Results for 'David M. Greer'
966 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria in the United States: The Case for Revising the Uniform Determination of Death Act.Ariane Lewis,Richard J. Bonnie,Thaddeus Pope,Leon G. Epstein,David M.Greer,Matthew P. Kirschen,Michael Rubin &James A. Russell -2019 -Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 47 (S4):9-24.Although death by neurologic criteria is legally recognized throughout the United States, state laws and clinical practice vary concerning three key issues: the medical standards used to determine death by neurologic criteria, management of family objections before determination of death by neurologic criteria, and management of religious objections to declaration of death by neurologic criteria. The American Academy of Neurology and other medical stakeholder organizations involved in the determination of death by neurologic criteria have undertaken concerted action to address variation (...) in clinical practice in order to ensure the integrity of brain death determination. To complement this effort, state policymakers must revise legislation on the use of neurologic criteria to declare death. We review the legal history and current laws regarding neurologic criteria to declare death and offer proposed revisions to the Uniform Determination of Death Act and the rationale for these recommendations. (shrink)
- Book reviews and notices. [REVIEW]Robert Menzies,Julius Lipner,Pradip Bhattacharya,Christian K. Wedemeyer,Carl Olson,Kate Brittlebarik,Karen Pechilis Prentiss,David Carpenter,Anne E. Monius,Robin Rinehart,Patricia M.Greer,John Grimes,Srimati Basu,Lorilai Biernacki,Reid B. Locklin,Srimati Basu,Michael H. Eisher,Doris R. Jakobsh,Steve Derné,Gail M. Harley,Gavin Flood,Frederick M. Smith &Ariel Glucklich -2002 -International Journal of Hindu Studies 6 (1):75-110.
- The Gender Egalitarianism of Musonius Rufus.David M. Engel -2000 -Ancient Philosophy 20 (2):377-391.
- Detection and recognition.David M. Green &Theodore G. Birdsall -1978 -Psychological Review 85 (3):192-206.
- In Defense of the Autonomy of Rights.David M. Adams -1988 -Philosophy Research Archives 14:51-72.Several philosophers, including most prominently Theodore Benditt, have recently urged that the discourse of rights, widely thought to be a central, if not foundational feature of moral and political thought, is in reality a mere “redundant” appendage---a discourse that holds no distinctive place in moral or legal reasoning owing to the fact that it is thoroughly derivative because collapsible into other forms of moral or legal language. In this paper I attempt to (1) flesh out this “Redundancy” Thesis (RT) and (...) (2) identify and criticize at least two general arguments that might be thought to give rise to it: the claims that rights reduce (respectively) to duties (the Correlativity Thesis) or to permissions (the Permissibility Thesis). I try to show how and why these arguments fail and why they do not therefore support RT. (shrink)No categories
- Social Philosophy in Transition.David M. Rasmussen -1993 -Social Philosophy Today 9:3-18.
- Sensitivity to emotion information in children’s lexical processing.Tatiana C. Lund,David M. Sidhu &Penny M. Pexman -2019 -Cognition 190 (C):61-71.
- Chiavacci,David (2018). Inequality and the 2017 election: decreasing dominance of Abenomics and regional revitalization. In: Pekkanen, Robert J.; Reed, Steven R.; Scheiner, Ethan; Smith, Daniel M.. Japan Decides 2017. New York, 219-242.David Chiavacci,Robert J. Pekkanen,Steven R. Reed,Ethan Scheiner &Daniel M. Smith (eds.) -2018No categoriesExport citation
Bookmark - Parallel psychometric functions from a set of independent detectors.David M. Green &R. Duncan Luce -1975 -Psychological Review 82 (6):483-486.No categories
- The reality of conscientious objection: Response to Shahvisi.Toni C. Saad &David M. Rassam -2019 -Clinical Ethics 14 (1):9-17.Arianne Shahvisi has argued that a doctor’s conscientious objection to abortion is a misuse of their authority which unduly burdens patients and, moreover, does not succeed in its aim of exculpating objectors from participating in perceived evil. We examine these claims in this response. First, we ask what the ‘conscience clause’ really requires of doctors and whether Shahvisi has interpreted it correctly. Second, we explore the notions of vulnerability and power in the doctor–patient relationship and cast doubt on Shahvisi’s claims (...) about these. Third, we tackle Shahvisi’s claim that conscientious objection is self-defeating because it entails remaing causally implicated in a chain of events leading to abortion. We show that this claim entails absurdity, then revisit the classical framework for the ethics ethics of co-operation to show that conscientious objection can suceed in exculpating objectors from perceived wrongdoing. We briefly critically evaluate the General Medical Council’s guidance on conscie... (shrink)
- The Spirit and its Letter. [REVIEW]David M. Parry -1992 -The Owl of Minerva 24 (1):96-99.What is the engine that drives Hegel’s philosophical system? According to John H. Smith, the answer is the classical system of rhetoric.
- Paul Ricoeur and the Philosophy of Technology.David M. Kaplan -2006 -Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy 16 (1-2):42-56.
- (2 other versions)How do Particulars stand to Universals?David M. Armstrong -2004 -Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 1:139--154.
- The philosophy of software: code and mediation in the digital age.David M. Berry -2011 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.This book is a critical introduction to code and software that develops an understanding of its social and philosophical implications in the digital age. Written specifically for people interested in the subject from a non-technical background, the book provides a lively and interesting analysis of these new media forms.
- Utopophobia: On the Limits (If Any) of Political Philosophy.David M. Estlund -2019 - Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.A leading political theorist’s groundbreaking defense of ideal conceptions of justice in political philosophy Throughout the history of political philosophy and politics, there has been continual debate about the roles of idealism versus realism. For contemporary political philosophy, this debate manifests in notions of ideal theory versus nonideal theory. Nonideal thinkers shift their focus from theorizing about full social justice, asking instead which feasible institutional and political changes would make a society more just. Ideal thinkers, on the other hand, question (...) whether full justice is a standard that any society is likely ever to satisfy. And, if social justice is unrealistic, are attempts to understand it without value or importance, and merely utopian? Utopophobia argues against thinking that justice must be realistic, or that understanding justice is only valuable if it can be realized.David Estlund does not offer a particular theory of justice, nor does he assert that justice is indeed unrealizable—only that it could be, and this possibility upsets common ways of proceeding in political thought. Estlund engages critically with important strands in traditional and contemporary political philosophy that assume a sound theory of justice has the overriding, defining task of contributing practical guidance toward greater social justice. Along the way, he counters several tempting perspectives, including the view that inquiry in political philosophy could have significant value only as a guide to practical political action, and that understanding true justice would necessarily have practical value, at least as an ideal arrangement to be approximated. Demonstrating that unrealistic standards of justice can be both sound and valuable to understand, Utopophobia stands as a trenchant defense of ideal theory in political philosophy. (shrink)
- Leveraging: A Political, Economic and Societal Framework.David M. Anderson (ed.) -2014 - Cham: Imprint: Springer.Leveraging, according toDavid M. Anderson and his colleagues, is both a basic principle of human conduct and the most dominant strategy in recent years that individuals, organizations and countries use to pursue their ends. Although many scholars agree that a crisis of "over-leveraging" caused the financial crisis of 2008-2010, it has not been appreciated that an "over-leveraging" crisis has existed in American politics and the American family system as well. This book addresses the need for a "Leverage Mean" (...) (falling between the extremes of too much leverage and too little leverage) in the economy, politics, family life, and international relations. It identifies three different kinds of leveraging-bargaining, resource, and investment and provides an explanatory and normative theory which draws on the fields of economics, political science, sociology, history, psychology, international relations, law, and philosophy. Moreover, it shows how the dissolution of the Cold War, the dismantling of the modern family, and the rise of the Internet along with the deregulation of the financial services industry led to the diffusion of power which has made leveraging of the first importance for everyone. This book should be of interest to social scientists, philosophers, political theorists, public policy makers and politicians.David Anderson and his colleagues are the first to characterize and assess one of the major instruments of power of the contemporary era. This volume represents the best work on leverage since Archimedes and will be widely read and discussed. Benjamin Ginsberg,David Bernstein Professor of Political Science and Chair, Center for Advanced Governmental Studies, Johns Hopkins University Leverage might literally be the operative word of the 21st century. Anderson's volume is a wide-ranging and illuminating study of this fundamental and dynamic concept. Parag Khanna, Senior Fellow, New Amer ica Foundation, author of The Second World: How Emerging Powers Are Redefining Global Competition in the Twenty-first Century. (shrink)No categories
- Multinomial modeling and the measurement of cognitive processes.David M. Riefer &William H. Batchelder -1988 -Psychological Review 95 (3):318-339.
- The Mind-Body Problem: An Opinionated Introduction.David M. Armstrong -1999 - Westview Press.The emphasis is always on the arguments used, and the way one position develops from another. By the end of the book the reader is afforded both a grasp of the state of the controversy, and how we got there.
- Escape from Democracy: The Role Of Experts And The Public In Economic Policy.David M. Levy &Sandra J. Peart -2017No categories
- (1 other version)Vérifacteurs pour des vérités modales.David M. Armstrong -2002 -Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 2 (4):491-507.Revenant sur la question des vérifacteurs, D. Armstrong demande ici d'abord comment concilier le maximalisme et la relation de nécessitation. L'A. examine quel sens métaphysique donner à la notion d'implication, et s'il y a un sens à admettre une contingence de re. Il traite à ce niveau des possibilités pures, examine le cas des aliens chezDavid Lewis, puis pose la question de savoir s'il est contingent de dire qu'il y a de l'être plutôt que rien. L'exposé le conduit (...) à traiter du cas des vérifacteurs pour les vérités nécessaires, mais adopte une thèse possibiliste pour les sujets de la science démonstrative. Il se clôt par un examen du genre de nécessité transcatégorielle qui est implicite à la généralisation des vérifacteurs. The A. wants to reconcile maximalisme about truthmakers and the relation of necessitation. He investigates the metaphysical sense of the implication and whether one can admit de re contingency. He examines the pure possibilities and the case of alien properties according withDavid Lewis and studies whether it is contingent that there is something rather than nothing. He analyses the truthmakers of necessary truths and adopts a possibilist thesis for matters of demonstrative science. He concludes with the transcategorial necessity which is implicit in the generalization of truthmakers. (shrink)
- Rethinking Utopia: Place, Power, Affect.David M. Bell -2017 - Routledge.Over five hundred years since it was named, utopia remains a vital concept for understanding and challenging the world we inhabit, even in or rather because of the condition of post-utopianism that supposedly permeates them. In Rethinking UtopiaDavid M. Bell offers a diagnosis of the present through the lens of utopia and then, by rethinking the concept through engagement with utopian studies, a variety of radical theories and the need for decolonizing praxis, shows how utopianism might work within, (...) against and beyond that which exists in order to provide us with hope for a better future. He proposes paying a subversive fidelity to utopia, in which its three constituent terms: good, place, and no are rethought to assert the importance of immanent, affective relations. The volume engages with a variety of practices and forms to articulate such a utopianism, including popular education/critical pedagogy; musical improvisation; and utopian literature. The problems as well as the possibilities of this utopianism are explored, although the problems are often revealed to be possibilities, provided they are subject to material challenge. Rethinking Utopia offers a way of thinking about utopia that helps overcome some of the binary oppositions structuring much thinking about the topic. It allows utopia to be thought in terms of place and process; affirmation and negation; and the real and the not-yet. It engages with the spatial and affective turns in the social sciences without ever uncritically being subsumed by them; and seeks to make connections to indigenous cosmologies. It is a cautious, careful, critical work punctuated by both pessimism and hope; and a refusal to accept the finality of this or any world. ". (shrink)No categories
- Questioning geopolitics: political projects in a changing world-system.Georgi M. Derluguian &Scott L.Greer (eds.) -2000 - Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Annotation Redefines globalization as merely the framework of the current political debate on the future of world power.
- The colors and shapes of visual experiences.David M. Rosenthal -1999 - In Denis Fisette,Consciousness and Intentionality: Models and Modalities of Attribution. Springer. pp. 95--118.red and round. According to common sense, the red, round thing we see is the tomato itself. When we have a hallucinatory vision of a tomato, however, there may be present to us no red and round phys- ical object. Still, we use the words 'red' and 'round' to describe that situation as well, this time applying them to the visual experience itself. We say that we have a red, round visual image, or a visual experience of a red disk, (...) or some such. Because we see physical objects far more often than we hallucinate, we apply terms for color and shape to physical objects far more often than to visual experiences. Moreover, different theories of perception explain in different ways the applications such terms have to physical objects and to visual experiences. But whatever their frequency and explanation, it seems clear that both sorts of application occur. (shrink)
- Explaining Consciousness.David M. Rosenthal -2002 - In David John Chalmers,Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings. New York: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 109-131.
- Effect of mood on lexical decisions.David M. Clark,John D. Teasdale,Donald E. Broadbent &Maryanne Martin -1983 -Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 21 (3):175-178.
- Minimal consciousness.David M. Armstrong -2006 - In Maureen Eckert,Theories of Mind: An Introductory Reader. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 213.Export citation Bookmark
- (1 other version)Reading Habermas.David M. Rasmussen -1992 -Studies in Soviet Thought 44 (2):156-158.No categories
- 'Biodiversity’ and Biological Diversities: Consequences of Pluralism Between Biology and Policy.David M. Frank -2016 - In Justin Garson, Anya Plutynski & Sahotra Sarkar,The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Biodiversity. New York: Routledge. pp. 96-109.
- What's Wrong With Genetically Modified Food?David M. Kaplan -2005 -Journal of Philosophical Research 30 (9999):69-80.
- Michael Novak’s Business as a Calling: Work and the Examined Life.David M. Introcaso &Michael Novak -1998 -Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (3):605.
- Emotions and the self.David M. Rosenthal -1983 - In K. S. Irani & Gerald E. Myers,Emotion: Philosophical Studies. Haven.Much of the perplexity that motivates modern discussion of the nature of mind derives indirectly from the striking success of physical explanation. Not only has physics itself advanced at a remarkable pace in the last four centuries; every hope has been held out that, in principle, all science can be understood and ultimately studied in terms of mechanisms proper to physics. Seeing all natural phenomena as explicable in terms appropriate to physics, however, makes the mental seem to be a singularity (...) in nature. Chemistry and biology may well be reducible to physics, but the same seems hardly possible for the mental. The gulf between mind and physics seems too great to bridge, and the success of physics guarantees its standing. The place of mind in nature is thereby rendered problematic. This line of reasoning has tempted thinkers since Descartes to see the mind as not only independent of other natural phenomena, but as even somehow lying outside the natural order itself. (shrink)
- Advanced capitalism and social theory: Habermas on the problem of legitimation.David M. Rasmussen -1976 -Philosophy and Social Criticism 3 (4):349-366.
- Vesey on bodily sensations.David M. Armstrong -1964 -Australasian Journal of Philosophy 42 (2):247-248.
- Sensory Quality and the Relocation Story.David M. Rosenthal -1999 -Philosophical Topics 26 (1-2):321-350.
- Ricoeur's Critical Theory.David M. Kaplan -2003 - State University of New York Press.The first book-length treatment of Paul Ricoeur's conception of philosophy as critical theory.
- Logical fallacies and reasonable debates in invasion biology: a response to Guiaşu and Tindale.David M. Frank,Daniel Simberloff,Jordan Bush,Angela Chuang &Christy Leppanen -2019 -Biology and Philosophy 34 (5):1-11.This critical note responds to Guiaşu and Tindale’s “Logical fallacies and invasion biology,” from our perspective as ecologists and philosophers of science engaged in debates about invasion biology and invasive species. We agree that “the level of charges and dismissals” surrounding these debates might be “unhealthy” and that “it will be very difficult for dialogues to move forward unless genuine attempts are made to understand the positions being held and to clarify the terms involved.” Although they raise several important scientific, (...) conceptual, and ethical issues at the foundations of invasion biology, we believe Guiaşu and Tindale’s attempts to clarify the debate were unsuccessful. Like some other critics of the field, they tend to misrepresent invasion biology by cherry-picking and constructing “straw people,” inaccurately portraying invasion biology, and thus failing to elevate the dialogue. In this critique, we clarify areas in the invasion biology literature misrepresented by Guiaşu and Tindale. We attempt to provide a more balanced view of areas of reasonable debate within invasion biology, including disputes about empirical evidence, diverse risk attitudes, and other diverse ethical commitments. (shrink)No categories
- Where Do You End, and I Begin? How Relationships Confound Advance Directives in the Care of Persons Living with Dementia.David M. Lyreskog,Jason Karlawish &Saskia K. Nagel -2020 -American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):83-85.Volume 20, Issue 8, August 2020, Page 83-85.
- Phenomenological overflow and cognitive access.David M. Rosenthal -2007 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (5-6):522-523.I argue that the partial-report results Block cites do not establish that phenomenology overflows cognitive accessibility, as Block maintains. So, without additional argument, the mesh he sees between psychology and neuroscience is unsupported. I argue further that there is reason to hold, contra Block, that phenomenology does always involve some cognitive access to the relevant experience.
- Mentality and neutrality.David M. Rosenthal -1976 -Journal of Philosophy 73 (13):386-415.
- (1 other version)The Founding and Tentative Aims of the American Bertrand Russell Society.David M. Albertson,Peter G. Cranford &Michael C. Moore -1987 -Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 7.No categories
- Contemporary Philosophy: A New Survey.David M. Armstrong -1983 - The Hague: M. Nijhoff.Export citation Bookmark
- Reacting to Meinong.David M. Armstrong -1995 -Grazer Philosophische Studien 50 (1):615-627.1. Some reasons are given for rejecting the view that there are entities that do not exist. 2. It is suggested, nevertheless, that this view has some plausibility when we consider unrealized empirical possibilities. 3. Even if non-existent entities are rejected, there remains Meinong's distinction between object and objectives, roughly: things and facts. The author would analyze objects in terms of objectives, yielding a world of facts.
- A Moral Evaluation of Sales Practices.David M. Holley -1986 -Business and Professional Ethics Journal 5 (1):3-21.
- Quest on the Entitlement Theory.David M. Lederkramer -1979 -Analysis 39 (4):219 - 222.
- Consciousness and Mind.David M. Rosenthal -2005 - New York: Oxford University Press UK.Consciousness and Mind presentsDavid Rosenthal's influential work on the nature of consciousness. Central to that work is Rosenthal's higher-order-thought theory of consciousness, according to which a sensation, thought, or other mental state is conscious if one has a higher-order thought that one is in that state. The first four essays develop various aspects of that theory. The next three essays present Rosenthal's homomorphism theory of mental qualities and qualitative consciousness, and show how that theory fits with and helps (...) sustain the HOT theory. A crucial feature of homomorphism theory is that it individuates and taxonomizes mental qualities independently of the way we're conscious of them, and indeed independently of our being conscious of them at all. So the theory accommodates the qualitative character not only of conscious sensations and perceptions, but also of those which fall outside our stream of consciousness. Rosenthal argues that, because this account of mental qualities makes no appeal to consciousness, it enables us to dispel such traditional quandaries as the alleged conceivability of undetectable quality inversion, and to disarm various apparent obstacles to explaining qualitative consciousness and understanding its nature. Six further essays build on the HOT theory to explain various important features of consciousness, among them the complex connections that hold in humans between consciousness and speech, the self-interpretative aspect of consciousness, and the compelling sense we have that consciousness is unified. Two of the essays, one an extended treatment of homomorphism theory, appear here for the first time. There is also a substantive introduction, which draws out the connections between the essays and highlights their implications. (shrink)
- Psychoanalysis and religion in the 21st century: competitors or collaborators?David M. Black (ed.) -2006 - New York: Routledge.What can be gained from a dialogue between psychoanalysis and religion?David Black brings together contributors from a wide range of schools and movements to discuss this question.
- Lost in translation: The normative and the historical.David M. Rasmussen -2024 -Philosophy and Social Criticism 50 (10):1432-1435.I am intrigued by the use of the words ‘embedded’ and ‘capacity’ as they appear in what I take to be the strategy of Sovereignty Across Generations where these words are used to make what is evidently implicit within John Rawls’s political liberalism explicit, that is, a normative account of ‘the justice and legitimacy of political orders’. If I am correct about this strategy, my question is quite simple: is something lost in translation in this transition from Rawls’s more historical (...) to this normative orientation? I conclude with a positive comment on the potential that a theory of temporality has for the development of a notion of political self-constitution as it pertains to the transition from ethnos to demos. (shrink)No categories
- Bcl‐2, a novel reguator of cell death.David M. Hockenbery -1995 -Bioessays 17 (7):631-638.The bcl‐2 gene product, a 25 kDa membrane protein residing at mitochondrial, microsomal and nuclear membrane sites within many cell types, is a broad and potent inhibitor of cell death by apoptosis. A family of bcl‐2‐related genes with death‐inhibiting or ‐promoting activities has recently been described, indicating a potentially quite complex cell death regulatory network at the level of gene expression and protein‐protein interactions. The function of bcl‐2 may be to regulate a final common pathway in apoptosis. Current hypotheses suggest (...) that oxidative stress, specific proteolytic activity or cell cycle control may be common elements in apoptosis through which bcl‐2 exerts its survival function. Based on the extent to which elements of apoptotic pathways overlap with non‐apoptotic cellular functions, the physiological role of bcl‐2 may also extend to other cellular processes such as differentiation and proliferation. (shrink)
- Why are verbally expressed thoughts conscious?David M. Rosenthal -1990 -Bielefeld Report.
- The Democratic Horizon.David M. Rasmussen -2016 -Philosophy and Social Criticism 42 (7):635-639.The Democratic Horizon offers us the project for the renewal of political liberalism through a response to hyperpluralism in the context of an emerging democratic ethos worldwide. While the book reads as a ringing endorsement of Political Liberalism, authored by John Rawls, it goes beyond that project in significant ways. In my view The Democratic Horizon represents something of a tour de force; a truly original contribution for those who recognize the imperative significance of our worldwide confrontation with the fact (...) of pluralism. (shrink)
| 1 — 50 / 966 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-bbztg uwo