Results for 'David F. Marshall'
956 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- That Great Curriculum in the Sky.David F.Marshall -forthcoming -Colloquy.Export citation
Bookmark - Insights & Perspectives.David S. Goodsell,Wallace F.Marshall,Anthony M. Poole,Takehiko Kobayashi,Austen Rd Ganley,Bertrand Jordan,Luke Isbel,Emma Whitelaw,Dylan Owen &Astrid Magenau -unknown -Bioessays 34:718 - 720.Export citation Bookmark
- (1 other version)Essays in evangelical social ethics.David F. Wright (ed.) -1978 - Exeter [Devon]: Paternoster Press.Introduction /David F. Wright -- The natural ethic / Oliver O'Donovan -- Using the Bible in ethics / HowardMarshall -- From Christendom to pluralism / John Briggs -- Towards a theology of the state / Haddon Wilmer -- The challenge of Marxism /David Lyon -- Man in society / E.David Cook -- Human rights / John Gladwin -- Epilogue : tasks which await us / John Stott.
- Beyond Physicalism: Toward Reconciliation of Science and Spirituality.Edward F. Kelly,Adam Crabtree &PaulDavidMarshall -2015 - Lanham, MD 20706, USA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.In Beyond Physicalism, an interdisciplinary group of physical scientists, behavioral and social scientists, and humanists from the Esalen Institute’s Center for Theory and Research argue that physicalism must be replaced by an expanded scientific naturalism that accommodates something spiritual at the heart of nature.
- Neonatal Viability in the 1990s: Held Hostage by Technology.Jonathan Muraskas,Patricia A.Marshall,Paul Tomich,Thomas F. Myers,John G. Gianopoulos &David C. Thomasma -1999 -Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (2):160-170.The emergence of new obstetrical and neonatal technologies, as well as more aggressive clinical management, has significantly improved the survival of extremely low birth weight infants. This development has heightened concerns about the limits of viability. ELBW infants, weighing less than 1,000 grams and no larger than the palm of one's hand, are often described as of late twentieth century technology. Improved survivability of ELBW infants has provided opportunities for long-term follow-up. Information on their physical and emotional development contributes to (...) developing standards of practice regarding their care. (shrink)
- Ethics Consultation: A Practical Guide, by John La Puma andDavid Schiedermayer.M. F.Marshall -1994 -Hec Forum: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Hospitals' Ethical and Legal Issues 6 (3):163-169.
- Justification, reasons, and reliability.Marshall Swain -1985 -Synthese 64 (1):69 - 92.Some time ago, F. P. Ramsey (1960) suggested that knowledge is true belief obtained by a reliable process. This suggestion has only recently begun to attract serious attention. In 'Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge', Alvin Goldman (1976) argues that a person has knowl- edge only if that person's belief has been formed as a result of a reliable cognitive mechanism. In Belief, Truth, and Knowledge,David Arm- strong (1973) argues that one has knowledge only if one's belief is a comPletely (...) reliable sign of the truth of the proposition believed. On both of these theories, the reliability of one's belief is a necessary condition of that belief's being an instance of knowledge. These reliability theories have another interesting feature in common, namely, that neither of them explicitly requires or includes the traditional justification requirement for knowledge. Reliability has taken over the role of justification. This naturally leads to the question whether reliability and justification are related in some philosophically interes- ting fashion. In this paper I shall investigate this question. The result will be a positive proposal to the effect that justified belief is reliable belief. This result, in turn, explains why reliability can take over the role of justification in an account of knowledge. Moreover, the identification of justification with reliability constitutes a step toward the naturalization of normative epistemological concepts. (shrink)
- Proceedings of the British Academy, Volume 124. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows, III.P.Marshall (ed.) -2004 - British Academy.Keith Thomas: Gerald Edward Aylmer, 1926-2000 Adrian Hollis: William Spencer Barrett, 1914-2001 Bruce Williams: Charles Frederick Carter, 1919-2002 Malcolm Mackintosh: John Erickson, 1929-2002 J. H .R. Davis: Raymond William Firth, 1901-2002 F. M. L. Thompson: Hrothgar John Habakkuk, 1915-2002 A. W. Price: Richard Mervyn Hare, 1919-2002 Hugh Lloyd-Jones: Geoffrey Stephen Kirk, 1921-2003 Michael Lapidge and Peter Matthews: Vivien Anne Law, 1954-2002 Ann Moss: John Lough, 1913-2000 Terence Cave: Ian Dalrymple McFarlane, 1915-2002 Ludwig Paul:David Neil MacKenzie, 1926-2001 Peter Birks: (...) John Kieran Barry Moylan Nicholas, 1919-2002 Jonathan Shepard: Dimitri Dimitrievich Obolensky, 1918-2001David Cannadine: John Harold Plumb, 1911-2001 Daniel Waley: Nicolai Rubinstein, 1911-2002 Ian Wood: John Michael Wallace-Hadrill, 1916-1985 R. G. M. Nisbet: William Smith Watt, 1913-2002 G. W. Bernard: Richard Bruce Wernham, 1906-1999. (shrink)Export citation Bookmark
- The evolution of multiple memory systems.David F. Sherry &Daniel L. Schacter -1987 -Psychological Review 94 (4):439-454.
- What's the meaning of "this"?: a puzzle about demonstrative belief.David F. Austin -1990 - Ithaca: Cornell University Press.In recent literature in the philosophy of mind and language, one finds a variety of examples that raise serious problems for the traditional analysis of belief as a two-term relation between a believer and a proposition. My main purpose in this essay is to provide a critical test case for any theory of the propositional attitudes, and to demonstrate that this case really does present an unsolved puzzle. Chapter I defines the traditional, propositional analysis of belief, and then introduces a (...) distinction, motivated by the intuitions that underlie Kripke's arguments for direct reference, between purely qualitative and individual propositions. Beliefs typically expressed using proper names, indexicals or demonstratives appear to relate the believer to individual propositions with the entity that may be referred to as subject constituent. Chapter II presents the critical test case . In this and Chapters III-VI it is used to show that the latter sorts of beliefs are not analyzable as dyadically relating the believer to individual propositions. The case constitutes a genuine counterexample to the traditional analysis only if it is possible for a believer to believe an individual proposition with a contingent thing other than herself as a constituent; and the believer in the case is in optimum conditions for believing an individual proposition. In Chapters III, IV, and VI, I criticize views prompted by rejection of , and in Chapter V, I criticize Stalnaker's view, which rejects . Chapter VI also considers the non-traditional, triadic analyses of belief proposed by Kaplan and Richard; they fall prey to the main criticisms of Chapter V. In the Postscript, I give a comparative assessment of approaches to resolving the Two Tubes Puzzle, and I place it in historical context by pointing out the puzzle's similarities to the 'problem of sense data' . Correlatively, I indicate the bearing of Methodological Solipsism on future attempts to solve the puzzle. My conclusion is that although the puzzle remains a puzzle, it gives us reason to supplement, rather than completely abandon, the use of propositions in the analysis of thought; and I say what a supplementing solution must do to remain faithful to the intuitions of Chapter I. (shrink)
- Contemporary Catholic health care ethics.David F. Kelly -2004 - Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Theological basis -- Religion and health care -- The dignity of human life -- The integrity of the human person -- Implications for health care -- Theological principles in health care ethics -- Method -- The levels and questions of ethics -- Freedom and the moral agent -- Right and wrong -- Metaethics -- Method in Catholic bioethics -- Catholic method and birth control -- The principle of double effect -- Application -- Forgoing treatment, pillar one: ordinary and extraordinary means (...) -- Forgoing treatment, pillar two: killing and allowing to die -- Forgoing treatment, pillar three: decisions by competent patients -- Forgoing treatment, pillar three: decisions for incompetent patients -- Forgoing treatment, pillar three: advance directives -- Hydration and nutrition -- Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia -- Medical futility -- Pain and pain management -- Ethics committees -- Embryonic stem cells and the beginning of human personhood -- Genetic engineering -- Allocating health care resources -- The use and misuse of the allocation argument. (shrink)
- Science is God.David F. Horrobin -1969 - Aylesbury (Bucks.),: Medical and Technical Publishing.I am becoming increasingly disturbed by the lack of under standing of science revealed by politicians, industrialists and the general public. I am also concerned about the widespread mis use of the word "scientific" which is more and more being used in situations where it is quite inappropriate. As a result, in some circumstances gross overestimates are made as to what science can do. In other circumstances the real power of science is foolishly underestimated and the contributions which it can (...) make are squandered. Science is God is an attempt to explain just what is meant by the scientific approach and to define more closoJ. y what the word "scientific" indicates. It is deliberately brief and controversial because I want it to be read. In fact, the material dealt with in each single chapter really deserves a whole book to itself. In the future I hope that I may be able to give to each subject such full treatment. Meanwhile I hope that this book will stimulate discussion about science and will increase understanding of it.DAVID F. (shrink)
- Incompatibilities of colours.David F. Pears -1951 - InLogic And Language. Oxford,: Blackwell.
- An interfaith wisdom: Scriptural reasoning between jews, Christians and muslims.David F. Ford -2006 -Modern Theology 22 (3):345-366.
- Of the Academical or Sceptical Philosphy.David F. Norton -2001 - In Peter Millican,Reading Hume on Human Understanding: Essays on the First Enquiry. New York: Oxford University Press.
- A Philosophical Study of Mysticism. Charles A. Bennett.David F. Swenson -1932 -International Journal of Ethics 42 (4):465-466.
- Charles Hartshorne and the Existence of God.David F. Haight -1986 -International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 20 (1):49-53.
- Fitch-style rules for many modal logics.David F. Siemens -1977 -Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 18 (4):631-636.
- Worldwide Testing and Test Security Issues: Ethical Challenges and Solutions.David F. Foster -2010 -Ethics and Behavior 20 (3-4):207-228.As psychology ethics begins to become more standardized and formalized globally (e.g., Gauthier, 2007) there are still educational, political, and psychological areas that require significant discussion. For example, test security has become a global issue, as psychological tests and even college entrance and graduate school admission tests have found their way online.
- Karl Rahner and Genetic Engineering.David F. Kelly -1995 -Philosophy and Theology 9 (1-2):177-200.Karl Rahner’s analysis of genetic manipulation is found most explicitly in two articles written in 1966 and 1968: “The Experiment with Man,” and “The Problem of Genetic Manipulation.” The articles have received some attention in ethical literature. The present paper analyzes Rahner’s use of theological and ethical principles, comparing and contrasting the two articles. In the first article, Rahner emphasizes humankind’s essential openness to self-creativity. What has always been true on the transcendental level—-we choose our final destiny and thus create (...) ourselves—-may now be possible as well on the categorial or historical level. Thus we Christians have no a-priori theological warrant for rejecting genetic manipulation.But there is a considerable difference in Rahner’s second article. Whereas in the first he makes no immediate ethical application, in the second he introduces both a normative principle—-there ought never be a fundamental separation of procreation and marital intercourse—-and a metaethical concept--his “moral instinct of faith”—-to enable him to deal specifically with artificial insemination by third party donor, a procedure he rejects. There is also a shift in emphasis in his anthropological approach from the first to the second article.A close analysis of his method here discloses some difficulties concerning the “moral instinct of faith” and forces us to ask how principles of theological anthropology are and ought to be applied to questions like genetic manipulation. I conclude with my own proposal for the use of theological principles in medical ethics. (shrink)
- Strawson on freedom and resentment.David F. Pears -1998 - InThe Philosophy of P.F. Strawson. Chicago: Open Court.
- Turtles All the Way Down: Academic Writing as Formalism.David F. Labaree -2020 -Journal of Philosophy of Education 54 (3):679-693.Journal of Philosophy of Education, EarlyView.
- Losing Our Virtue: Why the Church Must Recover Its Moral Vision.David F. Wells -1999 - Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.In Losing Our Virtue: Why the Church Must Recover Its Moral Vision, theologianDavid Wells argues that the Church is in danger of losing its moral authority to speak to a culture whose moral fabric is torn. Although much of the Church has enjoyed success and growth over the past years, Wells laments a "hollowing out of evangelical conviction, a loss of the biblical word in its authoritative function, and an erosion of character to the point that today, no (...) discernible ethical differences are evident in behavior when those claiming to have been reborn and secularists are compared." The assurance of the Good News of the gospel has been traded for mere good feelings, truth has given way to perception, and morality has slid into personal preference. Losing Our Virtue is about the disintegrating moral culture that is contemporary society and what this disturbing loss means for the church. Wells covers the following in this bold critique: how the theologically emptied spirituality of the church is causing it to lose its moral bearings; an exploration of the wider dynamic at work in contemporary society between license and law; an exposition of the secular notion of salvation as heralded by our most trusted gurus -- advertisers and psychotherapists; a discussion of the contemporary view of the self; how guilt and sin have been replaced by empty psychological shame; an examination of the contradiction between the way we view ourselves in the midst of our own culture and the biblical view of persons as created, moral beings. Can the church still speak effectively to a culture that has become morally unraveled? Wells believes it can. In fact, says Wells, no time in this century has been more opportune for the Christian faith -- if the church can muster the courage to regain its moral weight and become a missionary of truth once more to a foundering world. - Publisher. (shrink)
- Eunapius of Sardis and Theodosius the Great.David F. Buck -1988 -Byzantion 58 (1):36-53.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- Sozomen on Julian the Apostate.David F. Buck -2006 -Byzantion 76:53-73.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- The logical significance of the paradoxes of Zeno.David F. Swenson -1916 -Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 13 (19):515-525.
- Thrasyboulos' Thracian Support.David F. Middleton -1982 -Classical Quarterly 32 (02):298-.There has never been any doubt that an important part of Thrasyboulos’ forces in his campaign at Phyle and in the Peiraieus was non-Athenian. Lysias in his funeral oration, 2. 66 ff., gives fulsome praise to the xenoi who fought and died for the return of the democracy. Other honours paid to the living are recorded by Aeschines, 3. 187 f., and in the inscription I.G. II. 10, a decree followed by a list of names grouped by Athenian tribes, some (...) of which are certainly non-Athenian. However, little has been said about who these people were, or why they chose to help the return. (shrink)
- A Danish Thinker's Estimate of Journalism.David F. Swenson -1927 -International Journal of Ethics 38 (1):70-87.
- (1 other version)Objective uncertainty and human faith.David F. Swenson -1928 -Philosophical Review 37 (5):433-459.
- Something about Kierkegaard.David F. Swenson -1945 - Minneapolis,: Augsburg publishing house. Edited by Lillian Marvin Swenson.Swenson's discovery of Kierkegaard for himself led him to resolve to devote his career to the task of making Kierkegaard available in translation to the ...
- Something about Kierkegaard.David F. Swenson -1941 - Minneapolis,: Augsburg publishing house.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- The category of the unknowable.David F. Swenson -1905 -Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 2 (19):505-512.No categories
- Envisioning Real Utopias, Erik Olin Wright, London: Verso, 2010.David F. Ruccio -2011 -Historical Materialism 19 (4):219-227.In this review, I argue that Erik Olin Wright’s Envisioning Real Utopias is necessary reading for anyone interested in thinking through the possibilities of creating noncapitalist ways of organising economic and social life in the world today. However, I also raise questions about Wright’s deterministic interpretation of Marx’s critique of political economy, his relative neglect of class-analysis, and his non-Gramscian conception of the relationship between the state, economy, and civil society.
- The Priority of Sight According to Peter the Venerable.David F. Appleby -1998 -Mediaeval Studies 60 (1):123-157.No categories
- Textual Jealousies in Chariton’s Callirhoe.David F. Elmer -2022 -Classical Antiquity 41 (1):180-220.Chariton’s novel, Chaereas and Callirhoe, is intensely interested not only in the emotional experience of the protagonists but also in the emotional effect the narrative has on readers. Among the many emotions depicted within the text, one stands out for its architectonic function: jealousy. Jealousy articulates the plot and propels it forward. Jealousy is also represented as a fundamentally “readerly” emotion: scenes of reading focus on the potential of written texts to stir jealous emotions. Similarly, scenes of embedded narration focus (...) on the jealous reactions of narratees. The plot achieves closure when Chaereas learns to manage his jealousy as narratee and narrator. His experience, however, has implications also for Chariton and his readers. The text’s representation of jealousy as a narrative and textual force speaks both to the experience of writing in a culture that prizes the imitation of prestigious models and to the experience of reading a text that self-consciously hybridizes those models. (shrink)
- Causality, chaos theory, and the end of the weimar republic: A commentary on Henry Turner's hitler's thirty days to power.David F. Lindenfeld -1999 -History and Theory 38 (3):281–299.This article seeks to integrate the roles of structure and human agency in a theory of historical causation, using the fall of the Weimar Republic and in particular Henry Turner's book Hitler's Thirty Days to Power as a case study. Drawing on analogies from chaos theory, it argues that crisis situations in history exhibit sensitive dependence on local conditions, which are always changing. This undermines the distinction between causes and conditions . It urges instead a distinction between empowering and constraining (...) causes of specific human actions as a more fruitful model. The paper also discusses more briefly two other analogies to chaos theory: 1) similarity across differences in scale as applicable to different levels of individual and collective events, which are seen as homologous; 2) a model of branching as applicable to the totality of causes of a given event. (shrink)
- Devils.David F. Haight -1973 -International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 5 (3):152 - 156.
- The Anthropology of Childhood: Cherubs, Chattel, Changelings.David F. Lancy -2022 - Cambridge University Press.How are children raised in different cultures? What is the role of children in society? How are families and communities structured around them? Now in its third edition, this deeply engaging book delves into these questions by reviewing and cataloging the findings of over 100 years of anthropological scholarship dealing with childhood and adolescence. It is organized developmentally, moving from infancy through to adolescence and early adulthood, and enriched with anecdotes from ethnography and the daily media, to paint a nuanced (...) and credible picture of childhood in different cultures, past and present. This new edition has been expanded and updated with over 350 new sources, and introduces a number of new topics, including how children learn from the environment, middle childhood, and how culture is 'transmitted' between generations. It remains the essential book to read to understand what it means to be a child in our complex, ever-changing world. (shrink)No categories
- On Systems and Embodiments as Categories for Intellectual History.David F. Lindenfeld -1988 -History and Theory 27 (1):30-50.In response to the unsettled state of modern intellectual history, a model is offered for categorizing its subject matter. Two challenges to intellectual history are first examined: the relation of intellectual to social history and the relation of intellectual history to other disciplines which purport to deal with thought. The model proposed breaks down the "ideas" of intellectual historians into two sorts: 1) systems, complex bodies of thought related in a coherent fashion; and 2) embodiments, a way of fixating or (...) condensing a complex of meanings into a single expression. Each entails a distinct mode of communication, the former by processes of education or socialization, the latter by single symbols or slogans. The distinction between systems and embodiments is clarified by comparison to the abstract-concrete and the discursive-mythical thought distinctions. The "ideas" of intellectual history should ideally include both systems and embodiments as their components, as in the case of the Lutheran Reformation and the French Revolution. By showing their relation to other disciplines, these distinctions can be seen to demarcate the space in which intellectual history can operate. (shrink)
- Thoughts on Nonreductive Materialism.David F. Siemens -2002 -Philosophia Christi 4 (2):519-523.
- A Decision Made Well.Julia F. Taylor &Mary FaithMarshall -2018 -American Journal of Bioethics 18 (3):18-19.
- Epilogue: Twelve theses for Christian theology in the twenty-first century in the modern theologians : An introduction to Christian theology since 1918.David F. Ford &Rachel Muers -2007 - In David Ford,Shaping theology: engagements in a religious and secular world. Oxford: Blackwell.No categories
- What Have We Learned from Ontological Devil-Arguments?David F. Haight -1994 -International Philosophical Quarterly 34 (3):301-306.No categories
- Socrates Scholasticus on Julian the Apostate.David F. Buck -2003 -Byzantion 73 (2):301.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- The structure of the Lausiac history.David F. Buck -1976 -Byzantion 46:292.No categoriesExport citation Bookmark
- The influence of linguistics on early culture and personality theory.David F. Aberle -1960 - In Gertrude Evelyn Dole,Essays in the science of culture. New York,: Crowell.Export citation Bookmark
- Ethnography should replace experimentation.David F. Armstrong -2002 -Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (5):620-621.This paper points to the need in ape language research to shift from experimentation to ethnography. We cannot determine what goes on inside the head of an ape when it communicates with a human being, but we can learn about the nature and content of the communication that occurs in such face-to-face interaction. This information is fundamental for establishing a baseline for the abilities of an ape-human common ancestor.
- A Note on Universal Targeting and Hostile Environment Harassment.David F. Austin -manuscript
- Lancelot's Two Steps: A Problem in Textual Criticism.David F. Hult -1986 -Speculum 61 (4):836-858.In “Les deux pas de Lancelot,” the late Eugène Vinaver argued for the restoration of two lines that are lacking in the text of the Chevalier de la Charrete as transcribed by Guiot, the well-known copyist of one of the best surviving manuscripts of Chrétien de Troyes's collected works. Following is the “complete” passage with brackets around the two lines missing in Guiot.No categories
- Locke, Boyle, and the Percieving of Corpuscles.David F. Wolf Ii -1997 -Southwest Philosophy Review 13 (2):43-56.
| 1 — 50 / 956 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54b44b69b7-72j75 uwo