, possibly by next summer. The stimulus for this particular focus has been the American College of Medical Genetics's recommendation that all newborns in the U.S. be screened for a panel of 29 disorders.5 Currently, each state decides for its residents which conditions are subject to mandated screening, so it is possible to get early diagnoses of treatable disorders in one geographical area but not in another. Proponents of screening find the federal approach to mandated screening more equitable. Potential ethical problems, however, exist with the proposal. Some want to ensure that newborns are screened only for treatable conditions on grounds that it would be too burdensome to discover one is carrying the gene for a late-onset disease that cannot be prevented. Others want to make sure that insurance coverage for individuals and their families is... (shrink)
- Emotions in Group Sports: A Narrative Review From a Social Identity Perspective.Mickael Campo,Diane M. Mackie &Xavier Sanchez -2019 -Frontiers in Psychology 10.Recently, novel lines of research have developed to study the influence of identity processes in sport-related behaviours. Yet, whereas emotions in sport are the result of a complex psychosocial process, little attention has been paid to examining the mechanisms that underlie how group membership influences athletes’ emotional experiences. The present narrative review aims at complementing the comprehensive review produced by Rees et al. (2015) on social identity in sport by reporting specific work on identity-based emotions in sport. To that end, (...) we firstly overview the different terminology currently used in the field of emotions in groups to clarify the distinct nature of emotions that result from an individual’s social identity. Secondly, we discuss key concepts of social identity to better understand the mechanisms underlying identity-based emotions. Thirdly, we address existing knowledge on identity-based emotions in sport. We close the present narrative review by suggesting future research perspectives based on existing meta-theories of social identity. Evidence from the social psychology literature is discussed alongside existing works from the sport literature to propose a crucial theoretical approach to better understand emotions in sport. (shrink)
- Real-world Statistical Regularity Impacts Inattentional Blindness.Ling Lee Chong &Diane M. Beck -2024 -Consciousness and Cognition 125 (C):103768.
- Undifferentiated and “mote-beam” percepts in Watsonian-Skinnerian behaviorism.John J. Furedy &Diane M. Riley -1984 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (4):625.
- Influence of nonspecific interference on response recall.Geoffrey Keppel,Diane M. Henschel &Bonnie Zavortink -1969 -Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (2):246.
- Competition explains limited attention and perceptual resources: implications for perceptual load and dilution theories.Paige E. Scalf,Ana Torralbo,Evelina Tapia &Diane M. Beck -2013 -Frontiers in Psychology 4.
- Rescuing stimuli from invisibility: Inducing a momentary release from visual masking with pre-target entrainment.Kyle E. Mathewson,Monica Fabiani,Gabriele Gratton,Diane M. Beck &Alejandro Lleras -2010 -Cognition 115 (1):186-191.
- Examining the role of feedback in TMS-induced visual suppression: A cautionary tale.Evan G. Center,Ramisha Knight,Monica Fabiani,Gabriele Gratton &Diane M. Beck -2019 -Consciousness and Cognition 75:102805.
- Returning Genetic Research Results to Individuals: Points‐to‐Consider.Gaile Renegar,Christopher J. Webster,Steffen Stuerzebecher,Lea Harty,Susan E. Ide,Beth Balkite,Taryn A. Rogalski‐Salter,Nadine Cohen,Brian B. Spear &Diane M. Barnes -2006 -Bioethics 20 (1):24-36.This paper is intended to stimulate debate amongst stakeholders in the international research community on the topic of returning individual genetic research results to study participants. Pharmacogenetics and disease genetics studies are becoming increasingly prevalent, leading to a growing body of information on genetic associations for drug responsiveness and disease susceptibility with the potential to improve health care. Much of these data are presently characterized as exploratory (non‐validated or hypothesis‐generating). There is, however, a trend for research participants to be permitted (...) access to their personal data if they so choose. Researchers, sponsors, patient advocacy groups, ethics committees and regulatory authorities are consequently confronting the issue of whether, and how, study participants might receive their individual results. Noted international ethico‐legal guidelines and public policy positions in Europe and the United States are reviewed for background. The authors offer ‘Points‐to‐Consider’ regarding returning research results in the context of drug development trials based on their knowledge and experience. These considerations include: the clinical relevance of data, laboratory qualifications, informed consent procedures, confidentiality of medical information and the competency of persons providing results to participants. The discussion is framed as a benefit‐to‐risk assessment to balance the potential positive versus negative consequences to participants, while maintaining the integrity and feasibility of conducting genetic research studies. (shrink)
- Returning genetic research results to individuals: Points-to-consider.Gaile Renegar,Christopher J. Webster,Steffen Stuerzebecher,Lea Harty,I. D. E. E.,Beth Balkite,Taryn A. Rogalski-salter,Nadine Cohen,Brian B. Spear,Diane M. Barnes &Celia Brazell -2005 -Bioethics 20 (1):24–36.ABSTRACT This paper is intended to stimulate debate amongst stakeholders in the international research community on the topic of returning individual genetic research results to study participants. Pharmacogenetics and disease genetics studies are becoming increasingly prevalent, leading to a growing body of information on genetic associations for drug responsiveness and disease susceptibility with the potential to improve health care. Much of these data are presently characterized as exploratory (non‐validated or hypothesis‐generating). There is, however, a trend for research participants to be (...) permitted access to their personal data if they so choose. Researchers, sponsors, patient advocacy groups, ethics committees and regulatory authorities are consequently confronting the issue of whether, and how, study participants might receive their individual results. Noted international ethico‐legal guidelines and public policy positions in Europe and the United States are reviewed for background. The authors offer ‘Points‐to‐Consider’ regarding returning research results in the context of drug development trials based on their knowledge and experience. These considerations include: the clinical relevance of data, laboratory qualifications, informed consent procedures, confidentiality of medical information and the competency of persons providing results to participants. The discussion is framed as a benefit‐to‐risk assessment to balance the potential positive versus negative consequences to participants, while maintaining the integrity and feasibility of conducting genetic research studies. (shrink)
- Mission Command in the Age of Network-Enabled Operations: Social Network Analysis of Information Sharing and Situation Awareness.Norbou Buchler,Sean M. Fitzhugh,Laura R. Marusich,Diane M. Ungvarsky,Christian Lebiere &Cleotilde Gonzalez -2016 -Frontiers in Psychology 7.
- Book Review Section 1. [REVIEW]Clinton Collins,Rita M. Bean,Richard A. Brosio,Diane M. Dunlap,Harvey H. Neufeldt,Joan K. Smith,Donald Arnstine,William Casement &Mary E. Henry -1992 -Educational Studies 23 (1):18-69.No categories
- Promoting academic integrity through a stand-alone course in the learning management system.Diane L. Sturek,Kenneth E. A. Wendeln,Gina Londino-Smolar &M. Sara Lowe -2018 -International Journal for Educational Integrity 14 (1).IntroductionThis case study describes the process faculty at a large research university undertook to build a stand-alone online academic integrity course for first-year and transfer students. Because academic integrity is decentralized at the institution, building a more systematic program had to come from the bottom-up (faculty developed) rather than from the top down (institutionally mandated).Case descriptionUsing the learning management system, faculty and e-learning designers collaborated to build the course. Incorporating nuanced scenarios for six different types of misconduct (consistent with the (...) University’s Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities & Conduct), a pre- and post-test, and assessments for each scenario, the course provides experience in recognizing and avoiding academic misconduct.Discussion and evaluationAs a stand-alone course, the faculty who created it maintain control over content and are able to analyze student performance across the institution. In the ten months since its launch, the course has been eagerly adopted by faculty (n = 1853 students have completed the course) and post-test scores indicate students are learning from the course.ConclusionsAfter the successful launch of the student course, the next step, already underway, is the launch of learning modules for faculty and teaching assistants. (shrink)No categories
- Patient Perspectives on the Learning Health System: The Importance of Trust and Shared Decision Making.Maureen Kelley,Cyan James,Stephanie Alessi Kraft,DianeKorngiebel,Isabelle Wijangco,Emily Rosenthal,Steven Joffe,Mildred K. Cho,Benjamin Wilfond &Sandra Soo-Jin Lee -2015 -American Journal of Bioethics 15 (9):4-17.We conducted focus groups to assess patient attitudes toward research on medical practices in the context of usual care. We found that patients focus on the implications of this research for their relationship with and trust in their physicians. Patients view research on medical practices as separate from usual care, demanding dissemination of information and in most cases, individual consent. Patients expect information about this research to come through their physician, whom they rely on to identify and filter associated risks. (...) In general, patients support this research, but worry that participation in research involving randomization may undermine individualized care that acknowledges their unique medical histories. These findings suggest the need for public education on variation in practice among physicians and the need for a collaborative approach to the governance of research on medical practices that addresses core values of trust, transparency, and partnership. (shrink)
- Special Supplement: The XYY Controversy: Researching Violence and Genetics.Diane Bauer,Ronald Bayer,Jonathan Beckwith,Gordon Bermant,Digamber S. Borgaonkar,Daniel Callahan,Arthur Caplan,John Conrad,Charles M. Culver,Gerald Dworkin,Harold Edgar,Willard Gaylin,Park Gerald,Clarence Harris,Johnathan King,Ruth Macklin,Allan Mazur,Robert Michels,Carola Mone,Rosalind Petchesky,Tabitha M. Powledge,Reed E. Pyeritz,Arthur Robinson,Thomas Scanlon,Saleem A. Shah,Thomas A. Shannon,Margaret Steinfels,Judith P. Swazey,Paul Wachtel &Stanley Walzer -1980 -Hastings Center Report 10 (4):1.
- Reflecting on the Past to Shape the Future.Diane W. Birckbichler,Robert M. Terry,James J. Davis &American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages -2000 - National Textbook Company.No categories
- Clinical practice and the biopsychosocial approach.Ronald M. Epstein,Diane S. Morse,Geoffrey C. Williams,P. LeRoux,A. L. Suchman &T. E. Quill -2003 - In Richard M. Frankel, Timothy E. Quill & Susan H. McDaniel,The biopsychosocial approach: past, present, and future. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
- The Role of Patient Perspectives in Clinical Research Ethics and Policy: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Patient Perspectives on the Learning Health System”.Maureen Kelley,Cyan James,Stephanie Alessi Kraft,DianeKorngiebel,Isabelle Wijangco,Steven Joffe,Mildred K. Cho,Benjamin Wilfond &Sandra Soo-Jin Lee -2016 -American Journal of Bioethics 16 (2):7-9.
- Book Reviews Section 4.Adelia M. Peters,Mary B. Harris,Richard T. Walls,George A. Letchworth,Ruth G. Strickland,Thomas L. Patrick,Donald R. Chipley,David R. Stone,Diane Lapp,Joan S. Stark,James W. Wagener,Dewane E. Lamka,Ernest B. Jaski,John Spiess,John D. Lind,Thomas J. la Belle,Erwin H. Goldenstein,George R. la Noue,David M. Rafky,L. D. Haskew,Robert J. Nash,Norman H. Leeseberg,Joseph J. Pizzillo &Vincent Crockenberg -1973 -Educational Studies 4 (3):169-185.No categories
- Hedonic Capacity in the Broader Autism Phenotype: Should Social Anhedonia Be Considered a Characteristic Feature?Derek M. Novacek,Diane C. Gooding &Madeline J. Pflum -2016 -Frontiers in Psychology 7.
- Characterizing and Measuring Maliciousness for Cybersecurity Risk Assessment.Zoe M. King,Diane S. Henshel,Liberty Flora,Mariana G. Cains,Blaine Hoffman &Char Sample -2018 -Frontiers in Psychology 9.
- Symbolic interactionism and critical perspective: Divergent or synergistic?Patricia M. Burbank &Diane C. Martins -2010 -Nursing Philosophy 11 (1):25-41.Throughout their history, symbolic interactionism and critical perspective have been viewed as divergent theoretical perspectives with different philosophical underpinnings. A review of their historical and philosophical origins reveals both points of divergence and areas of convergence. Their underlying philosophies of science and views of human freedom are different as is their level of focus with symbolic interactionism having a micro perspective and critical perspective using a macro perspective. This micro/macro difference is reflected in the divergence of their major concepts, goals (...) and basic tenets. While their underlying philosophies are different, however, they are not necessarily contradictory and areas of convergence may include the concepts of reference groups and looking glass self within symbolic interactionism and ideological hegemony within critical perspective. By using a pragmatic approach and combining symbolic interactionism and critical perspectives, both micro and macro levels come into focus and strategies for change across individual and societal levels can be developed and applied. Application of both symbolic interactionism and critical perspective to nursing research and scholarship offers exciting new opportunities for theory development and research methodologies. In nursing education, these two perspectives can give students added insight into patients' and families' problems at the micro level while, at the same time, giving them a lens to see and tools to apply to problems at the macro level in health care. In nursing practice, a combined symbolic interactionism/critical perspective approach assists nurses to give high-quality care at the individual level while also working at the macro level to address the manufacturers of illness. New research questions emerge from this combination of perspectives with new possibilities for theory development, a transformation in nursing education, and the potential for new practice strategies that can address individual client and larger system problems through empowerment of clients and nurses. (shrink)
| 1 — 50 / 980 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6dc498764b-55mvq uwo