Results for 'David Brian Silver'
973 found
Order:
1 filter applied
- On the Possibility of Indeterminacy.DavidBrian Barnett -2003 - Dissertation, New York UniversityIntuitively, a question is indeterminate just in case it is unsettled, not merely epistemically, but metaphysically. We ordinarily ascribe indeterminacy by saying that there is no fact of the matter. We say for instance that there is no fact of the matter how many clouds exist. The distribution of water droplets in the sky would appear to settle that there are some clouds, but not how many. ;On the one hand, it seems obvious that certain questions are indeterminate. On the (...) other hand, it seems easy to reduce an arbitrary ascription of indeterminacy to absurdity: Suppose that it is indeterminate---that is, metaphysically unsettled---whether Jud is bald. Because it is true that Jud is bald only if it is metaphysically settled that he is bald, and because it is true that Jud is not bald only if it is metaphysically settled that he is not bald, it is not true that Jud is bald and not true that Jud is not bald. Because Jud is bald only if it is true that he is bald, and because Jud is not bald only if it is true that he is not bald, Jud is not bald and Jud is not not bald. This is a contradiction. Hence, our supposition is false. Moreover, because the issue of whether Jud is bald was chosen arbitrarily, the argument generalizes: indeterminacy is impossible. ;We are faced with a dilemma: take the anti-indeterminacy argument at face value and look for a way to explain away our pro-indeterminacy intuitions, or take our intuitions at face value and look for a way to reject the argument. Many philosophers are inclined toward the latter route, but I want to take the first step toward justifying the former. ;After emphasizing the costs of rejecting the preceding sort of argument, I show how five of the most salient phenomena that give rise to pro-indeterminacy intuitions can be accounted for without postulating genuine indeterminacy. I examine explicitly incomplete definitions, hidden relativity, vagueness, comparatives, and subjunctive conditionals. In each case I suggest a way to account for the phenomenon without postulating indeterminacy. (shrink)Export citation
Bookmark - Limited Performance Agreements and the Cost/Quality/Access Trade-Off, 11 GEO. J.David A. Hyman,CharlesSilver &Such Small Portions -1998 -Legal Ethics 959:959.Export citation Bookmark
- Walking in the Light: The Confessions of St. Augustine for the Modern Reader.DavidBrian Winter & Augustine -1986
- Edited by.David Allan Rehorick,Ronald Silvers,Elizabeth A. Behnke &Valerie Malhotra Bentz -1995 -Human Studies 18:415-422.No categories
- IVF Shared-Risk Programs.David A. Hyman &CharlesSilver -1998 -Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 26 (1):79-80.
- Leslie Tharp 1940-1981.Dorothy Grover,David Malament &Brian Skyrms -1982 -Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 56 (1):100 -.
- (1 other version)Just What the Patient Ordered: The Case for Result-Based Compensation Arrangements.David A. Hyman &CharlesSilver -2001 -Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 29 (2):170-173.For more than twenty years, Opinion 6.01 of the American Medical Association's Code of Medical Ethics has specified that “a physician's fee for medical services should be based on the value of the service provided by the physician to the patient.” In 1994, the AMA amended Opinion 6.01, adding a new statement that “a physician's fee should not be made contingent on the successful outcome of medical treatment.”We believe that the amendment is wholly indefensible. Therefore, in this essay, we argue (...) that the AMA should lift this prohibition and encourage the use of result-based compensation for medical services in appropriate circumstances.The 1994 amendment dramatically changed the significance and scope of Opinion 6.01. Result-based compensation arrangements clearly satisfy the original version of Opinion 6.01 because they base compensation on the “value of the services provided … to the patient.” Yet, it is equally clear that result-based compensation arrangements violate the amended version of Opinion 6.01 because they necessarily make compensation “contingent on the successful outcome of medical treatment.”. (shrink)
- Rational belief systems.BrianDavid Ellis -1979 - Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Littlefield.
- (1 other version)Taking Animals Seriously: Mental Life and Moral Status.Brian Luke &David DeGrazia -1998 -Philosophical Review 107 (2):300.David DeGrazia’s stated purposes for Taking Animals Seriously are to apply a coherentist methodology to animal ethics, to do the philosophical work necessary for discussing animal minds, and to fill in some of the gaps in the existing literature on animal ethics.
- Truth and objectivity.BrianDavid Ellis -1990 - Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell.
- Disability, Difference, Discrimination: Perspectives on Justice in Bioethics and Public Policy.Anita Silvers,David Wasserman,Mary B. Mahowald &Lawrence C. Becker -1998 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.How should we respond to individuals with disabilities? What does it mean to be disabled? Over fifty million Americans, from neonates to the fragile elderly, are disabled. Some people say they have the right to full social participation, while others repudiate such claims as delusive or dangerous. In this compelling book, three experts in ethics, medicine, and the law address pressing disability questions in bioethics and public policy. Anita Silvers,David Wasserman, and Mary B. Mahowald test important theories of (...) justice by bringing them to bear on subjects of concern in a wide variety of disciplines dealing with disability. They do so in the light of recent advances in feminist, minority, and cultural studies, and of the groundbreaking Americans with Disabilities Act. (shrink)
- Reward is enough.DavidSilver,Satinder Singh,Doina Precup &Richard S. Sutton -2021 -Artificial Intelligence 299 (C):103535.
- The Metaphysics of Scientific Realism.BrianDavid Ellis -2009 - Mcgill-Queen's University Press.Ellis shows that realistic theories of quantum mechanics, time, causality and human freedom - all problematic areas for the acceptance of scientific realism - can be developed satisfactorily. In particular, he shows how moral theory can be recast to fit within this comprehensive metaphysical framework by developing a radical moral theory that conceives morals to be social ideals and has implications for key ethical concepts such as moral responsibility, moral powers, moral rights, and moral obligations. The Metaphysics of Scientific Realism (...) is a bold and original development of the scientific characterization of reality by one of the world's leading metaphysicians of science. It marks a significant contribution not only to philosophy of science and metaphysics but also to the search for a first philosophy. (shrink)
- A Personalized Patient Preference Predictor for Substituted Judgments in Healthcare: Technically Feasible and Ethically Desirable.Brian D. Earp,Sebastian Porsdam Mann,Jemima Allen,Sabine Salloch,Vynn Suren,Karin Jongsma,Matthias Braun,Dominic Wilkinson,Walter Sinnott-Armstrong,Annette Rid,David Wendler &Julian Savulescu -2024 -American Journal of Bioethics 24 (7):13-26.When making substituted judgments for incapacitated patients, surrogates often struggle to guess what the patient would want if they had capacity. Surrogates may also agonize over having the (sole) responsibility of making such a determination. To address such concerns, a Patient Preference Predictor (PPP) has been proposed that would use an algorithm to infer the treatment preferences of individual patients from population-level data about the known preferences of people with similar demographic characteristics. However, critics have suggested that even if such (...) a PPP were more accurate, on average, than human surrogates in identifying patient preferences, the proposed algorithm would nevertheless fail to respect the patient’s (former) autonomy since it draws on the ‘wrong’ kind of data: namely, data that are not specific to the individual patient and which therefore may not reflect their actual values, or their reasons for having the preferences they do. Taking such criticisms on board, we here propose a new approach: the Personalized Patient Preference Predictor (P4). The P4 is based on recent advances in machine learning, which allow technologies including large language models to be more cheaply and efficiently ‘fine-tuned’ on person-specific data. The P4, unlike the PPP, would be able to infer an individual patient’s preferences from material (e.g., prior treatment decisions) that is in fact specific to them. Thus, we argue, in addition to being potentially more accurate at the individual level than the previously proposed PPP, the predictions of a P4 would also more directly reflect each patient’s own reasons and values. In this article, we review recent discoveries in artificial intelligence research that suggest a P4 is technically feasible, and argue that, if it is developed and appropriately deployed, it should assuage some of the main autonomy-based concerns of critics of the original PPP. We then consider various objections to our proposal and offer some tentative replies. (shrink)
- A Strawsonian Defense of Corporate Moral Responsibility.DavidSilver -2005 -American Philosophical Quarterly 42 (4):279 - 293.
- Mastering Chess and Shogi by Self-Play with a General Reinforcement Learning Algorithm.DavidSilver,Thomas Hubert,Julian Schrittwieser,Ioannis Antonoglou,Matthew Lai,Arthur Guez,Marc Lanctot,Laurent Sifre,Dharshan Kumaran,Thore Graepel,Timothy Lillicrap,Karen Simonyan &Demis Hassabis -2017 -.No categories
- Phenomenology.David Herman,Jean-Francois Lyotard &Brian Beakley -1993 -Substance 22 (1):112.
- Disability Rights in Sports and Education.Anita Silvers &David Wasserman -2007 - In William John Morgan,Ethics in Sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. pp. 451.
- Business Ethics After Citizens United: A Contractualist Analysis.DavidSilver -2015 -Journal of Business Ethics 127 (2):385-397.In Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission , the US Supreme Court sharply curtailed the ability of the state to limit political speech by for-profit corporations. This new legal situation elevates the question of corporate political involvement: in what manner and to what extent is it ethical for for-profit corporations to participate in the political process in a liberal democratic society? Using Scanlon’s version of contractualism, I argue for a number of substantive and procedural constraints on the political activities of (...) businesses. Central to this contractualist analysis is an identification of the self-governance-based interests of individuals that are affected by corporate political activity and a method for judging the various assignments of social rights, duties and roles according to how they collectively meet those interests. Together, these two features make this contractualist approach distinctive and allow it to generate substantive ethical results. (shrink)
- Wittgenstein: Lectures, Cambridge 1930-1933: From the Notes of G. E. Moore.David G. Stern,Brian Rogers &Gabriel Citron (eds.) -2015 - Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.This edition of G. E. Moore's notes taken at Wittgenstein's seminal Cambridge lectures in the early 1930s provides, for the first time, an almost verbatim record of those classes. The presentation of the notes is both accessible and faithful to their original manuscripts, and a comprehensive introduction and synoptic table of contents provide the reader with essential contextual information and summaries of the topics in each lecture. The lectures form an excellent introduction to Wittgenstein's middle-period thought, covering a broad range (...) of philosophical topics, ranging from core questions in the philosophy of language, mind, logic, and mathematics, to illuminating discussions of subjects on which Wittgenstein says very little elsewhere, including ethics, religion, aesthetics, psychoanalysis, and anthropology. The volume also includes a 1932 essay by Moore critiquing Wittgenstein's conception of grammar, together with Wittgenstein's response. A companion website offers access to images of the entire set of source manuscripts. (shrink)
- The Moral Accountability of the Financial Industry for the Global Financial Crisis.DavidSilver -2018 -Midwest Studies in Philosophy 42 (1):95-116.No categories
- Foreign Ministries in the European Union: Integrating Diplomats.Brian Hocking &David Spence -2002 - Palgrave-Macmillan.What role, if any, does the foreign ministry perform in contemporary world politics? Is the argument that it is in a state of terminal decline accurate or rooted in only partial understandings of its changing character? Foreign Ministries in the European Union explores this theme in the context of the EU where foreign ministry has played a key role in the development of integration but where its role is increasingly questioned. The contributors examine the foreign ministry in 13 member states (...) and draw conclusions that challenge some conventional wisdoms. (shrink)No categories
- Citizens as Contractualist Stakeholders.DavidSilver -2012 -Journal of Business Ethics 109 (1):3-13.This article examines the way that for-profit businesses should take into account the interests of the citizens in the liberal democratic societies in which they operate. I will show how a contractualist version of stakeholder theory identifies the relevant moral interests of both shareholders and citizen stakeholders, and provides a method for giving their interests appropriate consideration. These include (1) the interests that individuals have with respect to private property, (2) the interests citizens have in receiving equitable consideration in the (...) political process, and (3) citizens' interests which give them the collective right to determine the legal and economic structure of their societies. Using this contractualist analysis, I argue that corporations should consciously take into account the interests of citizen stakeholders when there is no other social mechanism for protecting their interests as citizens. (shrink)
- Collective responsibility, corporate responsibility and moral taint.DavidSilver -2004 -Midwest Studies in Philosophy 30 (1):269–278.
- Student perceptions of the social constructivist classroom.Brian Hand,David F. Treagust &Keith Vance -1997 -Science Education 81 (5):561-575.Export citation Bookmark
- Competition, Value Creation and the Self-Understanding of Business.DavidSilver -2016 -Business Ethics Journal Review 4 (10):59-65.In defense of his Market Failures Approach to business ethics Joseph Heath relies on an understanding of business as essentially oriented towards competition and profit maximization. In these remarks I defend an alternative understanding of business that is centered on the creation of valuable goods and services. It is preferable because it: (a) creates less pressure to take advantage of vulnerable stakeholders, (b) can readily recognize “beyond compliance” norms that do not relate to efficiency, (c) provides a more meaningful framework (...) for people who work in and with corporations, (d) may mitigate negative moral impacts outside the market, and (e) better captures the range of what actually counts as business activity. (shrink)
- A puzzle for particulars?David S. Brown &RichardBrian Davis -2008 -Axiomathes 18 (1):49-65.In this paper we examine a puzzle recently posed by Aaron Preston for the traditional realist assay of property (quality) instances. Consider Socrates (a red round spot) and red1—Socrates’ redness. For the traditional realist, both of these entities are concrete particulars. Further, both involve redness being `tied to’ the same bare individuator. But then it appears that red1 is duplicated in its ‘thicker’ particular (Socrates), so that it can’t be predicated of Socrates without redundancy. According to Preston, this suggests that (...) a concrete particular and its property instances aren’t genuinely related. We argue that Preston’s proffered solution here—to treat property instances as “mental constructs”—is fraught with difficulty. We then go on to show how, by fine-tuning the nature of bare particulars, treating them as abstract modes of things rather than concrete particulars, the traditional realist can neatly evade Preston’s puzzle. (shrink)
- Democratic Governance and the Ethics of Market Compliance.DavidSilver -2020 -Journal of Business Ethics 173 (3):525-537.The “question of reasonable compliance” concerns how business firms should comply with morally reasonable laws that have been democratically enacted. This article argues that, out of respect for the governing authority of democratic citizens, firms should comply with the law in accordance with legislators’ normative expectations of compliance. It defends this view against arguments from the legal, economic and business ethics literatures that focus on the contentious nature of democracy and the competitive nature of the market. In response this article (...) argues that these adversarial features of democracy and capitalism do not limit the ability of democratic legislatures to set normative expectations of market actors, nor the duty of firms to comply with them. (shrink)
- Book Reviews-Disability, Difference, Discrimination: Perspectives on Justice in Bioethics and Public Policy.Anita Silvers,David Wasserman,Mary B. Mahowald &Lynn Gillam -2000 -Bioethics 14 (3):276-278.
- The intuitive way of knowing: a tribute toBrian Goodwin.Brian C. Goodwin,David Lambert,Chris Chetland &Craig Millar (eds.) -2013 - Edinburgh: Floris Books.ProfessorBrian Goodwin (1931-2007) was a visionary biologist, mathematician and philosopher. Understanding organisms as dynamics wholes, he worked to develop an alternate view to extreme Darwinism based solely on genetic factors. He was a pioneer in the field of theoretical biology.
- Ethical Issues Regarding Nonsubjective Psychedelics as Standard of Care.David B. Yaden,Brian D. Earp &Roland R. Griffiths -2022 -Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 31 (4):464-471.Evidence suggests that psychedelics bring about their therapeutic outcomes in part through the subjective or qualitative effects they engender and how the individual interprets the resulting experiences. However, psychedelics are contraindicated for individuals who have been diagnosed with certain mental illnesses, on the grounds that these subjective effects may be disturbing or otherwise counter-therapeutic. Substantial resources are therefore currently being devoted to creating psychedelic substances that produce many of the same biological changes as psychedelics, but without their characteristic subjective effects. (...) In this article, we consider ethical issues arising from the prospect of such potential “nonsubjective” psychedelics. We are broadly supportive of efforts to produce such substances for both scientific and clinical reasons. However, we argue that such nonsubjective psychedelics should be reserved for those special cases in which the subjective effects of psychedelics are specifically contraindicated, whereas classic psychedelics that affect subjective experience should be considered the default and standard of care. After reviewing evidence regarding the subjective effects of psychedelics, we raise a number of ethical concerns around the prospect of withholding such typically positive, meaningful, and therapeutic experiences from most patients. (shrink)
- Disability, Difference, and Discrimination: Perspectives on Justice in Bioethics and Public Policy.Anita Silvers,David Wasserman &Mary B. Mahowald -2002 -Hypatia 17 (1):209-213.
- Meaningful Work and the Purpose of the Firm.DavidSilver -2023 -Journal of Business Ethics 185 (4):825-834.This paper argues in favor of the _end user thesis_, which holds that the fundamental goal of the firm is to create products and services that provide a benefit to _the people who ultimately use them._ The argument turns on the interest that employees have in work that is meaningful, in the sense that it is an activity worth spending time doing. I argue that a person’s life is diminished to the extent that work constitutes a central feature, but is (...) not meaningful in this way. I argue further that an employee’s work is fully worth doing only if her fundamental aim is to provide a benefit to the people who ultimately use what she produces, and that this is not possible within an organization that aims to maximize profits. The paper concludes by considering arguments that the efficiency gains generated by assigning the firm the goal of profit-maximization justify structuring the firm in a way that does not enable employees to have work that is fully worth doing. (shrink)
- The Philosophy of Nature: A Guide to the New Essentialism.BrianDavid Ellis -2002 - Chesham: Routledge.In "The Philosophy of Nature,"Brian Ellis provides a clear and forthright general summation of, and introduction to, the new essentialist position. Although the theory that the laws of nature are immanent in things, rather than imposed on them from without, is an ancient one, much recent work has been done to revive interest in essentialism and "The Philosophy of Nature" is a distinctive contribution to this lively current debate.Brian Ellis exposes the philosophical and scientific credentials of (...) the prevailing Humean metaphysic as less than compelling and makes the case for new essentialism as an alternative metaphysical perspective in lucid and unambiguous terms. This book develops this alternative metaphysic and considers the consequences for philosophy, and for some other areas of investigation, of working with such a metaphysic. Ellis argues that these consequences are profound and that a new essentialism provides a comprehensive new philosophy of nature for a modern scientific understanding of the world. (shrink)
- Law, Politics and Interpretation.David Dyzenhaus &Brian Langille -1998 - Faculty of Law, University of Toronto.Export citation Bookmark
- Expanding the Scope of Research Ethics Consultation Services in Safeguarding Research Integrity: Moving Beyond the Ethics of Human Subjects Research.David B. Resnik,Brian C. Martinson &Zubin Master -2018 -American Journal of Bioethics 18 (1):55-57.
- Corporate Codes of Conduct and the Value of Autonomy.DavidSilver -2005 -Journal of Business Ethics 59 (1-2):3-8.
- Mellow Monday and furious Friday: The approach-related link between anger and time representation.David J. Hauser,Margaret S. Carter &Brian P. Meier -2009 -Cognition and Emotion 23 (6):1166-1180.(2009). Mellow Monday and furious Friday: The approach-related link between anger and time representation. Cognition & Emotion: Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 1166-1180.
- Collective Responsibility and the Ownership of Actions.DavidSilver -forthcoming -Public Affairs Quarterly.
- Evolutionary Naturalism and the Reliability of Our Cognitive Faculties.DavidSilver -2003 -Faith and Philosophy 20 (1):50-62.
- Managing the Private Finance Initiative.Brian Salter,Tony Rich &David Bird -2000 -Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education 4 (3):68-73.No categories
- Positive and negative redundancy in multiple cue probability tasks.Brian A. Knowles,Kenneth R. Hammond,Thomas R. Stewart &David A. Summers -1971 -Journal of Experimental Psychology 90 (1):157.No categories
- Wittgenstein: Lectures, Cambridge 1930–1933, From the Notes of G. E. Moore.David Stern,Brian Rogers &Gabriel Citron -2016 - In Aidan Seery, Josef G. F. Rothhaupt & Lars Albinus,Wittgenstein’s Remarks on Frazer: The Text and the Matter. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 85-98.No categories
- The Challenge for the Comprehensive School, Culture, Curriculum and Community.Brian Simon &David H. Hargreaves -1983 -British Journal of Educational Studies 31 (1):75.
- Paragrammatisms.Brian Butterworth &David Howard -1987 -Cognition 26 (1):1-37.No categories
- Religious experience and the facts of religious pluralism.DavidSilver -2001 -International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 49 (1):1-17.
- The Impact of Ethical Tools on Aggressiveness in Financial Reporting.Brian M. Nagle,David M. Wasieleski &Stephen Rau -2012 -Business and Society Review 117 (4):477-513.The proposed adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in the United States has ignited a debate as to whether the principles‐based nature of these standards better serves the interests of investors. While it is argued that these principled‐based standards will encourage more transparent financial reporting than the current rules‐based U.S. standards, critics argue that IFRS will invite more aggressive financial reporting through the liberal exercising of professional judgment. This empirical study aims to understand what individual and organizational factors may (...) affect aggressiveness when making accounting judgments. In particular, we examine the influence that prior ethics training, codes of ethics and an individual's predominant moral reasoning schema have on adherence to company policy in an accounting‐related (depreciation) judgment. Results of the study show that respondents with prior ethics training are more likely to adhere to company accounting policy than those who have not had formal ethics education. Respondents presented with a company ethics code also were less aggressive in their accounting judgments than those who were not presented with a code prior to reading the scenario. Finally, decision aggressiveness was moderated by individuals who used conventional moral reasoning schemas. (shrink)
- Writing to reason: a companion for philosophy students and instructors.BrianDavid Mogck -2008 - Malden, MA: Blackwell.Writing to Reason presents the principles of writing a clear and well-argued philosophy paper in an easily-referenced numerical format, which facilitates efficient grading and clearer communication between instructors and students. Points out the most common problems students have achieving these objectives Increases efficiencies for instructors in grading papers Presents students with clearer information, objectivity, and transparency about their graded results Facilitates clearer communication between instructors and students.
- Law and Politics.David Dyzenhaus,Brian Langille &Hamish Stewart -1993 - Faculty of Law, University of Toronto.
- The philosophy of uncertainty.BrianDavid Ellis -1970 - Bundoora, Vic.,: [La Trobe University].No categories
| 1 — 50 / 973 |
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Create an account to enable off-campus access through your institution's proxy server or OpenAthens.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
 Email |  RSS feed |
Editorial team
General Editors:
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Area Editors:
David Bourget
Gwen Bradford
Berit Brogaard
Margaret Cameron
David Chalmers
James Chase
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Esa Diaz-Leon
Barry Hallen
Hans Halvorson
Jonathan Ichikawa
Monte Johnson
Michelle Kosch
Øystein Linnebo
Paul Livingston
Brandon Look
Manolo Martínez
Matthew McGrath
Michiru Nagatsu
Susana Nuccetelli
Giuseppe Primiero
Jack Alan Reynolds
Darrell P. Rowbottom
Aleksandra Samonek
Constantine Sandis
Howard Sankey
Jonathan Schaffer
Thomas Senor
Daniel Star
Jussi Suikkanen
Aness Kim Webster
Other editors
Contact us
Learn more about PhilPapers
Home |New books and articles |Bibliographies |Philosophy journals |About PhilPapers |API |Contact us |Code of conduct
PhilPapers logo byAndrea Andrews andMeghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see ourterms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).Use of this site is subject toterms & conditions.
All rights reserved byThe PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5b9ff6f457-86chw uwo