Movatterモバイル変換

​This contributed volume gives access to semiotic researches adopting a quantitative stance. European semiotics is traditionally based on immanent methodologies: meaning is seen as an autonomous dimension of human existence, whose laws can be investigated via purely qualitative analytical and reflexive analysis. Today, researches crossing disciplinary boundaries reveal the limitations of such an homogeneous practice. In particular, two families of quantitative research strategies can be identified. On the one hand, researchers wish to naturalize meaning, by making semiotic results interact with (...) those coming from Neurophysiological and psychological sciences. On the other hand, statistical and computational tools are adopted to work on linguistic and multimedia corpora. The book acts to put the two approaches into dialogue. (shrink)

No categories

Direct download(2 more)   Export citation   Bookmark   2 citations  

Direct download(3 more)   Export citation   Bookmark   1 citation  

This introduction provides a bridge between the theoretical background of European semiotics and quantitative research strategies developed within the discipline. In particular, it aims to show the limitations of purely qualitative approaches and how quantitative ones may provide solutions. Regarding the theoretical foundation, we focus on the work of L. Hjelmslev, R. Barthes, A.J. Greimas and U. Eco. These authors form a koiné of semiotic researches sharing references, ends and means. Two strategies of inquiry, integrating quantitative instruments, are shown to (...) emerge from this shared background: naturalizing studies, on the one hand, that aim to harmonize semiotic, psychological and physical results, and immanent studies, on the other hand, making use of statistical and computational tools for exploring the specificity of human language and culture. (shrink)

No categories

Direct download   Export citation   Bookmark  

Export citation   Bookmark  

Pouvons-nous appliquer les notions traditionnelles de vérité et d’erreur à la production artificielle d’énoncés? A partir d’une tripartition proposée par Umberto Eco, l’article s’interroge sur la pertinence contemporaine des critères de vérité utilisés pour évaluer les énoncés humains. Il s’agit de remarquer que les énoncés artificiels ne sont pas vrais ou faux comme ceux produits par les humains, ce qui remet en question notre conception du langage. L’article identifie la spécificité et les limites de la génération automatique de langage dans (...) l’incapacité des machines de s’ancrer au réel par le biais de la perception. Il conclut en indiquant les potentialités de l’énonciation mécanique et nomme “humilité,” l’attitude, opposée au concept courant d’explicabilité, que l’on pourrait adopter vis-à-vis des intelligences artificielles. (shrink)

Direct download(2 more)   Export citation   Bookmark  

The Philosophy of Umberto Eco. Edited by Beardsworth Sara C., Auxier Randall E..

No categories

Direct download(3 more)   Export citation   Bookmark  

No categories

Direct download(2 more)   Export citation   Bookmark